The First Delinquent Peers Are the Most Important: Examining Nonlinearity in the Peer Effect

References

• Agnew, R. (2005). Why do criminal offend? Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80, 123-129.10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, R. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E. (2011). The social animal. New York, NY: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2012). Social psychology. New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177-190). Carnegie: Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.10.1037/10025-000
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35.10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1-70.10.1037/h0093718
   Google Scholar
• Bagwell, C. L., & Schmidt, M. E. (2011). Friendships in childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balsa, A. I., Homer, J. F., French, M. T., & Norton, E. C. (2011). Alcohol use and popularity: Social payoffs from conforming to peers' behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 559-568.10.1111/jora.2011.21.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, T. J., & Murphy, L. M. (2002). Influences of friends and friendships: Myths, truths, and research recommendations. Advances in Child Development, 35, 275-310.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, R. (2005). Group size and conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 331-354.10.1177/1368430205056464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166-179.10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B., Bakken, J. P., Ameringer, S. W., & Mahon, S. D. (2008). A comprehensive conceptualization of peer influence process in adolescence. In M. J. Prinstein, & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescence (pp. 17-44). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buis, M. (2010). Stata tip 87: Interpretation of interactions in nonlinear models. Stata Journal, 10, 305-308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, R., & Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14, 128-147.10.2307/798612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2011). Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: pathways of youth in our time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, R. B., & Leung, M. C. (1995). Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: Fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. Child Development, 66, 1330-1345.10.2307/1131650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, P. (2011). Crime and social network analysis. In P. Carrington, & J. Scott (Eds.), The handbook of social network analysis (pp. 240-245). New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S. (1979). A cybernetic model of self-attention processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1251-1281.10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and Self-regulation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-5887-2
   Google Scholar
• Chantala, K., & Tabor, J. (1999). Strategies to perform a design based analysis using the add health data. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/data/guides
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, H. H., & Wiebe, R. P. (2003). The moderation of adolescent-to-peer similarity in tobacco and alcohol use by school levels of substance use. Child Development, 74, 279–291.10.1111/cdev.2003.74.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collett, D. (2002). Modelling binary data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373-390.10.1016/S0005-7894(96)80023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.10.1037/h0046408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, D. S., & Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: current theories (pp. 28–67). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (2010). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (2010). Social influence network theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimoto, K., & Valente, T. W. (2012a). Decomposing the components of friendship and friends’ influence on adolescent drinking and smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 136-143.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto, K., & Valente, T. W. (2012b). Social network influences on adolescent substance use: Disentangling structural equivalence from cohesion. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1952-1960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galef, B. G., Jr. (1988). Imitation in animals: History, de¢nitions and interpret- ation of the data from the psychological laboratory. In T. Zentall, & B. G. Galef Jr, (Eds.), Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 3-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2010). Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Economics Letters, 107, 291-296.10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halaby, C. N. (2004). Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507-544.10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 106, 1013-1057.
   Google Scholar
• Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 99-134.10.1023/A:1015227414929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21, 107-112.10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.10.1037/10628-000
   Google Scholar
• Hedstrom, P. (2005). Dissecting the social. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511488801
   Google Scholar
• Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Social learning: An introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., Blanton, H., & Dodge, T. (2005). Peer influences on risk behavior: An analysis of the effects of a close friend. Developmental Psychology, 41, 135-147.10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkhoff, W., Friedkin, N., & Johnsen, E. (2010). Status, networks and opinions. In S. Thye (Ed.), Advances in group processes (pp. 1-38). New York, NY: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karaca-Mandic, P., Norton, E. C., & Dowd, B. (2012). Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Services Research, 47, 255-274.10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01314.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knecht, A., Snijders, T. A. B., Baerveldt, C., Steglich, C. E. G., & Raub, W. (2010). Friendship and delinquency: Selection and influence processes in early adolescence. Social Development, 19, 494-514.10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobus, K. (2003). Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction, 98, 37-55.10.1046/j.1360-0443.98.s1.4.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn, M. D., Skinner, W. F., Massey, J. L., Akers, R. L., Krohn, D., & Skinner, F. (1985). Social learning theory and adolescent cigarette smoking: A longitudinal study. Social Problems, 32, 455-473.10.2307/800775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latane, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J. M. (1999). Solomon Asch’s legacy for group research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 358-364.10.1207/pspr.1999.3.issue-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maguin, E., & Loeber, R. (1996). Academic performance and delinquency. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (pp. 145-264). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcos, A., Bahr, S. J., & Johnson, R. E. (1986). Test of a bonding/association theory of adolescent drug use. Social Forces, 65, 135-161.10.1093/sf/65.1.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloin, J. M. (2009). Delinquency balance: Revisiting peer influence. Criminology, 47, 439-477.10.1111/crim.2009.47.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed, D., & Savage, S. V. (2013). Status, numbers and influence. Social Forces, 91, 1085-1104.10.1093/sf/sos194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L., & Amos, A. (1997). Girls, pecking order and smoking. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 1861-1869.10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00295-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804564
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D., & Paternoster, R. (2000). Population heterogeneity and state dependence: State of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 117-144.10.1023/A:1007502804941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, E. C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4, 154-167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcutt, J. D. (1987). Differential association and Marijuana use: A closer look at Sutherland (with a little help from Becker). Criminology, 25, 341-358.10.1111/crim.1987.25.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumridge, E. W., Fitzgerald, L. J., & Abel, G. M. (2002). Performing coolness: Smoking refusal and adolescent identities. Health Education Research, 17, 167-179.10.1093/her/17.2.167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310-342.10.1353/mpq.2003.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinstein, M. J., Meade, C. S., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Adolescent oral sex, peer popularity, and perceptions of best friends’ sexual behavior. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28, 243-249.10.1093/jpepsy/jsg012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, C. I., & Pogarsky, G. (2011). One bad apple may not spoil the whole bunch: Best friends and adolescent delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 197-223.10.1007/s10940-010-9103-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, J. P., Raghunathan, T. E., & Kinney, S. K. (2006). The importance of modeling the sampling design in multiple imputation for missing data. Survey Methodology, 32, 143-149.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Sharkey, P. (2008). Neighborhood selection and the social reproduction of concentrated racial inequality. Demography, 45, 1-29.10.1353/dem.2008.0012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J. F. (1960). Differential association as a hypothesis: Problems of empirical testing. Social Problems, 8, 14-25.10.2307/798626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smångs, M. (2010). Delinquency, social skills and the structure of peer relations: Assessing criminological theories by social network theory. Social Forces, 89, 609-631.10.1353/sof.2010.0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, E. J. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.10.1037/0033-2909.95.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (1997). Peers, drug use, and delinquency. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 218-233). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47-83.10.1111/crim.1994.32.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tittle, R. (1995). Control balance: Towards a general theory of deviance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18, 69-89.10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, T. W. (2005). Network models and methods for studying the diffusion of innovations. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 98-116). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811395
   Google Scholar
• Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2000). Influence of deviant friends on delinquency: Searching for moderator variables. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 313-325.10.1023/A:1005188108461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, P. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37, 87-113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803956
   Google Scholar
• Warr, M., & Stafford, M. (1991). The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do? Criminology, 29, 851-866.10.1111/crim.1991.29.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerman, Frank (2011). Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology, 49, 253-286.10.1111/crim.2011.49.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackston, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, G. M., & Messner, S. F. (2011). Neighborhood context and nonlinear peer effects on adolescent violent crime. Criminology, 49, 873-903.10.1111/crim.2011.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, G. M., & Vasquez, B. E. (2011). Decomposing the peer effect on adolescent substance use: Mediation, nonlinearity, and differential nonlinearity. Criminology, 49, 1235-1273.10.1111/crim.2011.49.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar