325
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Developing synthetic biology in Argentina: the Latin American TECNOx community as an alternative way for growth of the field

, , , &
Pages 357-364 | Received 08 Mar 2019, Accepted 21 Dec 2019, Published online: 19 Feb 2020

References

  • Cameron DE, Bashor CJ, Collins JJ. A brief history of synthetic biology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(5):381–390.
  • Farny NG. A vision for teaching the values of synthetic biology. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36(11):1097–1100.
  • Raimbault B, Cointet JP, Joly PB. Mapping the emergence of synthetic biology. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0161522.
  • Shapira P, Kwon S, Youtie J. Tracking the emergence of synthetic biology. Scientometrics. 2017;112(3):1439–1469.
  • McAdams HH, Shapiro L. Circuit simulation of genetic networks. Science. 1995;269(5224):650–656.
  • Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, et al. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science. 2002;298(5594):824–827.
  • Becskei A, Serrano L. Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature. 2000;405(6786):590–593.
  • Gardner TS, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature. 2000;403(6767):339–342.
  • Elowitz MB, Leibler S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature. 2000;403(6767):335–338.
  • Rejeski D. Synthetic biology in the United States: a brief history of an emerging innovation system. Plattform value now. 2016. Available from: http://platformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/SyntheticBiologyCaseStudy_Rejeski.pdf.
  • Robbins P, editor. The genesis of synthetic biology: innovation, interdisciplinarity and the IGEM student competition. Proceedings of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting; 2009, San Francisco, CA.
  • Roosth S. Synthetic: how life got made. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 2017.
  • Rebatchouk D, Daraselia N, Narita JO. NOMAD: a versatile strategy for in vitro DNA manipulation applied to promoter analysis and vector design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(20):10891–10896.
  • Arkin A, Endy D. A standard parts list for biological circuitry. DARPA white paper. 1999. Available From: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/29794/Arkin.Endy.DARPA.pdf?sequence=1.
  • Knight T. Idempotent vector design for standard assembly of biobricks. MIT Synthetic Biology Working Group Technical Reports; 2003.
  • Trump BD, Cegan J, Wells E, et al. Co-evolution of physical and social sciences in synthetic biology. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2019;39(3):1–15.
  • Martin VJ, Pitera DJ, Withers ST, et al. Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(7):796–802.
  • Christopher Anderson J, Arkin A, Church G, et al. SynBERC: Building the future with biology; 2016 [2018 Dec 04]. Available from: https://www.synberc.org/
  • Molyneux-Hodgson S, Meyer M. Tales of emergence—synthetic biology as a scientific community in the making. Biosocieties. 2009;4(2–3):129–145.
  • Ochoa Cruz EA, Van Sluys MA. Participation in iGEM competition; education toward synthetic biology innovation. J Biotechnol Biomater. 2015;05(01):170.
  • Federici F, Rudge TJ, Pollak B, et al. Synthetic biology: opportunities for Chilean bioindustry and education. Biol Res. 2013;46(4):383–393.
  • Alibes A, Nadra AD, De Masi F, et al. Using protein design algorithms to understand the molecular basis of disease caused by protein-DNA interactions: the Pax6 example. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(21):7422–7431.
  • Sanchez IE, Beltrao P, Stricher F, et al. Genome-wide prediction of SH2 domain targets using structural information and the FoldX algorithm. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008;4(4):e1000052.
  • Grunberg R, Serrano L. Strategies for protein synthetic biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(8):2663–2675.
  • Panke S, Stelling J, Greve F, et al. Emergence: a foundation for synthetic biology in Europe; 2009. Available from: http://webarchiv.ethz.ch/emergence/home.htm.
  • Nadra AD, Sanchez IE, Colman-Lerner A, et al. EMBO global exchange lecture course “Introduction to synthetic biology”; 2012. [Last accessed 2018 Sep 18]. Available from: http://events.embo.org/12-synthetic-biology/index.html
  • Bush A, Giménez M, Grande A, et al. Synthetic crossfeeding cocultures in yeast: computational model of autoregulation and design of a tryptophan export device. J Synth Biol. 2015;1(1):1–10.
  • Menzella HG, Reid R, Carney JR, et al. Combinatorial polyketide biosynthesis by de novo design and rearrangement of modular polyketide synthase genes. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(9):1171–1176.
  • Barone F, Dorr F, Marasco LE, et al. Design and evaluation of an incoherent feed-forward loop for an arsenic biosensor based on standard iGEM parts. Synth Biol. 2017;2(1):1–10.
  • iGEM BA. SENSAR: BIOSENSORES DE AGUA; 2013. [2018 Sep 24]. Available from: https://social.idea.me/projects/10897/sensar-water-biosensors.
  • Glunti G, Soto MM. TEDxUBA Cuerpo sano en mente sana; 2013. [2018 Sep 24]. Available from: https://www.ted.com/tedx/events/8892.
  • Nadra AD, Teijeiro A, editors. Diseño, implementación, re-diseño, re-implementación, …, de un biosensor. XX Congreso de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Gráfica Digital. São Paulo: Blucher; 2016; (Blucher Design Proceedings).
  • Nadra AD. SensAr: producto innovador, experiencia excepcional. Quimica Viva. 2015;14(1):1–7.
  • Nadra AD. Biología Sintética: imaginar es poder; 2014. [2018 Sep 24]. Available from: http://www.tedxriodelaplata.org/videos/biologia-sintetica.
  • Nadra AD, Basanta B, Bonomi HR, et al., editors. SensAr: an arsenic biosensor for drinking water. 5th International Congress on Arsenic in the Environment. Buenos Aires, Argentina: CRC Press; 2014. (Arsenic in the Environment- Proceedings).
  • Nadra AD. Interdisciplinary designed biosensor for arsenic detection in drinking water. Proceedings of the XII Congreso Argentino de microbiologia general; 2017; Tucumán, Argentina.
  • Rugiero M, Giménez M, Morosi L, et al. Tunable synthetic ecology. Proceedings of the SB 6.0 The sixth International meeting on synthetic biology; 2013; London, UK.
  • Eguinoa I. Implementación de una herramienta bioinformática para el diseño de secuencias linker. La Plata, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2015.
  • Rodríguez PE. Sobre una biología llamada sintética. Entre la ciencia y el arte, entre la técnica y la epistemología. Quadranti Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Contemporanea. 2016;4:143–168.
  • Rodríguez PE. Sobre un nuevo tipo de cuasi-objetos: la artificialidad de la vida en el caso de la biología sintética. In: Blanco J, Lawler D, Vaccari A, editors. La técnica en cuestión. Artificialidad, cultura material y ontología de lo creado. Buenos Aires, Argentina: UAI Editorial/Teseo; 2017. p. 269–288.
  • Ferreiro DU. Biología de sistemas, biología sintética, biología artificial: ¿nuevos paradigmas o refritos publicitarios? Configuraciones de “vida-vivo-viviente” en la actualidad científico-técnica de la región: episteme contemporánea, formas de subjetivación y modos de gobierno. II Congreso Latinoamericano de Teoría Social y Teoría Política “Horizontes y dilemas del pensamiento contemporáneo en el sur global”; 2017; Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Olalde LG, Ferreiro DU, Rodríguez PE, et al. Introversión dogmática; 2015 [2018 Sep 27]. Available from: https://introversiondogmatica.wordpress.com/.
  • Olalde LG, Ferreiro DU, Rodríguez PE, et al. Co-production from the Arts, Science and New Technologies. Proceedings of the SIGraDi 2016, XX Congreso de la Sociedad Ibero-americana de Gráfica Digital; 2016; Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Olalde LG, Rodríguez PE, Ferreiro DU, et al. Co-production from the arts, science, and new technologies: creating a SciArt object; 2018 [13 Dec 2018]. Available from: https://www.sciartmagazine.com/collaboration-creating-a-sciart-object.html.
  • De Luca G, Di Mateo V, Nafissi J, et al. BaNDA: El uso de la música como estrategia de enseñanza y acercamiento a la ingeniería genética y la bioinformática. Jornadas Internacionales de Educación con Tecnologías; 2013; San Juan, Argentina.
  • Kornblihtt A. Where science and nonsense collide. Nature. 2017;541(7636):135–135.
  • Roman V. Argentina’s economic crisis could trigger scientific ‘collapse,’ researchers warn. Science. 2018. DOI:10.1126/science.aav5602
  • Catanzaro M. Argentina’s scientists struggle amid slipping peso and rising inflation. Nature. 2018;562(7727):316–317.
  • Ochoa Cruz EA, Federici F, Grunberg R, et al. TECNOx: A Latin American Syn Bio (and more) student competition; 2016 [2018 Sep 28]. Available from: https://blogs.plos.org/synbio/2016/02/09/tecnox-a-latin-american-syn-bio-and-more-student-competition/.
  • Sanchez IE, Federici F, Nadra AD, editors. TECNOx Estudiantes latinoamericanos aplicando tecnologías. Foro Abierto de Ciencias de América Latina y el Caribe (CILAC). Montevideo, Uruguay; 2016.
  • Ochoa Cruz EA, de la Barrera Benavidez OJ, Giménez M, et al. The biohacking landscape in Latin America. BioCoder. 2016;10:5–12.
  • Nadra AD, Sanchez IE, Federici F, et al. editors. Estudiantes latinoamericanos aplicando tecnologías. Workshop de Ciencia Abierta y Ciudadana; 2017; La Plata, Argentina.
  • Rhizomatica Public Wiki; 2019. [cited 2019]. Available from: https://wiki.rhizomatica.org.
  • Ciencia libre con drones - Open science with drones [cited 2019]. Available from: http://vuela.cc.
  • van Zwanenberg P, Cremaschi A, Obaya M, et al. Seeking unconventional alliances and bridging innovations in spaces for transformative change: the seed sector and agricultural sustainability in Argentina. Ecol Soc. 2018;23(3):11.
  • Hardware GfOS. Global Open Science Hardware Roadmap; 2017. Available from: http://openhardware.science/global-open-science-hardware-roadmap/.
  • Arancio JC, editor Open science hardware: towards more democratic science and technology in Latin America? OpenSym Doctoral Consortium. Skovde, Sweden: University of Skovde; 2019; (Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium at the 15th International Symposium on Open Collaboration).
  • Freitas MPP, Heidemann LA, Muller DN, et al. Quarto Encontro Latino Americano e Caribenho de Tecnologias Livres TECNOx 4.0. Porto Alegre, Brasil: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2019. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/200080.
  • Pezzi RP, Marques Fernandes HC, Vasques Brandão R, et al. Development of technology for science and education based on open and free knowledge: the case of the Center of Academic Tecnology. LiiNC. 2017;13(1)205–222.
  • Arza V, Fressoli M, Sebastian S. Towards open science in Argentina: From experiences to public policies. FM. 2017;22(7). DOI:10.5210/fm.v22i7.7876
  • Torres D, Correa F, Marisi A, et al. Cientópolis: motorizando la ciencia ciudadana. Cuarto congreso internacional cientifico y tecnológico de la provincia de Buenos Aires; 2017.
  • Lopez FA. OpenCon; 2018. LATAM 2018 [cited 2019]. Available from: https://www.opencon2018.org/opencon_2018_latam.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.