Gene editing for cell engineering: trends and applications

References

• Doudna JA, Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346:1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran F, Hsu P, Wright J, et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:2281–2308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014;157:1262–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright AV, Nunez JK, Doudna JA. Biology and applications of CRISPR systems: harnessing nature’s toolbox for genome engineering. Cell. 2016;164:29–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stovicek V, Borodina I, Forster J. CRISPR–Cas system enables fast and simple genome editing of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Metab Eng Commun. 2015;2:13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Kallehauge TB, Pedersen LE, et al. Site-specific integration in CHO cells mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 and homology-directed DNA repair pathway. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebas P, Stein D, Tang WW, et al. Gene editing of CCR5 in autologous CD4 T cells of persons infected with HIV. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:901–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ain QU, Chung JY, Kim Y-H. Current and future delivery systems for engineered nucleases: ZFN, TALEN and RGEN. J Control Release. 2014;205:120–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park TS, Lee HJ, Kim KH, et al. Targeted gene knockout in chickens mediated by TALENs. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:12716–12721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen B, Niemann H. Molecular scissors and their application in genetically modified farm animals. Transgenic Res. 2015;24:381–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie F, Ye L, Chang JC, et al. Seamless gene correction of β-thalassemia mutations in patient-specific iPSCs using CRISPR/Cas9 and piggyBac. Genome Res. 2014;24:1526–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna J. RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature. 2012;482:331–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilles AF, Averof M. Functional genetics for all: engineered nucleases, CRISPR and the gene editing revolution. EvoDevo. 2014;5:43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet P, Smih F, Jasin M. Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:8096–8106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi R, Lambert AR, Mak AN-S, et al. Tapping natural reservoirs of homing endonucleases for targeted gene modification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:13077–13082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maresca M, Lin VG, Guo N, et al. Obligate ligation-gated recombination (ObLiGaRe): custom-designed nuclease-mediated targeted integration through nonhomologous end joining. Genome Res. 2013;23:539–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer TO, Duroure K, De Cian A, et al. Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homology-independent DNA repair. Genome Res. 2014;24:142–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristea S, Freyvert Y, Santiago Y, et al. In vivo cleavage of transgene donors promotes nuclease-mediated targeted integration. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013;110:871–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitinaite J, Wah D, Aggarwal AK, et al. FokI dimerization is required for DNA cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:10570–10575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza N. Primer: genome editing with engineered nucleases. Nat Methods. 2011;9:27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander JD, Dahlborg EJ, Goodwin MJ, et al. Selection-free zinc-finger-nuclease engineering by context-dependent assembly (CoDA). Nat Methods. 2011;8:67–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JC, Holmes MC, Wang J, et al. An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:778–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll D. Genome engineering with zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics. 2011;188:773–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeder ML, Thibodeau-Beganny S, Osiak A, et al. Rapid “open-source” engineering of customized zinc-finger nucleases for highly efficient gene modification. Mol Cell. 2008;31:294–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, et al. High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:390–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Q, Lee YK, Schaefer EK, et al. A TALEN genome-editing system for generating human stem cell-based disease models. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:238–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryan A, Anderson Ma E, Myles KM, et al. TALEN-based gene disruption in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilinger JP, Pattanayak V, Reyon D, et al. Broad specificity profiling of TALENs results in engineered nucleases with improved DNA-cleavage specificity. Nat Methods. 2014;11:429–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian M, Cermak T, Doyle EL, et al. Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics. 2010;186:757–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister S, Antonova O, Polo A, et al. TALENs mediate efficient and heritable mutation of endogenous genes in the marine annelid Platynereis dumerilii. Genetics. 2014;197:77–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedell VM, Wang Y, Campbell JM, et al. In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. Nature. 2012;491:114–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll D. Genome engineering with targetable nucleases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2014;83:409–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takasu Y, Sajwan S, Daimon T, et al. Efficient TALEN construction for Bombyx mori gene targeting. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Ochiai H, Sakuma T, et al. Non-transgenic genome modifications in a hemimetabolous insect using zinc-finger and TAL effector nucleases. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1017–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida K, Treen N, Hozumi A, et al. Germ cell mutations of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis with TALE nucleases. Genesis. 2014;52:431–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science. 2007;315:1709–1712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/sb500255k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garneau JE, Dupuis M-È, Villion M, et al. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature. 2010;468:67–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, et al. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E2579–E2586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojica FJ, Díez-Villaseñor C, García-Martínez J, et al. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J Mol Evol. 2005;60:174–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. A programmable dual RNA guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337:816–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, et al. Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods. 2013;9:39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson DJ, Ward JD, Reiner DJ, et al. Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1028–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang WY, Fu Y, Reyon D, et al. Heritable and precise zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR-Cas system. PLoS One. 2012;8:e68708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo S, Ueda R. Highly improved gene targeting by germline-specific Cas9 expression in Drosophila. Genetics. 2013;195:715–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Wei JJ, Sabatini DM, et al. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science. 2014;343:80–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doench JG, Hartenian E, Graham DB, et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:1262–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Huang S, Jiang WZ, et al. TAL nucleases (TALNs): hybrid proteins composed of TAL effectors and FokI DNA-cleavage domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:359–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Zhang H, Xu N, et al. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol Plant. 2013;6:2008–2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortesi L, Fischer R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33:41–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay SK, Kumar J, Alok A, et al. RNA-guided genome editing for target gene mutations in wheat. G3 (Bethesda). 2013;3:2233–2238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou H, Liu B, Weeks DP, et al. Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:10903–10914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldner F, Laganière J, Cheng AW, et al. Generation of isogenic pluripotent stem cells differing exclusively at two early onset parkinson point mutations. Cell. 2011;146:318–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillico SG, Proudfoot C, Carlson DF, et al. Live pigs produced from genome edited zygotes. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takata N, Sakakura E, Kasukawa T, et al. Establishment of functional genomics pipeline in epiblast-like tissue by combining transcriptomic analysis and gene knock-down/-in/-out using RNAi and CRISPR/Cas9. Hum Gen Ther. 2016;27:436–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Wang H, Shivalila CS, et al. One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell. 2013;154:1370–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, et al. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:4336–4343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas VK, Barrasa MI, Fink GR. A Candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families. Sci Adv. 2015;1:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta SK, Shukla P. Advanced technologies for improved expression of recombinant proteins in bacteria: perspectives and applications. Crit Rev in Biotechnol. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1084264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikard D, Jiang W, Samai P, et al. Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:7429–7437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339:823–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339:819–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratz SJ, Cummings AM, Nguyen JN, et al. Genome engineering of Drosophila with the CRISPR RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease. Genetics. 2013;194:1029–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao Z, Xiao H, Liang J, et al. Homology-integrated CRISPR–Cas (HI-CRISPR) system for one-step multigene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:585–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan OW, Skerker JM, Maurer MJ, et al. Selection of chromosomal DNA libraries using a multiplex CRISPR system. E Life. 2014;3:e03703. http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03703.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz AA, Walter JM, Schubert MG, et al. Efficient multiplexed integration of synergistic alleles and metabolic pathways in yeasts via CRISPR-Cas. Cell Systems. 2015;1:1:9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jao LE, Wente SR, Chen W. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:13904–13909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, et al. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell. 2013;153:910–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr-Weaver TL, Szostak JW, Rothstein RJ. Genetic applications of yeast transformation with linear and gapped plasmids. Meth Enzymol. 1983;101:228–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moqtaderi Z, Geisberg JV. Construction of mutant alleles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae without cloning: overview and the delitto perfetto method. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2013;104:10C.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs JZ, Ciccaglione KM, Tournier V, et al. Implementation of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in fission yeast. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayapal KP, Wlaschin KF, Hu W-S, et al. Recombinant protein therapeutics from CHO cells-20 years and counting. Chem Eng Prog. 2007;103:40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis NE, Liu X, Li Y, et al. Genomic landscapes of Chinese hamster ovary cell lines as revealed by the Cricetulus griseus draft genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:759–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Nagarajan H, Lewis NE, et al. The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) K1 cell line. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:735–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kildegaard HF, Baycin-Hizal D, Lewis NE, et al. The emerging CHO systems biology era: harnessing the ’omics revolution for biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24:1102–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamane-Ohnuki N, Kinoshita S, Inoue-Urakubo M, et al. Establishment of FUT8 knockout Chinese hamster ovary cells: an ideal host cell line for producing completely defucosylated antibodies with enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;87:614–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedivy JM, Sharp PA. Positive genetic selection for gene disruption in mammalian cells by homologous recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:227–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JC, Tan S, Qiao G, et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:143–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago Y, Chan E, Liu P-Q, et al. Targeted gene knockout in mammalian cells by using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:5809–5814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronda C, Pedersen LE, Hansen HG, et al. Accelerating genome editing in CHO cells using CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPy, a web-based target finding tool. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111:1604–1616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cost GJ, Freyvert Y, Vafiadis A, et al. BAK and BAX deletion using zinc finger nucleases yields apoptosis-resistant CHO cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010;105:330–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh SM, Sathyamurthy M, Lee GM. Development of recombinant Chinese hamster ovary cell lines for therapeutic protein production. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2013;2:391–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurm FM. Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1393–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson C, Bellen HJ, Gehring WJ. Position effects on eukaryotic gene expression. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:679–714.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim SJ, Kim NS, Ryu CJ, et al. Characterization of chimeric antibody producing CHO cells in the course of dihydrofolate reductase mediated gene amplification and their stability in the absence of selective pressure. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998;58:73–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar