Social Network Position of Gang Members in Schools: Implications for Recruitment and Gang Prevention

References

• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Arciaga, M., Sakamoto, W., & Jones, E. F. (2010). Responding to gangs in the school setting. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Baerveldt, C., Van Rossem, R., Vermande, M., & Weerman, F. (2004). Students’ delinquency and correlates with strong and weaker ties: A study of students’ networks in Dutch high schools. Connections, 26, 11-28.
   Google Scholar
• Bearman, P. S., Moody, J., & Stovel, K. (2004). Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 44-91. doi:10.1086/386272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1170-1182.10.1086/228631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, A. A., Hureau, D. M., & Papachristos, A. V. (2014). Deterring gang-involved gun violence: Measuring the impact of boston’s operation ceasefire on street gang behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 113-139. doi:10.1007/s10940-013-9198-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 363-394). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349-399. doi:10.1086/421787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, C. H., & Rees, C. (2015). Behavioral heterogeneity in adolescent friendship networks. Justice Quarterly, 32, 872-899. doi:10.1080/07418825.2013.856932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centola, D. (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329, 1194-1197. doi:10.1126/science.1185231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health risk behavior among adolescent males: An experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77, 967-983. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00913.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, S. H., & van Winkle, B. (1996). Life in the gang. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174732
   Google Scholar
• Densley, J. A. (2012). Street gang recruitment: Signaling, screening, and selection. Social Problems, 59, 301-321. doi:10.1525/sp.2012.59.3.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esbensen, F.-A., & Huizinga, D. (1993). Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology, 31, 565-589. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esbensen, F.-A., & Osgood, D. W. (1999). Gang resistance education and training (Great): Results from the national evaluation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 194-225. doi:10.1177/0022427899036002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esbensen, F. A., Peterson, D., Taylor, T. J., & Osgood, D. W. (2012). Results from a multi-site evaluation of the G.R.E.A.T. program. Justice Quarterly, 29, 125-151.10.1080/07418825.2011.585995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esbensen, F. A., Winfree, L. T., He, N., & Taylor, T. J. (2001). Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter? Crime & Delinquency, 47, 105-130.10.1177/0011128701047001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallupe, O. (2017). The influence of popular and delinquent adolescents on school delinquency: Specifying the key delinquent models. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40, 101-118, doi:10.1080/0735648X.2015.1070739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallupe, O., & Bouchard, M. (2015). The influence of positional and experienced social benefits on the relationship between peers and alcohol use. Rationality & Society, 27, 40-69. doi:10.1177/1043463114546316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garot, R. (2010). Who you claim: Performing gang identity in school and on the streets. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlinger, J., & Wo, J. C. (2016). Preventing school bullying: Should schools prioritize an authoritative school discipline approach over security measures? Journal of School Violence, 15, 133-157. doi:10.1080/15388220.2014.956321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Pugh, M. D. (1986). Friendships and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1170-1202.10.1086/228390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. A., Lahey, B. B., Kawai, E., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Antisocial behavior and youth gang membership: Selection and socialization. Criminology, 42, 55-88. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00513.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravel, J., Bouchard, M., Descormiers, K., Wong, J. S., & Morselli, C. (2013). Keeping promises: A systematic review and a new classification of gang control strategies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 228-242. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, J. (1993). The social embeddedness of crime and unemployment. Criminology, 31, 465-491. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01138.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013-1057. doi:10.1086/320298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 99-134. doi:10.1023/A:1015227414929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, K. G., Howell, J. C., Hawkins, J. D., & Battin-Pearson, S. R. (1999). Childhood risk factors for adolescent gang membership: Results from the seattle social development project. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 300-322. doi:10.1177/0022427899036003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houtzager, B., & Baerveldt, C. (1999). Just like normal: A social network study of the relation between petty crime and the intimacy of adolescent friendships. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 27, 177-192. doi:10.2224/sbp.1999.27.2.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. W., & Maxson, C. L. (2006). Street gang patterns and policies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195163445.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kreager, D. A., & Haynie, D. L. (2011). Dangerous liaisons? dating and drinking diffusion in adolescent peer networks. American Sociological Review, 76, 737-763. doi:10.1177/0003122411416934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815447
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, T. A., & Mulvey, E. P. (2010). Estimating treatment effects: Matching quantification to the question. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 163-180). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7
   Google Scholar
• McGloin, J. M. (2005). Policy and intervention considerations of a network analysis of street gangs. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 607-635. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00306.x
   Google Scholar
• McGloin, J. M., & Shermer, L. O. (2009). Self-control and deviant peer network structure. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 35-72. doi:10.1177/0022427808326585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloin, J. M., Sullivan, C. J., & Thomas, K. J. (2014). Peer influence and context: The interdependence of friendship groups, schoolmates and network density in predicting substance use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1436-1452. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0126-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melde, C., Diem, C., & Drake, G. (2012). Identifying correlates of stable gang membership. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 28, 482-498. doi:10.1177/1043986212458196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. B. (1958). Lower class culture as a generating milieu of gang delinquency. Journal of Social Issues, 14, 5-19. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1958.tb01413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., & Harding, D. J. (2006). Matching estimators of causal effects: Prospects and pitfalls in theory and practice. Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 3-60. doi:10.1177/0049124106289164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804564
   Google Scholar
• Papachristos, A. V., & Kirk, D. S. (2015). Changing the street dynamic. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 525-558. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, D. C., & Cornwell, B. (2007). Reconsidering peer influences on delinquency: Do less proximate contacts matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 127-149. doi:10.1007/s10940-006-9022-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrooz, D. C. (2014a). “From your first cigarette to your last dyin’ day”: The patterning of gang membership in the life-course. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 349-372. doi:10.1007/s10940-013-9206-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrooz, D. C. (2014b). From colors and guns to caps and gowns? The effects of gang membership on educational attainment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51, 56-87. doi:10.1177/0022427813484316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrooz, D. C., & Densley, J. A. (2016). Selection into street gangs: Signaling theory, gang membership, and criminal offending. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53, 447-481. doi:10.1177/0022427815619462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrooz, D. C., & Sweeten, G. (2015). Gang membership between ages 5 and 17 years in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 414-419. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrooz, D. C., Sweeten, G., & Piquero, A. R. (2013). Continuity and change in gang membership and gang embeddedness. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 239-271. doi:10.1177/0022427811434830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378-387. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez Jankowski, M. (1991). Islands in the street: Gangs and American urban society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J. F., & Strodtbeck, F. (1965). Group process and gang delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smångs, M. (2010). Delinquency, social skills and the structure of peer relations: Assessing criminological theories by social network theory. Social Forces, 89, 609-631. doi:10.1353/sof.2010.0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, C. S., Brashears, M. E., & Genkin, M. (2016). Gangs, clubs, and alcohol: The effect of organizational membership on adolescent drinking behavior. Social Science Research, 58, 279-291.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1978). Principles of criminology (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25, 863-892. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1987.tb00823.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., Smith, C. A., & Tobin, K. (2003). Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrasher, F. M. (1927). The gang: A study of 1,313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, E. A., Osman, S., & Wood, J. L. (2012). Rumination and the displacement of aggression in United Kingdom gang-affiliated youth. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 89-97.10.1002/ab.2012.38.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, B. E., & Waters, E. (1981). Attention structure, sociometric status, and dominance: Interrelations, behavioral correlates, and relationships to social competence. Developmental Psychology, 17, 275-288. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.17.3.275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, T. D., Giordano, P. C., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Everybody’s doin’it (right?): Neighborhood norms and sexual activity in adolescence. Social Science Research, 40, 1676-1690. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J. S., Gravel, J., Bouchard, M., Descormiers, K., & Morselli, C. (2016). Promises kept? A meta-analysis of gang membership prevention programs. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 2, 134-147. doi:10.1108/JCRPP-06-2015-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2007). Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. Journal of Econometrics, 141, 1281-1301. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. T. N. (2011). How do they ‘end up together’? A social network analysis of self-control, homophily, and adolescent relationships. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 251-273. doi:10.1007/s10940-010-9105-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar