1,691
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Disproportionate Minority Contact in the Juvenile Justice System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1293-1318 | Received 17 Nov 2020, Accepted 31 Mar 2021, Published online: 31 May 2021

References

  • Barton, W. H. (2012). Detention. In B. C. Feld & D. M. Bishop (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of juvenile crime and juvenile justice (pp. 636–663). Oxford University Press.
  • Baumer, E. P. (2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 231–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.682602
  • Berk, R. (2007). Statistical inference and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(3), 247–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-007-9036-y
  • Bishop, D. M. (2005). The role of race and ethnicity in juvenile justice processing. In D. F. Hawkins & K. Kempf-Leonard (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 23–82). The University of Chicago Press.
  • Bishop, D. M., & Leiber, M. (2012). Racial and ethnic differences in delinquency and justice system responses. In B. C. Feld & D. M. Bishop (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of juvenile crime and juvenile justice (pp. 445–484). Oxford University Press.
  • Bishop, D. M., Leiber, M. J., & Johnson, J. (2010). Contexts of decision making in the juvenile justice system: An organizational approach to understanding minority overrepresentation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(3), 213–233.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cheesman, F. L., Cohen, T., Dancy, D., Kleiman, M., & Mott, N. (2002). Blended sentencing in Minnesota: On target for public safety? An evaluation. National Center for State Courts.
  • Chen, H., Cohen, P., & Chen, S. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 39(4), 860–864.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Crutchfield, R. D., Fernandez, A., & Martinez, J. (2010). Racial and ethnic disparity in criminal justice: How much is too much? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100(3), 903–932.
  • Dillard, D. (2013). Limited disproportionate minority contact discourse may explain limited progress in reducing minority over-representation in the US juvenile justice system. Youth Justice, 13(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225413505383
  • Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.
  • Engen, R. L., Steen, S., & Bridges, G. S. (2002). Racial disparities in the punishment of youth: A theoretical and empirical assessment of the literature. Social Problems, 49(2), 194–220.
  • Farrington, D. (2003). Methodological quality standards for evaluation research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716202250789
  • Ferguson, C. J. (2016). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (pp. 301–310). American Psychological Association.
  • Fine, A., Donley, S., Cavanagh, C., Miltimore, S., Steinberg, L., Frick, P. J., & Cauffman, E. (2017). And justice for all: Determinants and effects of probation officers’ processing decisions regarding first-time juvenile offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(1), 105–117.
  • Franklin, T. W. (2018). The state of race and punishment in America: Is justice really blind? Journal of Criminal Justice, 59, 19–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.05.011
  • Gallupe, O., McLevey, J., & Brown, S. (2019). Selection and influence: A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(2), 313–335.
  • Hill, G. D., Harris, A. R., & Miller, J. L. (1985). The etiology of bias: Social heuristics and rational decision making in deviance processing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(2), 135–162.
  • Hockenberry, S., & Puzzanchera, C. (2020). Juvenile court statistics 2018. National Center for Juvenile Justice.
  • IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. (2016). Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 6(7), 1–6.
  • Johnson, B. D. (2010). Multilevel analysis in the study of crime and justice. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 615–648). Springer.
  • Kempf-Leonard, K. (2007). Minority youths and juvenile justice: Disproportionate minority contact after nearly 20 years of reform efforts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006295159
  • Kleck, G. (1981). Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing: A critical evaluation of the evidence with additional evidence on the death penalty. American Sociological Review, 46(6), 783–805. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2095079
  • Kochel, T. R., Wilson, D. B., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2011). Effect of suspect race on officers’ arrest decisions. Criminology, 49(2), 473–512.
  • Kramer, J., & Steffensmeier, D. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 357–376.
  • Kurlychek, M. C., & Johnson, B. D. (2019). Cumulative disadvantage in the American criminal justice system. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 291–319.
  • Leiber, M. J. (2002). Disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) of youth: An analysis of state and federal efforts to address the issue. Crime & Delinquency, 48(1), 3–45.
  • Leiber, M. J., & Fix, R. (2019). Reflections on the impact of race and ethnicity on juvenile court outcomes and efforts to enact change. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(4), 581–608.
  • Leiber, M. J., & Peck, J. H. (2013). Race in juvenile justice and sentencing policy: An overview of research and policy recommendations. Law & Inequality, 31(2), 331–368.
  • Leiber, M. J., & Peck, J. H. (2015). Race, gender, crime severity, and decision making in the juvenile justice system. Crime & Delinquency, 61(6), 771–797.
  • Lipsey, M. W. (2003). Those confounded moderators in meta-analysis: Good, bad, and ugly. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716202250791
  • Lytle, D. J. (2014). The effects of suspects characteristics on arrest: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 589–597. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.10.001
  • Maggard, S. R. (2015). Assessing the impact of the juvenile detention alternatives initiative (JDAI): Predictors of secure detention and length of stay before and after JDAI. Justice Quarterly, 32(4), 571–597. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.783610
  • Mayo, D. G. (2018). Statistical inference as severe testing: How to get beyond the statisticswars. Cambridge University Press.
  • McCarthy, B. R., & Smith, B. L. (1986). The conceptualization of discrimination in the juvenile justice process: The impact of administrative factors and screening decisions on juvenile court dispositions. Criminology, 24(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb00376.x
  • Mears, D. P. (2012). The front end of the juvenile court: Intake and informal versus formal processing. In B. C. Feld & D. M. Bishop (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of juvenile crime and juvenile justice (pp. 573–605). Oxford University Press.
  • Mears, D. P., Cochran, J. C., & Lindsey, A. M. (2016). Offending and racial and ethnic disparities in criminal justice: A conceptual framework for guiding theory and research and informing policy. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(1), 78–103.
  • Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439–466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7
  • Neil, R., & Winship, C. (2019). Methodological challenges and opportunities in testing for racial discrimination in policing. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 73–98.
  • Norton, E. C., & Dowd, B. E. (2018). Log odds and the interpretation of logit models. Health Services Research, 53(2), 859–878.
  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2020). OJJDP statistical briefing book. U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/.
  • Oliver, J., & Bell, M. L. (2013). Effect sizes for 2 x 2 contingency tables. PLoS One, 8(3), 1–7.
  • Peck, J. H. (2018). The importance of evaluation and monitoring within the disproportionate minority contact (DMC) mandate: Future directions in juvenile justice research. Race & Justice, 8(4), 305–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368716675923
  • Piquero, A. R. (2008). Disproportionate minority contact. The Future of Children, 18(2), 59–79.
  • Pope, C. E., & Feyerherm, W. (1990). Minority status and juvenile justice research: An assessment of the research literature (part I). Criminal Justice Abstracts, 22(2), 327–335.
  • Pope, C. E., Lovell, R., & Hsia, H. M. (2002). Disproportionate minority confinement: A review of the research literature from 1989 through 2001. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
  • Pratt, T. C. (1998). Race and sentencing: A meta-analysis of conflicting empirical results. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(6), 513–523. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(98)00028-2
  • Rodriguez, N. (2007). Juvenile court context and detention decisions: Reconsidering the role of race, ethnicity, and community characteristics in juvenile court processes. Justice Quarterly, 24(4), 629–656.
  • Rodriguez, N. (2010). The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 391–413.
  • Rodriquez, N. (2013). Concentrated disadvantage and the incarceration of youth: Examining how context affects juvenile justice. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(2), 189–215.
  • Rosenthal, J. A. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21(4), 37–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v21n04_02
  • Sampson, R. J., & Lauritzen, J. L. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. Crime & Justice, 21, 311–375.
  • Sellin, T. (1935). Race prejudice in the administration of justice. American Journal of Sociology, 41(2), 212–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/217058
  • Shaffer, D. K. (2011). Looking inside the Black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28(3), 493–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.525222
  • Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. W., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative review, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770.
  • Sorensen, J., Hope, R., & Stemen, D. (2003). Racial disproportionality in state prison admissions: Can regional variation be explained by differential arrest rates? Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(1), 73–84.
  • Spinney, E., Cohen, M., Feyerherm, W., Stephenson, R., Yeide, M., & Shreve, T. (2018). Disproportionate minority contact in the U.S. juvenile justice system: A review of the DMC literature, 2001–2014, part I. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(5), 573–595.
  • Spohn, C. (2009). Race, sex, and pretrial detention in federal court: Indirect effects and cumulative disadvantage. University of Kansas Law Review, 57(4), 879–902.
  • Spohn, C. (2013). The effects of the offender’s race, ethnicity, and sex on federal sentencing outcomes in the guidelines era. Law and Contemporary Problems, 76(1), 75–104.
  • Spohn, C. (2015). Race, crime, and punishment in the twentieth and twenty-first century. Crime & Justice, 44(1), 49–97.
  • Sridharan, S., Greenfield, L., & Blakley, B. (2004). A study of prosecutorial certification practice in Virginia. Criminology & Public Policy, 3(4), 605–632.
  • Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282.
  • Turanovic, J. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2020). Meta-analysis in criminology and criminal justice: Challenging the paradigm and charting a new path forward. Justice Evaluation Journal. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2020.1775107
  • van Wingerden, S., van Wilsem, J., & Johnson, B. D. (2016). Offender’s personal circumstances and punishment: Toward a more refined model for an explanation of sentencing disparities. Justice Quarterly, 33(1), 100–133.
  • Wilbanks, W. (1987). The myth of a racist criminal justice system. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
  • Wilson, D. B. (2010). Meta-analysis. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 181–208). Springer.
  • Wolfowicz, M., Litmanovitz, Y., Weisburd, D., & Badi, H. (2020). A field-wide systematic review and meta-analysis of putative risk and protective factors for radicalization outcomes. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(3), 407–447.
  • Wooldredge, J., Frank, J., Goulette, N., & Travis, L. (2015). Is the impact of cumulative disadvantage on sentencing greater for Black defendants? Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 187–223.
  • Wu, J. (2016). Racial/ethnic discrimination and prosecution: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(4), 437–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815628026
  • Yeaton, W. H., & Wortman, P. M. (1993). On the reliability of meta-analytic reviews: The role of intercoder agreement. Evaluation Review, 17(3), 292–309.
  • Zane, S. N. (2021). Have racial and ethnic disparities in juvenile justice declined over time? An empirical examination of the DMC mandate. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 19(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204020962163
  • Zane, S. N., Mears, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (2020). How universal is disproportionate minority contact? An examination of racial and ethnic disparities in juvenile justice processing across four states. Justice Quarterly, 37(5), 817–841. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1766544
  • Zane, S. N., Welsh, B. C., & Drakulich, K. M. (2016). Assessing the impact of race on the juvenile waiver decision: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 106–117.
  • Zane, S. N., Welsh, B. C., Mears, D. P., & Zimmerman, G. M. (2021). Pathways through juvenile justice: a system-level assessment of cumulative disadvantage in the processing of juvenile offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09505-w

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.