Disproportional Imprisonment of Black and Hispanic Males: Sentencing Discretion, Processing Outcomes, and Policy Structures

References

• Albonetti, C. (1998). The role of gender and departures in the sentencing of defendants convicted of a white collar offense under the Federal sentencing Guidelines. In J. T. Ulmervol (Ed.), Sociology of crime, law, and deviance (Vol. 1, pp. 3-48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumer, E. P. (2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30, 231-261.10.1080/07418825.2012.682602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, M. H., Kempinen, C. A., Ruback, B., & Tinik, L. (2009). A study on the use and impact of mandatory minimum sentences: House Resolution 12 Session of 2007 (Report to the Pennsylvania House of Representatives). State College, PA: The Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing.
   Google Scholar
• Bontrager, S., Bales, W., & Chiricos, T. (2005). Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology, 43, 589-622.10.1111/crim.2005.43.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein, A. (1993). Racial disproportionality of US prison populations revisited. University of Colorado Law Review, 64, 743-760.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Statistics (2011). Prison Inmates at Midyear—Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Bushway, S., & Forst, B. (2013). Studying discretion in the processes that generate criminal justice sanctions. Justice Quarterly, 30, 199-222.10.1080/07418825.2012.682604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S., & Piehl, A. M. (2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law and Society Review, 35, 733-764.10.2307/3185415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S., & Piehl, A. M. (2011). Location, location, location: The impact of guideline grid location on the value of sentencing enhancements. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 222-238.10.1111/jels.2011.8.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerner, J. K., & Demuth, S. (2010, June). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in US federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 1-27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engen, R. (2009). Assessing determinate and presumptive sentencing: Making research relevant. Criminology and Public Policy, 8, 323-336.10.1111/cpp.2009.8.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, J., Flemming, R., & Nardulli, P. (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Feldmeyer, B., & Ulmer, J. T. (2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 238-270.10.1177/0022427810391538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischman, J., & Schanzenbach, M. (2012). Racial disparities under the federal sentencing guidelines: The role of judicial discretion and mandatory minimums. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9, 729-764.10.1111/jels.2012.9.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frase, R. (2013). Research on race and sentencing: goals, methods, and topics. Justice Quarterly, 30, 262-269.10.1080/07418825.2012.687512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, L., Knapp, P., & DeFina, R. (2005). Racial similarity in the relationship between poverty and homicide rates: Comparing retransformed coefficients. Social Science Research, 34, 893-914.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C., Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J. T., & Painter-Davis, N. (2009). Are blacks and Hispanics disproportionately incarcerated relative to their arrests? Racial and ethnic disproportionality between arrest and incarceration. Race and Social Problems, 1, 187-199.10.1007/s12552-009-9019-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, B. D. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge and county level influences in the study of courtroom decision making. Criminology, 44, 259-298.10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (2008). The social contexts of guideline circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 711-783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. T. (2009). Sentencing guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Kurlychek, M. C., & Johnson, B. D. (2004). The juvenile penalty: A comparison of juvenile and young adult sentencing outcomes in criminal court. Criminology, 42, 485-515.10.1111/crim.2004.42.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, M. T. (2013). Punishing the ‘Others’: Citizenship and state social control in the United States and Germany ( PhD dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Light, M. T., Massoglia, M., & King, R. D. (In press). Citizenship and punishment: The salience of national membership in US. Criminal Courts. American Sociological Review.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 439-466.10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehavi, M. M., & Starr, S. S. (2012). Racial disparity in federal criminal charging and its sentencing consequences ( University of Michigan Law and Economics Working Paper). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Reitler, A. K., Sullivan, C., & Frank, J. (2013). The effects of legal and extralegal factors on detention decisions in US district courts. Justice Quarterly, 30, 340-368.10.1080/07418825.2012.668925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savelsberg, J. (1992). Law that does not fit society: Sentencing guidelines as a neoclassical reaction to the dilemmas of substantivized law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1346-1381.10.1086/ajs.1992.97.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevigny, E. L. (2009). Excessive uniformity in federal drug sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 155-180.10.1007/s10940-009-9064-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shermer, L. O., & Johnson, B. (2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in US federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 394-430.10.1080/07418820902856972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In Policies, processes and decisions of the criminal justice system. Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 3, pp. 427-501). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, S., & Rehavi, M. M. (2013). Mandatory sentencing and racial disparity: Assessing the role of prosecutors and the effects of Booker. Yale Law Journal, 123, 2-80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, S., Engen, R., & Gainey, R. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435-468.10.1111/crim.2005.43.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.10.1111/crim.1998.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stith, K. (2008). The arc of the pendulum: Judges, prosecutors, and the exercise of discretion. The Yale Law Journal, 117, 1420-1497.10.2307/20454685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. (1992). Mandatory penalties. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 16, pp. 243-273). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, M., & Melewski, M. (2008). The malign effects of drug control policies on black Americans. Crime and Justice, 37(1), 1-44.10.1086/588492
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 1-40.10.1080/07418825.2011.624115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., Eisenstein, J., & Johnson, B. D. (2010). Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 27, 560-592.10.1080/07418820902998063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34, 383-408.10.1111/crim.1996.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., Light, M., & Kramer, J. (2011a). The “Liberation” of federal judges’ discretion in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision: Is there increased disparity and divergence between courts?. Justice Quarterly, 28, 799-837.10.1080/07418825.2011.553726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., Light, M., & Kramer, J. (2011b). Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision. Criminology and Public Policy, 10, 1077-1118.10.1111/capp.2011.10.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Sentencing Commission. (2013). Report to Congress on the Continuing Impact of US v. Booker on Federal Sentencing. Retrieved from http://www.ussc.gov/Legislative_and_Public_Affairs/Congressional_Testimony_and_Reports/Booker_Reports/2012_Booker/index.cfm
   Google Scholar