2,131
Views
51
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Applying Moral Foundations Theory to the Explanation of Capital Jurors’ Sentencing Decisions

, &
Pages 1176-1205 | Received 04 Apr 2018, Accepted 13 Oct 2018, Published online: 17 Jan 2019

References

  • Alabama Legislature . (2017). Senate Bill 187 (Regular Session, 2017): Fair Justice Act. Retrieved from https://alisondb.legislature.state.al.us/ALISON/SearchableInstruments/2017RS/PrintFiles/SB187-enr.pdf
  • Ames, D. L. , & Fiske, S. T . (2013). Intentional harms are worse, even when they’re not. Psychological Science, 24 (9), 1755–1762.
  • Ansolabehere, S., & Schaffner, B. F. (2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 201.
  • Applegate, B. K. , Cullen, F. T. , Turner, M. G. , & Sundt, J. L . (1996). Assessing public support for three-strikes-and-you're-out laws: Global versus specific attitudes. Crime & Delinquency, 42 (4), 517–534.
  • Baldus, D. C. , Woodworth, G. , Zuckerman, D. , & Weiner, N. A . (1998). Racial discrimination and the death penalty in the post-Fuhrman era: An empirical and legal overview with recent findings from Philadelphia. Cornell Law Review, 83 (6), 1638–1770.
  • Barnett, M. E. , Brodsky, S. L. & Davis, C. M . (2004). When mitigation evidence makes a difference: Effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22 (6), 751–770.
  • Barnett, M. E. , Brodsky, S. L. , & Price, J. R . (2007). Differential impact of mitigating evidence in capital case sentencing. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 7 (1), 39–45.
  • Baumgartner, F. R. , De Boef, S. L. , & Boydstun, A. E . (2008). The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beckham, C. M. , Spray, B. J. , & Pietz, C. A . (2007). Jurors' locus of control and defendants' attractiveness in death penalty sentencing. Journal of Social Psychology, 147 (3), 285–298.
  • Bell Holleran, L. L. , Vaughan, T. J. , & Vandiver, D. M . (2017). Juror decision-making in death penalty sentencing when presented with defendant's history of child abuse or neglect. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 34 (6), 742 – 766.
  • Bentele, U. , & Bowers, W. J . (2000). How jurors decide on death: Guilt is overwhelming; aggravation requires death; and mitigation is no excuse. Brooklyn Law Review, 66 (4), 1011–1080.
  • Bohm, R. M . (1991). American death penalty opinion, 1936–1986: A critical examination of the Gallup polls. In R. M. Bohm (Ed.), Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences series. The death penalty in America: Current research (pp. 113–145). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.
  • Bowers, W. J . (1996). The capital jury: Is it tilted toward death. Judicature, 79 (5), 220–223.
  • Bowers, W. J. , & Foglia, W. D . (2003). Still singularly agonizing: Law’s failure to purge arbitrariness from capital sentencing. Criminal Law Bulletin-Boston, 39 (1), 51–86.
  • Bowers, W. J. , Steiner, B. D. , & Antonio, M. E . (2003). The capital sentencing decision: Guided discretion, reasoned moral judgment, or legal fiction. In J. R. Acker , R. M. Bohm , & C. S. Lanier (Ed.), America’s experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (2nd ed.). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  • Bowers, W.J. , Sandys, M. , & Steiner, B.D . (1998). Foreclosed impartiality in capital sentencing: Jurors’ predispositions, guilt-trial experience, and premature decision making. Cornell Law Review, 83 , 1476–1821.
  • Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design for market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bradford, B . (2014). Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing and Society, 24 (1), 22–43.
  • Brickman Bhutta, C. (2012). Not by the book: Facebook as a sampling frame. Sociological Methods & Research, 41 (1), 57–88.
  • Brown, E. K. , & Socia, K. M . (2016). Twenty-first century punitiveness: Social sources of punitive American views reconsidered. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33 (4), 935–959.
  • Butler, B . (2007). The role of death qualification in jurors’ susceptibility to pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37 (1), 115–123.
  • Butler, B. , & Moran, G . (2007). The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25 (1), 57–68.
  • Canton, R . (2015). Crime, punishment and the moral emotions: Righteous minds and their attitudes towards punishment. Punishment & Society, 17 (1), 54–72.
  • Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research and Politics, 1–9.
  • Cochran, J. , & Chamlin, M . (2006). The enduring racial divide in death penalty support. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34 (1), 85–99.
  • Cushman, F . (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108 (2), 353–380.
  • Cushman, F. , Young, L. , & Hauser, M . (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17 (12), 1082–1089.
  • Darley, J. M . (2009). Morality in the law: The psychological foundations of citizens’ desires to punish transgressions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5 , 1–23.
  • Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) . (2017). The death penalty in 2017: Year end report. Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/2017YrEnd.pdf
  • Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) . (2018). Execution database. Retrieved fromhttps://deathpenaltyinfo.org/views-executions
  • Devine, D. J. & Kelly, C. E . (2015). Life or death: An examination of jury sentencing with the capital jury project database. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 21 (4), 393–406.
  • Dillehay, R. C. , & Sandys, M. R . (1996). Life under Wainwright v. Witt: Juror dispositions and death qualification. Law and Human Behavior, 20 (2), 147–165.
  • Durkheim, E . (1964, 1933). The division of labor in society. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Eisenberg, T. , Garvey, S. P. , & Wells, M. T . (1996). Jury responsibility in capital sentencing: An empirical study. Buffalo Law Review, 33 (2), 339–380.
  • Eisenberg, T. , Garvey, S. P. , & Wells, M. T . (2001). Forecasting life and death: Juror race, religion, and attitude toward the death penalty. Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2), 277–311.
  • Elwert, F. & Winship, C . (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40 , 31–53.
  • Frost, N. A . (2010). Beyond public opinion polls: Punitive public sentiment & criminal justice policy. Sociology Compass, 4 (3), 156–168.
  • Graham, J. , Haidt, J. , & Nosek, B. A . (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 (5), 1029–1046.
  • Graham, J. , Nosek, B. A. , Haidt, J. , Iyer, R. , Koleva, S. , & Ditto, P. H . (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101 (2), 366–385.
  • Graham, J. , Haidt, J. , Koleva, S. , Motyl, M. , Iyer, R. , Wojcik, S. P. , & Ditto, P. H . (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47 , 55–130.
  • Gray, K. , Waytz, A. , & Young, L . (2012). The moral dyad: A fundamental template unifying moral judgment. Psychological Inquiry, 23 (2), 206–215.
  • Gray, K. , Young, L. , & Waytz, A . (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23 (2), 101–124.
  • Greene, J . (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason and the gap between us and them. London: Penguin Group (USA) LLC.
  • Haidt, J . (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108 (4), 814–832.
  • Haidt, J. , & Graham, J . (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20 (1), 98–116.
  • Haidt, J. , & Joseph, C . (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133 (4), 55–66.
  • Haidt, J . (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316 , 998–1002.
  • Haidt, J . (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Vintage.
  • Haney, C. , Hurtado, A. , & Vega, L . (1994). “Modern” death qualification: New data on its biasing effects. Law and Human Behavior, 18 (6), 619–633.
  • Haney, C . (1997). Violence and the capital jury: Mechanisms of moral disengagement and the impulse to condemn to death. Stanford Law Review, 49 (6), 1447–1486.
  • Harper, C. A. , & Harris, A. J . (2017). Applying moral foundations theory to understanding public views of sexual offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23 (2), 111–123.
  • Hong, N. & Viswanatha, A . (2018, January 9). U.S. to seek death penalty more often for violent crimes. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/sessions-signals-greater-willingness-to-use-death-penalty-1515493800.
  • Huff, C., & Tingley, D. (2015). Who are these people? Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research and Politics, 1–12. doi:10.1177/2053168015604648
  • Janoff-Bulman, R. , & Carnes, N. C . (2013). Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17 (3), 219–236.
  • Jackson, J. , & Sunshine, J . (2006). Public confidence in policing: A neo-Durkheimian perspective. British Journal of Criminology, 47 (2), 214–233.
  • Johnson, T. C . (2014). The biasing effect of death qualification: How juror attitudes toward capital punishment affect conviction and trial proceedings. Columbia Undergraduate Law Review, 7 (1), 71–90.
  • Jones, J. M . (2017). U.S. death penalty support lowest since 1972. Gallup. Retrieved from http://news.gallup.com/poll/221030/death-penalty-support-lowest-1972.aspx.
  • Kahneman, D . (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58 (9), 697–720.
  • Karlson, K. B. , Holm, A. , & Breen, R . (2012). Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and probit: A new method. Sociological Methodology, 42 (1), 286–313.
  • Koleva, S. P. , Graham, J. , Iyer, R. , Ditto, P. H. , & Haidt, J . (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46 (2), 184–194.
  • Kugler, M., Jost, J. T., Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in moral intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27 (4), 413–431.
  • Kutner, M. H. , Nachtsheim, C. , & Neter, J . (2004). Applied linear regression models (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill/Irwin.
  • Long, S . (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lynch, M. , & Haney, C . (2000). Discrimination and instructional comprehension: Guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty. Law and Human Behavior, 24 (3), 337–358.
  • Lynch, M. , & Haney, C . (2009). Capital jury deliberation: Effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination. Law and Human Behavior, 33 (6), 481–496.
  • Lytle, R. , & ten Bensel, T . (2016). Are self-identified Christian fundamentalists really more supportive of capital punishment? Exploring the relationship between fundamentalism and death penalty attitudes. Criminal Justice Studies, 29 (4), 309–324.
  • McCann, S. J . (2008). Societal threat, authoritarianism, conservatism, and U.S. state death penalty sentencing (1977–2004). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94 (5), 913–923.
  • Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2 (2), 109–138.
  • Murayama, K. , Pekrun, R. , & Fiedler, K . (2014). Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18 (2), 107–118.
  • Najdowski, C. J. , Bottoms, B. L. , & Vargas, M. C . (2009). Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: The influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27 (3), 401–430.
  • Niemi, L. , & Young, L . (2016). When and why we see victims as responsible: The impact of ideology on attitudes toward victims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42 (9), 1227–1242.
  • Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23 (3), 184–188.
  • Pizarro, D. A. , Uhlmann, E. , & Bloom, P . (2003). Causal deviance and the attribution of moral responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39 (6), 653–660.
  • Platania, J. , & Konstantopoulou, F . (2014). Evaluating evidence of childhood abuse as a function of expert testimony, judge’s instructions, and sentence recommendation. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 10 (1), 1–20.
  • Robinson, F . (2013). Global care ethics: Beyond distribution, beyond justice. Journal of Global Ethics, 9 (2), 131–143.
  • Robinson, R. J . (1993). What does “unwilling” to impose the death penalty mean anyway? Another look at excludable jurors. Law and Human Behavior, 17 (4), 471–477.
  • Roche, S. P. , Pickett, J. T. , & Gertz, M . (2016). The scary world of online news? Internet news exposure and public attitudes toward crime and justice. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32 (2), 215–236.
  • Salerno, J. M. , Najdowski, C. J. , Bottoms, B. L. , Harrington, E. , Kemner, G. , & Dave, R . (2015). Excusing murder? Conservative jurors’ acceptance of the gay-panic defense. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21 (1), 24.
  • Sandys, M . (1995). Attitudinal change among students in a capital punishment class: It may be possible. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20 (1), 37–55.
  • Silver, J. R . (2017). Moral foundations, intuitions of justice, and the intricacies of punitive sentiment. Law & Society Review, 51 (2), 413–450.
  • Silver, J. R. , & Silver, E . (2017). Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior, 41 (3), 258–272.
  • Simmons, A. D., & Bobo, L. D. (2015). Can non-full-probability internet surveys yield useful data? A comparison with full-probability face-to-face surveys in the domain of race and social inequality attitudes. Sociological Methodology, 45 (1), 357–387.
  • Sinn, J. S. , & Hayes, M. W . (2017). Replacing the moral foundations: An evolutionary‐coalitional theory of liberal‐conservative differences. Political Psychology, 38 (6), 1043–1064.
  • Shweder, R. , Much, N. , Mahapatra, M. , & Park, L . (1997). Divinity and the “big three” explanations of suffering. Morality and Health, 119, 119–169.
  • Smith, I. H. , Aquino, K. , Koleva, S. , & Graham, J . (2014). The moral ties that bind… even to out-groups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations. Psychological Science, 25 (8), 1554–1562.
  • Stauffer, A. R. , Smith, M. D. , Cochran, J. K. , Fogel, S. J. , & Bjerregaard, B . (2006). The interaction between victim race and gender on sentencing outcomes in capital murder trials: A further exploration. Homicide Studies, 10 (2), 98–117.
  • Stetler, R . (2007). The mystery of mitigation: What jurors need to make a reasoned moral response: In capital sentencing. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, 11 (2), 237–264.
  • Stevenson, M. C. , Bottoms, B. L. , & Diamond, S. S . (2010). Jurors’ discussions of a defendant’s history of child abuse and alcohol abuse in capital sentencing deliberations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16 (1), 1–38.
  • Sundby, S. E . (2002). The capital jury and empathy: The problem of worthy and unworthy victims. Cornell Law Revue, 88 , 343–381.
  • Suter, R. S. , & Hertwig, R . (2011). Time and moral judgment. Cognition, 119 (3), 454–458.
  • Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G., & Couper, M. P. (2013). The science of web surveys. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tyler, T. R. , & Boeckmann, R. J . (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law and Society Review, 31 , 237–265.
  • Unnever, J. D. , and Cullen, F. T . (2005). Executing the innocent and support for capital punishment: Implications for public policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 4 (1), 3–38.
  • Unnever, J. D. , & Cullen, F. T . (2010). The social sources of Americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology, 48 (1), 99–129.
  • Unnever, J. D. , & Cullen, F. T . (2012). White perceptions of whether African Americans and Hispanics are prone to violence and support for the death penalty. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49 (4), 519–544.
  • Van Leeuwen, F. , & Park, J. H . (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47 (3), 169–173.
  • Weinberg, J., Freese, J., & McElhattan, D. (2014). Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowdsource-recruited sample. Sociological Science, 1, 292–310.
  • Winship, C. & Mare, R. D . (1984). Regression models with ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 49 , 512–525.
  • Wozniak, K. H. , & Lewis, A. R . (2010). Reexamining the effect of Christian denominational affiliation on death penalty support. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38 (5), 1082–1089.
  • Young, R. L . (2004). Guilty until proven innocent: Conviction orientation, racial attitudes, and support for capital punishment. Deviant Behavior, 25 (2), 151–167.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.