Maybe I Should Do This Alone: A Comparison of Solo and Co-offending Robbery Outcomes

References

• Akiyama, Y., & Nolan, J. (1999). Methods for understanding and analyzing NIBRS data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 225-238.10.1023/A:1007531023247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarid, L. F., Burton, V. S., & Hochstetler, A. L. (2009). Group and solo robberies: Do accomplices shape criminal Form? Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 1-9.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Andresen, M. A., & Felson, M. (2010). The impact of co-offending. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 66-81.10.1093/bjc/azp043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen, M. A., & Felson, M. (2012a). Co-offending and the diversification of crime types. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 811-829.10.1177/0306624X11407154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen, M. A., & Felson, M. (2012b). An investigation into the fundamental regularities of co-offending for violent and property crime classifications. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 54, 101-115.10.3138/cjccj.2010.E.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumer, E., & Lauritsen, J. L. (2010). Reporting crime to the police 1973-2005: A multivariate analysis of long-term trends in the National Crime Survey (NCS) and National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Criminology, 48, 131-185.10.1111/crim.2010.48.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M. T., Slocum, L. A., & Loeber, R. (2013). Illegal behavior, neighborhood context, and police reporting by victims of violence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 75-103.10.1177/0022427811423107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernasco, W. (2006). Co-offending and the choice of target areas in burglary. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 3, 139-155.10.1002/(ISSN)1544-4767
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard, M., & Nguyen, H. (2010). Is it who you know, or how many that counts? criminal networks and cost avoidance in a sample of young offenders. Justice Quarterly, 27, 130-158.10.1080/07418820802593386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard, M., & Ouellet, F. (2011). Is small beautiful? The link between risks and size in illegal drug markets, 12, 70-86.
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J. A. (2002). Methodological and theoretical implications of using subject-generated consequences in tests of rational choice theory. Justice Quarterly, 19, 747-771.10.1080/07418820200095411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J. A. (2007). Predicting differences in the perceived relevance of crime's costs and benefits in a test of rational choice theory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 461-485.10.1177/0306624X06294136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1982). Mobility, notoriety, and crime: a study of crime patterns in urban nodal points. Journal of Environmental Systems, 11, 89-99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownfield, D., Sorenson, A. M., & Thompson, K. M. (2001). Gang membership, race, and social class: A test of the group hazard and master status hypotheses. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 73-89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, P. J. (2002). Group crime in Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 44, 277-315.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, P. J. (2009). Co-offending and the development of the delinquent career. Criminology, 47, 1295-1329.10.1111/(ISSN)1745-9125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147-185.10.1086/449106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, K. P., & McCord, J. (2002). A longitudinal examination of the relation between co-offending with violent accomplices and violent crime. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 97-108.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25, 933-948.10.1111/crim.1987.25.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusson, M. (1993). Situational deterrence: Fear during the criminal event. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies, Vol. 1 (pp. 55-68). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Alessio, S. J., & Stolzenberg, L. (2010). Do cities influence co-offending? Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 711-719.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felson, M. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In J. E. Eck, & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place, crime prevention studies, Vol. 4 (pp. 53-66). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felson, M. (2003). The process of co-offending. In M. J. Smith, & D. B. Cornish (Eds.), Crime prevention studies, Vol. 16 (pp. 149-168). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felson, M. (2009). The natural history of extended co-offending. Trends in Organized Crime, 12, 159-165.10.1007/s12117-008-9056-7
   Google Scholar
• Feyerherm, W. (1980). The group hazard hypothesis: A reexamination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17, 58-68.10.1177/002242788001700105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstadter, W. J. (1969). The social organization of armed robbery. Social Problems, 17, 64-83.10.2307/799893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. L. (1973). Group violations and official delinquency: The group hazard hypothesis. Criminology, 11, 127-160.10.1111/crim.1973.11.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation (2011a). NIBRS participation by state. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved from www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/nibrs/2011/resources/nibrs-participation-by-state
   Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation (2011a). Summary of NIBRS 2011. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved from www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/nibrs/2011/resources/summary-of-nibrs-2011
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Standford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, T. C., & Rennison, C. (2003). Reporting crime to the police, 1992–2000. Special Report, NCJ: Bureau of Justice Statistics 195710.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, A. (2001). Opportunities and decisions: Interactional dynamics in robbery and burglary groups. Criminology, 39, 737-764.10.1111/crim.2001.39.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. A. (2010). Serendipity in robbery target selection. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 514-529.10.1093/bjc/azq002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. A., & Wright, R. (2010). Bounded rationality, retaliation, and the spread of urban violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1739-1766.10.1177/0886260509354502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: moral and sexual attractions in doing evil. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kleemans, E. R., & de Poot, C. J. (2008). Criminal careers in organized crime and social opportunity structure. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 69-98.10.1177/1477370807084225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, A., & Bichler, G. (2011). Networks of collaborating criminals: Assessing the structural vulnerability of drug markets. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 271-297.10.1177/0022427810391535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxfield, M. G. (1999). The national incident-based reporting system: Research and policy applications. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 119-149.10.1023/A:1007518620521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, B., & Hagan, J. (2001). When crime pays: Capital, competence, and criminal success. Social Forces, 79, 1035-1060.10.1353/sof.2001.0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, B., Hagan, J., & Cohen, L. E. (1998). Uncertainty, cooperation, and crime: Understanding the decision to co-offend. Social Forces, 77, 155-184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloin, J. M., & Nguyen, H. (2012). It was my idea: Considering the instigation of co-offending. Criminology, 50, 463-494.10.1111/crim.2011.50.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloin, J. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2010). On the relationship between co-offending network redundancy and offending versatility. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 63-90.10.1177/0022427809348905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloin, J. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). ‘I Wasn’t Alone’: collective behaviour and violent delinquency. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42, 339-353.
   Google Scholar
• McGloin, J. M., & Stickle, W. P. (2011). Influence or convenience? disentangling peer influence and co-offending for chronic offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 419-447.10.1177/0022427810393019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, R. F., Kennedy, L. W., & Sacco, V. F. (2001). Crime and the criminal event perspective. In R. F. Meier, L. W. Kennedy, & V. F. Sacco (Eds.), The process and structure of crime: criminal events and crime analysis (pp. 1-28). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, S. F., McHugh, S., & Felson, R. B. (2004). Distinctive characteristics of assaults motivated by bias. Criminology, 42, 585-618.10.1111/crim.2004.42.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morselli, C., & Tremblay, P. (2004). Criminal achievement, offender networks and the benefits of low self-control. Criminology, 42, 773-804.10.1111/crim.2004.42.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morselli, C., Tremblay, P., & McCarthy, B. (2006). Mentors and criminal achievement. Criminology, 44, 17-43.10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Society Review, 27, 467-496.10.2307/3054102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., & Bouchard, M. (2013). Need, connections, or competence? Criminal achievement among adolescent offenders. Justice Quarterly, 30, 44-83.10.1080/07418825.2011.589398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papachristos, A. V., & Smith, C. M. (October 10, 2012). The small world of Al Capone: The embedded and multiplex nature of organized crime. Retrieved from SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2159899
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., & Pogarsky, G. (2009). rational choice, agency and thoughtfully reflective decision making: The short and long-term consequences of making good choices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 103-127.10.1007/s10940-009-9065-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Pogarsky, G., & Zimmerman, G. (2011). Thoughtfully reflective decision making and the accumulation of capital: bringing choice back in. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 1-26.10.1007/s10940-010-9095-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., & Simpson, S. (1993). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law and Society Review, 30, 549-583.
   Google Scholar
• Piliavin, I., Thornton, C., Gartner, R., & Matseuda, R. (1986). Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 51, 101-119.10.2307/2095480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogarsky, G. (2002). Identifying “deterrable” offenders: Implications for research on deterrence. Justice Quarterly, 19, 431-452.10.1080/07418820200095301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, A. J. (1988). Co-offending and criminal careers. Crime and Justice, 10, 117-170.10.1086/449145
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, A. J., & Farrington, D. P. (1991). Advancing knowledge about co-offending: results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 360-395.10.2307/1143811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2008). The influences of incident and contextual characteristics on crime clearance of nonlethal violence: A multilevel event history analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 61-71.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. R. (2012). Youth co-offending networks: An investigation of social and spatial effects. Social Networks, 34, 141-149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnebly, S. M. (2002). An examination of the impact of victim, offender, and situational attributes on the deterrent effect of defensive gun use: A research note. Justice Quarterly, 19, 377-398.10.1080/07418820200095281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1931). Social factors in juvenile delinquency. Washington, DC: United States Government Press, Wickersham Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138.10.1037/h0042769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snook, B., & Mercer, J. C. (2010). Modelling police officers’ judgments of the veracity of suicide notes. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 52, 79-95.10.3138/cjccj.52.1.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (2008). Co-offending and the age–crime curve. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 65-86.10.1177/0022427807309441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, E. (1947). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Company.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. P., Saltzman, L. E., & Bibel, D. (1999). Applying NIBRS data to the study of intimate partner violence: Massachusetts as a case study. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 163-180.10.1023/A:1007522721430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillyer, M. S., Miller, J. M., & Tillyer, R. (2011). The environmental and situational correlates of victim injury in nonfatal violent incidents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 433-452.10.1177/0093854811400250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillyer, M. S., & Tillyer, R. (2012). Violence in context: A multilevel analysis of victim injury in robbery incidents. Justice Quarterly. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.696127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, P. (1993). Searching for suitable co-offenders. In R. V. Clarke, & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine Activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 5 (pp. 17-36). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• van Mastrigt, S. B., & Farrington, D. P. (2009). Co-offending, age, gender and crime type: Implications for criminal justice policy. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 552-573.10.1093/bjc/azp021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mastrigt, S. B., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Prevalence and characteristics of co‐offending recruiters. Justice Quarterly, 28, 325-359.10.1080/07418825.2010.482535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warr, M. (1996). Organization and instigation in delinquent groups. Criminology, 34, 11-37.10.1111/crim.1996.34.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerman, F. M. (2003). Co-offending as a social exchange: Explaining characteristics of co-offending. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 398-416.10.1093/bjc/43.2.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikstrom, P. O. (2006). Individuals, settings and acts of crime. In P. O. Wikstrom, & R. Sampson (Eds.), The explanation of crime (pp. 61-107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489341
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. T., & Decker, S. H. (1997). Armed robbers in action: Stickups and street culture. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar