Transformation of animal genomics by next-generation sequencing technologies: a decade of challenges and their impact on genetic architecture

References

• Li M, Wang IX, Li Y, et al. Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome. Science. 2011;333:53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack JE, Hird SM, Zellmer AJ, et al. Applications of next-generation sequencing to phylogeography and phylogenetics. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;66:526–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzker ML. Emerging technologies in DNA sequencing. Genome Res. 2015;15:1767–1776.
   Google Scholar
• Mardis ER. Next-generation sequencing platforms. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2013;6:287–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Sartor M, Cavalcoli J. Current status and future perspectives for sequencing livestock genomes. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2012;3:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shendure J, Ji H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1135–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison CA. DNA sequencing: bench to bedside and beyond. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:6227–6237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain termination inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74:5463–5467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansorge WJ. Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques. N Biotechnol. 2009;25:195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Li Y, Li S, et al. Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;11:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• McGettigan PA. Transcriptomics in the RNA-seq era. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2013;17:4–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marozova O, Marra MA. Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics. 2008;92:255–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Bubnoff A. Next-generation sequencing: the race is on. Cell. 2008;132:721–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo JM, Buck MJ. Key principles and clinical applications of “‘next-generation’ DNA sequencing”. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012;5:887–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheyas AA, Burt DW. Microarray resources for genetic and genomic studies in chicken: a review. Genesis. 2013;51:337–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buermans HPJ, den Dunner JT. Next generation sequencing technology: advances and applications. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1842:1932–1941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronaghi A. Pyrosequencing sheds light on DNA sequencing. Genome Res. 2001;11:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delseny M, Han B, Hsing YL. High throughput DNA sequencing: the new sequencing revolution. Plant Sci. 2010;179:407–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casals F, Idaghdour Y, Hussin J, et al. Next-generation sequencing approaches for genetic mapping of complex diseases. J Neuroimmunol. 2012;248:10–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies – the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:31–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson MW, Schrijver I. Next generation DNA sequencing and the future of Genomic Medicine. Genes (Basel). 2010;1:38–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta PK. Single molecule DNA sequencing technologies for future genomics research. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:602–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quail MA, Smith M, Coupland P, et al. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusk N. Torrents of sequence. Nat Methods. 2011;8:44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothberg JM,  Hinz W, Rearick TM, et al. An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing. Nature. 2011;475:348–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golan D, Medvedev P. Using state machines to model the Ion Torrent sequencing process and to improve read error rates. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:i344–i351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shendure J, Porreca GJ, Reppas NB, et al. Accurate multiplex polony sequencing of an evolved bacterial genome. Science. 2005;309:1728–1732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porreca GJ, Shendure J, Church GM. Polony DNA sequencing. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2006;7:7.8.
   Google Scholar
• Munroe DJ, Harris TJR. Third-generation sequencing fireworks at Marco Island. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:426–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleidorn C. Third generation sequencing: technology and its potential impact on evolutionary biodiversity research. Syst Biodivers. 2015;14:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Gupta UD. Next generation sequencing and its applications. In: Verma A, Singh A, editors. Animal biotechnology: models in discovery and translation. New York: Academic Press; 2014. p. 345–367 (Chapter 19).
   Google Scholar
• Eid J, Fehr A, Gray J, et al. Real time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science. 2009;323:113–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts RJ, Carnerio MO, Schatz MC. The advantages of SMRT sequencing. Genome Biol. 2013;14:405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoads A, Au KF. PacBio sequencing and its applications. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015;13:278–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu H, Giordano F, Ning Z. Oxford nanopore MinION sequencing and genome assembly. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2016;14:265–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasianowicz JJ, Brandin E, Branton D, et al. Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:13770–13773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Zhang Y, Ying C, et al. Nanopore-based fourth generation DNA sequencing technology. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015;13:4–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke J, Wu HC, Jayasinghe L, et al. Continuous base identification for single-molecule nanopore DNA sequencing. Nat Nanotechnol. 2009;4:265–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Chiodini R, Badr A, et al. The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics. J Genet Genomics. 2011;38:95–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koitzsch U, Heydt C, Attig H, et al. Use of the GeneReader NGS System in a clinical pathology laboratory: a comparative study. J Clin Pathol. 2017;70:725–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisenfeld NI, Kumar V, Shah P, et al. Direct determination of diploid genomic sequences. Genome Res. 2017;27:757–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin S, McPherson JD, McCombie WR. Coming of age: ten years of next generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:333–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs RA, Taylor JF, VanTassell CP, et al. Bovine HAPMAP Consortium: the genetic history of cattle. Science. 2009;324:529–532.
   Google Scholar
• Zimin AV, Delcher AL, Florea L, et al. A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow, Bos taurus. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellam RL, Lemay DG, Van Tassell CP, et al. Unlocking the bovine genome. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsik CG, Tellam RL, Worlet KC, et al. The genome sequence of Taurine Cattle: a window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science. 2009;324:522–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsik CG, Unni DR, Diesh CM, et al. Bovine genome database: new tools for gleaning function from the Bos taurus genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D834–D839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareek CS, Smoczynski R, Pierzchala M, et al. From genotype to phenotype in bovine functional genomics. Brief Funct Genomics. 2011;10:165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raszek MM, Guan LL, Plastow GS. Use of genomic tools to improve cattle health in the context of infectious diseases. Front Genet. 2016;7:30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatsiou AI, Bazin E, Gaggiotti OE. Detection of selective sweeps in structured populations: a comparison of recent methods. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:89–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement JAJ, Toulza E, Gautier M, Parrinello H, et al. Private selective sweeps identified from next generation pool sequencing reveal convergent pathways under selection in two inbred Schistosoma mansoni strains. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boitard S, Schlotterer C, Nolte V, et al. Detection selective sweeps from pooled next generation sequencing samples. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:2177–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Pan D, Ren H, et al. Identification of selective sweeps reveals divergent selection between Chinese Holstein and Simmental cattle populations. Genet Sel Evol. 2016;48:76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramey HR, Decker JE, McKay SD, et al. Detection of selective sweeps in cattle using genome-wide SNP data. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barendse W, Bunch R, Thomas M, et al. The TG5 thyroglobulin gene test for a marbling quantitative trait loci evaluated in feedlot cattle. Aust J Exp Agric. 2004;44:669–674.
   Google Scholar
• Zinder MC, Seroussi E, Larkin DM, et al. Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine ABCG2 gene with a major effect on the QTL on chromosome 6 affecting milk yield and composition in Holstein cattle. Genome Res. 2005;5:936–944.
   Google Scholar
• Barendes W, Bunch RJ, Kijas JW, et al. The effect of genetic variation of the retinoic acid receptor related orphan receptor C gene on fatness in cattle. Genetics. 2007;175:843–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin KE, Nalpas NC, Rue-Albrecht K, et al. RNA-seq transcriptional profiling of peripheral blood leukocytes from cattle infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Front Immunol. 2014;5:396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda T, Nagai M, Yamasato H, et al. Identification of novel bovine group A rotavirus G15P [14] strain from epizootic diarrhea of adult cows by de novo sequencing using a next-generation sequencer. Vet Microbiol. 2014;171:66–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosse M, Megens HJ, Madsen O, et al. Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome: consequence of demography and the recombination landscape. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1003100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz LA, Schraiber JG, Madsen O, et al. Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz LA. Speciation and domestication in Suiformes: a genomic perspective [PhD thesis]. Wageningen University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Groenen MAM. A decade of pig genome sequencing: a window on pig domestication and evolution. Genet Select Evol. 2016;48:23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphray SJ, Scott CE, Clark R, et al. A high utility integrated map of the pig genome. Genome Biol. 2007;78:R139.
   Google Scholar
• Lim D, Cho YM, Lee KT, et al. The pig genomics database (PiGenome): an integrated database for pig genome research. Mamm Genome. 2009;20:60–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenen MA, Archibald AL, Uenishi H, et al. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into pocrine demography and evolution. Nature. 2012;491:393–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou ZY, Li A, Otecko NO, et al. PigVar: a database of pig variations and positive selection signatures. Database. 2017;2017:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavo G, Hoffmann OL, Ribani A, et al. A genomic landscape of mitochondrial DNA insertions in the pig nuclear genome provides evolutionary signatures of interspecies admixture. DNA Res. 2017;24:487–498.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin CJ, Megens HJ, BArrio AM, et al. Strong signature of selection in the domestic pig genome. PNAS. 2012;109:19529–19536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodhi SS, Park WC, Ghosh M, et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis to identify differentially expressed genes in fat tissue of adult Berkshire and Jeju Native Pig using RNA-seq. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41:6305–6315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh M, Sodhi SS, Song KD, et al. Evaluation of body growth and immunity-related differentially expressed genes through deep RNA sequencing in the piglets of Jeju native pig and Berkshire. Anim Genet. 2015;46:255–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramayo-Caldas Y, Castello A, Pena RN, et al. Copy number variation in the porcine genome inferred from a 60 k SNP BeadChip. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh M, Sodhi SS, Sharma N, et al. An integrated in silico approach for functional and structural impact of non-synonymous SNPs in the MYH1 gene in Jeju Native Pigs. BMC Genet. 2016;17:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SE, Hyun H, Park MR, et al. Production of transgenic pig as an Alzheimer's disease model using a multi-cistronic vector system. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0177933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald AL, Bolund L, Churcher C, et al. Pig genome sequence-analysis and publication strategy. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadiel A, Anidi I, Eichenbaum KD. Farm animal genomics and informatics: an update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6308–6318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Librado P, Gamba C, Gaunitz C, et al. Ancient genomic changes associated with domestication of the horse. Science. 2017;356:442–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert M, Jonsson H, Chang D, et al. Prehistoric genomes reveal the genetic foundation and cost of horse domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E5661–E5669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlando L, Ginoljac A, Zhang G, et al. Recalibrating Equus evolution using the genome sequence of an early Middle Pleistocene horse. Nature. 2013;499:74–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun JH, Cho YS, Hu H, et al. Whole genome sequence and analysis of the Marwari horse breed and its genetic origin. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:S4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade CM, Giulotto E, Sigurdsson S, et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis, and population genetics of the domestic horse. Science. 2009;326:865–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozaki T, Swinburne J, Hirota K, et al. Improved resolution of the comparative horse-human map: investigating markers with in silico and linkage mapping approaches. Gene. 2007;392:181–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucher E, Jayr L, Rossignol F, et al. Gene expression profiling in equine muscle tissues using mouse cDNA microarrays. Equine Vet J Suppl. 2006;36:359–364.
   Google Scholar
• Scharefer RJ, Schubert M, Bailey E, et al. Developing a 670k genotyping array to tag ∼2M SNPs across 24 horse breeds. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T. The Horse Genome Derby: racing from map to whole genome sequence. Chromosome Res. 2008;6:109–127.
   Google Scholar
• McGivney B, Gu J, Eivers S, et al. Population and functional genomics investigations of performance associations in thoroughbred horses. In: 7th Dorothy Russell Havemeyer International Equine Genome Mapping Workshop, Tahoe City, CA; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh M, Woo CH, Park WJ, et al. Comparative transcriptomic analyses by RNA-seq to elucidate differentially expressed genes in the muscle of Korean thoroughbred horses. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2016;180:588–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel PB, Dodgson JB, Andersson L. Progress from chicken genetics to the chicken genome. Poult Sci. 2006;85:2050–2060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt DW. Chicken genome: current status and future opportunities. Genome Res. 2005;15:1692–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawai H, Kim HL, Kuno K, et al. The origin and genetic variation of domestic chickens with special reference to Junglefowls Gallus g. gallus and G. varius. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature. 2004;432:695–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium. A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature. 2004;432:717–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid M, Smith J, Burt DW, et al. Third report on chicken genes and chromosomes 2015. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015;145:78–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin CJ, Zody MC, Eriksson J, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature. 2010;464:587–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren WC, Hillier LaD C, Tomlinson C, et al. A new chicken genome assembly provides insight into avian genome structure. G3. 2017;7:109–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenen MAM, Cheng HH, Bumstead N, et al. A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome. Genome Res. 2000;10:137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogburn LA, Wang X, Carre W, et al. Systems-wide chicken DNA microarrays, gene expression profiling, and discovery of functional genes. Poult Sci. 2003;82:939–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boichard MT, Bedhom B, Rognon X. Chicken domestication: from archeology to genomics. C R Biol. 2011;334:197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elferink MG, Megens HJ, Vereijken A, et al. Signatures of selection in the genomes of commercial and non-commercial chicken breeds. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belak S, Karleeon OE, Leijon M, et al. High throughput sequencing in veterinary infection biology and diagnostics. Rev Sci Tech Oie. 2013;32:(3):893–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borm SV, Belak S, Feimanis G, et al. Next-generation sequencing in veterinary medicine: how can the massive amount of information arising from high-throughput technologies improve diagnosis, control, and management of infectious diseases? Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1247:415–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deurenberg RH, Bathoorn E, Chlebowicz MA, et al. Application of next generation sequencing in clinical microbiology and infection prevention. J Biotechnol. 2017;243:16–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou K, Lokate M, Deurenberg RH, et al. Use of whole-genome sequencing to trace, control and characterize the regional expansion of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing ST15 Klebsiella pneumoniae. Sci Rep. 2013;6:20840.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou K, Lokate M, Deurenberg RH, et al. Characterization of a CTX-M-15 producing Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak strain assigned to a novel Sequence Type (1427). Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weterings V, Zhou K, Rossen JW, et al. An outbreak of colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Netherlands (July–December 2013), with inter-institutional spread. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34:1647–1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathoorn E, Rossen JW, Lokate M, et al. Isolation of an NDM-5-producing ST16 Klebsiella pneumoniae from a Dutch patient without travel history abroad, August 2015. Euro Surveil. 2015;20:30040.
   Google Scholar
• Ferdous M, Zhou K, de Boer RF, et al. Comprehensive characterization of Escherichia coli O104:H4 isolated from patients in the Netherlands. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao S, Jia J, Mo D, et al. Understanding PRRSV infection in porcine lung based on genome-wide transcriptome response identified by deep sequencing. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright CF, Morelli MJ, Thebaud G, et al. Beyond the consensus: dissecting within-host viral population diversity of foot-and-mouth disease virus by using nextgeneration genome sequencing. J Virol. 2011;85:2266–2275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomstrom AL, Belak S, Fossum C, et al. Studies of porcine circovirus type 2, porcine boca-like virus and Torque teno virus indicate the presence of multiple viral infections in postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome pigs. Virus Res. 2010;152:59–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biek R, O’Hare A, Wright D, et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals local transmission patterns of Mycobacterium bovis in sympatric cattle and badger populations. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1003008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifer I, Ruggli N, Blome S. Approaches to define the viral genetic basis of classical swine fever virus virulence. Virology. 2013;438:51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebure T, Bitar PD, Suzuki H, et al. Evolutionary dynamics of complete Campylobacter pan-genomes and the bacterial species concept. Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:646–655.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh M, Sodhi SS, Kim JH, et al. An integrated In silico approach for the structural and functional exploration of lipocalin 2and its functional insights with metalloproteinase and lipoprotein receptor related protein 2. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;176:712–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali R, Blackburn RM, Kozlakidis Z. Next-generation sequencing and influenza virus: a short review of the published implementation attempts. HAYATI J Biosci. 2016;23:155–159.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjadi L, Riziki T, Zhu Y, Li J, et al. Study of mcr-1 gene-mediated colistin resistance in enterobacteriaceae isolated from human and animals in different countries. Genes. 2017;8:398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluytmans-van den Bergh MF, Rossen JW, Bruijning-Verhagen PC, et al. Whole genome multilocus sequence typing of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:2919–2927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terveer EM, Nijhuis RHT, Crobach MJT, et al. Prevalence of colistin resistance gene (mcr1) containing Enterobacteriaceae in feces of patients attending a tertiary care hospital and detection of a mcr-1 containing, colistin susceptible E. coli. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar