Bacterial genome reduction for optimal chassis of synthetic biology: a review

References

• Martinez-Garcia E, de Lorenzo V. The quest for the minimal bacterial genome. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;42:216–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung BH, Choe D, Kim SC, et al. Construction of a minimal genome as a chassis for synthetic biology. Essays Biochem. 2016;60:337–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi H, Wang X, Shao Y, et al. Engineering and modification of microbial chassis for systems and synthetic biology. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2019;4:25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier JF, Sun L, Wise KS, et al. Genetic requirements for cell division in a genomically minimal cell. Cell. 2021;184:2430–2440.e16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredens J, Wang K, de la Torre D, et al. Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome. Nature. 2019;569:514–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe D, Cho S, Kim SC, et al. Minimal genome: worthwhile or worthless efforts toward being smaller? Biotechnol J. 2016;11:199–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurokawa M, Ying BW. Experimental challenges for reduced genomes: the cell model Escherichia coli. Microorganisms. 2019;8:3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng C, Lin Y, Luo H, et al. A comprehensive overview of online resources to identify and predict bacterial essential genes. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou D, Jiang Z, Pang Q, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-assisted seamless genome editing in Lactobacillus plantarum and its application in N-acetylglucosamine production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e01367-19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang P, Wang J, Qi Q. Prophage recombinases-mediated genome engineering in Lactobacillus plantarum. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhou H, Chen H, et al. Discovery of recombinases enables genome mining of cryptic biosynthetic gene clusters in Burkholderiales species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E4255–E4263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin J, Zhu H, Xia L, et al. A new recombineering system for Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e36–e36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolisnychenko V, Plunkett G, Herring CD, et al. Engineering a reduced Escherichia coli genome. Genome Res. 2002;12:640–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu M, Uchiyama T, Omura S, et al. Genome-minimized Streptomyces host for the heterologous expression of secondary metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:2646–2651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwadate Y, Honda H, Sato H, et al. Oxidative stress sensitivity of engineered Escherichia coli cells with a reduced genome. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;322:25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhu X, Zhang X, et al. Characterization of genome-reduced Bacillus subtilis strains and their application for the production of guanosine and thymidine. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya K, Cao YY, Kurokawa M, et al. A decay effect of the growth rate associated with genome reduction in Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18:101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Couto JM, Glidle A, et al. Single-cell microfluidics to study the effects of genome deletion on bacterial growth behavior. ACS Synth Biol. 2017;6:2219–2227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki N, Inui M, Yukawa H. Random genome deletion methods applicable to prokaryotes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;79:519–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw D, Miravet-Verde S, Pinero-Lambea C, et al. LoxTnSeq: random transposon insertions combined with cre/lox recombination and counterselection to generate large random genome reductions. Microb Biotechnol. 2021;14:2403–2419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernyik V, Karcagi I, Timar E, et al. Exploring the fitness benefits of genome reduction in Escherichia coli by a selection-driven approach. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goryshin IY, Naumann TA, Apodaca J, et al. Chromosomal deletion formation system based on Tn5 double transposition: use for making minimal genomes and essential gene analysis. Genome Res. 2003;13:644–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuge Y, Suzuki N, Inui M, et al. Random segment deletion based on IS31831 and Cre/loxP excision system in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:1333–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leprince A, de Lorenzo V, Voller P, et al. Random and cyclical deletion of large DNA segments in the genome of Pseudomonas putida. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:1444–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, Su T, Liu J, et al. Reduction of the bacterial genome by transposon-mediated random deletion. ACS Synth Biol. 2022;11:668–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, Su T, Liu J, et al. Random genome reduction coupled with polyhydroxybutyrate biosynthesis to facilitate its accumulation in Escherichia coli. Front Bioeng Biotech. 2022;10:978211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto M, Ichimura T, Mizoguchi H, et al. Cell size and nucleoid organization of engineered Escherichia coli cells with a reduced genome. Mol Microbiol. 2005;55:137–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizoguchi H, Sawano Y, Kato J, et al. Superpositioning of deletions promotes growth of Escherichia coli with a reduced genome. DNA Res. 2008;15:277–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posfai G, Plunkett G, Feher T, et al. Emergent properties of reduced-genome Escherichia coli. Science. 2006;312:1044–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokawa Y, Kawano H, Tanaka-Masuda K, et al. Genetic manipulations restored the growth fitness of reduced-genome Escherichia coli. J Biosci Bioeng. 2013;116:52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park MK, Lee SH, Yang KS, et al. Enhancing recombinant protein production with an Escherichia coli host strain lacking insertion sequences. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:6701–6713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umenhoffer K, Draskovits G, Nyerges A, et al. Genome-wide abolishment of mobile genetic elements using genome shuffling and CRISPR/Cas-assisted MAGE allows the efficient stabilization of a bacterial chassis. ACS Synth Biol. 2017;6:1471–1483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tilburg AY, van Heel AJ, Stulke J, et al. MiniBacillus PG10 as a convenient and effective production host for lantibiotics. ACS Synth Biol. 2020;9:1833–1842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuß DR, Altenbuchner J, Mäder U, et al. Large-scale reduction of the Bacillus subtilis genome: consequences for the transcriptional network, resource allocation, and metabolism. Genome Res. 2017;27:289–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalik S, Reder A, Richts B, et al. The Bacillus subtilis minimal genome compendium. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10:2767–2771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unthan S, Baumgart M, Radek A, et al. Chassis organism from Corynebacterium glutamicum a top-down approach to identify and delete irrelevant gene clusters. Biotechnol J. 2015;10:290–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgart M, Unthan S, Kloß R, et al. Corynebacterium glutamicum chassis C1*: building and testing a novel platform host for synthetic biology and industrial biotechnology. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7:132–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieder S, Nikel PI, de Lorenzo V, et al. Genome reduction boosts heterologous gene expression in Pseudomonas putida. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang P, Zhang Y, Xu B, et al. Deletion of genomic islands in the Pseudomonas putida KT2440 genome can create an optimal chassis for synthetic biology applications. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19:70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu QT, Yu P, Wang J, et al. Rational construction of genome-reduced and high-efficient industrial Streptomyces chassis based on multiple comparative genomic approaches. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antczak M, Michaelis M, Wass MN. Environmental conditions shape the nature of a minimal bacterial genome. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Lin Y, Liu T, et al. DEG 15, an update of the database of essential genes that includes built-in analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D677–D686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:2006.0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji Y, Zhang B, Horn SFV, et al. Identification of critical Staphylococcal genes using conditional phenotypes generated by antisense RNA. Science. 2001;293:2266–2269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdes SY, Scholle MD, Campbell JW, et al. Experimental determination and system level analysis of essential genes in Escherichia coli MG1655. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:5673–5684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousset F, Cui L, Siouve E, et al. Genome-wide CRISPR-dCas9 screens in E. coli identify essential genes and phage host factors. PLoS Genet. 2018;14:e1007749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Berardinis V, Vallenet D, Castelli V, et al. A complete collection of single-gene deletion mutants of Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4:174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nlebedim VU, Chaudhuri RR, Walters K. Probabilistic identification of bacterial essential genes via insertion density using TraDIS data with Tn5 libraries. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:4343–4349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall ECA, Robinson A, Johnston IG, et al. The essential genome of Escherichia coli K-12. mBio. 2018;9:e02096-17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain AK, Barquist L, Goodman AL, et al. A decade of advances in transposon-insertion sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2020;21:526–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski JD, Wong SMS, Giannoukos G, et al. Tracking insertion mutants within libraries by deep sequencing and a genome-wide screen for Haemophilus genes required in the lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:16422–16427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SA, Gallagher LA, Thongdee M, et al. General and condition-specific essential functions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:5189–5194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner KH, Wessel AK, Palmer GC, et al. Essential genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis sputum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:4110–4115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurumayum S, Jiang P, Hao X, et al. OGEE v3: online GEne essentiality database with increased coverage of organisms and human cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49: d998–D1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Wang SX, Liu W, et al. CEG 2.0: an updated database of clusters of essential genes including eukaryotic organisms. Database. 2020;2020:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu Y, Yang L, Liu Z, et al. Gene essentiality prediction based on fractal features and machine learning. Mol Biosyst. 2017;13:577–584.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ren J, Lee J, Na D. Recent advances in genetic engineering tools based on synthetic biology. J Microbiol. 2020;58:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hille F, Richter H, Wong SP, et al. The biology of CRISPR-Cas: backward and forward. Cell. 2018;172:1239–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Z, Zheng H, Zhang J, et al. A CRISPR/Cas9-mediated, homology-independent tool developed for targeted genome integration in Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87:e02666-20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So Y, Park SY, Park EH, et al. A highly efficient CRISPR-Cas9-mediated large genomic deletion in Bacillus subtilis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Guo L, Wang J, et al. Efficient long fragment editing technique enables large-scale and scarless bacterial genome engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:7943–7956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian J, Xing B, Li M, et al. Efficient large-scale and scarless genome engineering enables the construction and screening of Bacillus subtilis biofuel overproducers. IJMS. 2022;23:4853.
   Google Scholar
• Yu BJ, Sung BH, Koob MD, et al. Minimization of the Escherichia coli genome using a Tn5-targeted Cre/loxP excision system. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:1018–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Liu M, Zhang J, et al. Mapping of nonhomologous end Joining-mediated integration facilitates genome-scale trackable mutagenesis in Yarrowia lipolytica. ACS Synth Biol. 2022;11:216–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand C, Thibessard A, Bruand C, et al. Bacterial NHEJ: a never ending story. Mol Microbiol. 2019;111:1139–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chayot R, Montagne B, Mazel D, et al. An end-joining repair mechanism in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:2141–2146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya S, Soniata MM, Walkera D, et al. Phage Mu Gam protein promotes NHEJ in concert with Escherichia coli ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:e11614–E11622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Y, Dong H, Ma Y, et al. Strategies for applying nonhomologous end joining-mediated genome editing in prokaryotes. ACS Synth Biol. 2019;8:2194–2202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su T, Liu F, Gu P, et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 assisted non-homologous end-joining strategy for one-step engineering of bacterial genome. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Li SY, Zhao GP, et al. An efficient system for deletion of large DNA fragments in Escherichia coli via introduction of both Cas9 and the non-homologous end joining system from Mycobacterium smegmatis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;485:768–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Ding T, Wang J, et al. CRISPR-Cas9-assisted native end-joining editing offers a simple strategy for efficient genetic engineering in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:8497–8509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su T, Liu F, Chang Y, et al. The phage T4 DNA ligase mediates bacterial chromosome DSBs repair as single component non-homologous end joining. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2019;4:107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y, Charusanti P, Zhang L, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 based engineering of Actinomycetal genomes. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:1020–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan MY, Li SS, Ding XY, et al. A CRISPR-assisted nonhomologous end-joining strategy for efficient genome editing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. mBio. 2020;11:e02364-19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csörgő B, León LM, Chau-Ly IJ, et al. A compact Cascade-Cas3 system for targeted genome engineering. Nat Methods. 2020;17:1183–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umenhoffer K, Feher T, Baliko G, et al. Reduced evolvability of Escherichia coli MDS42, an IS-less cellular chassis for molecular and synthetic biology applications. Microb Cell Fact. 2010;9:38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csörgo B, Fehér T, Tímár E, et al. Low-mutation-rate, reduced-genome Escherichia coli: an improved host for faithful maintenance of engineered genetic constructs. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran H, Wu J, Wu D, et al. Enhanced production of recombinant Thermobifida fusca isoamylase in Escherichia coli MDS42. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2016;180:464–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronda C, Pedersen LE, Sommer MO, et al. CRMAGE: CRISPR optimized MAGE recombineering. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto T, Kadoya R, Endo K, et al. Enhanced recombinant protein productivity by genome reduction in Bacillus subtilis. DNA Res. 2008;15:73–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel M, Altenbuchner J. Development of a markerless gene deletion system for Bacillus subtilis based on the mannose phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system. Microbiology (Reading). 2015;161:1942–1949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ara K, Ozaki K, Nakamura K, et al. Bacillus minimum genome factory: effective utilization of microbial genome information. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2007;46:169–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manabe K, Kageyama Y, Morimoto T, et al. Combined effect of improved cell yield and increased specific productivity enhances recombinant enzyme production in genome-reduced Bacillus subtilis strain MGB874. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:8370–8381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manabe K, Kageyama Y, Morimoto T, et al. Improved production of secreted heterologous enzyme in Bacillus subtilis strain MGB874 via modification of glutamate metabolism and growth conditions. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toya Y, Hirasawa T, Morimoto T, et al. 13C-metabolic flux analysis in heterologous cellulase production by Bacillus subtilis genome-reduced strain. J Biotechnol. 2014;179:42–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar Suárez R, Stülke J, van Dijl JM. Less is more: toward a genome-reduced Bacillus cell factory for "difficult proteins. ACS Synth Biol. 2019;8:99–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgart M, Unthan S, Rückert C, et al. Construction of a prophage-free variant of Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 for use as a platform strain for basic research and industrial biotechnology. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:6006–6015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendisch VF. Genome-reduced Corynebacterium glutamicum fit for biotechnological applications. In: Lara, AR, Gosset, G, editors. Minimal cells: design, construction, biotechnological applications. Switzerland: Springer Cham Press; 2020. p. 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Liu X, Jiang W, et al. Recent advances in synthetic biology approaches to optimize production of bioactive natural products in Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurokawa M, Seno S, Matsuda H, et al. Correlation between genome reduction and bacterial growth. DNA Res. 2016;23:517–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karcagi I, Draskovits G, Umenhoffer K, et al. Indispensability of horizontally transferred genes and its impact on bacterial genome streamlining. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1257–1269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manabe K, Kageyama Y, Tohata M, et al. High external pH enables more efficient secretion of alkaline α-amylase AmyK38 by Bacillus subtilis. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tilburg AY, Fulleborn JA, Reder A, et al. Unchaining miniBacillus strain PG10: relief of FlgM-mediated repression of autolysin genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87:e0112321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura I, Kurokawa M, Liu L, et al. Coordinated changes in mutation and growth rates induced by genome reduction. mBio. 2017;8:e00676-17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta S, Costantino N, Zhou X, et al. Identification and analysis of recombineering functions from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and their phages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:1626–1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Wang Q, Su T, et al. Identification of phage recombinase function unit in genus Corynebacterium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105:5067–5075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosberg JA, Gregg CJ, Lajoie MJ, et al. Improving lambda red genome engineering in Escherichia coli via rational removal of endogenous nucleases. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue X, Wang T, Jiang P, et al. MEGA (multiple essential genes assembling) deletion and replacement method for genome reduction in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:700–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Wu R, Xue X, et al. CasHRA (Cas9-facilitated homologous recombination assembly) method of constructing megabase-sized DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:e124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison CA, Chuang RY, Noskov VN, et al. Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science. 2016;351:aad6253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe D, Lee JH, Yoo M, et al. Adaptive laboratory evolution of a genome-reduced Escherichia coli. Nat Commun. 2019;10:935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmerich J, Labib M, Steffens C, et al. Screening of a genome-reduced Corynebacterium glutamicum strain library for improved heterologous cutinase secretion. Microb Biotechnol. 2020;13:2020–2031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Pang Q, Wang Q, et al. Modular tuning engineering and versatile applications of genetically encoded biosensors. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2022;42:1010–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang Q, Han H, Liu X, et al. In vivo evolutionary engineering of riboswitch with high-threshold for N-acetylneuraminic acid production. Metab Eng. 2020;59:36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Li X, Liu Y, et al. Pyruvate-responsive genetic circuits for dynamic control of central metabolism. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16:1261–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Li Y, Xu Y, et al. Development of bifunctional biosensors for sensing and dynamic control of glycolysis flux in metabolic engineering. Metab Eng. 2021;68:142–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar