Using Multimedia Graphic Organizer Software in the Prewriting Activities of Primary School Students: What Are the Benefits?

REFERENCES

• Dye , G. A. 2000 . Graphic organizers to the rescue! Helping students link and remember information . Teaching Exceptional Children , 32 ( 3 ) : 72 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg , A. , Rusell , M. and Cook , A. 2003 . The effects of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992–2002 . The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment , 2 ( 1 ) : 1 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Griffin , C. C. , Malone , L. D. and Kameenui , E. J. 2001 . Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students . The Journal of Educational Research , 89 ( 2 ) : 107
   Google Scholar
• Hinson , J. , Distefano , C. and Daniel , C. 2003 . The Internet self-perception scale: Measuring elementary students’ levels of self-efficacy regarding Internet use . Journal of Educational Computing Research , 29 ( 2 ) : 209 – 228 .
   Google Scholar
• Inspiration . 2007 . “ Inspiration: The essential tool to visualize, think, organize, and learn ” . Retrieved January 5, 2007, from http://www.inspiration.com/Inspiration
   Google Scholar
• Institute for the Advancement of Research in Education . 2003 . “ Graphic organizers: A review of scientifically based research ” . Retrieved March 17, 2009, from www.inspiration.com/download/pdf/SBR_summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• James , L. A. , Abbott , M. and Greenwood , C. R. 2001 . How Adam became a writer: Winning writing strategies for low-achieving students . Teaching Exceptional Children , 33 ( 3 ) : 30 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Knight , K. S. 1998 . Using Inspiration (V.6) to organize reading and writing . LD Online Newsletter , 4 February Retrieved January 5, 2007, from http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/technology/inspiration.html
   Google Scholar
• Meyer , D. J. 1995 . The effects of graphic organizers on the creative writing of third-grade students Research Project, Kean College of New Jersey. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED380803)
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz , G. , Graham , S. and MacArthur , C. 1993 . Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities . The Journal of Learning Disabilities , 26 ( 4 ) : 237 – 249 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore , D. W. and Readence , J. E. 1984 . A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research . The Journal of Educational Research , 78 ( 1 ) : 11 – 17 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Panel on Educational Technology . 1997 . Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K–12 education in the United States, 1997 , Washington, DC : Executive Office of the President of the United States . ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED410950). Retrieved October 19, 2008, from http://www.ostp.gov/PCAST/k-12ed.html
   Google Scholar
• Roberts , S. K. 2002 . Taking a technological path to poetry prewriting . The Reading Teacher , 55 ( 7 ) : 678 – 687 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson , D. H. and Keiwra , K. A. 1995 . Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text . Journal of Educational Psychology , 78 ( 3 ) : 455 – 467 .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , C. B. 2000 . Writing instruction: Changing views over the years . ERIC Digest D155 ,
   Google Scholar