Adaptation of the Morningness–Eveningness Stability Scale improved (MESSi) into Turkish

References

• Adan A, Archer SN, Hidalgo MP, Di Milia L, Natale V, Randler C. 2012. Circadian typology: a comprehensive review. Chronobiol Int. 29(9):1153–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agargun MY, Kara H, Anlar Ö. 1996. Validity and reliability of the pittsburgh sleep quality index in turkish sample. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry. 7:107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Agargun MY, Cilli AS, Boysan M, Selvi Y. 2007. Turkish version of morningness-eveningness questionnaire (MEQ). Sleep Hypnosis. 9(1):16.
   Google Scholar
• Beşoluk Ş. 2018. Association of dietary patterns with circadian preference, sleep and personality in high school students. Biol Rhythm Res. 49(6):883–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beşoluk Ş, Önder İ, Deveci İ. 2011. Morningness-eveningness preferences and academic achievement of university students. Chronobiol Int. 28(2):118–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohle P, Tilley AJ, Brown S. 2001. Psychometric evaluation of the early/late preferences scale. Ergonomics. 44(10):887–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buysse DJ, Reynolds III CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. 1989. The pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research. 28(2):193–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carskadon MA, Vieira C, Acebo C. 1993. Association between puberty and delayed phase preference. Sleep. 16(3):258–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallera GM, Giudici S. 2008. Morningness and eveningness personality: a survey in literature from 1995 up till 2006. Pers Individ Dif. 44(1):3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen FF. 2007. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 14(3):464–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrey AL, Lee HB. 1992. A first course in factor analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Demirhan E, Randler C, Horzum MB. 2016. Is problematic mobile phone use explained by chronotype and personality? Chronobiol Int. 33(7):821–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung CG, Hasher L, Djikic M, Criger B, Peterson JB. 2007. Morning people are stable people: circadian rhythm and the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Pers Individ Dif. 43(2):267–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Milia L, Adan A, Natale V, Randler C. 2013. Reviewing the psychometric properties of contemporary circadian typology measures. Chronobiol Int. 30(10):1261–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Morales JF, Sanchez-Lopez MP. 2005. Composite scales of morningness and preferences: preliminary validity data in peruvian undergraduates. Ergonomics. 48(4):354–363. doi:10.1080/0014013042000327661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Morales JF, Jankowski KS, Vollmer C, Randler C. 2013. Morningness and life satisfaction: further evidence from Spain. Chronobiol Int. 30(10):1283–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Morales JF, Randler C. 2017. Spanish adaptation of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability-Scale improved (MESSi). Span J Psychol. 20:E23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosseville F, Laborde S, Lericollais R. 2013. Validation of a chronotype questionnaire including an amplitude dimension. Chronobiol Int. 30(5):639–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun OB, Ogutlu H, Esin IS. 2015. Turkish validation and adaptation of children’s chronotype questionnaire (CCTQ). Eurasian J Med. 47(1):56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faßl C, Quante M, Mariani S, Randler C. 2018. Preliminary findings for the validity of the Morningness–Eveningness-Stability Scale improved (MESSi): correlations with activity levels and personality. Chronobiol Int. 1–8. doi:10.1080/07420528.2018.1519570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidel A. 2000. Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. London (Thousand Oaks, New Delhi): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gençöz T. 2000. Positive and negative affect schedule: a study of validity and reliability. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 15(46):19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB Jr. 2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J Res Pers. 37(6):504–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green SB, Salkind NJ. 2005. Using SPSS for windows and macintosh: analyzing and understanding data. 4th ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Günel ÖD. 2010. İşletmelerde Yıldırma Olgusu ve Yıldırma Mağdurlarının Kişilik Özelliklerine İlişkin Bir Araştırma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 12(3):37–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton RK. 2005. Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. Adapting Educ Psychol Tests Cross-Cultural Assess. 1:3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstra WA, de Weerd AW. 2008. How to assess circadian rhythm in humans: a review of literature. Epilepsy Behav. 13(3):438–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne JA, Östberg O. 1976. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int J Chronobiol. 4:97–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lázár AS, Slak A, Lo JCY, Santhi N, von Schantz M, Archer SN, … Dijk DJ. 2012. Sleep, diurnal preference, health, and psychological well-being: a prospective single-allelic-variation study. Chronobiol Int. 29(2):131–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich AA, Credè M, Hahn E, Spinath FM, Roberts RD, Preckel F. 2017. How distinctive are morningness and eveningness from the Big Five factors of personality? A meta-analytic investigation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 112(3):491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masal E, Randler C, Beşoluk Ş, Önder İ, Horzum MB, Vollmer C. 2015. Effects of longitude, latitude and social factors on chronotype in Turkish students. Pers Individ Dif. (86):73–81. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.019.
   Google Scholar
• Merikanto I, Lahti T, Puolijoki H, Vanhala M, Peltonen M, Laatikainen T, … Partonen T. 2013. Associations of chronotype and sleep with cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes. Chronobiol Int. 30(4):470–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önder İ, Beşoluk Ş. 2013. Adaptation of the morningness eveningness scale for children into Turkish. Biol Rhythm Res. 44(2):313–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önder İ, Beşoluk Ş, Horzum MB. 2013. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the composite scale of morningness. Span J Psychol. 16:E67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önder İ, Beşoluk Ş, İskender M, Masal E, Demirhan E. 2014. Circadian preferences, sleep quality and sleep patterns, personality, academic motivation and academic achievement of university students. Learn Individ Differ. 32:184–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natale V, Ballardini D, Schumann R, Mencarelli C, Magelli V. 2008. Morningness–eveningness preference and eating disorders. Pers Individ Dif. 45(6):549–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natale V, Cicogna P. 1996. Circadian regulation of subjective alertness in morning and evening ‘types’. Pers Individ Dif. 20(4):491–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogińska H. 2011. Can you feel the rhythm? A short questionnaire to describe two dimensions of chronotype. Pers Individ Dif. 50(7):1039–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottoni GL, Antoniolli E, Lara DR. 2011. The Circadian Energy Scale (CIRENS): two simple questions for a reliable chronotype measurement based on energy. Chronobiol Int. 28(3):229–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punduk Z, Gur H, Ercan I. 2005. A reliability study of the Turkish version of the morningness-eveningness questionnaire. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 16(1):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahafar A, Randler C, Díaz-Morales JF, Kasaeian A, Heidari Z. 2017. Cross-cultural validity of Morningness-Eveningness Stability Scale improved (MESSi) in Iran, Spain and Germany. Chronobiol Int. 34(2):273–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C. 2008. Morningness‐eveningness comparison in adolescents from different countries around the world. Chronobiol Int. 25(6):1017–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Díaz-Morales JF, Rahafar A, Vollmer C. 2016. Morningness–eveningness and amplitude – development and validation of an improved composite scale to measure circadian preference and stability (MESSi). Chronobiol Int. 33(7):832–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Schredl M, Göritz AS. 2017. Chronotype, sleep behavior, and the big five personality factors. SAGE Open. 7(3):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues PF, Vagos P, Pandeirada JN, Marinho PI, Randler C, Silva CF. 2018. Initial psychometric characterization for the Portuguese version of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability-Scale improved (MESSi). Chronobiol Int. 1–11. doi:10.1080/07420528.2018.1495646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. 2003. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 8(2):23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Smith CS, Reilly C, Midkiff K. 1989. Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. J Appl Psychol. 74(5):728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomažič I, Randler C. 2018. Slovenian adaptation of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability Scales improved (MESSi). Biol Rhythm Res. 1–7. doi:10.1080/09291016.2018.1535539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonetti L, Adan A, Di Milia L, Randler C, Natale V. 2015. Measures of circadian preference in childhood and adolescence: a review. Eur Psychiatry. 30(5):576–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonetti L, Fabbri M, Natale V. 2009. Relationship between circadian typology and big five personality domains. Chronobiol Int. 26(2):337–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaousis I. 2010. Circadian preferences and personality traits: a meta‐analysis. Eur J Pers. 24(4):356–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot R, Lugtig P, Hox J. 2012. A checklist for testing measurement invariance. Eur J Dev Psychol. 9(4):486–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 54(6):1063. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1988-31508-001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar