Supervision Intensity and Parole Outcomes: A Competing Risks Approach to Criminal and Technical Parole Violations

References

• Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Bierens, H. J., & Carvalho, J. R. (2007). Semi-nonparametric competing risks analysis of recidivism. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 971–993.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein, A., & Beck, A. J. (2005). Reentry as a transient state between liberty and recommitment. In J. Travis, & C. Visher (Eds.), Prisoner reentry and crime in America (pp. 50–79). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier J. M., & Jones B. S. (2004). Event history modeling. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790874
   Google Scholar
• Cavender, G., & Knepper, P. (1992). Strange interlude: An analysis of juvenile parole revocation decision making. Social Problems, 39, 387–399.10.2307/3097017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, E. (2008). The liberation hypothesis and racial and ethnic disparities in the application of california’s three strikes law. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 6, 83–102.10.1080/15377930802096462
   Google Scholar
• Cicourel, A. (1976). The social organization of juvenile justice. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Copas, J. B., & Heydari, F. (1997). Estimating the risk of reoffending by use of exponential mixture models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 160, 237–252.10.1111/rssa.1997.160.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drass, K. A., & Spencer, J. W. (1987). Accounting for pre-sentencing recommendations: Typologies and probation officers’ theory of office. Social Problems, 34, 277–293.10.2307/800767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M. (1983). Holistic effects in social control decision-making. Law & Society Review, 17, 425–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escarela, G., Francis, B., & Soothill, K. (2000). Competing risks, persistence, and desistance in analyzing recidivism. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 385–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449–474.10.1111/crim.1992.30.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grattet, R., Lin, J., & Petersilia, J. (2011). Supervision regimes, risk, and official reactions to parolee deviance. Criminology, 49, 371–399.10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00229.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grattet, R., Petersilia, J., & Lin, J. (2008). Parole violations and revocations in California (Final Grant Report). National Institute of Justice.Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/224521.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, B. (2007). Against prediction: Profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalven, H. Jr., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kitsuse, J. I., & Cicourel, A. V. (1963). A note on the uses of official statistics. Social Problems, 11, 131–139.10.2307/799220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17, 61–87.10.1080/07418820000094481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubrin, C. E., & Stewart, E. A. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44, 165–197.10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letourneau, E. J., Bandyopadhyay, D., Sinha, D., & Armstrong, K. S. (2009). The influence of sex offender registration on juvenile sexual recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 136–153.
   Google Scholar
• Letourneau, E. J., Levenson, J. S., Bandyopadhyay, D., Sinha, D., & Armstrong, K. S. (2010). Effects of South Carolina’s sex offender registration and notification policy on adult recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 21, 435–458.10.1177/0887403409353148
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (1998). Waste managers? The new penology, crime fighting, and parole agent identity. Law & Society Review, 32, 839–869.10.2307/827741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. (2010). Parole revocation in the era of mass incarceration. Sociology Compass, 4, 999–1010.10.1111/soco.2010.4.issue-12
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J., Grattet, R., & Petersilia, J. (2010). ‘Back-end sentencing’ and reimprisonment: individual, organizational, and community predictors of parole sanctioning decisions. Criminology, 48, 759–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., Grattet, R., & Petersilia, J. (2012). Justice by other means: Venue sorting in parole revocation. Law and Policy, 34, 349–372.10.1111/lapo.2012.34.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltz, M. (1984). Recidivism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCleary, R. (1977). Dangerous men: The sociology of parole. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2009). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195160864.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 37, pp. 281–335). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reskin, B. F., & Visher, C. A. (1986). Impacts of evidence and extralegal factors on jurors’ decisions. Law & Society Review, 20, 423–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, W. (1986). A survival model with dependent competing events and right-hand censoring: Probation and parole as illustration. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 113–137.
   Google Scholar
• Rudes, D. S. (2012). Getting technical: Parole officers’ continued use of technical violations under California’s parole reform agenda. Journal of Crime & Justice, 35, 249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. D. (1989). Predicting criminal recidivism using ‘split population’ survival models. Journal of Econometrics, 40, 141–159.10.1016/0304-4076(89)90034-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, E., & Miller, L. L. (2002). A cautionary note on the use of actuarial risk assessment tools for social control. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 138–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. (1993). Poor discipline: Parole and the social control of the underclass, 1890–1990. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sirakaya, S. (2006). Recidivism and social interactions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 863–877.10.1198/016214506000000177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. L., & Damphousse, K. R. (1998). Terrorism, politics, and punishment: A test of structural-contextual theory and the ‘Liberation Hypothesis’. Criminology, 36, 67–92.10.1111/crim.1998.36.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, A. L., Kachnowski, V., & Bhati, A. (2005). Does parole work? Analyzing the impact of postprison supervision on rearrest outcomes. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Cederblom, J. (1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 8, 305–327.10.1080/07418829100091071
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J. (2007). Back-end sentencing: A practice in search of a rationale. Social Research, 74, 631–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S., Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1992). Evaluating intensive supervision probation/parole (ISP) for drug offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 38, 539–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D., & Hembroff, L. A. (1988). The prediction of racial/ethnic sentencing disparities: An expectation states approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 53–82.10.1177/0022427888025001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., Lattimore, P. K., & Linster, R. L. (1991). Predicting the recidivism of serious youthful offenders using survival models. Criminology, 29, 329–366.10.1111/crim.1991.29.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werth, R. (2012). I do what I’m told, sort of: Reformed subjects, unruly citizens, and parole. Theoretical Criminology, 16, 329–346.10.1177/1362480611410775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. A. (2005). Bad behavior or bad policy? An examination of Tennessee release cohorts. Criminology and Public Policy, 4, 485–518.10.1111/cpp.2005.4.issue-3
   Google Scholar