Three Directions for Future Research into Sentencing Discretion

References

• American Law Institute. (2009). Model penal code: Sentencing, discussion draft no. 2 (Kevin Reitz, Reporter).
   Google Scholar
• Archibold, R. C. (2010, March 23). California, in financial crisis, opens prison doors. The New York Times, p. A14.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, S., & McCannon, B. C. (2010). The effect of reelections on prosecutors. Retrieved from http://www.ssrn.com
   Google Scholar
• Barkow , R. 2009 . Institutional design and the policing of prosecutors: Lessons from administrative law . Stanford Law Review , 61 : 869 – 921 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibas , S. 2009 . Prosecutorial regulation versus prosecutorial accountability . University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 157 : 959 – 1016 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan , J. M. and Kinnevy , S. C. 2010 . National surveys of state paroling authorities: Models of service delivery . Federal Probation , 74 : 34 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Clement, M., Schwarzfeld, M., & Thompson, M. (2011). The National Summit on Justice Reinvestment and Public Safety: Addressing recidivism, crime, and corrections spending. Justice Center, Council of State Governments. Retrieved from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA/pdf/CSG_JusticeReinvestmentSummitReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Demleitner , N. V. 2009 . Good conduct time: How much and for whom? The unprincipled approach of the model penal code: Sentencing . Florida Law Review , 61 : 777 – 795 .
   Google Scholar
• Feeley , M. M. 1992 . The process is the punishment, handling cases in a lower criminal court , New York , NY : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, v. (2011). United States, 131 S.Ct. 2685.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. S., Irons-Guynn, C., & Weiland, D. (2002). Community prosecution strategies: Measuring impact. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/192826.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gordon , S. C. and Huber , G. A. 2007 . The effect of electoral competitiveness on incumbent behavior . Quarterly Journal of Political Science , 2 : 107 – 138 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grattet , R. , Petersilia , J. , Lin , J. and Beckman , M. 2009 . Parole violations and revocations in California: Analysis and suggestions for action . Federal Probation , 73 : 2 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2012). Actuarial sentencing: An “unsettled” proposition. Justice Quarterly. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2012.682603
   Google Scholar
• Howell , K. B. 2009 . Broken lives from broken windows: The hidden costs of aggressive order-maintenance policing . New York University Review of Law and Social Change , 33 : 271 – 326 .
   Google Scholar
• Huber , Gregory A. and Gordon , Sanford C. 2004 . Accountability and coercion: Is justice blind when it runs for office? . American Journal of Political Science. , 48 : 247 – 255 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Lucas L. (2010, September 7). Effort to curb recidivism pays off, Tennessee Officials Say. The Tennesseean, p. 2B.
   Google Scholar
• Kallman, K. V. (2003). A comparative analysis for processing misdemeanor cases in the criminal justice center of the Los Angeles superior court. Retrieved from http://contentdm.ncsconline.org/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=/ctadmin&CISOPTR=473
   Google Scholar
• King , N. J. 2007 . Regulating settlement: What is left of the rule of law in the criminal process? . DePaul Law Review , 56 : 389 – 399 .
   Google Scholar
• King , N. J. 2005 . Judicial oversight of negotiated sentences in a world of bargained punishment . Stanford Law Review , 58 : 293 – 308 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King , N. J. and O'Neill , M. 2005 . Appeal waivers and the future of sentencing policy . Duke Law Journal , 55 : 209 – 261 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingele, Cecelia M. (2010). Changing the sentence without hiding the truth: Judicial sentence modification as a promising method of early release. William & Mary Law Review, 52, 465-536.
   Google Scholar
• LaFave, W., Israel, J., King, N., & Kerr, O. 2007 & Supp. 2010. 7 criminal procedure. § 27.5.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, K. (2008). The state's role in prosecutorial politics. In: Worrall, J. L., & Nugent-Borakove, M. E. (Eds.), The changing role of the American prosecutor (pp. 27-50). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Love , Margaret . 2010 . Alternatives to conviction: Deferred adjudication as a way of avoiding collateral consequences . Federal Sentencing Reporter , 22 : 6 – 16 .
   Google Scholar
• Memo to professor Capra from Judge Baylson. April 7, 2010, Reproduced in materials for the Conference on privacy and internet access to court files, held April 13, 2010 at Fordham Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Miller , M. and Wright , R. 2008 . The black box: The reasons behind prosecutors' declination choices . Iowa Law Review , 94 : 125 – 196 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. (2009). Minor crimes, massive waste, the terrible toll of America's broken misdemeanor courts. Retrieved from http://www.nacdl.org/misdemeanor
   Google Scholar
• National Center for State Courts (NCSC). Resource guide: Public access to court records. Retrieved from http://www.ncsconline.org/wc/courtopics/ResourceGuide.asp?topic=PriPub
   Google Scholar
• National Center for State Courts (NCSC). (2009). Examining the work of state courts: An analysis of 2007 state court caseloads. Retrieved from http://contentdm.ncsconline.org/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=/ctadmin&CISOPTR=1500
   Google Scholar
• National District Attorneys Association. (2007). Just look what you've done: Determining the effectiveness of community prosecution. Retrieved from http://www.ndaa.org/pdf/just_look_07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Corrections. (2010). A framework for evidence-based decision making in local criminal justice systems. Retrieved from http://nicic.gov/Library/024372
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S. W. (2006). Prosecutors in state courts, 2005, BJS Bulletin, July 2006, NCJ 213799.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, A. (2010, May 20). Utah corrections director warns of possible emergency releases by this summer. Deseret News (Salt Lake City), p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Reitz, K. R. (2012). Indeterminate sentencing. In: Petersilia, P., & Reitz, K. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on sentencing and corrections (pp. 270-298). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhine, E. E. (2012). The present status and future prospects of parole boards and parole supervision. In: Petersilia, J., & Reitz, K. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on sentencing and corrections (pp. 627-656). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, A. L., Osborne, J. W. L., Winterfield, L., & Elderbroom, B. (2008). Putting public safety first: 13 parole supervision strategies to enhance reentry outcomes. Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA/pdf/UI_public_safety_first.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stockinger, Josh. (2010, August 10). Overcrowding leads to early release from jail. Daily Herald (Chicago). Retrieved from http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20100810/news/308109873/
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. J. (2010). An investigation of the key components of the supervision to aid reentry (STAR) program. Report submitted to the Federal Probation Department for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer , J. T. and Johnson , B. D. 2004 . Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis . Criminology , 42 : 137 – 178 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff , M. A. 2008 . Evidence-based judicial discretion: Promoting public safety through state sentencing reform . New York University Law Review , 83 : 1389 – 1419 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall , J. L. and Nugent-Borakove , M. E. 2008 . The changing role of the American prosecutor , Albany , NY : State University of New York Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wright , R. F. 2005 . Sentencing commissions as provocateurs of prosecutorial self-regulation . Columbia Law Review , 105 : 1010 – 1047 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright , R. F. 2009 . How prosecutor elections fail us . Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law. , 6 : 581 – 610 .
   Google Scholar
• Wright , R. F. 2010 . Public defender elections and popular control over criminal justice . Missouri Law Review , 75 : 803 – 829 .
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. F. (2012). Charging and plea bargaining as forms of sentencing discretion. In: Reitz, K., & Petersilia, J. (Eds.), Oxford handbook on sentencing and corrections (pp. 247-269). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar