Buckwheat OMICS: present status and future prospects

References

• FAOSTAT. 2021. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC2017
   Google Scholar
• Morishita T, Hara T, Hara T. Important agronomic characteristics of yielding ability in common buckwheat; ecotype and ecological differentiation, preharvest sprouting resistance, shattering resistance, and lodging resistance. Breed. Sci. 2020;70:39–47. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.19020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Huang L, Gou J, et al. Genetic relationships among buckwheat (Fagopyrum) species from southwest China based on chloroplast and nuclear SSR markers. J Genet. 2014;93:849–853. doi: 10.1007/s12041-014-0439-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrungoo NK, Chettry U. Buckwheat: a critical approach towards assessment of its potential as a super crop. Indian J. Genet. 2021;81:1–23. doi: 10.31742/IJGPB.81.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonafaccia G, Gambelli L, Fabjan N, et al. Trace elements in flour and bran from common and tartary buckwheat. Food Chem. 2003;83:1–5. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00228-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreft I, Zhou M, Golob A, et al. Breeding buckwheat for nutritional quality. Breed. Sci. 2020;70:67–73. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.19016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui K, Walker AR. Biosynthesis and regulation of flavonoids in buckwheat. Breed. Sci. 2020;70:74–84. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.19041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovaya SA, Klykov AG. Some aspects of flavonoid biosynthesis and accumulation in buckwheat plants. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2020;14:213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi DC, Chaudhari GV, Sood S, et al. Revisiting the versatile buckwheat: reinvigorating genetic gains through integrated breeding and genomics approach. Planta. 2019;250:783–801. doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-03080-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Campbell CG. Tartary buckwheat breeding (Fagopyrum tataricum L. Gaertn.) through hybridization with its Rice-Tartary type. Euphytica. 2007;156:399–405. doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9389-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Wen L, Li Z, et al. Advance on the benefits of bioactive peptides from buckwheat. Phytochem Rev. 2015;14:381–388. doi: 10.1007/s11101-014-9390-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Hu D, Liu X, et al. Effects of uniconazole on the lignin metabolism and lodging resistance of culm in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.). F Crop Res. 2015;180:46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Li X, Ma B, et al. The tartary buckwheat genome provides insights into rutin biosynthesis and abiotic stress tolerance. Mol Plant. 2017;10:1224–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Lv Q, Deng J, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals key seed-development genes in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum). Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui K, Yasui Y. Buckwheat heteromorphic self-incompatibility: genetics, genomics and application to breeding. Breed Sci. 2020;70:32–38. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.19083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshima R, Nishio T, Komatsu S, et al. Identification of a gene encoding polygalacturonase expressed specifically in short styles in distylous common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum). Heredity. 2019;123:492–502. doi: 10.1038/s41437-019-0227-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasui Y, Mori M, Matsumoto D, et al. Construction of a BAC library for buckwheat genome research - An application to positional cloning of agriculturally valuable traits. Genes Genet. Syst. 2008;83:393–401. doi: 10.1266/ggs.83.393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasui Y, Mori M, Aii J, et al. S-LOCUS EARLY FLOWERING 3 is exclusively present in the genomes of short-styled buckwheat plants that exhibit heteromorphic self-incompatibility. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang X, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, et al. De novo transcriptome assembly and identification of genes related to seed size in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.). Breed Sci. 2019;69:487–497. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.18194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Bai X, Zhao W, et al. De novo assembly and analysis of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum garetn.) transcriptome discloses key regulators involved in salt-stress response. Genes. 2017;8:255. doi: 10.3390/genes8100255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson T, Thistleton J, Higgins TJ, et al. Efficient Agrobacterium transformation of elite wheat germplasm without selection. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014;119:647–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YK, Xu H, Park WT, et al. Genetic transformation of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.) with Agrobacterium rhizogenes and production of rutin in transformed root cultures. Aust J Crop Sci. 2010;4:485–490.
   Google Scholar
• Park N, Il, Li X, Thwe AA, et al. Enhancement of rutin in Fagopyrum esculentum hairy root cultures by the Arabidopsis transcription factor AtMYB12. Biotechnol Lett. 2012;34:577–583. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0807-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thwe AA, Kim JK, Li X, et al. Metabolomic analysis and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in hairy root culture of tartary buckwheat cultivars. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65349. doi: 10.1371/annotation/e3bbacf5-42a6-4010-869a-1c999804869f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CH, Thwe AA, Kim SJ, et al. Effect of auxins on anthocyanin accumulation in hairy root cultures of tartary buckwheat cultivar Hokkai T10. Nat Prod Commun. 2016;11(9):1283–1286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varzakas T, Zakynthinos G, Verpoort F. Plant food residues as a source of nutraceuticals and functional foods. Foods. 2016;5:88. doi: 10.3390/foods5040088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mir RA, Nazir M, Naik S, et al. Utilizing the underutilized plant resources for development of life style foods: putting nutrigenomics to use.Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022;171:128–138. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.12.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates S, Lagüe M, Knox R, et al. Crop Information Engine and Research Assistant (CIERA) for managing genealogy, phenotypic and genotypic data for breeding programs. bioRxiv. 2018. 10.1101/439505v4
   Google Scholar
• Coppens F, Wuyts N, Inzé D, et al. Unlocking the potential of plant phenotyping data through integration and data-driven approaches. Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2017;4:58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.07.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhondt S, Wuyts N, Inzé D. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:428–439. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Kim JK, Park SY, et al. Comparative analysis of flavonoids and polar metabolite profiling of tanno-original and tanno-high rutin buckwheat. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62:2701–2708. doi: 10.1021/jf4049534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sytar O, Bruckova K, Plotnitskaya A, et al. Non-destructive methodology in comparative physiology of buckwheat genotypes within the different origin. Fagopyrum. 1970;36:11–21. doi: 10.3986/fag0007.
   Google Scholar
• Yasui Y, Hirakawa H, Ueno M, et al. Assembly of the draft genome of buckwheat and its applications in identifying agronomically useful genes. DNA Res. 2016;23:215–224. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsw012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CL, Ding MQ, Zou CY, et al. Comparative analysis of four buckwheat species based on morphology and complete chloroplast genome sequences. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6514. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06638-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma KH, Kim NS, Lee GA, et al. Development of SSR markers for studies of diversity in the genus Fagopyrum. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;119:1247–1254. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1129-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana JC, Singh M, Chauhan RS, et al. Genetic resources of buckwheat in India. In: Zhou M, Kreft I, Woo SH, Chrungoo N, Wieslander G, editors. Molecular breeding and nutritional aspects of buckwheat. UK: Academic Press; 2016. pp. 109–135.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Sharma SK, Rana JC, et al. AFLP fingerprinting of tartary buckwheat accessions (Fagopyrum tataricum) displaying rutin content variation. Fitoterapia. 2012;83:1131–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.04.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SQ, Howard Zhang Q. Advances in the development of functional foods from buckwheat. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2001;41:451–464. doi: 10.1080/20014091091887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielińska D, Turemko M, Kwiatkowski J, et al. Evaluation of flavonoid contents and antioxidant capacity of the aerial parts of common and tartary buckwheat plants. Molecules. 2012;17:9668–9682. doi: 10.3390/molecules17089668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma TR, Jana S. Species relationships in Fagopyrum revealed by PCR-based DNA fingerprinting. Theor Appl Genet. 2002;105:306–312. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-0938-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick R. Nutrigenomics, individualism and public health. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63:161–166. doi: 10.1079/PNS2003329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe JW, Navarro SL, Hullar MAJ, et al. Inter-individual differences in response to dietary intervention: integrating omics platforms towards personalised dietary recommendations. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72:207–218. doi: 10.1017/S0029665113000025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afman L, Müller M. Nutrigenomics: from molecular nutrition to prevention of disease. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:569–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.01.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramesha C, Kumari SS, Anuradha CM, et al. Nutrigenomic analysis of mulberry silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) strains using polymerase chain reaction - simple sequence repeats (PCR-SSR). Int J Biotechnol Mol Biol Res. 2010;1:92–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kore KB, Pathak AK, Gadekar YP. Nutrigenomics: emerging face of molecular nutrition to improve animal health and production. Vet World. 2008;1(9):285–286.
   Google Scholar
• DeBusk RM. Nutritional genomics: the foundation for personalized nutrition, what is nutritional genomicsl. In: Sareen S. G, Smith JL, G. JL, editors. Advanced nutrition and human metabolism. 5th ed. Australia: Wadsworth-Cengage Learning; 2009. p. 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput J, Noble J, Hatipoglu B, et al. Application of nutrigenomic concepts to Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2007;17(2):89–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo XD, Ma YJ, Parry J, et al. Phenolics content and antioxidant activity of tartary buckwheat from different locations. Molecules. 2011;16:9850–9867. doi: 10.3390/molecules16129850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sytar O. Phenolic acids in the inflorescences of different varieties of buckwheat and their antioxidant activity. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2015;27:136–142.
   Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI. Proteogenomics: concepts, applications and computational strategies. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1114–1125. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best A, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz R. A hundred-year-old insight into the gut microbiome!. Gut Pathog. 2009;1:21. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-1-21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Hou Z, Liu D, et al. Tartary buckwheat flavonoids protect hepatic cells against high glucose-induced oxidative stress and insulin resistance via MAPK signaling pathways. Food Funct. 2016;7:1523–1536. doi: 10.1039/C5FO01467K.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan C, Guo J, Zhang ML. Research progress of flavonoids in buckwheat. Food Nutr China. 2015;21:65–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bai YC, Li CL, Zhang JW, et al. Characterization of two tartary buckwheat R2R3-MYB transcription factors and their regulation of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis. Physiol Plant. 2014;152(3):431–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X, Zhao H, Yao P, et al. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor FtMYB15 involved in the synthesis of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidins from tartary buckwheat. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018;37:76–84. doi: 10.1007/s00344-017-9709-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Jiang C, Huang C, et al. The light-induced transcription factor FtMYB116 promotes accumulation of rutin in Fagopyrum tataricum. Plant Cell Environ. 2019;42:1340–1351. doi: 10.1111/pce.13470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo XP, Li SJ, Yao PF, et al. The jasmonate-ZIM domain protein FtJAZ2 interacts with the R2R3-MYB transcription factor FtMYB3 to affect anthocyanin biosynthesis in tartary buckwheat. Turkish J Biol. 2017;41:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Ma Z, Zheng T, et al. Insights into the correlation between Physiological changes in and seed development of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.). BMC Genomics. 2018;19:648. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5036-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Jarvis DI, Ahmed S, et al. Tartary buckwheat genetic diversity in the himalayas associated with farmer landrace diversity and low dietary dependence. Sustain. 2017;9:1806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Wang T, Liu M, et al. Transcriptome analysis of filling stage seeds among three buckwheat species with emphasis on rutin accumulation. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0189672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo JS, Suh HY, Park SY, et al. Structural basis for protein recognition by B30.2/SPRY domains. Mol Cell. 2006;24:967–976. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo SH, Fukuda M, Islam N, et al. Efficient peptide mapping and its application to identify embryo proteins in rice proteome analysis. Electrophoresis. 2002;23:647–654. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683(200202)23:4<647::AID-ELPS647>3.0.CO;2-O.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda M, Islam N, Woo SH, et al. Assessing matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry as a means of rapid embryo protein identification in rice. Electrophoresis. 2003;24:1319–1329. doi: 10.1002/elps.200390168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chui H, Chan M, Hernandez D, et al. Rapid, sensitive, and specific Escherichia coli H antigen typing by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight-based peptide mass fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:2480–2485. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00593-15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matros A, Kaspar S, Witzel K, et al. Recent progress in liquid chromatography-based separation and label-free quantitative plant proteomics. Phytochemistry. 2011;72:963–974. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam MH, Heo EJ, Kim JY, et al. Proteome analysis of the responses of Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer leaves to high light: use of electrospray ionization quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry and expressed sequence tag data. Proteomics. 2003;3:2351–2367. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park PJ. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:669–680. doi: 10.1038/nrg2641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radović SR, Maksimović VR, Varkonji-Gašić EI. Characterization of buckwheat seed storage proteins. J Agric Food Chem. 1996;44:972–974. doi: 10.1021/jf950655x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu F. Chemical composition and health effects of Tartary buckwheat. Food Chem. 2016;203:231–245. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashiguchi A, Yoshioka H, Komatsu S. Proteomic analysis of temperature dependency of buckwheat seed dormancy and quality degradation. Theor Exp Plant Physiol. 2018;30:77–88. doi: 10.1007/s40626-018-0104-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Sharma SK, Rana JC, et al. Expression of flavonoid biosynthesis genes vis-à-vis rutin content variation in different growth stages of Fagopyrum species. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168:2117–2123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Wang J, Guo Y. Microwave irradiation enhances the germination rate of tartary buckwheat and content of some compounds in its sprouts. Polish J Food Nutr Sci. 2018;68(3):195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gang W, Gang W, Wang J, et al. Effects of quercetin nanoliposomes on C6 glioma cells through induction of type III programmed cell death. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:271–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng XK, Zhang L, Wang WW, et al. Anti-diabetic activity and potential mechanism of total flavonoids of Selaginella tamariscina (Beauv.) Spring in rats induced by high fat diet and low dose STZ. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137(1):662–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaryan H, Arabyan E, Oo A, et al. Flavonoids: promising natural compounds against viral infections. Arch Virol. 2017;162:2539–2551. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3417-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaoming W, Ling L, Jinghang Z. Antioxidant and Anti-Fatigue Activities of Flavonoids From Puerariae Radix. African J Tradit Complement Altern Med [Internet]. 2012;9:221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsai H, Deng H, Tsai S, et al. Bioactivity comparison of extracts from various parts of common and tartary buckwheats: evaluation of the antioxidant- and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activities. Chem Cent J. 2012;6:78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang ZL, Zhou ML, Tang Y, et al. Bioactive compounds in functional buckwheat food. Food Res. Int. 2012;49:389–395. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.07.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Kim YB, Kim Y, et al. Differential stress-response expression of two flavonol synthase genes and accumulation of flavonols in tartary buckwheat. J Plant Physiol. 2013;170(18):1630–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Zaidul ISM, Suzuki T, et al. Comparison of phenolic compositions between common and tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum) sprouts. Food Chem. 2008;110:814–820. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.02.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesjak M, Beara I, Simin N, et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of quercetin and its derivatives. J Funct Foods. 2018;40:68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojilkovski K, Glavač NK, Kreft S, et al. Fagopyrin and flavonoid contents in common, Tartary, and cymosum buckwheat. J Food Compos Anal. 2013;32:126–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2013.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Lv Q, Ma C, et al. Metabolite profiling and transcriptome analyses provide insights into the flavonoid biosynthesis in the developing seed of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum). J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67:11262–11276. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b03135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakab G, Ton J, Flors V, et al. Enhancing Arabidopsis salt and drought stress tolerance by chemical priming for its abscisic acid responses. Plant Physiol. 2005;139(1):267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes LF, Cisneros-Zevallos L. Electron-beam ionizing radiation stress effects on mango fruit (Mangifera indica L.) antioxidant constituents before and during postharvest storage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007;55:6132–6139. doi: 10.1021/jf0635661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manavalan LP, Guttikonda SK, Phan Tran LS, et al. Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50(7):1260–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzaq MK, Aleem M, Mansoor S, et al. Omics and crispr-cas9 approaches for molecular insight, functional gene analysis, and stress tolerance development in crops. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghesi E, González-Miret ML, Escudero-Gilete ML, et al. Effects of salinity stress on carotenoids, anthocyanins, and color of diverse tomato genotypes. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:11676–11682. doi: 10.1021/jf2021623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Han B, Wang T, et al. Mechanisms of plant salt response: insights from proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2012;11:49–67. doi: 10.1021/pr200861w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Li W, Lv J, et al. Ectopic expression of a wheat MYB transcription factor gene, TaMYB73, improves salinity stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(3):1511–1522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong H, Guo QQ, Chen L, et al. Two Brassica napus genes encoding NAC transcription factors are involved in response to high-salinity stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2012;31:1991–2003. doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1311-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golldack D, Lüking I, Yang O. Plant tolerance to drought and salinity: stress regulating transcription factors and their functional significance in the cellular transcriptional network. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30:1383–1391. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1068-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin P, Wang Q, Shan F, et al. Nutritional composition and flavonoids content of flour from different buckwheat cultivars. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2010;45:951–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu QH, Wang YQ, Song JN, et al. Transcriptomic identification of salt-related genes and de novo assembly in common buckwheat (F. esculentum). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;127:299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germ M, Simčič T, Gaberščik A, et al. UV-B treated algae exhibiting different responses as a food source for Daphnia magna. J Plankton Res. 2004;26:1219–1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaberščik A, Germ M, Škof A, et al. UV-B radiation screen and respiratory potential in two aquatic primary producers: scenedesmus quadricauda and Ceratophyllum demersum. SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010. 2002;28:422–425. doi: 10.1080/03680770.2001.11902616.
   Google Scholar
• Fabjan N, Rode J, Košir IJ, et al. Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) as a source of dietary rutin and quercitrin. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:6452–6455. doi: 10.1021/jf034543e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieza K, Lois R. An arabidopsis mutant tolerant to lethal ultraviolet-b levels shows constitutively elevated accumulation of flavonoids and other phenolics. Plant Physiol. 2001;126:1105–1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreft S, Štrukelj B, Gaberšc̃ik A, et al. Rutin in buckwheat herbs grown at different UV-B radiation levels: comparison of two UV spectrophotometric and an HPLC method. J Exp Bot. 2002;53:1801–1804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kočevar Glavač N, Stojilkovski K, Kreft S, et al. Determination of fagopyrins, rutin, and quercetin in Tartary buckwheat products. LWT. 2017;79:423–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foy CD, Chaney RL, White MC. The Physiology of Metal Toxicity in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 1978;29:511–566. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.002455.
   Google Scholar
• Kochian LV. Cellular mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1995;46:237–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hue NV, Craddock GR, Adams F. Effect of organic acids on aluminum toxicity in subsoils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1986;50:28–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng SJ, Ma JF, Matsumoto H. Continuous secretion of organic acids is related to aluminium resistance during relatively long-term exposure to aluminium stress. Physiol Plant. 1998;103:209–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma JF, Zheng SJ, Matsumoto H, et al. Detoxifying aluminium with buckwheat. Nature. 1997;390:569–570. doi: 10.1038/37518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornyák M, Płażek A, Kopeć P, et al. Photosynthetic activity of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) exposed to thermal stress. Photosynt. 2020;58:45–53. doi: 10.32615/ps.2019.140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Słomka A, Michno K, Dubert F, et al. Embryological background of low seed set in distylous common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) with biased morph ratios, and biostimulant-induced improvement of it. Crop Pasture Sci. 2017;68:680. doi: 10.1071/CP17009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopeć P, Hornyák M, Pastuszak J, et al. Changes in the flower and leaf proteome of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum moench) under high temperature. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:2678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murai M, Ohnishi O. Population genetics of cultivated common buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. X. Diffusion routes revealed by RAPD markers. Genes Genet Syst. 1996;71:211–218. doi: 10.1266/ggs.71.211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konishi T, Yasui Y, Ohnishi O. Original birthplace of cultivated common buckwheat inferred from genetic relationships among cultivated populations and natural populations of wild common buckwheat revealed by AFLP analysis. Genes Genet Syst. 2005;80:113–119. doi: 10.1266/ggs.80.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwata H, Imon K, Tsumura Y, et al. Genetic diversity among Japanese indigenous common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) cultivars as determined from amplified fragment length polymorphism and simple sequence repeat markers and quantitative agronomic traits. Genome. 2005;48:367–377. doi: 10.1139/g04-121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasui Y, Wang Y, Ohnishi O, et al. Amplified fragment length polymorphism linkage analysis of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) and its wild self-pollinated relative Fagopyrum homotropicum. Genome. 2004;47:345–351. doi: 10.1139/g03-126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yabe S, Hara T, Ueno M, et al. Rapid genotyping with DNA micro-arrays for high-density linkage mapping and QTL mapping in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Breed. Sci. 2014;64:291–299. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.64.291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara T, Iwata H, Okuno K, et al. QTL analysis of photoperiod sensitivity in common buckwheat by using markers for expressed sequence tags and photoperiod-sensitivity candidate genes. Breed. Sci. 2011;61:394–404. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.61.394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson A, Ghosh S, Williams MJ, et al. Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nat Plants. 2018;4:23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yabe S, Hara T, Ueno M, et al. Potential of genomic selection in mass selection breeding of an allogamous crop: an empirical study to increase yield of common buckwheat. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:276. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu JM, Fan W, Jin JF, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Al-induced genes in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum moench) root apex: new insight into al toxicity and resistance mechanisms in an Al accumulating species. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:1141. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosa KA, Ismail A, Helmy M. Plant stress tolerance: an integrated omics approach. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yokoyama S, Yura K. Special issue: big data analyses in structural and functional genomics. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2016;17:67–67. doi: 10.1007/s10969-016-9213-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowe R, Shirley N, Bleackley M, et al. Transcriptomics technologies. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleby N, Edwards D, Batley J. New technologies for ultra-high throughput genotyping in plants. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;513:19–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vu LD, Gevaert K, De Smet I. Protein Language: post-Translational Modifications Talking to Each Other. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23:1068–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldakak M, Milad SIM, Nawar AI, et al. Proteomics: a biotechnology tool for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:35. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahner B, Gong J, Mahmoudian M, et al. Genomic scale profiling of nutrient and trace elements in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:1215–1221. doi: 10.1038/nbt865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Emon JM. The omics revolution in agricultural research. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016;64:36–44. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar