Estimating effects of short-term imprisonment on crime using random judge assignments

References

• Aebi, M. F., & Delgrande, N. (2014). Council of Europe annual penal statistics, SPACE I – Prison populations – Survey 2012. Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Aebi, M. F., Cocco, E., Molnar, L., & Tiago, M. M. (2022). Prison populations, SPACE 1 – 2021. Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Aizer, A., & Doyle, J. J. Jr. (2015). Juvenile incarceration, human capital, and future crime: Evidence from randomly assigned judges. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 759–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D. (1990). Lifetime earnings and the Vietnam era draft lottery: Evidence from social security administrative records. American Economic Review, 80, 313–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D. (2006). Instrumental variables methods in experimental criminological research: What, why and how. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001). Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives, 1, 68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagaric, M. (2020). The contours of a utilitarian theory of punishment in light of contemporary empirical knowledge about the attainment of traditional sentencing objectives. In F. Focquaert, E. Shaw, & B. N. Waller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the philosophy and science of punishment (pp. 62–74). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuller, M., Dahl, G. B., Løken, K. V., & Mogstad, M. (2020). Incarceration, recidivism, and employment. Journal of Political Economy, 128, 1269–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choenni, R., Van den Baak, S. W., & Platenburg, P. F. M. (2019). Criminaliteit en rechtshandhaving. Ontwikkelingen en samenhangen [Crime and law enforcement. Trends and correlations]. Research and Documentation Centre/Statistics Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, G. B., Kostol, A. R., & Mogstad, M. (2014). Family welfare cultures. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 1711–1752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damm, A. P., & Gorinas, C. (2020). Prison as a criminal school: Peer effects and criminal learning behind bars. The Journal of Law and Economics, 63, 149–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, N. M., Von Hinke Kessler Scholder, S., Farbmacher, H., Burgess, S., Windmeijer, F., Davey, & Smith, G. (2014). The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian Randomization. Statistics in Medicine, 34, 454–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbie, W., Goldin, J., & Yang, C. (2018). The effects of pre-trial detention on conviction, future crime, and employment: Evidence from randomly assigned judges. American Economic Review, 108, 201–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, D., Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2006). Personal income and attitudes toward redistribution: A study of lottery winners. Political Psychology, 27, 441–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dünkel, F. (2017). European penology: The rise and fall of prison population rates in Europe in times of migrant crises and terrorism. European Journal of Criminology, 14, 629–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, O., & Mocan, N. (2021). Juvenile punishment, high school graduation, and adult crime: Evidence from idiosyncratic judge harshness. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 103, 34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., & Winik, D. (2010). Using random judge assignments to estimate the effects of incarceration and probation on recidivism on drug offenders. Criminology, 48, 357–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, C., & Kozbur, D. (2014). Instrumental variables estimation with many weak instruments using regularized JIVE. Journal of Econometrics, 182, 290–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, D. J., Morenoff, J. D., Nguyen, A. P., & Bushway, S. D. (2017). Short- and long term effects of imprisonment on future felony convictions and prison admissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 11103–11108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, D. J., Morenoff, J. D., Nguyen, A. P., Bushway, S. D., & Binswanger, I. A. (2019). A natural experiment study of the effects of imprisonment on violence in the community. Nature Human Behavior, 3, 671–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonson, C. L. (2010). The impact of imprisonment on reoffending: A meta-analysis Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Kalidien, S. N. (2013). Tenuitvoerlegging van sancties. In S. N. Kalidien & N. E. de Heer-de Lange (Eds.), Criminaliteit en rechtshandhaving 2012 (pp. 153–178). Boom Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Killias, M., Aebi, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2000). Does community service rehabilitate better than short-term imprisonmen?: Results of a controlled experiment. The Howard Journal, 39, 40–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. S., & Wakefield, S. (2018). Collateral consequences of punishment: A critical review and path forward. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 171–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, J. R. (2006). Incarceration length, employment, and earnings. American Economic Review, 96, 863–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopf, S., & Mowen, T. J. (2020). Collateral consequences of incarceration. In L. A. Gould & J. J. Brent (Eds.), Routledge handbook on American prisons (pp. 271–279). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. H. (2016). Covariate adjustments in randomized controlled trials increased study power and reduced biasedness of effect size estimation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 76, 137–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeffler, C. E. (2013). Does imprisonment alter the life course? Evidence on crime and employment from a natural experiment. Criminology, 51, 137–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeffler, C. E., & Nagin, D. S. (2022). The Impact of incarceration on recidivism. Annual Review of Criminology, 5, 133–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mears, D. P., Cochran, J. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2015). Incarceration heterogeneity and its implications for assessing the effectiveness of imprisonment on recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26, 691–712.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller-Smith, M. (2015). The criminal and labor market impacts of incarceration. Working paper. 1–59. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mgms/wp-content/uploads/sites/283/2015/09/incar.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D., Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L. (2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice (Vol. 38, pp. 115–200). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., & Snodgrass, G. M. (2013). The effect of incarceration on re-offending: Evidence from a natural experiment in Pennsylvania. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29, 601–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pager, D., Western, B., & Sugie, N. (2009). Sequencing disadvantage: Barriers to employment facing young Black and White men with criminal records. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208330793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994). Perceptions of punishment: Inmates and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. The Prison Journal, 74, 306–328.
   Google Scholar
• Petrich, D. M., Pratt, T. C., Jonson, C. L., & Cullen, F. T. (2021). Custodial sanctions and reoffending: A meta-analytic review. Crime and Justice, 50, 353–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, M. S., & Pager, D. (2016). Inequality and punishment: A turning point for mass incarceration? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 663, 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompoco, A., Wooldredge, J., Lugo, M., Sullivan, C., & Latessa, E. J. (2017). Reducing inmate misconduct and prison returns with facility education programs. Criminology & Public Policy, 16, 515–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, S., & Weahterburn, D. (2021). Does prison deter drunk-drivers? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 37, 979–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research and Documentation Centre. (2008). Afschrikking en generale preventie [Deterrence and general prevention]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 34, 1–140.
   Google Scholar
• RSJ – The council for the administration of criminal justice and protection of juveniles. (2021). Korte detenties nader bekeken [A closer look on short-term imprisonment]. RSJ.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Gendreau, C., & Goggin, C. (2002). The effects of prison sentences and intermediate sanctions on recidivism: General effects and individual differences. User Report 2002-01, Public Safety Canada, Ottawa, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Staiger, D., & Stock, J. H. (1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65, 557–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorley, D. (2020). Randomness pre‐considered: Recognizing and accounting for “de‐randomizing” events when utilizing random judicial assignment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 17(2), 342–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villettaz, P., Killias, M., & Zoder, I. (2006). The effects of custodial vs. non-custodial sentences on re-offending: A systematic review of the state of knowledge. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2, 1–69.
   Google Scholar
• Villettaz, P., Gillieron, G., & Killias, M. (2015). The effects on re-offending of custodial vs. non-custodial sanctions: An updated systematic review of the state of knowledge. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 11, 1–92.
   Google Scholar
• Western, B., Davis, J., Ganter, F., & Smith, N. (2021). The cumulative risk of jail incarceration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermink, H. T., Blokland, A. A. J., Nieuwbeerta, P., Nagin, D., & Tollenaar, N. (2010). Comparing the effects of community service and short-term imprisonment on recidivism: A matched samples approach. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6(3), 325–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermink, H. T., Apel, R., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Blokland, A. A. J. (2013). The incapacitation effect of first-time imprisonment: A matched samples comparison. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29, 579–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermink, H. T., & Blokland, A. A. J. (2019). Criminal careers and life-course circumstances of Dutch sentenced offenders (Codebook and Documentation). Leiden University, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Yasrebi-De Kom, F. M., Dirkzwager, A. J., Van Der Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2022). The effect of sanction severity and its interaction with procedural justice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(2), 200–219.
   Google Scholar