Multiple Attribute Decision Analysis with Imprecise Information

REFERENCES

• Barber , R. and Roblyer , P. W. , “ Alternative Analyses Involving Diverse Evaluation Factors , ” Vitro Technical Journal , 3 , 1, 20 – 33 , ( 1984 ).
   Google Scholar
• Beckenbach , E. and Bellman , R. , An Introduction to Inequalities , Random House , New York . ( 1961 ) .
   Google Scholar
• Canada , J. R. , “ Non-traditional Method for Evaluating CIM Opportunities Assigns Weights to Intangibles , ” Industrial Engineering , 18 . 3 , 66 – 71 , ( 1986 ).
   Google Scholar
• Degarmo , E. P. , Sullivan , W. G. , and Canada , J. R. , Engineering Economy , MacMillan Publishing Company , New York , 260 – 266 , 1984 ).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards , W. , “ Use o f Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making , ” Conflicting Objectives in Decisions , (D. E. Bell etal., Eds.) , Wiley , New York , 247 – 276 , ( 1977 ).
   Google Scholar
• Farmer , T. A. , “ Testing the Robustness of Multiattribute Utility Theory in an Applied Setting ,” Decision Sciences , 18 , 178 – 193 ,198).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishburn , P. C. , “ Independence in Utility Theory with Whole produc Sets , ” Operations Research , 13 , 1 , 28 – 45 , ( 1965 ).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs , B. F. , “ A Comparison of Weighting Methods in Power Plant Siting , ” Decision Sciences , 11 , 3 , 725 – 737 , ( 1980 ).
   Google Scholar
• Hwang , C. L. , and Yoon , K. , Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey , Springer-Verlag , New York , ( 1981 ) .
   Google Scholar
• Kamentezky , R. D. , “ The Relationship between the Analytical Hierarchy Process and the Additive Value Function , ” Decision Sciences , 13 , 4 , 702 – 713 , ( 1982 ).
   Google Scholar
• Keeney , R. L. and Raiffa , H. , Decision with Multiple Objectives , John Wiley , ( 1976 ) .
   Google Scholar
• Kocaoglu , D. F. , “ A Participative Approach to Program Evaluation , ” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , EM-30 , 3 , 112 – 118 , ( 1983 ).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon , K. R. , Decision Making among Multiaitribute Alternatives A Survey and Consolidated Approach , RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA , The RANDCorporation , Santa Monica , CA , ( 1968 ) .
   Google Scholar
• Nijkamp , P. van Delft , A. , Multi-Criteria Analysis and Regional Decision-Making , Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division , Leiden , The Netherlands , ( 1977 ) .
   Google Scholar
• Pugh , E. M. and Winslow , G. H. , The Analysis of Physical Measurements , Addison-Wesley , Reading , Mass. , 118 – 142 , ( 1966 ).
   Google Scholar
• Saary , T. L. , “ A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , ” Journal of Mathematical Psychology , 15 , 3 , 234 – 281 , ( 1977 ).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty , T.L. , The Analytic Hierarchy Process , McGraw-Hill , New York , ( 1980 ) .
   Google Scholar
• Stillwell , W. G. , arron , F. H. , and Edwards , W. , ” EvaluatingCredit Applications A Validation of Multiattribute Utility Weight Elicita-tion Techniques ,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 32 , 87 – 108 , ( 1983 ).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan , W. G. , “ Models IES Can Use to include Strategic, Non-Monetary Factorsin Automation Decisions ,” Industrial Engineering , 18 , 3 , 42 – 50 , 1986 ).
   Google Scholar
• Vamey , M. S. , Sullivan , W. G. , and Cochran , J. K. , “ Justification of Flexible Manufacturing Systems with the Analytical Hierarchy Roc-ess , ” 1985 Annual International Industrial Engineering Conference Proceedings . ( 1985 ).
   Google Scholar
• Yoon , K. , “ A Reconciliation among Discrete Compromise Solutions ,” Journal of the Operational Research Society , 38 , 3 , 277 – 286 , 1987 ).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeleny , M. , Multiple Criteria Decision Making , McGraw-Hill , New York , ( 1982 ) .
   Google Scholar