Vaginal birth after cesarean or recurrent elective cesarean section: What are the decision making processes of pregnant women in Turkey? A phenomenological study

References

• Akgün, M., & Boz, İ. (2019). Women’s decision-making processes and experiences of vaginal birth after caesarean birth: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 25(6), e12780. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attanasio, L. B., Kozhimannil, K. B., & Kjerulff, K. H. (2019). Women’s preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 46(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolo, S., Goffinet, F., Blondel, B., & Deneux-Tharaux, C. (2016). Why women with previous caesarean and eligible for a trial of labour have an elective repeat caesarean delivery? A national study in France. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 123(10), 1664–1673. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile Ibrahim, B., Knobf, M. T., Shorten, A., Vedam, S., Cheyney, M., Illuzzi, J., & Kennedy, H. P. (2021). “I had to fight for my VBAC”: A mixed methods exploration of women’s experiences of pregnancy and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 48(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beake, S., Bick, D., Narracott, C., & Chang, Y. S. (2017). Interventions for women who have a caesarean birth to increase uptake and duration of breastfeeding: A systematic review. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 13(4), e12390. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biraboneye, S. P., Ogutu, O., van Roosmalen, J., Wanjala, S., Lubano, K., & Kinuthia, J. (2017). Trial of labour or elective repeat caesarean delivery: Are women making an informed decision at Kenyatta national hospital? BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1440-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black, M., Entwistle, V. A., Bhattacharya, S., & Gillies, K. (2016). Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women’s accounts of their birth choices. BMJ Open, 6(1), e008881. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonzon, M., Gross, M. M., Karch, A., & Grylka-Baeschlin, S. (2017). Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section. An online survey investigating women’s preferences in Western Switzerland. Midwifery, 50, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, C. O., Govindappagari, S., & Gyamfi-Bannerman, C. (2017). Outcomes of operative vaginal delivery during trial of labor after cesarean delivery. American Journal of Perinatology, 34(8), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1598080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. W. (2016). The decision-making processes in Taiwanese Women with repeat caesarean deliveries. Hu li za Zhi the Journal of Nursing, 63(5), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.63.5.44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, S. W., Hutchinson, A. M., Nagle, C., & Bucknall, T. K. (2018). Women’s decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1661-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Çayır, G., & Şendir, M. (2014). Uterine rupture complication in women vaginal birth after caesarean: A systematic review. International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v11i2.2709
   Google Scholar
• Eide, K. T., Morken, N. H., & Baerøe, K. (2019). Maternal reasons for requesting planned cesarean section in Norway: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2250-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. M. (2019). Trade-offs during trial of labour after caesarean delivery: Fewer caesareans, more frequent uterine rupture. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 126(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gözükara, İ., Karapinar, O., Hakverdi, A. U., Kurt, R., & Demirkiran, G. (2016). Cesarean birth after vaginal delivery: A survey in healthcare professionals. The Journal of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Neonatology, 13(4), 151–153.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve Trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., & Redshaw, M. (2011). Midwifery factors associated with successful breastfeeding. Child: Care, Health and Development, 37(5), 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01177.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husby, A. E., van Duinen, A. J., & Aune, I. (2019). Caesarean birth experiences. A qualitative study from Sierra Leone. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare: Official Journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives, 21, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2019.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keedle, H., Peters, L., Schmied, V., Burns, E., Keedle, W., & Dahlen, H. G. (2020). Women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(1), 381. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03075-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keedle, H., Schmied, V., Burns, E., & Dahlen, H. G. (2015). Women’s reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15, 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0639-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keedle, H., Schmied, V., Burns, E., & Dahlen, H. G. (2018). The journey from pain to power: A meta-ethnography on women’s experiences of vaginal birth after caesarean. Women and Birth: Journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 31(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keedle, H., Schmied, V., Burns, E., & Dahlen, H. G. (2019). A narrative analysis of women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) in Australia using critical feminist theory. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2297-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kisa, S., Kisa, A., & Younis, M. Z. (2017). Opinions and attitudes of obstetricians and midwives in Turkey towards caesarean section and vaginal birth following a previous caesarean section. The Journal of International Medical Research, 45(6), 1739–1749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060516663998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., & Lakhtakia, S. (2021). Rising cesarean deliveries in India: Medical compulsions or convenience of the affluent? Health Care for Women International, 42(4–6), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2020.1798963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, G., Ying, Y. H., & Chang, K. (2019). The determinants of obstetricians’ willingness to undertake delivery by vaginal birth after cesarean section in Taiwan. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, ume 15, 991–1002. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S205009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, I., Healy, P., Carroll, M., Begley, C., Matterne, A., Gross, M. M., Grylka-Baeschlin, S., Nicoletti, J., Morano, S., Nilsson, C., & Lalor, J. (2016). Clinicians’ views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): A study from countries with low VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), 350. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1144-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyckestam Thelin, I., Lundgren, I., & Nilsson, C. (2019). To challenge oneself as a childbearing woman-the lived experience of vaginal birth after caesarean section in Sweden. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 14(1), 1605784. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2019.1605784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. (2010). Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü: Doğum ve sezaryen eylemi yönetim rehberi. Retrieved May 10, 2021, from https://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/a%C3%A7sap27.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura-Pereira, M., Esteves-Pereira, A. P., Gama, S. G. N., & Leal, M. (2018). Elective repeat cesarean delivery in women eligible for trial of labor in Brazil. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 143(3), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramvi, E., & Tangerud, M. (2011). Experiences of women who have a vaginal birth after requesting a cesarean section due to a fear of birth: A biographical, narrative, interpretative study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 13(3), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00614.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şentürk, M. B., Çakmak, Y., Ataç, H., & Budak, M. Ş. (2015). Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean section and outcomes in rural area of Anatolia. International Journal of Women’s Health, 7, 693–697. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S83800
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Speziale, H. S., Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   Google Scholar
• Uno, K., Mayama, M., Yoshihara, M., Takeda, T., Tano, S., Suzuki, T., Kishigami, Y., & Oguchi, H. (2020). Reasons for previous cesarean deliveries impact a woman’s independent decision of delivery mode and the success of trial of labor after Cesarean. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(1), 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2833-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallenborn, J. T., Graves, W. C., & Masho, S. W. (2017). Breastfeeding initiation in mothers with repeat cesarean section: The impact of marital status. Breastfeeding Medicine: The Official Journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, 12, 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2016.0205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingert, A., Johnson, C., Featherstone, R., Sebastianski, M., Hartling, L., & Douglas Wilson, R. (2018). Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: Systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2065-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2015). Department of reproductive health and research. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Retrieved July 10, 2020, from www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/
   Google Scholar