“Juvenile Drug Courts and Recidivism: Results from a Multisite Outcome Study”

References

• Aarons, G. A., Brown, S. A., Hough, R. L., Garland, A. F., & Wood, P. A. (2001). Prevalence of adolescent substance use disorders across five sectors of care. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 419–426.10.1097/00004583-200104000-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie, A., Drukker, D., Leber Herr, J., & Imbens, G. W. (2004). Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. The Stata Journal, 4, 290–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52.10.1177/0093854890017001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balter Rossman, S., Butts, J. A., Roman, J., DeStefano, C., & White, R. (2004). What juvenile drug courts do and how they do it. In J. A. Butts & J. Roman (Eds.), Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse (pp. 55–106). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battjes, R. J., Gordon, M. S., O’Grady, K. E., Kinlock, T. W., & Carswell, M. A. (2003). Factors that predict adolescent motivation for substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 221–232.10.1016/S0740-5472(03)00022-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko, S. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. New York, NY: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko, S. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. New York, NY: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko, S., & Logan, T. K. (2003). Delivering more effective treatment to adolescents: Improving the juvenile drug court model. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25, 189–211.10.1016/S0740-5472(03)00123-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, G., & Fox, A. (2010). Trial and error in criminal justice reform: Learning from failure. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation (User Report 2007–06). Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Breda, C. S., & Heflinger, C. A. (2007). The impact of motivation to change on substance use among adolescents in treatment. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 16, 109–124.10.1300/J029v16n03_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2003). Juvenile drug courts: Strategies in practice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Assistance Drug Court Technical Assistance Project. (2012). Drug court activity update: Composite summary information. Washington, DC: American University.
   Google Scholar
• Butts, J. A., & Roman, J. (2004). Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butts, J. A., Zweig, J. M., & Mamalian, C. (2004). Defining the mission of juvenile drug courts. In J. A. Butts & J. Roman (Eds.), Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse (pp. 137–184). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. M. (2004). Clackamas County juvenile drug court outcome evaluation: Final report. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. M., Waller, M., & Marchand, G. (2006). Clackamas County juvenile drug court enhancement: Process, outcome/impact and cost evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2012). Emerging findings from research on adolescent development and juvenile justice. Victims & Offenders, 7, 428–449.10.1080/15564886.2012.713901
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. S. (2001). Juvenile drug court programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. S. (2002). Juvenile drug treatment courts in the United States: Initial lessons learned and issues being addressed. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1689–1722.10.1081/JA-120014427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crumpton, D., Carey, S. M., Mackin, J. R., & Finigan, M. W. (2006). Harford county juvenile drug court performance evaluation: Final report. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Gottfredson, D. C., Sherman, L. W., & Welsh, B. C. (2006). The Maryland scientific methods scale. In L. W. Sherman, D. P. Farrington, B. C. Welsh, & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (2nd ed., pp. 13–21). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henggeler, S. W., McCart, M. R., Cunningham, P. B., & Chapman, J. E. (2012). Enhancing the effectiveness of juvenile drug courts by integrating evidence-based practices. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 264–275.10.1037/a0027147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller, M. L., Malluche, D., Bryan, V., DuPont, M. L., Martin, B., Abensur, R., … Payne, C. (2010). A multisite description of juvenile drug courts: Program models and during-program outcomes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 213–235.10.1177/0306624X08327784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2007). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2006 (NIH Publication No. 07-6202). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., Shaffer, D. K., & Lowenkamp, C. (2002). Outcome evaluation of Ohio’s drug court efforts ( Technical Report). Cincinnati, OH: Center for Criminal Justice Research, University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., Sullivan, C., Blair, L., Sullivan, C. J., & Smith, P. (2013). Final report: Outcome and process evaluation of juvenile drug courts. ( Technical Report). Cincinnati, OH: Center for Criminal Justice Research, University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (1989, November). The efficacy of intervention for juvenile delinquency: Results from 400 studies. Paper presented at the 41st annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Reno, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4, 124–147.10.1080/15564880802612573
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Are drug courts effective: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Community Corrections, 15, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B. (2011). Adult and juvenile drug courts. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mears, D. P. (2004). Identifying adolescent substance abuse. In J. A. Butts & J. Roman (Eds.), Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse (pp. 185–220). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melnick, G., De Leon, G., Hawke, J., Jainchill, N., & Kressel, D. (1997). Motivation and readiness for therapeutic community treatment among adolescents and adult substance abusers. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 485–506.10.3109/00952999709016891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milkman, H. B., & Wanberg, K. W. (2012). Criminal conduct & substance abuse treatment for adolescents: Pathways to self-discovery and change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60–71.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvey, E., & Schubert, C. (2012). Some initial policy implications from the pathways to desistance study. Victims & Offenders, 7, 407–427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, National Drug Court Institute and United States Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2003). Juvenile drug courts: Strategies in practice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Justice. (2000). 1999 annual report on drug use among adult and juvenile arrestees. Juvenile program findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Puzzanchera, C. (2013). Juvenile arrests 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M., J. Brophy, & C. Cooper (1997). The juvenile drug court movement. Fact sheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, N., & Webb, V. J. (2004). Multiple measures of juvenile drug court effectiveness: Results of a quasi-experimental design. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 292–314.10.1177/0011128703254991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, J., & DeStefano, C. (2004). Drug court effects and the quality of existing evidence. In J. A. Butts & J. Roman (Eds.), Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse (pp. 107–136). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K. (2006). Reconsidering drug court effectiveness: A meta-analytic review ( doctoral dissertation). Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, D. D., & Joe, G. W. (1993). Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 30, 357–368.10.1037/0033-3204.30.2.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan, J. J., & Smykla, J. O. (2003). Juvenile drug courts: Understanding the importance of dimensional variability. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 339–360.10.1177/0887403403253720
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, M. D., & Shadish, W. R. (1997). Outcome, attrition, and family-couples treatment for drug abuse: A meta-analysis and review of the controlled, comparative studies. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 170–191.10.1037/0033-2909.122.2.170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, D. M., Deberard, S., & Homan, K. (2012). Predicting success and failure in juvenile drug treatment court: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44, 159–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, E. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25, 1–21.10.1214/09-STS313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration) (2010). Results from the 2009 national survey on drug use and health: Volume I. Summary of national findings. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-38A, HHS Publication No. SMA 10-4856).
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C. J., & Jolliffe, D. (2012). Peer influence, mentoring and crime prevention. In B. C. Welsh & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Handbook of crime prevention (pp. 207–225). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner-Smith, E. E., Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2012). The comparative effectiveness of outpatient treatment for adolescent substance abuse: A meta-analysis. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44, 145–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TCU Institute for Behavioral Research. (2005). Offender functioning in treatment: Assessment factsheet. Retrieved December 2013, from http://www.ibr.tcu.edu/evidence/TCU-CJ-CEST-AFS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, T. A., Skilling, T. A., & Peterson-Badali, M. (2009). Matching court-ordered services with treatment needs predicting treatment success with young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 385–401.10.1177/0093854808331249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, H. B., Brody, J. L., & Slesnik, N. (2001). Integrative behavioral and family therapy for adolescent substance abuse. In P. M. Monti, S. M. Colby, & T. A. O’Leary (Eds.), Adolescents, alcohol, and substance abuse: Reaching teens through brief interventions (pp. 216–243). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803956
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. J., & Chang, S. Y. (2000). A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 138–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. B., Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, K. C., Botzet, A. M., & Fahnhorst, T. (2011). Advances in adolescent substance abuse treatment. Current Psychiatry Reports, 13, 416–421.10.1007/s11920-011-0214-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar