Spectroscopy and computational studies on the interaction of octyl, dodecyl, and hexadecyl derivatives of anionic and cationic surfactants with adenosine deaminase

References

• Ajloo, D., Fazeli, S. M., & Amirani, F. (2013). Interaction of cationic and anionic phthalocyanines with adenosine deaminase, molecular dynamics simulation and docking studies. Computational Molecular Bioscience, 3, 81–93.10.4236/cmb.2013.34010
   Google Scholar
• Ajloo, D., Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A., Hakimelahi, G. H., Saboury, A. A., & Gharibi, H. (2002). The effect of dodecyl trimethylammonium bromide on the formation of methemoglobins and hemichrome. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 26, 185–196.10.1016/S0927-7765(02)00003-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajloo, D., Sangian, M., Ghadamgahi, M., Evini, M., & Saboury, A. A. (2013). Effect of two imidazolium derivatives of ionic liquids on the structure and activity of adenosine deaminase. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 47, 47–61.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.12.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajloo, D., Taghizadeh, E., Saboury, A. A., Bazyari, E., & Mahnam, K. (2008). Effects of surfactant, salt and solvent on the structure and activity of adenosine deaminase: Molecular dynamic and spectrophotometric studies. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 43, 151–158.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åqvist, J., Medina, C., & Samuelsson, J. (1994). A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, 7, 385–391.10.1093/protein/7.3.385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathaie, S. Z., Ajloo, D., Daraie, M., & Ghadamgahi, M. (2015). Comparative study of the interaction of meso-tetrakis (N-para-trimethyl-anilium) porphyrin (TMAP) in its free base and Fe derivative form with oligo(dA.dT)15 and oligo(dG.dC)15. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 33, 1598–1611.10.1080/07391102.2014.963674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., & Hermans, J. (1981). Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. In B. Pullman (Ed.), Intermolecular Forces (pp. 331–342). Dordecht, Holland: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Bordbar, A. K., & Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A. (1996). Binding data analysis of the interaction of bovine hemoglobin with dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 69, 2231–2234.10.1246/bcsj.69.2231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordbar, A. K., Saboury, A. A., Housaindokht, M. R., & Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A. (1997). Statistical effects of the binding of ionic surfactant to protein. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 192, 415–419.10.1006/jcis.1997.4999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden, T., York, D., & Pedersen, L. (1993). Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 98, 10089–10092.10.1063/1.464397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divsalar, A., Saboury, A. A., Ahadi, L., Zemanatyar, E., Mansoori-Torshizi, H., Ajloo, D., & Ramaswammy, H. S. (2012). Biological evaluation and interaction of newly designed anti cancer Pd(II) complex with human serum albumin. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 29, 283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, D., & McLachlan, A. D. (1986). Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature, 319, 199–203.10.1038/319199a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, W. W., Reynolds, J. A., & Tanford, C. (1970). Gel chromatography of proteins in denaturing solvents. Comparison between sodium dodecyl sulfate and guanidine hydrochloride as denaturants. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 245, 5166–5168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich, E., Mandeville, J. S., Jennings, C. J., Sedaghat-Herati, R., & Tajmir-Riahi, H. A. (2009). Dendrimers bind human serum albumin. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 113, 6986–6993.10.1021/jp9011119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giehm, L., Oliveira, C. L. P., Christiansen, G., Pedersen, J. S., & Otzen, D. E. (2010). SDS-induced fibrillation of α-synuclein: An alternative fibrillation pathway. Journal of Molecular Biology, 401, 115–133.10.1016/j.jmb.2010.05.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. H., Petersen, S. V., Andersen, K. K., Enghild, J. J., Damhus, T., & Otzen, D. E. (2009). Stable intermediates determine proteins' primary unfolding sites in the presence of surfactants. Biopolymers, 91, 221–231.10.1002/bip.v91:3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, T., Marelius, J., & Åqvist, J. (1998). Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 12, 27–35.10.1023/A:1007930623000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalili, S., & Akhavan, M. A. (2009). A coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulation of a sodium dodecyl sulfate micelle in aqueous solution. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 352, 99–102.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. N. (1992). Surfactant interactions with biomembranes and proteins. Chemical Society Reviews, 21, 127–136.10.1039/cs9922100127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmipraba, J., Arunachalam, S., Solomon, R. V., Venuvanalingam, P., Riyasdeen, A., Dhivya, R., & Akbarsha, M. A. (2014). Surfactant–copper(II) Schiff base complexes: Synthesis, structural investigation, DNA interaction, docking studies, and cytotoxic activity. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 33, 877–891. doi:10.1080/07391102.2014.918523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maulik, S., Moulik, S. P., & Chattoraj, D. K. (1996). Biopolymer-surfactant interaction: 4 Kinetics of binding of cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide with gelatin, hemoglobin, β-lactoglobulin and lysozyme. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 13, 771–780.10.1080/07391102.1996.10508890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghadamnia, S. H., Saboury, A. A., Hakimelahi, G. H., & Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A. (1997). Denaturation of adenosine deaminase with urea and GduHCl. Journal of the Chemical Society, 44, 417–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A. (1996). Thermodynamic views of inhibition, activation and denaturation of adenosine deaminase by ring opened nucleosides and denaturants. In Z. H. Zaidi & D. L. Smith (Eds.), Protein Strucure Function Relationship (pp. 147–156). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A. (2002). Thermodynamics and binding properties of surfactant protein interactions. In P. Somasundaran (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Surface and Colloid Science (pp. 5344–5354). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker
   Google Scholar
• Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A., Moghadamnia, H., & Hakimelahi, G. H. (1994). Thermal analysis of adenosine deaminase in the presence of sodium n-dodecyl sulphate. Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, 13, 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A., Naderi, G. A., & Farzami, B. (1994). The denaturation behaviour of calmodulin in sodium n-dodecyl sulphate, dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, guanidine hydrochloride and urea. Thermochimica Acta, 239, 61–71.10.1016/0040-6031(94)87056-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, G. M., Goodsell, D. S., Halliday, R. S., Huey, R., Hart, W. E., Belew, R. K., & Olson, A. J. (1998). Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 19, 1639–1662.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-987X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2009). AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 30, 2785–2791.10.1002/jcc.v30:16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosé, S. A. (1984). A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Molecular Physics, 52, 255–268.10.1080/00268978400101201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österberg, F., & Åqvist, J. (2005). Exploring blocker binding to a homology model of the open hERG K+ channel using docking and molecular dynamics methods. FEBS Letters, 579, 2939–2944.10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otzen, D. E. (2002). Protein unfolding in detergents: Effect of micelle structure, ionic strength, pH, and temperature. Biophysical Journal, 83, 2219–2230.10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73982-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otzen, D. (2011). Protein–surfactant interactions: A tale of many states. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Proteins and Proteomics, 1814, 562–591.10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrinello, M., & Rahman, A. (1980). Crystal structure and pair potentials: A molecular-dynamics study. Physical Review Letters, 45, 1196–1199.10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. A., & Tanford, C. (1970a). Binding of dodecyl sulfate to proteins at high binding ratios. Possible implications for the state of proteins in biological membranes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 66, 1002–1007.10.1073/pnas.66.3.1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. A., & Tanford, C. (1970b). The gross conformation of protein–sodium dodecyl sulfate complexes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 245, 5161–5165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei-Tavirani, M., Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A., Moosavi-Nejad, S. Z., Chamani, J., & Ajloo, D. (2003). Domain analysis of human apotransferin upon interaction with sodium n-dodecyl sulphate: Differential scanning calorimetry and circular dichroism approaches. Thermochimica Acta, 408, 9–16.10.1016/S0040-6031(03)00311-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel, G., Rouse, S. L., Sansom, M. S. P., Michaux, C., & Perpète, E. A. (2014). The role of 2-methyl-2, 4-pentanediol in sodium dodecyl sulfate micelle dissociation unveiled by dynamic light scattering and molecular dynamics simulations. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 114, 357–362.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saboury, A. A., Borbar, A. K., & Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A. (1996). Resolution method of two sets of binding sites for the cationic surfactant-urease interaction. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 69, 3031–3035.10.1246/bcsj.69.3031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Still, W. C., Tempczyk, A., Hawley, R. C., & Hendrickson, T. (1990). Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 112, 6127–6129.10.1021/ja00172a038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanford, C. (1970). Protein denaturation. Part C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 24, 1–95.10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60241-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanford, C. (1980). The hydrophobic effect. Formation of micelles and biological membranes (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tanford, C., Nozaki, Y., Reynolds, J. A., & Makino, S. (1974). Molecular characterization of proteins in detergent solutions. Biochemistry, 13, 2369–2376.10.1021/bi00708a021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aalten, D. M., Bywater, R., Findlay, J. B., Hendlich, M., Hooft, R. W., & Vriend, G. (1996). PRODRG, a program for generating molecular topologies and unique molecular descriptors from coordinates of small molecules. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 10, 255–262.10.1007/BF00355047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Spoel, D., Lindahl, E., Hess, B., Groenhof, G. A., Mark, A. E., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (2005). GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 26, 1701–1718.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-987X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlet, L. (1967). Computer “experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Physical Review, 159, 98–103.10.1103/PhysRev.159.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Wang, J., & Kollman, P. A. (1999). What determines the van der waals coefficient β in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations? PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 34, 395–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar