Regulatory science requirements of labeling of genetically modified food

References

• Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Science and research (food). [Internet]; 2016. Available from: www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM265446.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moghissi AA, Pei S, Liu Y. Golden rice: scientific, regulatory, and public information processes of genetically modified organism. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36:535–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghissi AA, McBride DK, Garcia PM, et al. Assessment of organic versus conventional food using best available science concept and metrics derived from it. Technol Innov. 2015;17:135–143.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden BR. The unknowns and possible implications of mandatory labeling. Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35:1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murlin JR, Miller CW. Preliminary results of nutritional surveys in United States Army camps. Am J Public Health. 1919;9:401–413.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek AM, Wright MG. History of agricultural biotechnology: how crop development has evolved. Nat Educ Knowl. 2012;3:9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Piperno DR, Ramere AJ, Holst I, et al. A Starch grain and phytolith evidence for early ninth millennium B.P. maize from the central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2009;106:5019–5024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DR, Epp MD, Riordon HD. Changes in USDA Food composition data for 43 garden crops, 1950 to 1999. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004;23:669–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel G. Versuche űber pflanzen hybriden. In: Verhandlungendes Naturforschenden Veriensin Brűnn Vol. IV. (Experiments in plant hybridization). English translation. [Internet]; 1865. Available from: www.netspace.org/WendelWeb
   Google Scholar
• Shull GH. Some latent characteristics of white bean. Science. 1907;103:828–832.
   Google Scholar
• Shull GH. The significance of latent characters. Science. 1907;25:792–794.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shull GH. Hybrid seed corn. Science. 1946;103:547–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key S, Ma JKC, Drake PM. Genetically modified plants and human health. J Roy Soc Med. 2008;101:290–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 as amended through P.L. 107-377. [Internet]; 2002. Available from: www.epw.senate.gov/FDA_001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fair Packaging and Labeling Act. 2017. Fair Packaging and Labeling Act: U.S.C. 15, Chapter 39.
   Google Scholar
• US Senate. An original bill to amend Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to require the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a national voluntary labeling standard for bioengineered food and for other purposes, S.2609-114th Congress (2015–2016). [Internet]; 2015–2016. Available from: www.congress.gov/bill/1124th-congress/senate-bill/2609
   Google Scholar
• Moghissi AA, Straja SR, Love BR, et al. Innovation in regulatory science: evolution of a new scientific discipline. Technol Innov. 2014;16:155–165.
   Google Scholar
• Moghissi AA, Calderone RA, McBride DK, et al. Innovation in regulatory science; metrics for evaluation of regulatory science claims based on best available regulatory science. J Regul Sci. 2017;5:50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Moghissi AA, Gerraa VK, McBride DK, et al. Scientific foundation of regulating ionizing radiation: application of metrics for evaluation of regulatory science information. Health Phys. 2014;107:388–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghissi AA, Keim M, McBride DK, et al. Wakefield effect. Synesis. 2013;4:15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, et al. RETRACTED: ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet. 1998;351:637–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies (NA). Genetically engineered crops. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies (NA). Public engagement on genetically modified organisms: when science and citizens connect. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Siipi H. Is natural food healthy? J Agri Environ Ethics. 2013;26:797–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies (NA). The impact of genetically engineered crops on farm sustainability in the United States. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies (NA). Biological confinement of genetically engineered organisms. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Laureates letter. Laureates letter supporting precision agriculture (GMO). [Internet]; [cited June 29, 2016]. Available from: www. supportprecision agriculture.org/nobel-laureate-gmo-ltr_rjr.html
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. Chapter 6. Public Opinion about Food. [Internet]; 2015. Available from: http://www.supportprecisionagriculture.org/nobel-laureate-gmo-letter_rjr.html
   Google Scholar
• McFadden BR, Lusk JL. What consumers don’t know about genetically modified food, and how that affects beliefs. FASEB J. 2016;30:3091–3096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malthus TR. An essay on the principle of population. Available as Oxford World’s Classics Reprint; 1798.
   Google Scholar