Clarifying the unmet clinical need during medical device innovation in women’s health – A narrative review

References

• Amin, A., Remme, M., Allotey, P., & Askew, I. (2021). Gender equality by 2045: Reimagining a healthier future for women and girls. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 373, n1621. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1621
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2019). The health of Australia’s females. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D., Behrendt, A., Baric, S., Devillé, M., Ferguson, L., Luchsinger, G., & Roseman, M. (2021). My body is my own: Claiming the right to autonomy and self-determination. United Nations Population Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Balas, E., & Boren, S. (2000). Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 1, 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1637943
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, S., & Caulfield, M. (2022). Women’s Health Strategy for England. HH Associates ltd. on Behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, CP 736.
   Google Scholar
• Boddin, D. (2016). IMF Working Paper (WP/16/207): The Role of Newly Industrialized Economies in Global Value Chains. International Monetary Fund https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475545456.001
   Google Scholar
• Bown, C. P. (2021). How COVID-19 Medical Supply Shortages Led to Extraordinary Trade and Industrial Policy. Asian Economic Policy Review, 17(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, M., & Mittman, R. (2002). Diffusion of Innovation in Healthcare. California Healthcare Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• News, C. B. C, CBC. News. (2019). Transvaginal mesh pulled from Canadian market following safety review. https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/prolapse-mesh-pulled-canada-1.5226794
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi, J., Logan, A., Narayan, G., & Kuttappa, S. (2015). A structured process for unmet clinical need analysis for medical device innovation in India: Early experiences. BMJ Innovations, 1(3), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2014-000010
   Google Scholar
• Commission Regulation (EC.) No 507/ (2006). Article 4, Paragraph 2 C.F.R. (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Consortia for Improving Medicine with Innovation and Technology. GAITS - Guidance and Impact Tracking System. Consortia for Improving Medicine with Innovation and Technology (CIMIT) https://www.gaits.org/fr/
   Google Scholar
• Consortia for Improving Medicine with Innovation and Technology. Milestone: Idea. Consortia for Improving Medicine with Innovation and Technology https://www.gaits.org/fr/home/-/project/milestone/4102
   Google Scholar
• Consortia for Improving Medicine with Innovation and Technology. Milestone: Need. Consortia for Improving Medicine with Innovation and Technology https://www.gaits.org/fr/home/-/project/milestone/4101
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, A., & Oldham, J. (2016). Person-centred care: What is it and how do we get there? Future Hospital Journal, 3(2), 114–116. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dechambenoit, G. (2016). Access to health care in sub-Saharan Africa. Surgical Neurology International, 7, 108. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.196631
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devlin, H. (2017). New Zealand bans vaginal mesh implants. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/dec/12/new-zealand-bans-vaginal-mesh-implants
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, H. (2018). Government halts vaginal mesh surgery in NHS hospitals. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jul/09/government-halts-vaginal-mesh-surgery-in-nhs-hospitals
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. C. (2001). The “Market Pull” versus “Technology Push” Continuum of Engineering Education. 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition New Mexico US.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, L. V., Marshall, S. D., Scott, J., Brindley, P. G., & Grocott, H. P. (2019). The MacGyver bias and attraction of homemade devices in healthcare. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia = Journal Canadien D’anesthesie, 66(7), 757–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01361-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emergen Research. (2021). Femtech Market By Type (Devices, Software, Services), By End-Use (Direct-to-Consumer, Hospitals, Fertility Clinics, Surgical Centers, Diagnostic Centers), By Application (Reproductive Health, Pregnancy & Nursing Care, Pelvic & Uterine Healthcare), By Region, Forecasts to 2027. E. Research. https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/femtech-market
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, V. A., Carter, S. M., Cribb, A., & McCaffery, K. (2010). Supporting patient autonomy: The importance of clinician-patient relationships. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(7), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, H. T., Pitrelli, K., Hayes, M. K., & Murphy, M. M. (2014). Decision to adopt medical technology: Case study of breast cancer radiotherapy techniques. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 34(8), 1006–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14541679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, A. (2020). Menstrual taboos: Moving beyond the curse. In C. Bobel, I. T. Winkler, B. Fahs, K. A. Hasson, E. A. Kissling, & T. A. Roberts (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies. (pp. 143–162). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7_14
   Google Scholar
• Grayden, D., Lim, K., & Vitale, M. (2022). Biodesign Innovation Melbourne. University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, L., Greene, M. E., Opper, N., Stavropoulou, M., Harper, C., Nascimento, M., Zewdie, D., Darmstadt, G. L., Greene, M. E., Hawkes, S., Heise, L., Henry, S., Heymann, J., Klugman, J., Levine, R., Raj, A., & Rao Gupta, G, Gender Equality, Norms, and Health Steering Committee. (2019). Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: Framing the challenges to health. Lancet (London, England), 393(10189), 2440–2454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooton, A. (2019). The ‘eight-minute’ cure: How transvaginal mesh sentenced thousands of women to a life of pain. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellness/the-eight-minute-cure-how-transvaginal-mesh-sentenced-thousands-of-women-to-a-life-of-pain-20190611-p51whn.html
   Google Scholar
• Ijzerman, M., Koffijberg, H., Fenwick, E., & Krahn, M. (2017). Emerging Use of Early Health Technology Assessment in Medical Product Development: A Scoping Review of the Literature. PharmacoEconomics, 35(7), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0509-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijzerman, M. J., & Steuten, L. M. (2011). Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: A review of methods and applications. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 9(5), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.2165/11593380-000000000-00000
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemble, E., Perez, L., Sartori, V., Tolub, G., & Zheng, A. (2022). The dawn of the FemTech revolution McKinsey & Company https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/the-dawn-of-the-femtech-revolution
   Google Scholar
• Kukla, R., & Wayne, K. (2016). Pregnancy, Birth, and Medicine. Stanford University https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-pregnancy/
   Google Scholar
• Leng, G., Williams, S., Hung, I., Partridge, G., & Sanghvi, S. (2018). Uptake of medical devices approved by NICE. BMJ Innovations, 4(4), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2018-000273
   Google Scholar
• Mallik, S. (n.d.). Patient centric Innovation That Delivers More than Wellness. Infosys https://www.infosys.com/insights/industry-stories/patient-centric-innovation.html
   Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, K. (2017). Health technology assessment of medical devices during development., University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Marquez, P. (2017). Healthy women are the cornerstone of healthy societies. World Bank https://blogs.worldbank.org/health/healthy-women-are-cornerstone-healthy-societies
   Google Scholar
• Mastroianni, A., Faden, R., & Federman, D. (1999). Women and Health Research. Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies: Volume 2: Workshop and Commissioned Papers. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCambridge, J., Witton, J., & Elbourne, D. R. (2014). Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokarram, N., Denend, L., Lyon, J., Rait, D., Brinton, T., Makower, J., & Yock, P. (2021). Need Statements in Healthcare Innovation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 49(7), 1587–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02782-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Money, A. G., Barnett, J., Kuljis, J., Craven, M. P., Martin, J. L., & Young, T. (2011). The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: Medical device manufacturers’ perspectives. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 11, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, Z. S., Wooding, S., & Grant, J. (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Innovation and Science Agenda [Australia. (2015)]. National Innovation and Science Agenda Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• NIH Office of Communications. (2016). What health issues or conditions are specific to women only?. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Health. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/womenshealth/conditioninfo/whatconditions
   Google Scholar
• Ocampo, J. U., & Kaminski, P. C. (2019). Medical device development, from technical design to integrated product development. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 43(5), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2019.1653393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliveria, S. A., Sachs, D., Belasco, K. T., & Halpern, A. C. (2003). Adoption of new technologies for early detection of melanoma in dermatologic practice. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 49(5), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1067/S0190-9622(03)02464-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petkova, H., Schanker, B., Samaha, D., & Hansen, J. (2010). Barriers to innovation in the field of medical devices - Background Paper 6. W. H. Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. (Fifth ed.). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saitman, A. (2019). Translational Medicine: A Clinical Pull Or A Technological Push?
   Google Scholar
• Science and Technology Committee [UK. (2013)]. Bridging the valley of death: Improving the commercialisation of research - Eighth Report of Session 2012–13. The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A., Pasichnyk, D., Harstall, C., & Chojecki, D. (2015). Optimizing adoption and diffusion of medical devices at the system level.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, A. (2018). 9 in 10 Digital Health Start-ups Fail. Here’s how You can Avoid being One of Them Entrepreneur India. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/307595
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M. (2018). Medtech Funding: Emerging from the Valley of Death? MPO - Medical Product Outsourcing. https://www.mpo-mag.com/issues/2018-10-01/view_columns/medtech-funding-emerging-from-the-valley-of-death/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, V., Warty, R., Nair, A., Krishnan, S., Sursas, J. A., da Silva Costa, F., Vollenhoven, B., & Wallace, E. M. (2019). Defining the clinician’s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation - A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res, 19(1), 514. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4305-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spink, D. (2018). The Top 7 Reasons Why Medical Devices Fail. Boyd Technologies https://www.boydtech.com/articles/the-top-7-reasons-why-medical-devices-fail
   Google Scholar
• Stanford Byers Center for Biodesign. (2020). Our Impact. Stanford Byers Center for Biodesign. https://biodesign.stanford.edu/our-impact/trainee-outcomes.html
   Google Scholar
• Steinberger, J. D., Denend, L., Azagury, D. E., Brinton, T. J., Makower, J., & Yock, P. G. (2017). Needs-Based Innovation in Interventional Radiology: The Biodesign Process. Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 20(2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2017.04.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanenbaum, M. L., Adams, R. N., Lanning, M. S., Hanes, S. J., Agustin, B. I., Naranjo, D., & Hood, K. K. (2018). Using Cluster Analysis to Understand Clinician Readiness to Promote Continuous Glucose Monitoring Adoption. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 12(6), 1108–1115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296818786486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thapa, D. K., & Niehof, A. (2013). Women’s autonomy and husbands’ involvement in maternal health care in Nepal. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 93, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topçu, S., & Brown, P. (2019). The impact of technology on pregnancy and childbirth: Creating and managing obstetrical risk in different cultural and socio-economic contexts. Health, Risk & Society, 21(3-4), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2019.1649922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. C., Duggan, L. V., Glezerson, B. A., & Marshall, S. D. (2020). Thinking outside the (acrylic) box: A framework for the local use of custom-made medical devices. Anaesthesia, 75(12), 1566–1569. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2015). Gender equality and women’s empowerment. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. (2021a). FDA’s Activities: Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh. US Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/urogynecologic-surgical-mesh-implants/fdas-activities-urogynecologic-surgical-mesh
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. (2021b). Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh Implants. US Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/implants-and-prosthetics/urogynecologic-surgical-mesh-implants
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. US Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Medical Device Shortages During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/medical-device-shortages-during-covid-19-public-health-emergency
   Google Scholar
• Veit-Rubin, N., Dubuisson, J., Ford, A., Dubuisson, J. B., Mourad, S., & Digesu, A. (2019). Burch colposuspension. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 38(2), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P.-P. (2008). Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: A Postphenomenological Analysis. Human Studies, 31(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9079-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, J., Hellman, E., Denend, L., Rait, D., Venook, R., Lucian, L., Azagury, D., Yock, P. G., & Brinton, T. J. (2017). The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 45(5), 1163–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1777-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warty, R. R., Smith, V., Salih, M., Fox, D., McArthur, S. L., & Mol, B. W. (2021). Barriers to the Diffusion of Medical Technologies Within Healthcare: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access. 9, 139043–139058. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3118554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigl, B. H., Gaydos, C. A., Kost, G., Beyette, F. R., Jr., Sabourin, S., Rompalo, A., de Los Santos, T., McMullan, J. T., & Haller, J. (2012). The Value of Clinical Needs Assessments for Point-of-Care Diagnostics. Point of Care, 11(2), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0b013e31825a241e
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (n.d.). Women’s Health. World Health Organisation (WHO). https://www.who.int/health-topics/women-s-health
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (2011). Needs assessment for medical devices. World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M. Y., Gemba, K., & Tamada, S. (2016). Training innovators at the stanford biodesign program and its implications [Paper presentation].2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)., https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806570
   Google Scholar
• Yock, Zenios, Brinton, Kumar, Watkins, Denend, & Krummel, Kurihara. (2015). Biodesign: The process of innovating medical technologies. (Second ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar