Fragmented blind docking: a novel protein–ligand binding prediction protocol

References

• Agrawal, P., Singh, H., Srivastava, H. K., Singh, S., Kishore, G., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2019). Benchmarking of different molecular docking methods for protein–peptide docking. BMC Bioinformatics, 19(S13), 426. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2449-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmed, L., Rasulev, B., Turabekova, M., Leszczynska, D., & Leszczynski, J. (2013). Receptor- and ligand-based study of fullerene analogues: Comprehensive computational approach including quantum-chemical, QSAR and molecular docking simulations. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, 11(35), 5798–5808. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ob40878g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Sha'er, M. A., & Taha, M. O. (2012). Application of docking-based comparative intermolecular contacts analysis to validate Hsp90α docking studies and subsequent in silico screening for inhibitors. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 18(11), 4843–4863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1479-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparoy, P., Kumar Reddy, K., & Reddanna, P. (2012). Structure and ligand based drug design strategies in the development of Novel 5- LOX inhibitors. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 19(22), 3763–3778. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986712801661112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacilieri, M., & Moro, S. (2006). Ligand-based drug design methodologies in drug discovery process: An overview. Current Drug Discovery Technologies, 3(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.2174/157016306780136781
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batool, M., Ahmad, B., & Choi, S. (2019). A structure-based drug discovery paradigm. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(11), 2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20112783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Shimon, A., & Niv, M. Y. (2015). AnchorDock: Blind and flexible anchor-driven peptide docking. Structure (London, England : 1993), 23(5), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2015.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T. N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I. N., & Bourne, P. E. (2000). The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Research, 28(1), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaszczyk, M., Kurcinski, M., Kouza, M., Wieteska, L., Debinski, A., Kolinski, A., & Kmiecik, S. (2016). Modeling of protein–peptide interactions using the CABS-dock web server for binding site search and flexible docking. Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 93, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brik, A., & Wong, C. H. (2003). HIV-1 protease: Mechanism and drug discovery. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, 1(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1039/b208248a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. M., & Jagt, D. L. V. (2004). Creating artificial binding pocket boundaries to improve the efficiency of flexible ligand docking. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 44(4), 1412–1422. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci049853r
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castro-Alvarez, A., Costa, A. M., & Vilarrasa, J. (2017). The Performance of several docking programs at reproducing protein–macrolide-like crystal structures. Molecules, 22(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavasotto, C. N., & Abagyan, R. A. (2004). Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. Journal of Molecular Biology, 337(1), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M. W., Ayeni, C., Breuer, S., & Torbett, B. E. (2010). Virtual screening for HIV protease inhibitors: A comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina. PLoS One, 5(8), e11955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Liu, H., Sun, H., Pan, P., Li, Y., Li, D., & Hou, T. (2016). Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein–protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein–protein docking. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics: PCCP, 18(32), 22129–22139. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp03670h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J. C., Murray, C. W., Nissink, J. W. M., Taylor, R. D., & Taylor, R. (2005). Comparing protein–ligand docking programs is difficult. Proteins, 60(3), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeks, S. G., Smith, M., Holodniy, M., & Kahn, J. O. (1997). HIV-1 protease inhibitors. A review for clinicians. JAMA, 277(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.277.2.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X., Li, Y., Xia, Y. L., Ai, S. M., Liang, J., Sang, P., Ji, X. L., & Liu, S. Q. (2016). Insights into protein–ligand interactions: Mechanisms, models, and methods. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17020144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Khoury, L., Santos-Martins, D., Sasmal, S., Eberhardt, J., Bianco, G., Ambrosio, F. A., Solis-Vasquez, L., Koch, A., Forli, S., & Mobley, D. L. (2019). Comparison of affinity ranking using AutoDock-GPU and MM-GBSA scores for BACE-1 inhibitors in the D3R Grand Challenge 4. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 33(12), 1011–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-019-00240-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, L., dos Santos, R., Oliva, G., & Andricopulo, A. (2015). Molecular docking and structure-based drug design strategies. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 20(7), 13384–13421. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200713384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabb, H. A., Jackson, R. M., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (1997). Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. Journal of Molecular Biology, 272(1), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaillard, T. (2018). Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 benchmark. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 58(8), 1697–1706. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido, C., Gurbuxani, S., Ravagnan, L., & Kroemer, G. (2001). Heat shock proteins: Endogenous modulators of apoptotic cell death. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 286(3), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genheden, S., & Ryde, U. (2015). The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 10(5), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghersi, D., & Sanchez, R. (2009). Improving accuracy and efficiency of blind protein–ligand docking by focusing on predicted binding sites. Proteins, 74(2), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, A. P., Shivakumar, D. M., Boyce, S. E., Jacobson, M. P., Case, D. A., & Shoichet, B. K. (2008). Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: Predictions and experimental testing. Journal of Molecular Biology, 377(3), 914–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosdidier, A., Zoete, V., & Michielin, O. (2009). Blind docking of 260 protein–ligand complexes with EADock 2.0. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 30(13), 2021–2030. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, M., Sharma, R., & Kumar, A. (2018). Docking techniques in pharmacology: How much promising? Computational Biology and Chemistry, 76, 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, N. M., Alhossary, A. A., Mu, Y., & Kwoh, C. K. (2017). Protein–ligand blind docking using QuickVina-W with inter-process spatio-temporal integration. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 15451. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15571-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hernandez, M., Ghersi, D., & Sanchez, R. (2009). SITEHOUND-web: A server for ligand binding site identification in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Research, 37(Web Server issue), W413–W416. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hernndez-Santoyo, A., Yair, A., Altuzar, V., Vivanco-Cid, H., & Mendoza-Barrer, C. (2013). Protein–protein and protein–ligand docking. In Protein engineering – Technology and application. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/56376
   Google Scholar
• Hetényi, C., & van der Spoel, D. (2002). Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site. Protein Science, 11(7), 1729–1737. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.0202302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetényi, C., & Van Der Spoel, D. (2006). Blind docking of drug-sized compounds to proteins with up to a thousand residues. FEBS Letters, 580(5), 1447–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.01.074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetényi, C., & Van Der Spoel, D. (2011). Toward prediction of functional protein pockets using blind docking and pocket search algorithms. Protein Science, 20(5), 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Balaz, S., & Shelver, W. H. (2004). A practical approach to docking of zinc metalloproteinase inhibitors. Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling, 22(4), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2003.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., Rees, S., Kalindjian, S., & Philpott, K. (2011). Principles of early drug discovery. British Journal of Pharmacology, 162(6), 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01127.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbernón, B., Serrano, A., Bueno-Crespo, A., Abellán, J. L., Pérez-Sánchez, H., & Cecilia, J. M. (2021). METADOCK 2: A high-throughput parallel metaheuristic scheme for molecular docking. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 37(11), 1515–1520. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kairys, V., Baranauskiene, L., Kazlauskiene, M., Matulis, D., & Kazlauskas, E. (2019). Binding affinity in drug design: Experimental and computational techniques. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 14(8), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2019.1623202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lape, M., Elam, C., & Paula, S. (2010). Comparison of current docking tools for the simulation of inhibitor binding by the transmembrane domain of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase. Biophysical Chemistry, 150(1–3), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2010.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Fu, A., & Zhang, L. (2019). An overview of scoring functions used for protein–ligand interactions in molecular docking. Interdisciplinary Sciences, Computational Life Sciences, 11(2), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-019-00327-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. F., Cheng, C. W., Shih, C. S., Hwang, J. K., Yu, C. S., & Lu, C. H. (2016). MIB: Metal ion-binding site prediction and docking server. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 56(12), 2287–2291. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Grimm, M., Dai, W., Tao, Hou, M., Chun, Xiao, Z. X., & Cao, Y. (2020). CB-Dock: A web server for cavity detection-guided protein–ligand blind docking. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 41(1), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-019-0228-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Li, Y., Han, L., Li, J., Liu, J., Zhao, Z., Nie, W., Liu, Y., & Wang, R. (2015). PDB-wide collection of binding data: Current status of the PDBbind database. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 31(3), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyne, P. D., Lamb, M. L., & Saeh, J. C. (2006). Accurate prediction of the relative potencies of members of a series of kinase inhibitors using molecular docking and MM-GBSA scoring. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 49(16), 4805–4808. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm060522a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macalino, S. J. Y., Gosu, V., Hong, S., & Choi, S. (2015). Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery. Archives of Pharmacal Research, 38(9), 1686–1701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-015-0640-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mey, A. S. J. S., Juárez-Jiménez, J., Hennessy, A., & Michel, J. (2016). Blinded predictions of binding modes and energies of HSP90-α ligands for the 2015 D3R grand challenge. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 24(20), 4890–4899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2016.07.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobaraki, N., Hemmateenejad, B., Weikl, T. R., & Sakhteman, A. (2019). On the relationship between docking scores and protein conformational changes in HIV-1 protease. Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling, 91, 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2019.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobley, D. L., Liu, S., Lim, N. M., Wymer, K. L., Perryman, A. L., Forli, S., Deng, N., Su, J., Branson, K., & Olson, A. J. (2014). Blind prediction of HIV integrase binding from the SAMPL4 challenge. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 28(4), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-014-9723-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2009). AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 30(16), 2785–2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, G. M., Huey, R., & Olson, A. J. (2008). UNIT using AutoDock for ligand-receptor docking. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 24(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0814s24
   Google Scholar
• Muscat, S., Pallante, L., Stojceski, F., Danani, A., Grasso, G., & Deriu, M. A. (2020). The impact of natural compounds on S-shaped Aβ42 fibril: From molecular docking to biophysical characterization. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(6), 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21062017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., Roe, D. R., & Simmerling, C. (2013). Improved generalized born solvent model parameters for protein simulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 9(4), 2020–2034. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct3010485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissink, J. W. M., Murray, C., Hartshorn, M., Verdonk, M. L., Cole, J. C., & Taylor, R. (2002). A new test set for validating predictions of protein–ligand interaction. Proteins, 49(4), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.10232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novič, M., Tibaut, T., Anderluh, M., Borišek, J., & Tomašič, T. (2016). The comparison of docking search algorithms and scoring functions: An overview and case studies. In S. Dastmalchi, M. Hamzeh-Mivehroud, & B. Sokouti (Eds.), Methods and algorithms for molecular docking-based drug design and discovery (pp. 99–127). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0115-2.ch004
   Google Scholar
• Palacio-Rodríguez, K., Lans, I., Cavasotto, C. N., & Cossio, P. (2019). Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 5142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41594-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penkler, D. L., & Tastan Bishop, Ö. (2019). Modulation of Human Hsp90α Conformational Dynamics by Allosteric Ligand Interaction at the C-Terminal Domain. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1600. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35835-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preto, J., Gentile, F., Winter, P., Churchill, C., Omar, S. I., & Tuszynski, J. A. (2018). Molecular dynamics and related computational methods with applications to drug discovery. In L. Bonilla, E. Kaxiras, R. Melnik (Eds.), Coupled Mathematical Models for Physical and Biological Nanoscale Systems and Their Applications. BIRS-16w5069 2016. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 232 (pp. 267–285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76599-0_14
   Google Scholar
• Prieto-Martínez, F. D., Arciniega, M., & Medina-Franco, J. L. (2018). Acoplamiento molecular: Avances recientes y retos. TIP Revista Especializada en Ciencias Químico-Biológicas, 21. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesz.23958723e.2018.0.143
   Google Scholar
• Prodromou, C., & Pearl, L. (2003). Structure and functional relationships of Hsp90. Current Cancer Drug Targets, 3(5), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568009033481877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodromou, C., Roe, S. M., Piper, P. W., & Pearl, L. H. (1997). A molecular clamp in the crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of the yeast Hsp90 chaperone. Nature Structural Biology, 4(6), 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb0697-477
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quiroga, R., & Villarreal, M. A. (2016). Vinardo: A scoring function based on Autodock Vina improves scoring, docking, and virtual screening. PLoS One, 11(5), e0155183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastelli, G., Del Rio, A., Degliesposti, G., & Sgobba, M. (2010). Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 31(4), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastelli, G., & Pinzi, L. (2019). Refinement and rescoring of virtual screening results. Frontiers in Chemistry, 7, 498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon-Ferrer, R., Case, D. A., & Walker, R. C. (2013). An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 3(2), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanner, M. F. (1999). Python: A programming language for software integration and development. Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling, 17(1), 57–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeliger, D., & De Groot, B. L. (2010). Ligand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 24(5), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-010-9352-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sgobba, M., Caporuscio, F., Anighoro, A., Portioli, C., & Rastelli, G. (2012). Application of a post-docking procedure based on MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA on single and multiple protein conformations. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 58, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.10.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Śledź, P., & Caflisch, A. (2018). Protein structure-based drug design: From docking to molecular dynamics. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 48, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, P.-C., Tsai, C.-C., Mehboob, S., Hevener, K. E., & Johnson, M. E. (2015). Comparison of radii sets, entropy, QM methods, and sampling on MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and QM/MM-GBSA ligand binding energies of F. tularensis enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI). Journal of Computational Chemistry, 36(25), 1859–1873. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H., Li, Y., Shen, M., Tian, S., Xu, L., Pan, P., Guan, Y., & Hou, T. (2014). Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 5. Improved docking performance using high solute dielectric constant MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 16(40), 22035–22045. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp03179b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H., Li, Y., Tian, S., Xu, L., & Hou, T. (2014). Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 4. Accuracies of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methodologies evaluated by various simulation protocols using PDBbind data set. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 16(31), 16719–16729. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp01388c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surabhi, S., & Singh, B. (2018). Computer aided drug design: An overview. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 8(5), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v8i5.1894
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. C., Humblet, C., & Joseph-McCarthy, D. (2008). Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 48(5), 1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci700470c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott, O., & Olson, A. J. (2010). AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 31(2), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veselovsky, A. V., & Ivanov, A. S. (2003). Strategy of computer-aided drug design. Current Drug Targets. Infectious Disorders, 3(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568005033342145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vuignier, K., Schappler, J., Veuthey, J. L., Carrupt, P. A., & Martel, S. (2010). Drug-protein binding: A critical review of analytical tools. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 398(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3737-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Fang, X., Lu, Y., Yang, C.-Y., & Wang, S. (2005). The PDBbind database: Methodologies and updates. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 48(12), 4111–4119. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm048957q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, E., Sun, H., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Zhang, J. Z. H., & Hou, T. (2019). End-point binding free energy calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and applications in drug design. Chemical Reviews, 119(16), 9478–9508. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Wang, X., Li, Y., Lei, T., Wang, E., Li, D., Kang, Y., Zhu, F., & Hou, T. (2019). farPPI: A webserver for accurate prediction of protein–ligand binding structures for small-molecule PPI inhibitors by MM/PB(GB)SA methods. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 35(10), 1777–1779. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016). Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 54(1), 5.6.1–5.6.37. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weng, G., Wang, E., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Zhu, F., Li, D., & Hou, T. (2019). HawkDock: A web server to predict and analyze the protein–protein complex based on computational docking and MM/GBSA. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(W1), W322–W330. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Roy, A., & Zhang, Y. (2013). Protein–ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment. Bioinformatics, 29(20), 2588–2595. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer-Ul-Haq, Halim, S. A., Uddin, R., & Madura, J. D. (2010). Benchmarking docking and scoring protocol for the identification of potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 28(8), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Perez-Sanchez, H., C., & Lightstone, F. (2017). A comprehensive docking and MM/GBSA rescoring study of ligand recognition upon binding antithrombin. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 17(14), 1631–1639. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026616666161117112604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar