Quantitative structure activity relationship studies of androgen receptor binding affinity of endocrine disruptor chemicals with index of ideality of correlation, their molecular docking, molecular dynamics and ADME studies

References

• Achary, P. G. R., Toropova, A. P., & Toropov, A. A. (2019). Combinations of graph invariants and attributes of simplified molecular input-line entry system (SMILES) to build up models for sweetness. Food Research International, 122, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, S., Basketter, D., Creton, S., Pelkonen, O., van Benthem, J., Zuang, V., Andersen, K. E., Angers-Loustau, A., Aptula, A., Bal-Price, A., Benfenati, E., Bernauer, U., Bessems, J., Bois, F. Y., Boobis, A., Brandon, E., Bremer, S., Broschard, T., Casati, S., … Zaldivar, J.-M. (2011). Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: Current status and future prospects—2010. Archives of Toxicology, 85(5), 367–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-011-0693-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aher, R. B., & Roy, K. (2017). Exploring the structural requirements in multiple chemical scaffolds for the selective inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum calcium-dependent protein kinase-1 (PfCDPK-1) by 3D-pharmacophore modelling, and docking studies. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 28(5), 390–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2017.1326401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, S. (2020). Mathematical modeling of cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles using the index of ideality correlation criteria. Chemosphere, 242, 125192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, S., Lotfi, S., Afshari, S., Kumar, P., & Ghasemi, E. (2021). CORAL: Monte Carlo based global QSAR modelling of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors using hybrid descriptors. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 32(12), 1013–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2021.2003429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., De, P., Kumar, V., Kar, S., Roy, K., Theoretics, D., Sciences, A., & States, U. (2022a). Quick and efficient quantitative predictions of androgen receptor binding affinity for screening endocrine disruptor chemicals using 2D-QSAR and chemical read across. Chemosphere, 309(Pt 1), 136579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136579
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Begum, S., & Achary, P. G. R. (2015). Simplified molecular input line entry system-based: QSAR modelling for MAP kinase-interacting protein kinase (MNK1). SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 26(5), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2015.1039577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhayye, S. S., Roy, K., & Saha, A. (2016). Pharmacophore generation, atom-based 3D-QSAR, HQSAR and activity cliff analyses of benzothiazine and deazaxanthine derivatives as dual A2A antagonists/MAO‑B inhibitors. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 27(3), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2015.1136840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhedjar, K., Manganelli, S., Gini, G., Toropov, A., Toropova, A., Ali-Mokhnache, S., & Messadi, D. (2017). QSAR modeling useful in anti-cancer drug discovery: Prediction of V600EBRAF-dependent p-ERK using Monte Carlo Method. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Toxicology, 2, 34-39 https://doi.org/10.15436/2575-808X.17.1308
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. J., Chow, D. E., Xu, H., Dror, R. O., Eastwood, M. P., Gregersen, B. A., Klepeis, J. L., Kolossvary, I., Moraes, M. A., Sacerdoti, F. D., Salmon, J. K., Shan, Y., & Shaw, D. E. (2006). Scalable algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations on commodity clusters. SC ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, 43. https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.2006.54
   Google Scholar
• Casals-Casas, C., & Desvergne, B. (2011). Endocrine disruptors: From endocrine to metabolic disruption. Annual Review of Physiology, 73, 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De, P., Kar, S., Ambure, P., & Roy, K. (2022). Prediction reliability of QSAR models: an overview of various validation tools. Archives of Toxicology, 96(5), 1279–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03252-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhan, M., Kumar, P., Sindhu, J., Singh, R., Devi, M., Kumar, A., Kumar, R., & Lal, S. (2021). Exploring biological efficacy of novel benzothiazole linked 2,5-disubstituted-1,3,4-oxadiazole hybrids as efficient α-amylase inhibitors: Synthesis, characterization, inhibition, molecular docking, molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo based QSAR studies. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 138, 104876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhan, M., Sindhu, J., Kumar, P., Devi, M., Singh, R., Kumar, R., Lal, S., Kumar, A., Kumar, S., & Hussain, K. (2022). Quantitative structure activity relationship studies of novel hydrazone derivatives as α-amylase inhibitors with index of ideality of correlation. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 40(11), 4933–4953. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1863861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhan, M., Singh, R., Devi, M., Sindhu, J., Bhatia, R., Kumar, A., & Kumar, P. (2021). Synthesis, molecular docking and QSAR study of thiazole clubbed pyrazole hybrid as α-amylase inhibitor. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 39(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1704885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Pettersen, E. F., Couch, G. S., Morris, J. H., & Ferrin, T. E. (2018). UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Science, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A. (2002). Beware of q2!. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 20(4), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golubović, M., Lazarević, M., Zlatanović, D., Krtinić, D., Stoičkov, V., Mladenović, B., Milić, D. J., Sokolović, D., & Veselinović, A. M. (2018). The anesthetic action of some polyhalogenated ethers—Monte Carlo method based QSAR study. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 75, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramatica, P., & Sangion, A. (2016). A historical excursus on the statistical validation parameters for QSAR models: A clarification concerning metrics and terminology. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 56(6), 1127–1131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halder, A. K., Moura, A. S., & Cordeiro, M. N. D. S. (2018). QSAR modelling: A therapeutic patent review 2010-present. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, 28(6), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2018.1475560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H., Fang, H., Xie, Q., Perkins, R., Sheehan, D. M., & Tong, W. (2003). Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model using a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 14(5–6), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10629360310001623962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T., Sun, G., Zhao, L., Zhang, N., Zhong, R., & Peng, Y. (2021). Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies on the toxic effects of nitroaromatic compounds (NACs): A systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(16), 8557. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, S., Amin, S. A., Adhikari, N., Jha, T., & Gayen, S. (2020). Good and bad molecular fingerprints for human rhinovirus 3C protease inhibition: identification, validation, and application in designing of new inhibitors through Monte Carlo-based QSAR study. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 38(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1566093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, E. R., Rahman, M. S., & Rahman, I. (2015). A review on endocrine disruptors and their possible impacts on human health. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 40(1), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2015.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar, S., Roy, K., & Leszczynski, J. (2018). Applicability domain: a step toward confident predictions and decidability for QSAR modeling. Computational Toxicology, 1800, 141–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7899-1_6
   Google Scholar
• Kataria, R., Vashisht, D., Rani, P., Sindhu, J., Kumar, S., Sharma, S., Sahoo, S. C., Kumar, V., & Kumar Mehta, S. (2021). Experimental and computational validation of structural features and BSA binding tendency of 5-hydroxy-5-trifluoromethyl-3-arylpyrazolines**. ChemistrySelect, 6(38), 10324–10335. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202102669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., & Kumar, A. (2018). Monte Carlo method based QSAR studies of mer kinase inhibitors in compliance with OECD principles. Drug Research, 68(4), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-119288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., & Kumar, A. (2020a). CORAL: QSAR models of CB1 cannabinoid receptor inhibitors based on local and global SMILES attributes with the index of ideality of correlation and the correlation contradiction index. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 200, 103982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.103982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., & Kumar, A. (2020b). Nucleobase sequence based building up of reliable QSAR models with the index of ideality correlation using Monte Carlo method. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 38(11), 3296–3306. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1656109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., Kumar, A., & Sindhu, J. (2019). Design and development of novel focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitors using Monte Carlo method with index of ideality of correlation to validate QSAR. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 30(2), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2018.1564067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., Kumar, A., Sindhu, J., & Lal, S. (2019). QSAR models for nitrogen containing monophosphonate and bisphosphonate derivatives as human farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase inhibitors based on Monte Carlo method. Drug Research, 69(3), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0652-5290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liman, W., Oubahmane, M., Hdoufane, I., Bjij, I., Villemin, D., Daoud, R., Cherqaoui, D., & El Allali, A. (2022). Monte Carlo method and GA-MLR-based QSAR modeling of NS5A inhibitors against the hepatitis C virus. Molecules, 27(9), 2729. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001). Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 46(1-3), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00129-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luccio-Camelo, D. C., & Prins, G. S. (2011). Disruption of androgen receptor signaling in males by environmental chemicals. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 127(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manisha, Chauhan, S., Kumar, P., & Kumar, A. (2019). Development of prediction model for fructose- 1,6- bisphosphatase inhibitors using the Monte Carlo method. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 30(3), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2019.1568299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2009). AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 30(16), 2785–2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesmerak, K., Toropov, A., Toropova, A., Ertan-Bolelli, T., & Yildiz, I. (2017). QSAR of antimycobacterial activity of benzoxazoles by optimal SMILES-based descriptors. Medicinal Chemistry Research, 26, 3203-3208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-017-2013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimbhal, M., Bagri, K., Kumar, P., & Kumar, A. (2020). The index of ideality of correlation: A statistical yardstick for better QSAR modeling of glucokinase activators. Structural Chemistry, 31(2), 831–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-019-01468-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha, P. K., Mitra, I., Das, R. N., & Roy, K. (2011). Further exploring rm2 metrics for validation of QSPR models. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 107(1), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piir, G., Sild, S., & Maran, U. (2021). Binary and multi-class classification for androgen receptor agonists, antagonists and binders. Chemosphere, 262, 128313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratim Roy, P., Paul, S., Mitra, I., & Roy, K. (2009). On two novel parameters for validation of predictive QSAR models. Molecules, 14(5), 1660–1701. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules14051660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani, P., Kiran, Chahal, S., Priyanka, Kataria, R., Kumar, P., Kumar, S., & Sindhu, J. (2022). Unravelling the thermodynamics and binding interactions of bovine serum albumin (BSA) with thiazole based carbohydrazide: Multi-spectroscopic, DFT and molecular dynamics approach. Journal of Molecular Structure, 1270, 133939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescifina, A., Floresta, G., Marrazzo, A., Parenti, C., Prezzavento, O., Nastasi, G., Dichiara, M., & Amata, E. (2017). Sigma-2 receptor ligands QSAR model dataset. Data in Brief, 13, 514–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.06.022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy, K., Chakraborty, P., Mitra, I., Ojha, P. K., Kar, S., & Das, R. N. (2013). Some case studies on application of “rm2” metrics for judging quality of quantitative structure-activity relationship predictions: Emphasis on scaling of response data. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 34(12), 1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, K., Kar, S., & Ambure, P. (2015). On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 145, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, P. P., Leonard, J. T., & Roy, K. (2008). Exploring the impact of size of training sets for the development of predictive QSAR models. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 90(1), 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansch, C., Sammes, P. G., & Taylor, J. B. (1990). Computers and the Medicinal Chemist. In: Comprehensive medicinal chemistry. Pregamon Press, Oxford, 4, 33-58
   Google Scholar
• Schug, T. T., Janesick, A., Blumberg, B., & Heindel, J. J. (2011). Endocrine disrupting chemicals and disease susceptibility. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 127(3), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüürmann, G., Ebert, R.-U., Chen, J., Wang, B., & Kühne, R. (2008). External validation and prediction employing the predictive squared correlation coefficient-test set activity mean vs training set activity mean. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 48(11), 2140–2145. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800253u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Kumar, P., & Chandra, R. (2019). Chapter 7 - Applications of BIOVIA materials studio, LAMMPS, and GROMACS in various fields of science and engineering. Micro and Nano Technologies, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816954-4.00007-3
   Google Scholar
• Simon, L., Imane, A., Srinivasan, K. K., Pathak, L., & Daoud, I. (2017). In silico drug-designing studies on flavanoids as anticolon cancer agents: pharmacophore mapping, molecular docking, and Monte Carlo method-based QSAR modeling. Interdisciplinary Sciences-Computational Life Sciences, 9(3), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-016-0169-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolović, D., Ranković, J., Stanković, V., Stefanović, R., Karaleić, S., Mekić, B., Milenković, V., Kocić, J., & Veselinović, A. M. (2017). QSAR study of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors based on the Monte Carlo method. Medicinal Chemistry Research, 26(4), 796–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-017-1792-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolović, D., Stanković, V., Toskić, D., Lilić, L., Ranković, G., Ranković, J., Nedin-Ranković, G., & Veselinović, A. M. (2016). Monte Carlo-based QSAR modeling of dimeric pyridinium compounds and drug design of new potent acetylcholine esterase inhibitors for potential therapy of myasthenia gravis. Structural Chemistry, 27(5), 1511–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-016-0776-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoičkov, V., Stojanović, D., Tasić, I., Šarić, S., Radenković, D., Babović, P., Sokolović, D., & Veselinović, A. M. (2018). QSAR study of 2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ones derivatives as angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists based on the Monte Carlo method. Structural Chemistry, 29(2), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-017-1041-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Y., Zhang, S., Yin, H., & Yan, A. (2020). Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models and their applicability domain analysis on HIV-1 protease inhibitors by machine learning methods. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 196, 103888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.103888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• aToropov, A. A., & Toropova, A. P. (2019). Use of the index of ideality of correlation to improve predictive potential for biochemical endpoints. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, 29(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2018.1506851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• bToropov, A. A., & Toropova, A. P. (2019). QSAR as a random event: criteria of predictive potential for a chance model. Structural Chemistry, 30(5), 1677–1683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-019-01361-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov, A. A., Carbó-Dorca, R., & Toropova, A. P. (2018). Index of ideality of correlation: new possibilities to validate QSAR: a case study. Structural Chemistry, 29(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-017-0997-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov, A. A., & Toropova, A. P. (2017). The index of ideality of correlation: a criterion of predictive potential of QSPR/QSAR models? Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 819, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2017.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov, A. A., & Toropova, A. P. (2018). Predicting cytotoxicity of 2-phenylindole derivatives against breast cancer cells using index of ideality of correlation. Anticancer Research, 38(11), 6189–6194. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov, A. A., & Toropova, A. P. (2020). The Monte Carlo method as a tool to build up predictive QSPR/QSAR. Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, 16(3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573409915666190328123112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov, A. A., Toropova, A. P., & Benfenati, E. (2009). Additive SMILES-Based Carcinogenicity Models: Probabilistic Principles in the Search for Robust Predictions. In International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 10(7), 3106–3127. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10073106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropova, A. P., & Toropov, A. A. (2017). The index of ideality of correlation: A criterion of predictability of QSAR models for skin permeability? Science of the Total Environment, 586, 466–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropova, A. P., & Toropov, A. A. (2018). CORAL: QSAR models for carcinogenicity of organic compounds for male and female rats. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 72, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2017.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropova, A. P., & Toropov, A. A. (2019). The index of ideality of correlation: improvement of models for toxicity to algae. Natural Product Research, 33(15), 2200–2207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1493591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropova, A. P., Toropov, A. A., Carnesecchi, E., Benfenati, E., & Dorne, J. L. (2020). The index of ideality of correlation: models for flammability of binary liquid mixtures. Chemical Papers, 74(2), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-019-00903-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropova, A. P., Toropov, A. A., Leszczynska, D., & Leszczynski, J. (2017). CORAL and Nano-QFAR: quantitative feature-activity relationships (QFAR) for bioavailability of nanoparticles (ZnO, CuO, Co3O4, and TiO2). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 139, 404–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropova, A. P., Toropov, A. A., Veselinović, A. M., Veselinović, J. B., Leszczynska, D., & Leszczynski, J. (2019). Semi-correlations combined with the index of ideality of correlation: a tool to build up model of mutagenic potential. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 452(1), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-018-3419-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiffen, P. J. (2013). Methadone for chronic noncancer pain (cncp) in adults. Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy, 27(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.3109/15360288.2013.810896
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L.-C., Liu, L., Ren, X.-M., Zhang, M.-R., Cong, N., Xu, A.-Q., & Shao, J.-H. (2008). Evaluation of androgen receptor transcriptional activities of some pesticides in vitro. Toxicology, 243(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2007.09.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar