Toward better births? Political discourses of maternity care in birth practices in Denmark and France

References

• Aune, I., Holsether, O. W., & Kristensen, A. M. T. (2018). Midwifery care based on a precautionary approach: Promoting normal births in maternity wards: The thoughts and experiences of midwives. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare: official Journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives, 16, 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300050005493
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? (1st ed.). Pearson Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2012). Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 02(01), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2012.21001
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2015). Problematizations in alcohol policy: WHO’s “alcohol problems. Contemporary Drug Problems, 42(2), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450915576116
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2016). Problematizations in health policy: Questioning how “problems” are constituted in policies. SAGE Open, 6(2), 215824401665398–215824401665316. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016653986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policy analysis. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8
   Google Scholar
• Behruzi, B., Hatem, M., Goulet, L., & Fraser, W. D. (2014). Perception of humanization of birth in a highly specialized hospital: Let’s think differently. Health Care for Women International, 35(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2013.857321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, C., Wrede, S., Bourgeault, I., Sandall, J., De Vries, R., & van Teijlingen, E. R. (2005). Understanding the social organisation of maternity care systems: Midwifery as a touchstone. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(6), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00471.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, M. G., & Bradshaw, P. L. (1997). Changing childbirth: The midwifery manager’s tale. Journal of Nursing Management, 5(3), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2834.1997.00009.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cesbron, P. (2006). Quelques propositions d’organisation des soins obstétricaux [Some proposals for the organization of obstetric care]. Spirale, 37(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.3917/spi.037.78
   Google Scholar
• Ciane. (2015). Dossier déclenchement: L’importance cruciale de l’information et du consentement [Induction file: The critical importance of information and consent]. Retrieved from https://ciane.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CPDeclenchement2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dam, H. (2017). Giv kvinderne fødslen tilbage - en debatbog om fødselspolitik og livets begyndelse [Give women back their births – A debate book on birth policy and the beginning of life] (1st ed.). Tiderne Skifter.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Health Authority/Sundhedsstyrelsen. (1998). Svangreomsorg. Retningslinjer og redegørelse. [Guidelines and report]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Health Authority/Sundhedsstyrelsen. (2013). Anbefalinger for svangreomsorgen [Recommendations for maternity care]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Health Authority/Sundhedsstyrelsen. (2015). Specialevejledning for gynaekologi og obstetrik [Specialized guidelines for gynecology and obstetrics]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Health Authority/Sundhedsstyrelsen. (2017). Retningslinjer for fosterdiagnostik [Guidelines for prenatal diagnosis]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Health Authority/Sundhedsstyrelsen. (2019). Krav og faglige anbefalinger til organiseringen af fødeområdet (Udkast) [Requirements and professional recommendations for the organization of birth care (draft)]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (2001). The technocratic, humanistic and holistic paradigms of childbirth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75, S5–S23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00510-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVries, R., Wrede, S., van Tejlingen, E., & Benoit, C. (2001). Birth by design: Pregnancy, maternity care, and midwifery in North America and Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three political economies of the welfare state. International Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 92–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15579336.1990.11770001
   Google Scholar
• Fannin, M. (2013). The burden of choosing wisely: Biopolitics at the beginning of life. Gender, Place & Culture, 20(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2012.694355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAS (Haute Autorité de Santé/National Authority for Health). (2005). Comment mieux informer les femmes enceintes? Recommandations pour les professionnels de santé [How can pregnant women be better informed? Recommendations for health professionals]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• HAS (Haute Autorité de Santé/National Authority for Health). (2006). Préparation à la naissance et à la parentalité [Preparation for birth and parenthood]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• INSERM & DREES. (2017). Enquête nationale périnatale. Rapport 2016 [National perinatal survey. Report 2016]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. (2008). The political “nature” of pregnancy and childbirth. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 889–913. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423908081079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jomeen, J. (2012). The paradox of choice in maternity care. Journal of Neonatal Care Journal of Neonatal Care, 18, 60–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2012.01.010
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, S. (2005). The politics of birth. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kotaska, A. (2011). Guideline-centered care: A two-edged sword. Birth (Berkeley, CA), 38(2), 97–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00469.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion, C. (2004). La sage-femme: Un acteur incontournable de la périnatalité en France [The midwife: An essential player in perinatal care in France]. Santé, Société et Solidarité, 1, 97–103.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, K. (2016). Mothercraft: Birth work and the making of neo-liberal mothers. Social Science & Medicine, 162, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministère de la Santé et de la Protection Sociale/Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. (2004). Plan ‘périnatalité’ 2005-2007. Humanité, proximité, sécurité, qualité [Perinatality Plan 2005–2007. Humanity, proximity, security, quality]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Négrié, N., & Cascales, B. (2016). L’accouchement est politique. Fécondité, femmes en travail et institutions [Birth is political. Fertility, working women and institutions]. Editions l’Instant Présent.
   Google Scholar
• Newnham, E. (2014). Birth control: Power knowledge in the politics of birth. Health Sociology Review, 23(3), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2014.11081978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklasson, G. (2015). Graviditet og risiko [Pregnancy and risk] (1st ed.). Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1980). Women confined: Towards a sociology of childbirth. M. Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Page, L. (2001). Human resources for maternity care: The present system in Japan, Brazil, North America, Western Europe and New Zealand. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75, S81–S88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00515-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, O. K. (2011). Konkurrencestaten [The competition state]. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pilliot, M. (2006). Le regard du naissant [The gaze of the newborn]. Spirale, 37(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.3917/spi.037.96
   Google Scholar
• Puech, F. (2007). L’organisation autour de la grossesse et de la naissance [Organization around pregnancy and birth]. ADSP, 61/62, December 2007-March 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Rattner, D. (2009). Humanizing childbirth care: Brief theoretical framework. Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 13(Suppl. 1), 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-32832009000500011
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. (2010). Reaching the parts that other theories and methods can’t reach: How and why a policy-as-discourse approach can inform health-related policy. Health (London, England: 1997), 14(2), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459309353295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umenai, T., Wagner, M., Page, L. A., Faundes, A., Rattner, D., Dias, M. A., Tyrrell, M. A., Hotimsky, S., Haneda, K., Onuki, D., Mori, T., Sadamori, T., Fujiwara, M., & Kikuchi, S. (2001). Conference agreement on the definition of humanization and humanized care. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75, S3–S4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00508-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2001). Fish can’t see water: The need to humanize birth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75, S25–S37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00519-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (1996). Care in normal birth: A practical guide. Maternal and Newborn Health/Safe Motherhood Unit. WHO.
   Google Scholar