Drop fragility of the display of a smart mobile phone: weakest link failure or cumulative shock failure?

References

• ASTM. (1999) ASTM D332-99. Standard Test Methods for Mechanical-Shock Fragility of Products Using Shock Machines.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. (1970) A method for discriminating between models (with discussions). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 40, 323–353.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, L.J. and Englehardt, M. (1980) Probability of correct selection of Weibull versus gamma based on livelihood ratio. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 9, 375–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, E.A. and Cox, D.R. (1967) Discriminating between alternative binary response models. Biometrika, 54, 573–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W.W. (1980) On the tests of separate families of hypotheses with small sample size. Journal of Statistical Computations and Simulations, 2, 183–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhikara, R.S. and Folks, J.L. (1989) The Inverse Gaussian Distribution: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D.R. (1961) Tests of separate families of hypothesis, in Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Dumonceaux, R. and Antle, C.E. (1973) Discriminating between the log-normal and Weibull distribution. Technometrics, 15, 923–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham, S.D. and Padgett, W.J. (1997) Cumulative damage models for system failure with application to carbon fibers and composites. Technometrics, 39, 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearn, D.H. and Nebenzahl, E. (1991) On the maximum likelihood ratio method of deciding between the Weibull and gamma distributions. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 20, 579–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, S., Papadopoulos, J.M. and Sullivan, P.A.(1997) Shock protection of portable electronic products: shock response spectrum, damage boundary approach, and beyond. Shock and Vibration, 4, 169–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R.D. and Kundu, D. (1951) Discriminating between Weibull and generalized exponential distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 43, 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kullback, S. and Leibler, R.A. (1951) On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Kundu, D., Gupta, R.D. and Manglick, A. (2005) Discriminating between the log-normal and generalized exponential distributions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 127, 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, D. and Manglick, A. (2004) Discriminating between the Weibull and log-normal distributions. Naval Research Logistics, 51, 893–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, D. and Manglick, A. (2005) Discriminating between the log-normal and gamma distributions. Journal of the Applied Statistical Sciences, 14, 175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C.-T., Teo, Y.M. and Shim, V.P.W. (2002) Numerical simulation of the drop impact response of a portable electronic product. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 25(3), 478–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeker, W.Q. and Escobar, L.A. (1998) Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, Wiley, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, R.E. (1968) Fragility Assessment Theory and Test Procedure, Monterey Research Laboratory, Inc., Monterey, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Onar, A. and Padgett, W.J. (2000) Inverse Gaussian accelerated test models based on cumulative damage. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 64, 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, F.G. (2005) Maximum likelihood estimation under misspecified log-normal and Weibull distributions. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computations, 34, 503–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, B.B. (1978) Empirical comparisons of some tests of separate families of hypotheses. Metrika, 25, 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Quesenberry, C.P. and Kent, J. (1982) Selecting among probability distributions used in reliability. Technometrics, 24, 59–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-C., Tseng, S.-T. and Balakrishnan, N. (2011) Mis-specification analyses of gamma and Wiener degradation processes. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141, 3725–3735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (1982a) Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica, 50, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (1982b) Regularity conditions for Cox's test of non-nested hypotheses. Journal of Econometrics, 19, 301–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H.-F. (2007) Mis-specification analysis between normal and extreme value distributions for a linear regression model. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 36, 499–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar