Reassessing the Influence of Criminal History in Federal Criminal Courts

References

• Acock, A. C. (2005). Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family , 67 (4), 1012–1028. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00191.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti, A. , & Finlay, B. (1997). Statistical models for the social sciences. Journal of the American Medical Association , 269 , 2642–2646.
   Google Scholar
• Albonetti, C. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law & Society Review , 31 (4), 789–822. doi:10.2307/3053987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. L. , & Spohn, C. (2010). Lawlessness in the federal sentencing process: A test for uniformity and consistency in sentence outcomes. Justice Quarterly , 27 (3), 362–393. doi:10.1080/07418820902936683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S. , Johnson, B. D. , & Slocum, L. A. (2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 23 (2), 151–178. doi:10.1007/s10940-007-9024-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. M. , & Turner, S. (2010). Reforming federal sentencing guidelines: A modest proposal. Victims & Offenders , 5 (3), 220–232. doi:10.1080/15564886.2010.485976
   Google Scholar
• Demuth, S. (2002). The effect of citizenship status on sentencing outcomes in drug cases. Federal Sentencing Reporter , 14 (5), 271–275. doi:10.1525/fsr.2002.14.5.271
   Google Scholar
• Doerner, J. K. , & Demuth, S. (2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in US federal courts. Justice Quarterly , 27 (1), 1–27. doi:10.1080/07418820902926197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerner, J. K. , & Demuth, S. (2014). Gender and sentencing in the federal courts: Are women treated more leniently? Criminal Justice Policy Review , 25 (2), 242–269. doi:10.1177/0887403412466877
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, C. (2000). Juvenile delinquents & federal criminal law: The federal juvenile delinquency act & related matters . Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Engen, R. L. , & Gainey, R. R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology , 38 (4), 1207–1230. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb01419.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, R. S. , & Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (2002). Difference, disparity, and race/ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 18 (2), 189–211. doi:10.1023/A:1015258732676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmeyer, B. , & Ulmer, J. T. (2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , 48 (2), 238–270. doi:10.1177/0022427810391538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmeyer, B. , Warren, P. Y. , Siennick, S. E. , & Neptune, M. (2015). Racial, ethnic, and immigrant threat: Is there a new criminal threat on state sentencing? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , 52 (1), 62–92. doi:10.1177/0022427814548488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2015). Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, R. D. , Maddan, S. , & Spohn, C. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly , 24 (3), 382–407. doi:10.1080/07418820701485379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D. , Ulmer, J. T. , & Kramer, J. H. (2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology , 46 (3), 737–783. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, N. R. , & Spohn, C. (2014). Mitigating the effect of a criminal record at sentencing: Local life circumstances and substantial assistance departures among recidivists in federal court. Criminal Justice Policy Review , 25 (1), 3–28. doi:10.1177/0887403412459542
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice , 3 , 427–501.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Brennan, P. K. (2011). The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and gender on sentencing departures in federal courts. Race and Justice , 1, 49–78.
   Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D. , & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review , 65 (5), 705–729. doi:10.2307/2657543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D. , Ulmer, J. T. , & Kramer, J. H. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology , 36 (4), 763–798. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillyer, R. , Hartley, R. D. , & Ward, J. (2015). Differential treatment of female defendants: Does criminal history moderate the effect of gender on sentence length in federal narcotics cases?. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 7 , 703–721.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. B. (2011). Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. Journal of Financial Economics , 99 (1), 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (2000). The rules have changed—So proceed with caution: A comment on Engen and Gainey’s method for modeling sentencing outcomes under guidelines. Criminology , 38 (4), 1231–1244. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb01420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. , & Bradley, M. S. (2006). Variation in trial penalties among serious violent offenders. Criminology , 44 (3), 631–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. , Eisenstein, J. , & Johnson, B. D. (2010). Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly , 27 (4), 560–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. , Kurlychek, M. C. , & Kramer, J. H. (2007). Prosecutorial discreation and the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , 44 (4), 427–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. , Light, M. T. , & Kramer, J. H. (2011). The liberation of federal judges’ discretion in the wake of the booker/fanfan decision: Is there increased disparity and divergence between courts. Justice Quarterly , 28 (6), 799–837. doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.553726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. , Painter-Davis, N. , & Tinik, L. (2016). Disproportional imprisonment of Black and Hispanic males: Sentencing discretion, processing outcomes, and policy structures. Justice Quarterly , 33 (4), 642–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) . (1987). Supplementary report on the initial sentences guidelines and policy statements . Washington, DC: Office of General Counsel United States Sentencing Commission.
   Google Scholar
• United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) . (2004). Fifteen years of guidelines sentencing: An assessment of how well the federal criminal system is achieving the goals of sentencing reform . Washington, DC: Office of General Counsel United States Sentencing Commission.
   Google Scholar
• United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) . (2015). Federal sentencing guidelines manual . Washington, DC: Office of General Counsel United States Sentencing Commission.
   Google Scholar
• United States Sentencing Commission. (2016). Interactive source book: Comparison of sentence imposed and position relative to the guideline range FY 2014 to 2016. Washington, DC: Office of General Counsel United States Sentencing Commission.
   Google Scholar
• United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) . (2017). Interactive source book: Reasons given by sentencing courts for all sentences below the guideline range FY 2017 . Washington, DC: Office of General Counsel United States Sentencing Commission.
   Google Scholar
• United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) . (2018). Primer: Criminal History . Washington, DC: Office of General Counsel United States Sentencing Commission.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, P. T. (2007). Regression with missing Y’s: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology , 37 (1), 83–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2007.00180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (4th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Zatz, M. S. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. Criminal Justice , 3 , 503–552.
   Google Scholar