R&D project selection and scheduling with a filtered beam search approach

References

• Asher , D. I. ( 1962 ) A linear programming model for the allocation of R&D efforts . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 9 , 154 – 157 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker , N. R. ( 1974 a) R&D project selection models an assessment . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 21 ( 4 ), 165 – 171 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker , K. R. ( 1974b ) Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling , Wiley , New York .
   Google Scholar
• Baker , N. and Freeland , J. ( 1975 ) Recent advances in R&D benefit measurement and project selection methods . Management Science , 21 ( 10 ), 1164 – 1175 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker , N. R. and Pound , W. H. ( 1964 ) R and D project selection where we stand . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 11 , 124 – 134 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beged-Dov , A. G. ( 1965 ) Optimal assignment of research and development projects in a large company using an integer programming model . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 12 ( 4 ), 138 – 143 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardo , J. J. ( 1977 ) An assignment approach to choosing R&D experiments . Decision Sciences , 8 , 489 – 501 .
   Google Scholar
• Board , J. F. , Balachandra , R. and Kaufman , P. E. ( 1988 ) An interactive approach to R&D project selection and termination . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 35 , 139 – 146 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetron , M. J. , Martino , J. and Roepcke , L. ( 1967 ) The selection of R&D program content-survey of quantitative methods . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 14 ( 1 ), 4 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Cochran , M. A. , Pyle , E. B. , Greene , L. C , Clymer , H. A. and Bender , A. D. ( 1971 ) Investment model for R&D project evaluation and scheduling . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 18 ( 3 ), 89 – 100 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danila , N. ( 1989 ) Strategic evaluation and selection of R&D projects . R&D Management , 19 ( 1 ), 47 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean , B. V. and Roepcke , L. A. ( 1969 ) Cost effectiveness in R&D organizational resource allocation . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 16 , 222 – 242 .
   Google Scholar
• Dean , B. V. and Sengupta , S. S. ( 1962 ) Research budgeting and project selection . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 9 , 158 – 169 .
   Google Scholar
• Garey , M. R. and Johnson , D. S. ( 1979 ) Computers and Intractability A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , Freeman , San Francisco .
   Google Scholar
• Gear , A. E. , Lockett , A. G. and Pearson , A. W. ( 1971 ) Analysis of some portfolio models for R&D . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 18 ( 2 ), 66 – 75 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giffler , B. and Thompson , G. L. ( 1960 ) Algorithms for solving production scheduling problems . Operations Research , 8 ( 4 ), 487 – 503 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta , S. K. , Kyparisis , J. and Ip , C. ( 1992 ) Project selection and sequencing to maximize net present value of the total return . Management Science , 38 ( 5 ), 751 – 752 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess , S. W. ( 1962 ) A dynamic programming approach to R&D budgeting and project selection . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 9 , 170 – 179 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeremiah , B. , Lalchandani , A. and Schrage , L. ( 1964 ) Heuristic rules towards optimal scheduling . Research Report, Department of Industrial Engineering , Cornell University .
   Google Scholar
• Keown , A. J. , Taylor , B. W. , Ill and Duncan , C. P. ( 1979 ) Allocation of research and development funds a zero-one goal programming approach . Omega , 7 ( 4 ), 345 – 351 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberatore , M. J. and Titus , G. J. ( 1983 ) The practice of management science in R&D project management . Management Science , 29 ( 8 ), 962 – 974 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandakovic , T. and Souder , W. E. ( 1985 ) A flexible hierarchical model for project selection . R&D Management , 15 , 23 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore , J. R. and Baker , N. R. ( 1969 ) Computational analysis of scoring models for R&D project selection . Management Science , 16 , 4 , pB212–B232 p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton , T. E. and Pentico , D. W. ( 1993 ) Heuristic Scheduling Systems with Applications to Production Systems and Project Management , Wiley , New York .
   Google Scholar
• Oral , M. , Kettani , O. and Lang , P. ( 1991 ) A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects . Management Science , 37 , 871 – 885 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ow , P. S. and Morton , T. E. ( 1989 ) The single machine early/tardy problem . Management Science , 35 ( 2 ), 177 – 191 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritsker , A.A.B. , Watters , L. J. and Wolf , P. M. ( 1969 ) Multiproject scheduling with limited resources a zero-one programming approach . Management Science , 16 ( 1 ), 93 – 107 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanam , R. , Muralidhar , K. and Schniederjans , M. ( 1989 ) A zero-one goal programming approach for information system project selection . Omega , 17 ( 6 ), 583 – 593 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt , R. L. and Freeland , J. R. ( 1992 ) Recent progress in modeling R&D project-selection processes . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 39 , 189 – 201 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souder , W. E. ( 1972 ) Comparative analysis of R&D investment models . AIIE Transactions , 4 ( 1 ), 57 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , B. W. , Moore , L. J. and Clayton , E. R. ( 1982 ) R&D project selection and manpower allocation with nonlinear goal programming . Management Science , 28 ( 10 ), 1149 – 1158 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkofsy , E. P. , Baker , N. R. and Sweeney , D. J. ( 1981 ) A decision process model of R&D resource allocation in hierarchical organizations . Management Science , 27 , 268 – 283 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar