Profiling microbial lignocellulose degradation and utilization by emergent omics technologies

References

• Youngs H, Somerville C. Development of feedstocks for cellulosic biofuels. F1000 Biol Rep. 2012;4:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C. Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science. 2006;314:1598–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollegioni L, Tonin F, Rosini E. Lignin-degrading enzymes. FEBS J. 2015;282:1190–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei H, Xu Q, Taylor Ii LE, et al. Natural paradigms of plant cell wall degradation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20:330–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behling R, Valange S, Chatel G. Heterogeneous catalytic oxidation for lignin valorization into valuable chemicals: what results? What limitations? What trends? Green Chem. 2016;18:1839–1854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SK, Chou H, Ham TS, et al. Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuels production: from bugs to synthetic biology to fuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19:556–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan C. Big oil turns on biofuels. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:870–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deangelis KM, Allgaier M, Chavarria Y, et al. Characterization of trapped lignin-degrading microbes in tropical forest soil. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deangelis KM, Sharma D, Varney R, et al. Evidence supporting dissimilatory and assimilatory lignin degradation in Enterobacter lignolyticus scf1. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuroff T, Curtis W. Developing symbiotic consortia for lignocellulosic biofuel production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93:1423–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer M, Golyshina OV, Chernikova TN, et al. Novel hydrolase diversity retrieved from a metagenome library of bovine rumen microflora. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1996–2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Li F, Chen G, et al. Isolation and characterization of novel cellulase genes from uncultured microorganisms in different environmental niches. Microbiol Res. 2009;164:650–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi M, Wang P, O'toole N, et al. Snapshot of the eukaryotic gene expression in muskoxen rumen – a metatranscriptomic approach. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylward FO, Burnum KE, Scott JJ, et al. Metagenomic and metaproteomic insights into bacterial communities in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens. ISME J. 2012;6:1688–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'haeseleer P, Gladden JM, Allgaier M, et al. Proteogenomic analysis of a thermophilic bacterial consortium adapted to deconstruct switchgrass. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez DJ, Chaves-Moreno D, Van Elsas JD. Unveiling the metabolic potential of two soil-derived microbial consortia selected on wheat straw. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada R, Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Endowing non-cellulolytic microorganisms with cellulolytic activity aiming for consolidated bioprocessing. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:754–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertz C, Garvey M, Klinger J, et al. Challenges and advances in the heterologous expression of cellulolytic enzymes: a review. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn S, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, et al. Novel enzymes for the degradation of cellulose. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Dou J. Biofuels and bio-based chemicals from lignocellulose: metabolic engineering strategies in strain development. Biotechnol Lett. 2016;38:213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth S, Spiess AC. Laccases for biorefinery applications: a critical review on challenges and perspectives. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2015;38:2285–2313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne CM, Knott BC, Mayes HB, et al. Fungal cellulases. Chem Rev. 2015;115:1308–1448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno AD, Ibarra D, Alvira P, et al. A review of biological delignification and detoxification methods for lignocellulosic bioethanol production. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2015;35:342–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montella S, Amore A, Faraco V. Metagenomics for the development of new biocatalysts to advance lignocellulose saccharification for bioeconomic development. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2015;1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugg TDH, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, et al. The emerging role for bacteria in lignin degradation and bio-product formation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011;22:394–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picart P, Domínguez De María P, Schallmey A. From gene to biorefinery: microbial β-etherases as promising biocatalysts for lignin valorization. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgher M, Shahid M, Kamal S, et al. Recent trends and valorization of immobilization strategies and ligninolytic enzymes by industrial biotechnology. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2014;101:56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin EM. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature. 2008;454:841–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Zhang CK, Cheng Y, et al. A comparison of methods for clustering 16s rRNA sequences into OTUs. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichorst SA, Varanasi P, Stavila V, et al. Community dynamics of cellulose-adapted thermophilic bacterial consortia. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:2573–2587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gannes V, Eudoxie G, Hickey WJ. Prokaryotic successions and diversity in composts as revealed by 454-pyrosequencing. Bioresour Technol. 2013;133:573–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventorino V, Aliberti A, Faraco V, et al. Exploring the microbiota dynamics related to vegetable biomasses degradation and study of lignocellulose-degrading bacteria for industrial biotechnological application. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mhuantong W, Charoensawan V, Kanokratana P, et al. Comparative analysis of sugarcane bagasse metagenome reveals unique and conserved biomass-degrading enzymes among lignocellulolytic microbial communities. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do TH, Nguyen TT, Nguyen TN, et al. Mining biomass-degrading genes through illumina-based de novo sequencing and metagenomic analysis of free-living bacteria in the gut of the lower termite Coptotermes gestroi harvested in Vietnam. J Biosci Bioeng. 2014;118:665–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng P, Li Y, Marshall SD, et al. High genetic diversity of microbial cellulase and hemicellulase genes in the hindgut of Holotrichia parallela larvae. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:16545–16559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, et al. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D490–DD95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng H, Zhi Y, Shi W, et al. Isolation, identification and characterization of a straw degrading Streptomyces griseorubens jsd-1. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2013;7:2730–2735.
   Google Scholar
• Feng H, Sun Y, Zhi Y, et al. Lignocellulose degradation by the isolate of Streptomyces griseorubens jsd-1. Funct Integr Genomics. 2015;15:163–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuki M, Kuwahara H, Shintani M, et al. Dominant ectosymbiotic bacteria of cellulolytic protists in the termite gut also have the potential to digest lignocellulose. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:4942–4953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon KV, Haitjema CH, Henske JK, et al. Early-branching gut fungi possess a large, comprehensive array of biomass-degrading enzymes. Science. 2016;351:1192–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnet MC, Dohnalkova AC, Neumann AP, et al. Evaluating models of cellulose degradation by Fibrobacter succinogenes s85. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0143809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi X, Gu H, Gao Q, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Zymomonas mobilis zm4 reveals mechanisms of tolerance and detoxification of phenolic aldehyde inhibitors from lignocellulose pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams N, Hyland A, Mitchener R, et al. Demonstrating the in situ biodegradation potential of phenol using Bio-Sep® Bio-Traps® and stable isotope probing. Remediation. 2013;23:7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Pold G, Melillo J, Deangelis KM. Two decades of warming increases diversity of a potentially lignolytic bacterial community. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davids M, Hugenholtz F, Martins Dos Santos V, et al. Functional profiling of unfamiliar microbial communities using a validated de novo assembly metatranscriptome pipeline. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0146423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larance M, Lamond AI. Multidimensional proteomics for cell biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16:269–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker ES, Burnum-Johnson KE, Ibrahim YM, et al. Enhancing bottom-up and top-down proteomic measurements with ion mobility separations. Proteomics. 2015;15:2766–2776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim YM, Baker ES, Danielson WF, et al. Development of a new ion mobility (quadrupole) time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2015;377:655–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing MA, Glover MS, Clemmer DE. Hybrid ion mobility and mass spectrometry as a separation tool. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1439:3–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Garimella SVB, Prost SA, et al. Ion trapping, storage, and ejection in structures for lossless ion manipulations. Anal Chem. 2015;87:6010–6016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catherman AD, Skinner OS, Kelleher NL. Top down proteomics: facts and perspectives. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;445:683–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI. Proteogenomics: concepts, applications, and computational strategies. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1114–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Tiwari R, Renuse S, et al. Proteomic analysis of Streptomyces sp. Ssr-198 grown on paddy straw. J Basic Microbiol. 2015;55:790–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adav SS, Ng CS, Arulmani M, et al. Quantitative iTRAQ secretome analysis of cellulolytic Thermobifida fusca. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:3016–3024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylward FO, Khadempour L, Tremmel DM, et al. Enrichment and broad representation of plant biomass-degrading enzymes in the specialized hyphal swellings of Leucoagaricus gongylophorus, the fungal symbiont of leaf-cutter ants. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylward FO, Burnum-Johnson KE, Tringe SG, et al. Leucoagaricus gongylophorus produces diverse enzymes for the degradation of recalcitrant plant polymers in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:3770–3778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Fredrickson JK, Sadler NC, et al. Advancing understanding of microbial bioenergy conversion processes by activity-based protein profiling. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015b;8:156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler NC, Wright AT. Activity-based protein profiling of microbes. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2015;24:139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler NC, Melnicki MR, Serres MH, et al. Live cell chemical profiling of temporal redox dynamics in a photoautotrophic cyanobacterium. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;9:291–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansong C, Sadler NC, Hill EA, et al. Characterization of protein redox dynamics induced during light-to-dark transitions and nutrient limitation in cyanobacteria. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speers AE, Adam GC, Cravatt BF. Activity-based profiling in vivo using a copper(i)-catalyzed azide-alkyne [3+2] cycloaddition. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:4686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cravatt BF, Wright AT, Kozarich JW. Activity-based protein profiling: from enzyme chemistry to proteomic chemistry. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:383–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong V, Steinmetz NF, Manchester M, et al. Labeling live cells by copper-catalyzed alkyne-azide click chemistry . Bioconjug Chem. 2010;21:1912–1916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson LN, Culley DE, Hofstad BA, et al. Activity-based protein profiling of secreted cellulolytic enzyme activity dynamics in Trichoderma reesei qm6a, ng14, and rut-c30. Mol Biosyst. 2013;9:2992–3000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvigné-Hines LM, Anderson LN, Weaver HM, et al. Suite of activity-based probes for cellulose-degrading enzymes. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:20521–20532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekar B, Colby T, Emran Khan Emon A, et al. Broad-range glycosidase activity profiling. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:2787–2800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duo T, Goddard-Borger ED, Withers SG. Fluoro-glycosyl acridinones are ultra-sensitive active site titrating agents for retaining β-glycosidases. Chem Commun (Camb). 2014;50:9379–9382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson LN, Koech PK, Plymale AE, et al. Live cell discovery of microbial vitamin transport and enzyme-cofactor interactions. ACS Chem Biol. 2016;11:345–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2007;26:51–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindl W, Deng K, Gladden JM, et al. Colloid-based multiplexed screening for plant biomass-degrading glycoside hydrolase activities in microbial communities. Energy Environ Sci. 2011;4:2884–2893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northen TR, Yanes O, Northen MT, et al. Clathrate nanostructures for mass spectrometry. Nature. 2007;449:1033–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Hiras J, Deng K, et al. High throughput nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry screening of microbial growth conditions for maximal β-glucosidase production. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JA, Takasuka TE, Deng K, et al. Multifunctional cellulase catalysis targeted by fusion to different carbohydrate-binding modules. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng K, Takasuka TE, Bianchetti CM, et al. Use of nanostructure initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS) to deduce selectivity of reaction in glycoside hydrolases. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3:165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deng K, Takasuka TE, Heins R, et al. Rapid kinetic characterization of glycosyl hydrolases based on oxime derivatization and nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS). ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9:1470–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang EL, Aylward FO, Kim YM, et al. The fungus gardens of leaf-cutter ants undergo a distinct physiological transition during biomass degradation. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2014;6:389–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X, Da Costa Sousa L, Jin M, et al. Designer synthetic media for studying microbial-catalyzed biofuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez JA, Vargas-Garcia Mdel C, Lopez MJ, et al. Enzymatic characterization of microbial isolates from lignocellulose waste composting: chronological evolution. J Environ Manage. 2014;145:137–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Inokuma K, Ho SH, et al. Combined cell-surface display- and secretion-based strategies for production of cellulosic ethanol with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015c;8:162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couturier M, Mathieu Y, Li A, et al. Characterization of a new aryl-alcohol oxidase secreted by the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:697–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmich KE, Pereira JH, Gall DL, Jr., et al. Structural basis of stereospecificity in the bacterial enzymatic cleavage of beta-aryl ether bonds in lignin. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:5234–5246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie N, Ruprich-Robert G, Silar P, et al. Bilirubin oxidase-like proteins from Podospora anserina: promising thermostable enzymes for application in transformation of plant biomass. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:866–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canam T, Town JR, Tsang A, et al. Biological pretreatment with a cellobiose dehydrogenase-deficient strain of Trametes versicolor enhances the biofuel potential of canola straw. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:10020–10027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhalla A, Bischoff KM, Sani RK. Highly thermostable xylanase production from a thermophilic Geobacillus sp. strain wsucf1 utilizing lignocellulosic biomass. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3:84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva TLD, Roseiro JC, Reis A. Applications and perspectives of multi-parameter flow cytometry to microbial biofuels production processes. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terashima M, Freeman ES, Jinkerson RE, et al. A fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based strategy for rapid isolation of high-lipid Chlamydomonas mutants. Plant J. 2015;81:147–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumin J, Bonnefond H, Saint-Jean B, et al. The use of fluorescent Nile Red and bodipy for lipid measurement in microalgae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanavati H, Nahvi I, Roghanian R. Monitoring growth and lipid production of new isolated oleaginous yeast Cryptococcus aerius uimc65 on glucose and xylose cultures. Biotechnol Bioproc Eng. 2014;19:468–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira H, Barreira L, Mozes A, et al. Microplate-based high throughput screening procedure for the isolation of lipid-rich marine microalgae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011;4:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren HY, Liu BF, Ma C, et al. A new lipid-rich microalga Scenedesmus sp. strain R-16 isolated using Nile Red staining: effects of carbon and nitrogen sources and initial pH on the biomass and lipid production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grate JW, Mo KF, Shin Y, et al. Alexa fluor-labeled fluorescent cellulose nanocrystals for bioimaging solid cellulose in spatially structured microenvironments. Bioconjug Chem. 2015;26:593–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foston M. Advances in solid-state NMR of cellulose. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;27:176–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupoi JS, Singh S, Parthasarathi R, et al. Recent innovations in analytical methods for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of lignin. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;49:871–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Brech Y, Delmotte L, Raya J, et al. High resolution solid state 2D NMR analysis of biomass and biochar. Anal Chem. 2015;87:843–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira SC, Maehara L, Machado CMM, et al. Physical–chemical–morphological characterization of the whole sugarcane lignocellulosic biomass used for 2G ethanol production by spectroscopy and microscopy techniques. Renew Energy. 2016;87:607–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu L, Mccallum SA, Miao J, et al. Rapid and accurate determination of the lignin content of lignocellulosic biomass by solid-state NMR. Fuel (Lond). 2015;141:39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Xu L, Ge M, et al. Radiation degradation of microcrystalline cellulose in solid status. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013;127:1630–1636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang KQ, Xiong XY, Chen JP, et al. Comparison of gamma irradiation and steam explosion pretreatment for ethanol production from agricultural residues. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;46:301–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Chen J, Wu X, et al. Insights into the effects of γ-irradiation on the microstructure, thermal stability and irradiation-derived degradation components of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). RSC Adv. 2015a;5:34353–34363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Lu M, Carl S, et al. Biomass characterization of agave and opuntia as potential biofuel feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy. 2015;76:43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnecke F, Luginbuhl P, Ivanova N, et al. Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature. 2007;450:560–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allgaier M, Reddy A, Park JI, et al. Targeted discovery of glycoside hydrolases from a switchgrass-adapted compost community. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suen G, Scott JJ, Aylward FO, et al. An insect herbivore microbiome with high plant biomass-degrading capacity. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R, et al. Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science. 2011;331:463–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lelie D, Taghavi S, Mccorkle SM, et al. The metagenome of an anaerobic microbial community decomposing poplar wood chips. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Ju F, Fang HHP, et al. Mining of novel thermo-stable cellulolytic genes from a thermophilic cellulose-degrading consortium by metagenomics. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh KM, Reddy B, Patel D, et al. High potential source for biomass degradation enzyme discovery and environmental aspects revealed through metagenomics of indian buffalo rumen. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 267189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar