Discussion Activities in Asynchronous Online Learning: Motivating Adult Learners’ Interactions

References

• Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M. A., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021). Emergency online learning in low-resource settings: Effective student engagement strategies. Education Sciences, 11(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlJeraisy, M. N., Mohammad, H., Fayyoumi, A., & Alrashideh, W. (2015). Web 2.0 in education: The impact of the discussion board on student performance and satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 247–259.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2005). Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: Seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alzahrani, M. G. (2017). The effect of using online discussion forums on students’ learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 164–176.
   Google Scholar
• An, H., Shin, S., & Lim, K. (2009). Different instructor facilitation approaches affect students’ interactions during asynchronous online discussions. Computers & Education, 53(3), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, D., & Thomas, M. (2020). Asynchronous learning or live lessons? Which one works better for me? EdSurge. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-10-01-asynchronous-learning-or-live-lessons-which-one-works-better-for-me
   Google Scholar
• Brierton, S., Wilson, E., Kistler, M., Flowers, J., & Jones, D. (2016). A comparison of higher order thinking skills demonstrated in synchronous and asynchronous online college discussion posts. Nacta Journal, 60(1), 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, J. E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L. M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment introduction: The challenge of creating effective study groups. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. (2006). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Buelow, J. R., Barry, T., & Rich, L. E. (2018). Supporting learning engagement with online students. Online Learning, 22(4), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carwile, J. (2007). A constructivist approach to online teaching and learning. Inquiry, 12(1), 68–73.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W.-C. (2014). Actual and preferred teacher feedback on student blog writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Gao, Q., & Gao, G. (2022). Timeline-anchored comments in video-based learning: The impact of visual layout and content depth. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(9), 868–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1976505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covelli, B. J. (2017). Online discussion boards: The practice of building community for adult learners. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2017.1274616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends, 60(6), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2008). Using discussion pedagogy to enhance oral and written communication skills. College Teaching, 56(3), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.56.3.163-172
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Errico, F., Paciello, M., & Cerniglia, L. (2016). When emotions enhance students’ engagement in e-learning processes. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(4), 9–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNoyelles, A., Mannheimer Zydney, J., & Chen, B. (2014). Strategies for creating a community of inquiry through online asynchronous discussions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(1), 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Elena, G., S., O’Dulain, M., O’Mahony, N., Kehoe, C., McCarthy, F., & Morgan, G. (2017). Instructor-provided summary infographics to support online learning. Educational Media International, 54(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1362795
   Google Scholar
• Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., Cheung, W. S., & Ng, C. S. L. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science, 38(6), 571–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9087-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houle, C. O. (1961). The inquiring mind. University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning: A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. (2013). Polyphonic/pseudo-synchronic: Animated writing in the comment feed of nicovideo. Japanese Studies, 33(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2013.859982
   Google Scholar
• Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., & Laflamme, E. (2007). The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00620.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, S. B. (2014). Graduate student perceptions of the use of online course tools to support engagement. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080105
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1973). The adult student: A neglected species. Gulf Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. Cambridge Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species (4th ed.). Gulf.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y. C., Eastmond, J. N., Schroder, K. E. E., & Bennett, L. J. (2009). Student perceptions of interactions and course satisfaction in a blended learning environment. Paper presented at the Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications World Conference, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S. (2007). The online discussion board. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2007(113), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.248
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. C., & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2006). Implementing effective online teaching practices: Voices of exemplary faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9010-z
   Google Scholar
• Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(5), 5–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S. C. R., Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2011). Critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: An investigation of student facilitation techniques. New Horizons in Education, 59(1), 52–65.
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman, E. C. (1961). The meaning of adult education. Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, D. J., Kearsley, G., & Thompson, K. (2011). Faculty use of asynchronous discussions in online learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 8(2), 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martyn, M. A. (2005). Using interaction in online discussion boards. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 28(4), 61–62.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, J. (2015). The quest for authenticity: A study of an online discussion forum and the needs of adult learners. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55(1), 94–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, K., Altringer, L., Gebhardt, K., & Long, M. G. (2022). Promoting meaningful interaction and community development through discussion board activities in the online classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 19(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2022.19.1.15
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, K., Gebhardt, K., & Altringer, L. (2019). Exploring community in discussion board activities. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(3), 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1993). Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, M. John, & D. Keegan (Eds.), Distance education theory (pp. 19–24). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.667957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). Higher Education General Information Survey (HEGIS), Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall Enrollment component. Postbaccalaureate Enrollment. “Degrees and Other Formal Awards Conferred” surveys, 1970–71 through 1985-86; Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), “Completions Survey” (IPEDS-C:91 and 96); and IPEDS Fall 2001 through Fall 2019, Completions component (Table prepared June 2020). https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d20/tables/dt20_324.10.asp?current=yes
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., & Shaw, G. P. (2003). Asynchronous discussion in support of medical education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ostertagova, E., Ostertag, O., & Kováč, J. (2014). Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 611, 115–120. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.611.115
   Google Scholar
• Radford, A. W., Cominole, M., & Skomsvold, P. (2015). Demographic and enrollment characteristics of nontraditional undergraduates: 2011–12. Web Tables. NCES 2015-025. National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Foundations of problem‐based learning: some explanatory notes. Medical Education, 27(5), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1993.tb00296.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102–120.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (Ed.). (2018). Teaching & learning online: New pedagogies for new technologies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315042527
   Google Scholar
• To, J., & Carless, D. (2016). Making productive use of exemplars: Peer discussion and teacher guidance for positive transfer of strategies. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(6), 746–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Stein, D., & Shen, S. (2021). Students’ and teachers’ perceived teaching presence in online courses. Distance Education, 42(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1956304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., & Leung, S. O. (2017). Can Likert scales be treated as interval scales?—A simulation study. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W. C. V., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom enhances EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 142–157. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90002170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, D., De Serio, L., Malakhov, A., & Matys, O. (2020). Memes and education: opportunities, approaches, and perspectives. Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal, 3(2), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.2478/gssfj-2020-0009
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, N., & McDougall, D. (2005). Cultural factors affecting Chinese students’ participation in asynchronous online learning. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (pp. 2723–2729). AACE.
   Google Scholar