Design, molecular dynamics simulation, and investigation of the mechanical behavior of DNA origami nanotubes with auxetic and honeycomb structures

References

• Bathe, M., & Rothemund, P. W. K. (2017). DNA nanotechnology: A foundation for programmable nanoscale materials. MRS Bulletin, 42(12), 882–888. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2017.279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, C. E., Kilchherr, F., Kim, D.-N., Shiao, E. L., Wauer, T., Wortmann, P., Bathe, M., & Dietz, H. (2011). A primer to scaffolded DNA origami. Nature Methods, 8(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Weng, T.-W., Riccitelli, M. M., Cui, Y., Irudayaraj, J., & Choi, J. H. (2014). Understanding the mechanical properties of DNA origami tiles and controlling the kinetics of their folding and unfolding reconfiguration. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 136(19), 6995–7005. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja500612d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiriboga, M., Green, C., Hastman, D., Mathur, D., Wei, Q., Díaz, S. A., Medintz, I. L., & Veneziano, R. (2022). Rapid DNA origami nanostructure detection and classification using theYOLOv5 deep convolutional neural network. Scientific Reports, 12, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. B., & Lakes, R. S. (1996). Fracture toughness of re-entrant foam materials with a negative Poisson’s ratio: Experiment and analysis. International Journal of Fracture, 80(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dans, P. P., Ivani, I., Hospital, A., Portella, G., Gonz ́alez, C., & Orozco, M. (2017). How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA? Nucleic Acids Research, 45(7), 4217–4230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastorani, S., Ghasemi, R. H., & Soheilifard, R. (2021). A study on the bending stiffness of a new DNA origami nano-joint. Molecular Biotechnology, 63(11), 1057–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-021-00367-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastorani, S., Mogheiseh, M., Ghasemi, R. H., & Soheilifard, R. (2020). Modeling and structural investigation of a new DNA origami based flexible bio-nano joint. Molecular Simulation, 46(13), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2020.1797019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Jin, Z., Zhang, X., Tang, Y., Tian, Y., Zhu, J.-J., & Min, Q. (2022). A six-plex switchable DNA origami cipher disk for tandem-in-time cryptography. Chemical Communications, 58(41), 6124–6127. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CC01349E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S. M., Marblestone, A. H., Teerapittayanon, S., Vazquez, A., Church, G. M., & Shih, W. M. (2009). Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with CaDNAno. Nucleic Acids Research, 37(15), 5001–5006. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi, M. S., Hashemi, R., & Etemadi, E. (2022). In-plane energy absorption characteristics and mechanical properties of 3D printed novel hybrid cellular structures. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 20, 3616–3632.
   Google Scholar
• Etemadi, E., & Safikhani Nasim, M. (2017). Analysis of effective parameters of auxetic composite structure made with multilayer orthogonal reinforcement by finite element method. Modares Mechanical Engineering, 17(4), 247–254.
   Google Scholar
• Etemadi, E., Zamani, A. M., & Safikhan Nasim, M. (2021). Experimental and numerical analysis of effective geometrical parameters for energy absorbing of the structures with negative Poisson’s ratio made from aluminium alloy 1100. Solid and Fluid Mechanics, 11, 311–324.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. P., Schaap, I. A., Tardin, C. F., Erben, C. M., Berry, R. M., Schmidt, C. F., & Turberfield, A. J. (2005). Rapid chiral assembly of rigid DNA building blocks for molecular nanofabrication. Science (New York, N.Y.), 310(5754), 1661–1665. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanke, M., Dornbusch, D., Hadlich, C., Rossberg, A., Hansen, N., Grundmeier, G., Tsushima, S., Keller, A., & Fahmy, K. (2022). Anion-specific structure and stability of guanidinium-bound DNA origami. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 20, 2611–2623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, M., & Austin, R. H. (1987). Importance of DNA stiffness in protein–DNA binding specificity. Nature, 329(6136), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1038/329263a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingrole, A., Hao, A., & Liang, R. (2017). Design and modeling of auxetic and hybrid honeycomb structures for in-plane property enhancement. Materials & Design, 117, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., Gu, B., & Hu, H. (2016). Auxetic composite made with multilayer orthogonal structural reinforcement. Composite Structures, 135, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, H., Zhang, F., Shepherd, T., Ratanalert, S., Qi, X., Yan, H., & Bathe, M. (2019). Autonomously designed free-form 2D DNA origami. Science Advances, 5(1), eaav0655. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav0655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. S., Xiong, Y., Huang, J., & Gang, O. (2022). Cascaded enzyme reactions over a three-dimensional, wireframe DNA origami scaffold. JACS Au, 2(2), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.1c00387
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kauert, D. J., Kurth, T., Liedl, T., & Seidel, R. (2011). Direct mechanical measurements reveal the material properties of three-dimensional DNA origami. Nano Letters, 11(12), 5558–5563. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl203503s
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, G., Biswas, R., Haldar, K. K., & Sen, T. (2022). DNA origami-templated bimetallic core − shell nanostructures for enhanced oxygen evolution reaction. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 126(16), 6915–6924. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadem-Reza, L., Etemadi, E., Abbaslou, M., & Hu2, H. (2022). Design of novel 3D auxetic structures based on S-shaped unit-cells. Smart Matrial and Structures, 31(7), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi, R., Ghasemi, R. H., & Soheilifard, R. (2020). Design and simulation of a DNA origami nanopore for large cargoes. Molecular Biotechnology, 62(9), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-020-00261-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.-N., Kilchherr, F., Dietz, H., & Bathe, M. (2012). Quantitative prediction of 3D solution shape and flexibility of nucleic acid nanostructures. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(7), 2862–2868. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakes, R. S. (1987). Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science, 235(4792), 1038–1040. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4792.1038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H., Singer, J. P., & Thomas, E. L. (2012). Micro-/nanostructured mechanical metamaterials. Advanced Materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 24(36), 4782–4810. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201201644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, Y., Mei, Z., Chen, Y., Deng, N., & Li, Y. (2022). Facile purification and concentration of DNA origami structures by ethanol precipitation. ChemNanoMat. 8(7), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnma.202200161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R., Chen, H., & Hyun Choi, J. (2021). Auxetic two-dimensional nanostructures from DNA. Angewandte Chemie, 133(13), 7241–7249. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202014729
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, D. B., Duggan, G., Gouil, Q., & Saleh, O. A. (2014). Sequence-dependent elasticity and electrostatics of single-stranded DNA: Signatures of base-stacking. Biophysical Journal, 106(3), 659–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, H. G., Dutta, S., Krishanan, A., Hariprasad M. P., & Shankar, B. (2022). Proposed auxetic cluster designs for lightweight structural beams with improved load bearing capacity. Engineering Structures, 260: 114241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minhas, V., Sun, T., Mirzoev, A., Korolev, N., Lyubartsev, A. P., & Nordenskiöld, L. (2020). Modeling DNA flexibility: Comparison of force fields from atomistic to multiscale levels. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, 124(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b09106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogheiseh, M., & Ghasemi, R. H. (2022). An analysis of the capturing and passing ability of a DNA origami nanocarrier with the aid of molecular dynamics simulation. Molecular Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-022-00636-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogheiseh, M., Ghasemi, R. H., & Soheilifard, R. (2020). The effect of crossovers on the stability of DNA origami type nanocarriers. Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures, 17(2), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/MMMS-05-2020-0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nečemer, B., Vuherer, T., Glodež, S., & Kramberger, J. (2022). Fatigue behaviour of re-entrant auxetic structures made of the aluminium alloy AA7075-T651. Thin-Walled Structures, 180, 109917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.109917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, H., Fan, X., Zhou, F., Guo, G., Young Lee, J., Seeman, N. C., Kim, D.-N., Yao, N., Chaikin, P. M., & Han, Y. (2022). Direct visualization of floppy two-dimensional DNA origami using cryogenic electron microscopy. iScience, 25(6), 104373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochmann, S. E., Schröder, T., Schulz, C. M., & Tinnefeld, P. (2022). Quantitative single-molecule measurements of membrane charges with DNA origami sensors. Analytical Chemistry, 94(5), 2633–2640. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pensa, E., Bogawat, Y., Simmel, F. C., & Santiago, I. (2022). Single DNA origami detection by nanoimpact electrochemistry. ChemElectroChem, 9(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202101696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, S. Y., Leclerc, F., & Karplus, M. (2003). DNA polymorphism: A comparison of force fields for nucleic acids. Biophysical Journal, 84(3), 1421–1449. V https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74957-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothemund, P. W. K. (2006). Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature, 440(7082), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safikhani Nasim, M., & Etemadi, E. (2018). Three dimensional modeling of warp and woof periodic auxetic cellular structure. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 136, 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, F., & Tomlin, P. J. (2000). On the transverse shear modulus of negative Poisson’s ratio honeycomb structures. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 23(8), 717–720. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00278.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Z., Castro, C. E., & Arya, G. (2017). Conformational dynamics of mechanically compliant DNA nanostructures from coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. ACS Nano, 11(5), 4617–4630. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b00242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoja-Senobar, M., Etemadi, E., & Lezgy-Nazargah, M. (2021). An analytical investigation of elastic–plastic behaviors of 3D warp and woof auxetic structures. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 17(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-021-09546-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, S. S., Nickels, P. C., & Liedl, T. (2014). Wireframe and tensegrity DNA nanostructures. Accounts of Chemical Research, 47(6), 1691–1699. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar400319n
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodin, B. E. K., Randisi, F., Mosayebi, M., Šulc, P., Schreck, J. S., Romano, F., Ouldridge, T. E., Tsukanov, R., Nir, E., Louis, A. A., & Doye, J. P. K. (2015). Introducing improved structural properties and salt dependence into a coarse-grained model of DNA. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 142(23), 234901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4921957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani, P., Rana, S., Oliveira, D. V., Fangueiro, R., & Xavier, J. (2014). Development of novel auxetic structures based on braided composites. Materials & Design, 61, 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, X. C., Ren, X., Zhang, Y., Jiang, W., Pan, Y., Zhang, X. G., Zhang, X. Y., & Xie, Y. M. (2022). A simple 3D re-entrant auxetic metamaterial with enhanced energy absorption. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 229, 107524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udomprasert, A., Wootthichairangsan, C., Duangrat, R., Chaithongyot, S., Zhang, Y., Nixon, R., Liu, W., Wang, R., Ponglikitmongkol, M., & Kangsamaksin, T. (2022). Enhanced functional properties of three DNA origami nanostructures as doxorubicin carriers to breast cancer cells. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 5(5), 2262–2272. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.2c00114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagenbauer, K. F., Sigl, C., & Dietz, H. (2017). Gigadalton-scale shape-programmable DNA assemblies. Nature, 552(7683), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamhoff, E.-C., Romanov, A., Huang, H., Read, B. J., Ginsburg, E., Knappe, G. A., Min Kim, H., Farrell, N. P., Irvine, D. J., & Bathe, M. (2022). Controlling nuclease degradation of wireframe DNA origami with minor groove binders. ACS Nano, 16(6), 8954–8966. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c11575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-H., Chen, X.-Q., Su, Y.-Y., Wang, H., & Li, D. (2022). Precise regulating T cell activation signaling with spatial controllable positioning of receptors on DNA origami. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 50(6), 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjac.2022.100091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., Schiffels, D., Martinez Cuesta, S., Kuchnir Fygenson, D., & Seeman, N. C. (2012). Design and characterization of 1D nanotubes and 2D periodic arrays self-assembled from DNA multi-helix bundles. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 134(3), 1606–1616. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja207976q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Jun, H., & Bathe, M. (2022). Programming 2D supramolecular assemblies with wireframe DNA origami. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 144(10), 4403–4409. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c11332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weizman, E. R., Azaria, A. G., & Garini, Y. (2022). Conformation of ring single-stranded DNA measured by DNA origami structures. Biophysical Journal, 121(11), 2127–2134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2022.04.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, L., Yan, Q., & Ruzsinszky, A. (2017). Negative Poisson’s ratio in 1T-type crystalline two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Communications, 8(1), 15224. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, X. Y., Ren, X., Wang, X. Y., Zhang, Y., & Xie, Y. M. (2021). A novel combined auxetic tubular structure with enhanced tunable stiffness. Composites Part B: Engineering, 226, 109303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar