Recent advancements in CRISPR-Cas toolbox for imaging applications

References

• Hubner MR, Spector DL. Chromatin dynamics. Annu Rev Biophys. 2010;39(1):471–489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barth R, Bystricky K, Shaban HA. Coupling chromatin structure and dynamics by live super-resolution imaging. Sci Adv. 2020;6(27):eaaz2196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawte AD, Unrau PJ, Rueda DS. Live cell imaging of single RNA molecules with fluorogenic Mango II arrays. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1283–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dultz E, Mancini R, Polles G, et al. Quantitative imaging of chromatin decompaction in living cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2018;29(13):1763–1777.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanenbaum ME, Gilbert LA, Qi LS, et al. A protein-tagging system for signal amplification in gene expression and fluorescence imaging. Cell. 2014;159(3):635–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz ZB, English BP, Lionnet T, et al. Mapping translation ‘hot-spots’ in live cells by tracking single molecules of mRNA and ribosomes. Elife. 2016;5:e10415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedersha N, Stoecklin G, Ayodele M, et al. Stress granules and processing bodies are dynamically linked sites of mRNP remodeling. J Cell Biol. 2005;169(6):871–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon SL, Morisaki T, Khong A, et al. Multicolour single-molecule tracking of mRNA interactions with RNP granules. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(2):162–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilbertz JH, Voigt F, Horvathova I, et al. Single-molecule imaging of mRNA localization and regulation during the integrated stress response. Mol Cell. 2019;73(5):946–958.e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino K, et al. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J Bacteriol. 1987;169(12):5429–5433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath P, Barrangou R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science. 2010;327(5962):167–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Alkhnbashi OS, et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(11):722–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337(6096):816–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339(6121):823–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339(6121):819–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright AV, Nuñez JK, Doudna JA. Biology and applications of CRISPR systems: harnessing nature's toolbox for genome engineering. Cell. 2016;164(1–2):29–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. 2015;163(3):759–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmakov S, Abudayyeh OO, Makarova KS, et al. Discovery and functional characterization of diverse Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. Mol Cell. 2015;60(3):385–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmakov S, Smargon A, Scott D, et al. Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(3):169–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell. 2013;152(5):1173–1183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez AA, Lim WA, Qi LS. Beyond editing: repurposing CRISPR-Cas9 for precision genome regulation and interrogation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(1):5–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida K, Arazoe T, Yachie N, et al. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science. 2016;353(6305):aaf8729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Gilbert LA, Cimini BA, et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell. 2013;155(7):1479–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita T, Fujii H. Efficient isolation of specific genomic regions and identification of associated proteins by engineered DNA-binding molecule-mediated chromatin immunoprecipitation (enChIP) using CRISPR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;439(1):132–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Naseri A, Reyes-Gutierrez P, et al. Multicolor CRISPR labeling of chromosomal loci in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(10):3002–3007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abudayyeh OO, Gootenberg JS, Konermann S, et al. C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector. Science. 2016;353(6299):aaf5573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konermann S, Lotfy P, Brideau NJ, et al. Transcriptome engineering with RNA-targeting type VI-D CRISPR effectors. Cell. 2018;173(3):665–676.e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• East-Seletsky A, O'Connell MR, Burstein D, et al. RNA targeting by functionally orthogonal type VI-A CRISPR-Cas enzymes. Mol Cell. 2017;66(3):373–383.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan WX, Chong S, Zhang H, et al. Cas13d Is a compact RNA-targeting type VI CRISPR effector positively modulated by a WYL-domain-containing accessory protein. Mol Cell. 2018;70(2):327–339.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grynberg M, Erlandsen H, Godzik A. HEPN: a common domain in bacterial drug resistance and human neurodegenerative proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28(5):224–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LZ, Wang W, Li SQ, et al. Dynamic imaging of RNA in living cells by CRISPR-Cas13 systems. Mol Cell. 2019;76(6):981–997.e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorkin DU, Leung D, Ren B. The 3D genome in transcriptional regulation and pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14(6):762–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maass PG, Barutcu AR, Rinn JL. Interchromosomal interactions: a genomic love story of kissing chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(1):27–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltsov M, MacLellan KM, Maeshima K, et al. Analysis of cryo-electron microscopy images does not support the existence of 30-nm chromatin fibers in mitotic chromosomes in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(50):19732–19737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonis M, Klous P, Splinter E, et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet. 2006;38(11):1348–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beliveau BJ, Boettiger AN, Avendaño MS, et al. Single-molecule super-resolution imaging of chromosomes and in situ haplotype visualization using Oligopaint FISH probes. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozubek S, Lukasova E, Amrichova J, et al. Influence of cell fixation on chromatin topography. Anal Biochem. 2000;282(1):29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettiger AN, Bintu B, Moffitt JR, et al. Super-resolution imaging reveals distinct chromatin folding for different epigenetic states. Nature. 2016;529(7586):418–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickfaden H, Zunhammer A, van Koningsbruggen S, et al. 4D chromatin dynamics in cycling cells: Theodor Boveri’s hypotheses revisited. Nucleus. 2010;1(3):284–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlich D, Beaudouin J, Kalbfuss B, et al. Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell. 2003;112(6):751–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belmont AS. Large-scale chromatin organization: the good, the surprising, and the still perplexing. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014;26:69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masui O, Bonnet I, Le Baccon P, et al. Live-cell chromosome dynamics and outcome of X chromosome pairing events during ES cell differentiation. Cell. 2011;145(3):447–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinett CC, Straight A, Li G, et al. In vivo localization of DNA sequences and visualization of large-scale chromatin organization using lac operator/repressor recognition. J Cell Biol. 1996;135(6 Pt 2):1685–1700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzke AJM, Huettel B, van der Wnden J, et al. Use of two-color fluorescence-tagged transgenes to study interphase chromosomes in living plants. Plant Physiol. 2005;139(4):1586–1596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhout BI, Fransz P, Tessadori F, et al. Live cell imaging of repetitive DNA sequences via GFP-tagged polydactyl zinc finger proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(16):e107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Reyes-Gutierrez P, Pederson T. Visualization of repetitive DNA sequences in human chromosomes with transcription activator-like effectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(52):21048–21053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto S, Sugano SS, Kuwata K, et al. Visualization of specific repetitive genomic sequences with fluorescent TALEs in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(21):6101–6110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyanari Y, Ziegler-Birling C, Torres-Padilla ME. Live visualization of chromatin dynamics with fluorescent TALEs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(11):1321–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanisch K, Schneider K, Morbitzer R, et al. Targeting and tracing of specific DNA sequences with dTALEs in living cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(6):e38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan K, O'Farrell PH. TALE-light imaging reveals maternally guided, H3K9me2/3-independent emergence of functional heterochromatin in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 2016;30(5):579–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao S, Zhang W, Hu H, et al. Long-term dual-color tracking of genomic loci by modified sgRNAs of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(9):e86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin P, Parlak M, Kuscu C, et al. Live cell imaging of low- and non-repetitive chromosome loci using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):14725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anton T, Bultmann S, Leonhardt H, et al. Visualization of specific DNA sequences in living mouse embryonic stem cells with a programmable fluorescent CRISPR/Cas system. Nucleus. 2014;5(2):163–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Tu LC, Naseri A, et al. Multiplexed labeling of genomic loci with dCas9 and engineered sgRNAs using CRISPRainbow. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(5):528–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Hao Y, Zhang L, et al. Multiplexed superresolution CRISPR imaging of chromatin in living cells. CCS Chem. 2019;1:278–285.
   Google Scholar
• Duan J, Lu G, Hong Y, et al. Live imaging and tracking of genome regions in CRISPR/dCas9 knock-in mice. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujimoto S, Matsunaga S. Visualization of chromatin loci with transiently expressed CRISPR/Cas9 in plants. Cytologia. 2017;82(5):559–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu B, Swigut T, Spencley A, et al. Transcription-coupled changes in nuclear mobility of mammalian cis-regulatory elements. Science. 2018;359(6379):1050–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue Y, Acar M. Live-cell imaging of chromatin condensation dynamics by CRISPR. iScience. 2018;4:216–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takei Y, Shah S, Harvey S, et al. Multiplexed dynamic imaging of genomic loci by combined CRISPR imaging and DNA sequential FISH. Biophys J. 2017;112(9):1773–1776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Wang P, Tian F, et al. Painting a specific chromosome with CRISPR/Cas9 for live-cell imaging. Cell Res. 2017;27(2):298–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Hu J, Almeida R, et al. Expanding the CRISPR imaging toolset with Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 for simultaneous imaging of multiple genomic loci. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(8):e75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Zou W, Xu H, et al. Efficient labeling and imaging of protein-coding genes in living cells using CRISPR-Tag. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5065.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shao S, Chang L, Sun Y, et al. Multiplexed sgRNA expression allows versatile single nonrepetitive DNA labeling and endogenous gene regulation. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7(1):176–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng AW, Jillette N, Lee P, et al. Casilio: a versatile CRISPR-Cas9-Pumilio hybrid for gene regulation and genomic labeling. Cell Res. 2016;26(2):254–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Tu LC, Naseri A, et al. CRISPR-Sirius: RNA scaffolds for signal amplification in genome imaging. Nat Methods. 2018;15(11):928–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Lu G, Duan J, et al. Comparison and optimization of CRISPR/dCas9/gRNA genome-labeling systems for live cell imaging. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dreissig S, Schiml S, Schindele P, et al. Live-cell CRISPR imaging in plants reveals dynamic telomere movements. Plant J. 2017;91(4):565–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neguembor MV, Sebastian-Perez R, Aulicino F, et al. (Po)STAC (Polycistronic SunTAg modified CRISPR) enables live-cell and fixed-cell super-resolution imaging of multiple genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(5):e30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi S, Schindele P, Gladilin E, et al. Application of aptamers improves CRISPR-based live imaging of plant telomeres. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Y, Rocha PP, Luo VM, et al. CRISPR-dCas9 and sgRNA scaffolds enable dual-colour live imaging of satellite sequences and repeat-enriched individual loci. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):11707.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang S, Su JH, Zhang F, et al. An RNA-aptamer-based two-color CRISPR labeling system. Sci. Rep. 2016;6(1):26857.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maass PG, Barutcu AR, Shechner DM, et al. Spatiotemporal allele organization by allele-specific CRISPR live-cell imaging (SNP-CLING). Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018;25(2):176–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Song Z. Aio-Casilio: a robust CRISPR–Cas9–Pumilio system for chromosome labeling. J Mol Hist. 2017;48(4):293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clow P, Jillette N, Zhu J, et al. CRISPR-mediated multiplexed live cell imaging of nonrepetitive genomic loci. bioRxiv. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.03.974923
   Google Scholar
• Ma H, Tu LC, Naseri A, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 nuclear dynamics and target recognition in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 2016;214(5):529–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Mao S, Ying Y, et al. Progress and challenges for live-cell imaging of genomic loci using CRISPR-based platforms. Gen Prot Bioinfo. 2019;17(2):119–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao S, Ying Y, Wu X, et al. CRISPR/dual-FRET molecular beacon for sensitive live-cell imaging of non-repetitive genomic loci. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(20):e131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Los GV, Encell LP, McDougall MG, et al. HaloTag: a novel protein labeling technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. ACS Chem Biol. 2008;3(6):373–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight SC, Xie L, Deng W, et al. Dynamics of CRISPR-Cas9 genome interrogation in living cells. Science. 2015;350(6262):823–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng W, Shi X, Tjian R, et al. CASFISH: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated in situ labeling of genomic loci in fixed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(38):11870–11875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii T, Schubert V, Khosravi S, et al. RNA-guided endonuclease – in situ labelling (RGEN-ISL): a fast CRISPR/Cas9-based method to label genomic sequences in various species . New Phytol. 2019;222(3):1652–1661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Němečková A, Wäsch C, Schubert V, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-based RGEN-ISL allows the simultaneous and specific visualization of proteins, DNA repeats, and sites of DNA replication. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2019;159(1):48–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Nakamura M, Abbott TR, et al. CRISPR-mediated live imaging of genome editing and transcription. Science. 2019;365(6459):1301–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Wang M, Li W, et al. Live visualization of HIV-1 proviral DNA using a dual-color-labeled CRISPR system. Anal Chem. 2017;89(23):12896–12901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YB, Tang YD, Hu Y, et al. Single virus tracking with quantum dots packaged into enveloped viruses using CRISPR. Nano Lett. 2020;20(2):1417–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunde BM, Moore C, Varani G. RNA-binding proteins: modular design for efficient function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(6):479–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangelo PJ, Nix B, Tsourkas A, et al. Dual FRET molecular beacons for mRNA detection in living cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(6):e57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangelo PJ, Lifland AW, Curt P, et al. Single molecule-sensitive probes for imaging RNA in live cells. Nat Methods. 2009;6(5):347–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipovska A, Razif MF, Nygård KK, et al. A universal code for RNA recognition by PUF proteins. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(7):425–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Ma Z, Wu X, et al. A molecular beacon-based approach for live-cell imaging of RNA transcripts with minimal target engineering at the single-molecule level. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):1550.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyagi S, Kramer FR. Molecular beacons: probes that fluoresce upon hybridization. Nat Biotechnol. 1996;14(3):303–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirri V, Jourdan N, Hernandez-Verdun D, et al. Sharing of mitotic pre-ribosomal particles between daughter cells. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(8):1592–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koberna K, Malínský J, Pliss A, et al. Ribosomal genes in focus: new transcripts label the dense fibrillar components and form clusters indicative of “Christmas trees” in situ. J Cell Biol. 2002;157(5):743–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Ari Y, Brody Y, Kinor N, et al. The life of an mRNA in space and time. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 10):1761–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson DR, Zenklusen D, Wu B, et al. Real-time observation of transcription initiation and elongation on an endogenous yeast gene. Science. 2011;332(6028):475–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B, Chao JA, Singer RH. Fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy enables quantitative imaging of single mRNAs in living cells. Biophys J. 2012;102(12):2936–2944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Femino AM, Fay FS, Fogarty K, et al. Visualization of single RNA transcripts in situ. Science. 1998;280(5363):585–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj A, van den Bogaard P, Rifkin SA, et al. Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes. Nat Methods. 2008;5(10):877–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen KH, Boettiger AN, Moffitt JR, et al. RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science. 2015;348(6233):aaa6090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelles DA, Fang MY, O'Connell MR, et al. Programmable RNA tracking in live cells with CRISPR/Cas9. Cell. 2016;165(2):488–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abudayyeh OO, Gootenberg JS, Essletzbichler P, et al. RNA targeting with CRISPR-Cas13. Nature. 2017;550(7675):280–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun NH, Chen DY, Ye LP, et al. CRISPR-sunspot: imaging of endogenous low-abundance RNA at the single-molecule level in live cells. Theranostics. 2020;10(24):10993–11012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil TT, Parton RM, Davis I. Making the message clear: visualizing mRNA localization. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20(7):380–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Chen K, Wu Q, et al. RCasFISH: CRISPR/dCas9-mediated in situ imaging of mRNA transcripts in fixed cells and tissues. Anal Chem. 2020;92(3):2468–2475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Deng S, Ge T, et al. Live cell imaging and proteomic profiling of endogenous NEAT1 lncRNA by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in. Protein Cell. 2020;11(9):641–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang DJ, Cao T, Huang ZM, et al. Crosslinking catalytic hairpin assembly for high-contrast imaging of multiple mRNAs in living cells. Chem Commun. 2019;55(27):3899–3902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li S, Zhang L, et al. A sensitive and specific method for microRNA detection and in situ imaging based on a CRISPR–Cas9 modified catalytic hairpin assembly. RSC Adv. 2020;10(47):28037–28040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford L, Palmer A. Recent advances in development of genetically encoded fluorescent sensors. Methods Enzymol. 2017;589:1–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund L, Björling E, Oksvold P, et al. A genecentric human protein atlas for expression profiles based on antibodies. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7(10):2019–2027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egelhofer TA, Minoda A, Klugman S, et al. An assessment of histone-modification antibody quality. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18(1):91–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel MC, Wieland T, Tsujimoto G. How reliable are G-protein-coupled receptor antibodies? Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharma. 2009;379(4):385–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda R, Harvey CD, Zhong H, et al. Supersensitive Ras activation in dendrites and spines revealed by two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(2):283–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura K, Judkewitz B, Kano M, et al. Targeted patch-clamp recordings and single-cell electroporation of unlabeled neurons in vivo. Nat Methods. 2008;5(1):61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AEl-Din E-H, Schnell E, Chetkovich DM, et al. PSD-95 involvement in maturation of excitatory synapses. Science. 2000;290(5495):1364–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikuni T, Nishiyama J, Sun Y, et al. High-throughput, high-resolution mapping of protein localization in mammalian brain by in vivo genome editing. Cell. 2016;165(7):1803–1817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin DA, Tillo SE, Yang G, et al. Live imaging of endogenous PSD-95 using ENABLED: a conditional strategy to fluorescently label endogenous proteins. J Neurosci. 2014;34(50):16698–16712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Siao CJ, Nagappan G, et al. Neuronal release of proBDNF. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(2):113–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross GG, Junge JA, Mora RJ, et al. Recombinant probes for visualizing endogenous synaptic proteins in living neurons. Neuron. 2013;78(6):971–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki K, Tsunekawa Y, Hernandez-Benitez R, et al. In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration. Nature. 2016;540(7631):144–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Z, Bozzella M, Seluanov A, et al. DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(18):2902–2906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer WD, Ehmsen KT, Liu J. Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet. 2010;44:113–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014;157(6):1262–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh-Gohari N, Helleday T. Conservative homologous recombination preferentially repairs DNA double-strand breaks in the S phase of the cell cycle in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(12):3683–3688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiyama J, Mikuni T, Yasuda R. Virus-mediated genome editing via homology-directed repair in mitotic and postmitotic cells in mammalian brain. Neuron. 2017;96(4):755–768.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsunekawa Y, Terhune RK, Fujita I, et al. Developing a de novo targeted knock-in method based on in utero electroporation into the mammalian brain. Development. 2016;143(17):3216–3222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uemura T, Mori T, Kurihara T, et al. Fluorescent protein tagging of endogenous protein in brain neurons using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in and in utero electroporation techniques. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):35861.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao Y, Hisey E, Bradshaw TWA, et al. Plug-and-play protein modification using homology-independent universal genome engineering. Neuron. 2019;103(4):583–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiyama D, Sekine S, Barsi-Rhyne B, et al. Versatile protein tagging in cells with split fluorescent protein. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):11046.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwinn MK, Machleidt T, Zimmerman K, et al. CRISPR-mediated tagging of endogenous proteins with a luminescent peptide. ACS Chem Biol. 2018;13(2):467–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Xu X, Nguyen CM, et al. CRISPR-mediated programmable 3D genome positioning and nuclear organization. Cell. 2018;175(5):1405–1417.e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar