Electrochemical-based biosensors for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and tuberculosis biomarkers

References

• World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2016. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rachkov A, Patskovsky S, Soldatkin A, et al. Surface plasmon resonance detection of oligonucleotide sequences of the rpoB genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Talanta. 2011;85(4):2094–2099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai M, Denkinger CM, Kik SV, et al. Gamma interferon release assays for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(1):3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, He X, He D, et al. Biosensing technologies for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection: status and new developments. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011;2011:1.
   Google Scholar
• Simsek H, Alpar S, Uçar N, et al. Comparison of tuberculin skin testing and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosis of latent and active tuberculosis. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2010;63(2):99–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe JZ, Cattamanchi A, McCulloch CE, et al. Test variability of the QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube assay in clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(2):206–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos A, Carvalho T, Ribeiro M, et al. Capilia TB-Neo assay: a new tool for rapid distinction between tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20(6):753–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah M, Hanrahan C, Wang ZY, et al. Lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay for detecting active tuberculosis in HIV-positive adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;17(5):1–108.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Kakkar V. Recent technological advancements in tuberculosis diagnostics—a review. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;115:14–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nour-Neamatollahi A, Siadat SD, Yari S, et al. A new diagnostic tool for rapid and accurate detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018;25(3):418–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeka AN, Tasbakan S, Cavusoglu C. Evaluation of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampin resistance in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(12):4138–4141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Kim YJ, Ki C-S, et al. Evaluation of Cobas TaqMan MTB PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(1):173–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn SD, Mwaba P, Bates M, et al. Advances in tuberculosis diagnostics: the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and future prospects for a point-of-care test. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(4):349–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin KL, Sarmiento ME, Norazmi MN, et al. DNA markers for tuberculosis diagnosis. Tuberculosis. 2018;113:139–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddabra R, Benhassou HA. Rapid molecular assays for detection of tuberculosis. Pneumonia. 2018;10(1):4.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen VAT, Nguyen HV, Dinh TV, et al. Evaluation of Loopamp™MTBC detection kit for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis at a peripheral laboratory in a high burden setting. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;90(3):190–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bholla M, Kapalata N, Masika E, et al. Evaluation of Xpert® MTB/RIF and Ustar EasyNAT™ TB IAD for diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis of children in Tanzania: a prospective descriptive study. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mhimbira FA, Bholla M, Sasamalo M, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by EasyNAT diagnostic kit in sputum samples from Tanzania. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(4):1342–1344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golichenari B, Velonia K, Nosrati R, et al. Label-free nano-biosensing on the road to tuberculosis detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;113:124–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small PM, Pai M. Tuberculosis diagnosis—time for a game change. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(11):1070–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai M, Minion J, Sohn H, et al. Novel and improved technologies for tuberculosis diagnosis: progress and challenges. Clin Chest Med. 2009;30(4):701–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera V, Perry S, Parsonnet J, et al. Clinical application and limitations of interferon-γ release assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(8):1031–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehme CC, Nicol MP, Nabeta P, et al. Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study. Lancet. 2011;377(9776):1495–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakhki RK, Neshani A, Sankian M, et al. The short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDR) gene: a new specific target for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by modified comparative genomic analysis. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;70:158–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarashi S, Fateh A, Mirsaeidi M, et al. Mixed infections in tuberculosis: the missing part in a puzzle. Tuberculosis. 2017;107:168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal V, Hashim U. Advances in biosensors: principle, architecture and applications. J Appl Biomed. 2014;12(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner AP. Biosensors: sense and sensibility. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(8):3184–3196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosrati R, Dehghani S, Karimi B, et al. Siderophore-based biosensors and nanosensors; new approach on the development of diagnostic systems. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;117:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigneshvar S, Sudhakumari CC, Senthilkumaran B, et al. Recent advances in biosensor technology for potential applications – an overview. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2016;4(11):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu C, Yang G, Li H, et al. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on nanomaterials and nanostructures. Anal Chem. 2015;87(1):230–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X, Davis JJ. Electrical biosensors and the label free detection of protein disease biomarkers. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(13):5944–5962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velusamy V, Arshak K, Korostynska O, et al. An overview of foodborne pathogen detection: in the perspective of biosensors. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28(2):232–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palchetti I, Mascini M. Amperometric biosensor for pathogenic bacteria detection. In: Zourob M., Elwary S., Turner A., editors. Principles of bacterial detection: biosensors, recognition receptors and microsystems. New York, NY: Springer; 2008. p. 299–312.
   Google Scholar
• Ronkainen NJ, Halsall HB, Heineman WR. Electrochemical biosensors. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39(5):1747–1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond JL, Formisano N, Estrela P, et al. Electrochemical biosensors and nanobiosensors. Essays Biochem. 2016;60(1):69–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarma AK, Vatsyayan P, Goswami P, et al. Recent advances in material science for developing enzyme electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009;24(8):2313–2322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ŠVancara I, VytřAs K, Kalcher K, et al. Carbon paste electrodes in facts, numbers, and notes: a review on the occasion of the 50‐years jubilee of carbon paste in electrochemistry and electroanalysis. Electroanalysis. 2009;21(1):7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giljohann DA, Seferos DS, Daniel WL, et al. Gold nanoparticles for biology and medicine. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49(19):3280–3294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Volder MF, Tawfick SH, Baughman RH, et al. Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications. Science. 2013;339(6119):535–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman J, Power A, Kiran K, et al. New twists in the plot: recent advances in electrochemical genosensors for disease screening. J Electrochem Soc. 2017;164(13):B665–B673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koncki R. Recent developments in potentiometric biosensors for biomedical analysis. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;599(1):7–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard P, Hearty S, Brennan J, et al. Advances in biosensors for detection of pathogens in food and water. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2003;32(1):3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang Z, Liu Y, et al. Recent advances in rapid pathogen detection method based on biosensors. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;37(6):1021–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limpert G. The power of pulsed amperometric detection coupled with chromatography for analyzing carbohydrates. Am Lab. 2011;43:28–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro VG, Ramos L, Monteiro HS, et al. Intestinal permeability and malabsorption of rifampin and isoniazid in active pulmonary tuberculosis. Braz J Infect Dis. 2006;10(6):374–379.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Façanha MC, Gondim A, Pinheiro VG, et al. Intestinal barrier function and serum concentrations of rifampin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Braz J Infect Dis. 2009;13(3):210–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syhre M, Chambers ST. The scent of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. 2008;88(4):317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metters JP, Kampouris DK, Banks CE. Fingerprinting breath: electrochemical monitoring of markers indicative of bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Braz Chem Soc. 2014;25(9):1667–1672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahadır EB, Sezgintürk MK. Applications of electrochemical immunosensors for early clinical diagnostics. Talanta. 2015;132:162–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Chai X, Xu C, et al., editors. Electrochemical biosensor based on modified graphene oxide for tuberculosis diagnosis. 2011 IEEE 9th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON); 2011 Oct 25–28; Xiamen, China. IEEE; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yan Y, Zhang B, et al. Fabrication of an interferon-gamma-based ITO detector for latent tuberculosis diagnosis with high stability and lower cost. J Solid State Electrochem. 2015;19(10):3111–3119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao V, Sharma M, Pandey P, et al. Comparison of different carbon ink based screen-printed electrodes towards amperometric immunosensing. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;22(11):1135–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renedo OD, Alonso-Lomillo M, Martínez MA. Recent developments in the field of screen-printed electrodes and their related applications. Talanta. 2007;73(2):202–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-González M, González-García MB, Costa-García A. Immunosensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis on screen-printed carbon electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron. 2005;20(10):2035–2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Leng C, Tang S, et al. Enzyme-free signal amplification for electrochemical detection of Mycobacterium lipoarabinomannan antibody on a disposable chip. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012;38(1):421–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diouani MF, Ouerghi O, Refai A, et al. Detection of ESAT-6 by a label free miniature immuno-electrochemical biosensor as a diagnostic tool for tuberculosis. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;74:465–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu C, Chai X-s, Zhang S-l, et al., editors. Immunosensor for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis markers in human serum. 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology (ICSICT); 2010 Nov 1–4; Shanghai, China. IEEE; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhakar N, Solanki PR, Kaushik A, et al. Peptide nucleic acid immobilized biocompatible silane nanocomposite platform for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection. Electroanalysis. 2010;22(22):2672–2682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo W-H, Liu S, Chung J-H, et al. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cells by using microtip-based immunoassay. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009;393(6–7):1593–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-H, Yeo W-H, Shu Z, et al. Immunosensor towards low-cost, rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. Lab Chip. 2012;12(8):1437–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-H, Hiraiwa M, Gao D, et al., editors. Dendritic nanotip for low-cost detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. ASME 2012 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 2012 Nov 9–15; Houston, Texas, USA. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hiraiwa M, Kim J-H, Lee H-B, et al. Amperometric immunosensor for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Micromech Microeng. 2015;25(5):055013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschou D, Greathead L, Pantelidis P, et al. Amperometric IFN-γ immunosensors with commercially fabricated PCB sensing electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;86:805–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Jian Z, Chen X, et al. Electrochemical impedance immunosensor for sub-picogram level detection of bovine interferon gamma based on cylinder-shaped TiO2 nanorods. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;63:190–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Rahimian A, Krylyuk S, et al. Nanowire aptasensors for electrochemical detection of cell-secreted cytokines. ACS Sens. 2017;2(11):1644–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Mazurek GH, Alocilja EC. Measurement of interferon gamma concentration using an electrochemical immunosensor. J Electrochem Soc. 2016;163(5):B140–B145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang B, Ye X, et al. Electrochemical immunosensor for interferon-γ based on disposable ITO detector and HRP-antibody-conjugated nano gold as signal tag. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;59:577–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou B, Zhu M, Qiu Y, et al. Novel electrochemiluminescence-sensing platform for the precise analysis of multiple latent tuberculosis infection markers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(22):18493–18500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou B, Zhu M, Hao Y, et al. Potential-resolved electrochemiluminescence for simultaneous determination of triple latent tuberculosis infection markers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(36):30536–30542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chutichetpong P, Cheeveewattanagul N, Srilohasin P, et al. Rapid screening drug susceptibility test in tuberculosis using sandwich electrochemical immunosensor. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1025:108–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui H, Li S, Yuan Q, et al. An AC electrokinetic impedance immunosensor for rapid detection of tuberculosis. Analyst. 2013;138(23):7188–7196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bart M, Stigter E, Stapert H, et al. On the response of a label-free interferon-γ immunosensor utilizing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Biosens Bioelectron. 2005;21(1):49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Han X, Ma A, et al. Fabrication of electrochemical immunosensor for interferon-γ determination and its application of tuberculosis diagnosis. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2017;12(8):7262–7271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksma M, Kamp B, Hoogvliet J, et al. Development of an electrochemical immunosensor for direct detection of interferon-gamma at the attomolar level. Anal Chem. 2001;73(5):901–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Tang Y, Wen Q, et al. Dynamic evaluation of cell-secreted interferon gamma in response to drug stimulation via a sensitive electro-chemiluminescence immunosensor based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with graphene oxide, polyaniline nanofibers, magnetic beads, and gold nanoparticles. Microchim Acta. 2016;183(5):1739–1748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soo P-C, Horng Y-T, Chang K-C, et al. A simple gold nanoparticle probes assay for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from clinical specimens. Mol Cell Probes. 2009;23(5):240–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara P, Cavusoglu C, Cavdar S, et al. Direct electrochemical genosensing for multiple point mutation detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis during the development of rifampin resistance. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009;24(6):1796–1800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Chen F, Li Q, et al. Isothermal amplification of nucleic acids. Chem Rev. 2015;115(22):12491–12545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiruppathiraja C, Kamatchiammal S, Adaikkappan P, et al. Specific detection of Mycobacterium sp. genomic DNA using dual labeled gold nanoparticle based electrochemical biosensor. Anal Biochem. 2011;417(1):73–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Jiang D, Xiang G, et al. An electrochemical DNA biosensor for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, based on signal amplification of graphene and a gold nanoparticle–polyaniline nanocomposite. Analyst. 2014;139(21):5460–5465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreda-García S, González-Álvarez MJ, de-los-Santos-Álvarez N, et al. Attomolar quantitation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by asymmetric helicase-dependent isothermal DNA-amplification and electrochemical detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;68:122–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreda-García S, Miranda-Castro R, de-los-Santos-Álvarez N, et al. Comparison of isothermal helicase-dependent amplification and PCR for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by an electrochemical genomagnetic assay. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(30):8603–8610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng BY, Wee EJ, West NP, et al. Naked-eye colorimetric and electrochemical detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis toward Rapid screening for active case finding. ACS Sens. 2016;1(2):173–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miodek A, Mejri N, Gomgnimbou M, et al. E-DNA sensor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on electrochemical assembly of nanomaterials (MWCNTs/PPy/PAMAM). Anal Chem. 2015;87(18):9257–9264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaloglou M-N, Nemiroski A, Camci-Unal G, et al. Handheld isothermal amplification and electrochemical detection of DNA in resource-limited settings. Anal Biochem. 2018;543:116–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Lim BKL, Lim SY, et al. Label-free, real-time and multiplex detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on silicon photonic microring sensors and asymmetric isothermal amplification technique (SPMS-AIA). Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2018;255:1595–1603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, March G, Noel V, et al. Label-free and reagentless electrochemical detection of PCR fragments using self-assembled quinone derivative monolayer: application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012;32(1):163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa MP, Andrade CA, Montenegro RA, et al. Self-assembled monolayers of mercaptobenzoic acid and magnetite nanoparticles as an efficient support for development of tuberculosis genosensor. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;433:141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaid MHM, Abdullah J, Yusof NA, et al. PNA biosensor based on reduced graphene oxide/water soluble quantum dots for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2017;241:1024–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Z, Gan N, Zhang H, et al. A sandwich-hybridization assay for simultaneous determination of HIV and tuberculosis DNA targets based on signal amplification by quantum dots-PowerVision™ polymer coding nanotracers. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;71:207–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JS, Goo N-I, Kim D-E. Mechanism of DNA adsorption and desorption on graphene oxide. Langmuir. 2014;30(42):12587–12595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Yu Y, Li Q, et al. A homogeneous signal-on strategy for the detection of rpoB genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on electrochemiluminescent graphene oxide and ferrocene quenching. Anal Chem. 2014;86(3):1608–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesil M, Donmez S, Arslan F. Development of an electrochemical DNA biosensor for detection of specific Mycobacterium tuberculosis sequence based on poly (l-glutamic acid) modified electrode. J Chem Sci. 2016;128(11):1823–1829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wang F, Dong S. Methylene blue as an indicator for sensitive electrochemical detection of adenosine based on aptamer switch. J Electroanal Chem. 2009;626(1–2):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan F, Wang F, Chen Z. Aptamer-based electrochemical biosensor for label-free voltammetric detection of thrombin and adenosine. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2011;160(1):1380–1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zribi B, Roy E, Pallandre A, et al. A microfluidic electrochemical biosensor based on multiwall carbon nanotube/ferrocene for genomic DNA detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical isolates. Biomicrofluidics. 2016;10(1):014115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh K, Patterson AS, Ferguson BS, et al. Rapid, sensitive, and quantitative detection of pathogenic DNA at the point of care through microfluidic electrochemical quantitative loop‐mediated isothermal amplification. Angew Chem. 2012;124(20):4980–4984.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Chavolla E, Alocilja EC. Nanoparticle based DNA biosensor for tuberculosis detection using thermophilic helicase-dependent isothermal amplification. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;26(11):4614–4618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das M, Dhand C, Sumana G, et al. Zirconia grafted carbon nanotubes based biosensor for M. Tuberculosis detection. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;99(14):143702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Chai Y, Jiang J, et al. Sensitive ECL sensor for sequence-specific DNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on N-(aminobutyl)-N-ethylisoluminol functionalized gold nanoparticles labeling. J Photochem Photobiol. 2012;241:45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang J, Chai Y, Cui H. The electrogenerated chemiluminescence detection of IS6110 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on a luminol functionalized gold nanoprobe. RSC Adv. 2011;1(2):247–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhakar N, Singh H, Malhotra BD. Nucleic acid immobilized polypyrrole–polyvinylsulphonate film for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection. Electrochem Commun. 2008;10(6):821–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghdisi SM, Danesh NM, Emrani AS, et al. A novel electrochemical aptasensor based on single-walled carbon nanotubes, gold electrode and complimentary strand of aptamer for ultrasensitive detection of cocaine. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;73:245–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezami A, Nosrati R, Golichenari B, et al. Nanomaterial-based aptasensors and bioaffinity sensors for quantitative detection of 17β-estradiol. Trends Anal Chem. 2017;94:95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat P, Nosrati R, Alibolandi M, et al. SELEX methods on the road to protein targeting with nucleic acid aptamers. Biochimie. 2018;154:132–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari N, Ghazvini K, Ramezani M, et al. Selection of DNA aptamers against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ag85A, and its application in a graphene oxide-based fluorometric assay. Microchim Acta. 2018;185(1):21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhiman A, Kalra P, Bansal V, et al. Aptamer-based point-of-care diagnostic platforms. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2017;246:535–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trausch JJ, Shank-Retzlaff M, Verch T. Replacing antibodies with modified DNA aptamers in vaccine potency assays. Vaccine. 2017;35(41):5495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramezani M, Danesh NM, Lavaee P, et al. A novel colorimetric triple-helix molecular switch aptasensor for ultrasensitive detection of tetracycline. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;70:181–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosrati R, Golichenari B, Nezami A, et al. Helicobacter pylori point-of-care diagnosis: nano-scale biosensors and microfluidic systems. Trends Anal Chem. 2017;97:428–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X-L, Zhou Y-X, Wu S-M, et al. CFP10 and ESAT6 aptamers as effective Mycobacterial antigen diagnostic reagents. J Infect. 2014;69(6):569–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baassi L, Sadki K, Seghrouchni F, et al. Evaluation of a multi-antigen test based on B-cell epitope peptides for the serodiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13(7):848–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu C, Liu J, Ling Y, et al. Evaluation of the clinical value of ELISA based on MPT64 antibody aptamer for serological diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thakur H, Kaur N, Sareen D, et al. Electrochemical determination of M. tuberculosis antigen based on poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and functionalized carbon nanotubes hybrid platform. Talanta. 2017;171:115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai G, Zhang H, Tamanna T, et al. Ultrasensitive immunoassay based on electrochemical measurement of enzymatically produced polyaniline. Anal chem. 2014;86(3):1789–1793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar NA, Choi H-J, Shin YR, et al. Polyaniline-grafted reduced graphene oxide for efficient electrochemical supercapacitors. ACS Nano. 2012;6(2):1715–1723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai L, Chen Y, Bai Y, et al. Fullerene-doped polyaniline as new redox nanoprobe and catalyst in electrochemical aptasensor for ultrasensitive detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis MPT64 antigen in human serum. Biomaterials. 2017;133:11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li Y, Yang Y, et al. A polyaniline-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as a redox nanoprobe in a voltammetric DNA biosensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microchim Acta. 2017;184(6):1801–1808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin L-H, Liu Z-H, Yang H, et al. Dynamic evolution and immunoreactivity of aptamers binding to polyclonal antibodies against MPT64 antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(7):1199–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura Y, Niwa T, Naya S-I, et al. In situ room temperature synthesis of a polyaniline–gold–titanium (IV) dioxide heteronanojunction system. Chem Commun. 2013;49(5):520–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhang H, Wang G, et al. A novel electrode material based on a highly homogeneous polyaniline/titanium oxide hybrid for high-rate electrochemical capacitors. J Mater Chem. 2010;20(47):10598–10601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golichenari B, Nosrati R, Farokhi-Fard A, et al. Nano-biosensing approaches on tuberculosis: defy of aptamers. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;117:319–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crulhas BP, Hadley D, Liu Y, et al. An electrochemical aptasensor for detection of bovine interferon gamma. Anal Methods. 2017;9(31):4527–4532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Yan J, Howland MC, et al. Micropatterned aptasensors for continuous monitoring of cytokine release from human leukocytes. Anal Chem. 2011;83(21):8286–8292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Tuleouva N, Ramanculov E, et al. Aptamer-based electrochemical biosensor for interferon gamma detection. Anal Chem. 2010;82(19):8131–8136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Kwa T, Revzin A. Simultaneous detection of cell-secreted TNF-α and IFN-γ using micropatterned aptamer-modified electrodes. Biomaterials. 2012;33(30):7347–7355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Pui TS, Kongsuphol P, et al. Aptamer-based array electrodes for quantitative interferon-γ detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;53:257–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Matharu Z, Rahimian A, et al. Detecting multiple cell-secreted cytokines from the same aptamer-functionalized electrode. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;64:43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan G, Wang Y, He X, et al. A highly sensitive label-free electrochemical aptasensor for interferon-gamma detection based on graphene controlled assembly and nuclease cleavage-assisted target recycling amplification. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;44:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks R, Pierce NA, inventors; Google Patents, assignee. Hybridization chain reaction; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Chen C, Zhang L, et al. An electrochemical aptasensor based on hybridization chain reaction with enzyme-signal amplification for interferon-gamma detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012;36(1):129–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Xiang G, Jiang D, et al. An electrochemical aptasensor for detection of IFN-γ using graphene and a dual signal amplification strategy based on the exonuclease-mediated surface-initiated enzymatic polymerization. Analyst. 2015;140(22):7784–7791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Shi L, Chu Z, et al. A highly sensitive electrochemical IFN-γ aptasensor based on a hierarchical graphene/AuNPs electrode interface with a dual enzyme-assisted amplification strategy. RSC Adv. 2017;7(71):45053–45060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao X, Ko C-N, Vellaisamy K, et al. A cyclometalated iridium (III) complex used as a conductor for the electrochemical sensing of IFN-γ. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):42740.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abnous K, Danesh NM, Ramezani M, et al. A triple-helix molecular switch-based electrochemical aptasensor for interferon-gamma using a gold electrode and Methylene Blue as a redox probe. Microchim Acta. 2017;184(10):4151–4157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding S, Mosher C, Lee XY, et al. Rapid and label-free detection of interferon gamma via an electrochemical aptasensor comprising a ternary surface monolayer on a gold interdigitated electrode array. ACS Sens. 2017;2(2):210–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia J, Song D, Wang Z, et al. Single electrode biosensor for simultaneous determination of interferon gamma and lysozyme. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;68:55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Li X, Zhang L, et al. Aptamer-based electrochemical sensors with aptamer-complementary DNA oligonucleotides as probe. Anal Chem. 2008;80(6):1883–1890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farid S, Meshik X, Choi M, et al. Detection of Interferon gamma using graphene and aptamer based FET-like electrochemical biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;71:294–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Cai X, Rivas G, et al. Nucleic-acid immobilization, recognition and detection at chronopotentiometric DNA chips. Biosens Bioelectron. 1997;12(7):587–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torati SR, Reddy V, Yoon SS, et al. Electrochemical biosensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection based on gold nanotubes array electrode platform. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;78:483–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varshney M, Li Y. Interdigitated array microelectrodes based impedance biosensors for detection of bacterial cells. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009;24(10):2951–2960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshafey R, Tlili C, Abulrob A, et al. Label-free impedimetric immunosensor for ultrasensitive detection of cancer marker Murine double minute 2 in brain tissue. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;39(1):220–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Mansfeld F. Exploring the use of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in microbial fuel cell studies. Energy Environ Sci. 2009;2(2):215–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randviir EP, Banks CE. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: an overview of bioanalytical applications. Anal Methods. 2013;5(5):1098–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahadır EB, Sezgintürk MK. A review on impedimetric biosensors. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016;44(1):248–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia X, Chao D, Zhang Y, et al. Generic synthesis of carbon nanotube branches on metal oxide arrays exhibiting stable high‐rate and long‐cycle sodium‐ion storage. Small. 2016;12(22):3048–3058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manicone PF, Iommetti PR, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007;35(11):819–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath SC, Perumal V, Kumaresan R, et al. Nanogapped impedimetric immunosensor for the detection of 16 kDa heat shock protein against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microchim Acta. 2016;183(10):2697–2703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsishin M, Rachkov A, Errachid A, et al. Development of impedimetric DNA biosensor for selective detection and discrimination of oligonucleotide sequences of the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2016;222:1152–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizid S, Blili S, Mlika R, et al. Direct E-DNA sensor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutant strain based on new nanocomposite transducer (Fc-ac-OMPA/MWCNTs). Talanta. 2018;184:475–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathebula NS, Pillay J, Toschi G, et al. Recognition of anti-mycolic acid antibody at self-assembled mycolic acid antigens on a gold electrode: a potential impedimetric immunosensing platform for active tuberculosis. Chem Commun. 2009;23:3345–3347.
   Google Scholar
• He F, Zhao J, Zhang L, et al. A rapid method for determining Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on a bulk acoustic wave impedance biosensor. Talanta. 2003;59(5):935–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourmir A, Bahrmand A, Far SE, et al. Rapid diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with electrical impedance spectroscopy in suspensions using interdigitated microelectrode. J Anal Chem. 2016;71(7):676–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palchetti I, Mascini M. Electroanalytical biosensors and their potential for food pathogen and toxin detection. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;391(2):455–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beis K, Srikannathasan V, Liu H, et al. Crystal structures of Mycobacteria tuberculosis and Klebsiella pneumoniae UDP-galactopyranose mutase in the oxidised state and Klebsiella pneumoniae UDP-galactopyranose mutase in the (active) reduced state. J Mol Biol. 2005;348(4):971–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll MD, McLean KJ, Cheesman MR, et al. Expression and characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis CYP144: common themes and lessons learned in the M. tuberculosis P450 enzyme family. Biochim Biophys Acta-Proteins Proteom. 2011;1814(1):76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Rivas G, Cai X, et al. Sequence-specific electrochemical biosensing of M. tuberculosis DNA. Anal Chim Acta. 1997;337(1):41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratov A, Abramova N, Ipatov A. Recent trends in potentiometric sensor arrays—a review. Anal Chim Acta. 2010;678(2):149–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapliyal N, Chiwunze TE, Karpoormath R, et al. Research progress in electroanalytical techniques for determination of antimalarial drugs in pharmaceutical and biological samples. RSC Adv. 2016;6(62):57580–57602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz F. Voltammetric techniques of analysis: the essentials. ChemTexts. 2015;1(4):17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratova IS, Kartsova LA, Mikhelson KN. Voltammetric vs. potentiometric sensing of dopamine: advantages and disadvantages, novel cell designs, fundamental limitations and promising options. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2015;207:900–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelada-Guillen GA, Tweed-Kent A, Niemann M, et al. Ultrasensitive and real-time detection of proteins in blood using a potentiometric carbon-nanotube aptasensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;41:366–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Ye Z, Ying Y. New trends in impedimetric biosensors for the detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Sensors. 2012;12(3):3449–3471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koksal D, Unsal E, Poyraz B, et al. The value of serum interferon-gamma level in the differential diagnosis of active and inactive pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberkuloz ve toraks. 2006;54(1):17–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussain S, Afzal N, Javaid K, et al. Level of interferon gamma in the blood of tuberculosis patients. Iran J Immunol. 2010;7(4):240–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar