Validity and reliability of the Slovene version of the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire

References

• Adan A, Archer SN, Hidalgo MP, Di Milia L, Natale V, Randler C. 2012. Circadian typology: A comprehensive review. Chronobiol Int. 29:1153–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adan A, Lachica J, Caci H, Natale V. 2010. Circadian typology and temperament and character personality dimensions. Chronobiol Int. 27(1):181–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adan A, Natale V. 2002. Gender differences in morningness-eveningness preference. Chronobiol Int. 19:709–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borbély AA, Daan S, Wirz-Justice A, Deboer T. 2016. The two-process model of sleep regulation: a reappraisal. J Sleep Res. 25(2):131–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czeisler CA, Buxton OM, Khalsa SBS. 2005. The human circadian timing system and sleep-wake regulation. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, editors. Principles and practices of sleep medicine. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; p. 37–394.
   Google Scholar
• DeYoung CG, Peterson JB, Higgins DM. 2002. Higher-order factors of the big five predict conformity: arethere neuroses of health? Pers Individ Dif. 33:533–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Milia L, Adan A, Natale V, Randler C. 2013. Reviewing the psychometric properties of contemporary circadian typology measures. Chronobiol Int. 30:1261–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Milia L, Bohle P. 2009. Morningness or morning affect? A short composite scale of morningness. Chronobiol Int. 26:494–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne JA, Östberg O. 1976. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int J Chronobiol. 4:97–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inomata Y, Echizenya M, Takeshima M, Shimizu K, Shimizu T. 2014. Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the morningness-eveningness questionnaire evaluated from actigraphy. Sleep Biol Rhythm. 12:289–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara K, Miyasita A, Inugami M, Fukuda K, Miyata Y. 1987. Differences in sleep-wake habits and EEG sleep variables between active morning and evening subjects. Sleep. 10:330–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski KS. 2013. Polish version of the reduced morningness–eveningness questionnaire. Biol Rhythm Res. 44(3):427–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John OP, Donahue EM, Kentle RL 1991. The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kovaleva A, Beierlein C, Kemper CJ, Rammstedt B. 2013. Psychometric properties of the BFI-K: a cross-validation study. Int J Educ Psychol Assess. 13(1):34–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Kim SJ, Lee SY, Jang KH, Kim IS, Duffy JF. 2014. Reliability and valididty of the Korean version of morningess-eveningness questionnaire in adults aged 20–39 years. Chronobiol Int. 31(4):479–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SX, Li QQ, Wang XF, Liu LJ, Liu Y, Zhang LX, Zhang B, Lu L. 2011. Preliminary test for the Chinese version of the morningness–eveningness questionnaire. Sleep Biol Rhythms. 9:19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich AA, Credè M, Hahn E, Spinath FM, Roberts RD, Preckel F. 2017. How distinctive are morningness and eveningness from the big five factors of personality? A meta-analytic investigation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 112:491–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, John OP. 1992. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers. 60:175–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohawk JA, Green CB, Takahashi JS. 2012. Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Annu Rev Neurosci. 35:445–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk T. 2005. Shift work: basic principles. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, editors. Principles and practice of sleep medicine. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; p. 673–680.
   Google Scholar
• Monk TH, Buysse DJ, Potts JM, Degrazia JM, Kupfer DJ. 2004. Morningness–eveningness and lifestyle regularity. Chronobiol Int. 21:435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk TH, Kupfer DJ. 2007. Which aspects of morningnesseveningness change with age? J Biol Rhythms. 22:278–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natale V, Cicogna P. 2002. Morningness-eveningness dimension: is it really a continuum? Pers Individ Dif. 32:809–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogińska H. 2011. Can you feel the rhythm? A short questionnaire to describe two dimensions of chronotype. Pers Individ Dif. 50:1039–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preckel F, Lipnevich A, Boehme K, Brandner L, Georgi K, Könen T, Mursin K, Roberts R. 2013. Morningness‐eveningness and educational outcomes: the lark has an advantage over the owl at high school. Br J Educ Psychol. 83(1):114–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punduk Z, Gür H, Ercan I. 2005. A reliability study of the Turkish version of the mornings-eveningness questionnaire. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 16(1):40–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putilov AA, Donskaya OG, Verevkin EG. 2015. How many diurnal types are there? A search for two further “bird species”. Pers Individ Dif. 72:12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammstedt B, John OP. 2005. Kurzversion des Big FiveInventory (BFI-K): entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit. Diagnostica. 51:195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C. 2007. Gender differences in morningness– eveningness assessed by self-report questionnaires: A meta-analysis. Pers Individ Dif. 43:1667–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C. 2013. German version of the reduced morningness–eveningness questionnaire (rMEQ). Biol Rhythm Res. 44(5):730–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Faßl C, Kalb N. 2017a. From Lark to Owl: developmental changes in morningness-eveningness from new-borns to early adulthood. Sci Rep. 7:45874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Schredl M, Göritz SA. 2017b. Chronotype, sleep behavior, and the big five personality factors. SAGE Open. 7(3):215824401772832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo PM, Leone L, Penolazzi B, Natale V. 2012. Circadian preference and the big five: the role of impulsivity and sensation seeking. Chronobiol Int. 29:1121–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susman EJ, Dockray S, Schiefelbein VL, Herwehe S, Heaton JA, Dorn LD. 2007. Morningness/eveningness, morning-to-afternoon cortisol ratio, and antisocial behavior problems during puberty. Dev Psychol. 43:811–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taillard J, Philip P, Chastang JF, Bioulac B. 2004. Validation of horne and ostberg morningness-eveningness questionnaire in a middle-aged population of French workers. J Biol Rhythms. 19:76–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taillard J, Philip P, Chastang JF, Diefenbach K, Bioulac B. 2001. Is self-reported morbidity related to the circadian clock? J Biol Rhythms. 16:183–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomažič I, Randler C. 2018. Slovenian adaptation of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability Scales improved (MESSi). Biol Rhythm Res. 1–7. doi:10.1080/09291016.2018.1535539.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonetti L, Fabbri M, Natale V. 2009. Relationship between circadian typology and big five personality domains. Chronobiol Int. 26:337–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonetti L, Natale V, Randler C. 2015. Association between circadian preference and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chronobiol Int. 32(6):792–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaousis I. 2010. Circadian preferences and personality traits: A metaanalysis. Eur J Pers. 24:356–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker RJ, Kribs ZD, Christopher AN, Shewach OR, Wieth MB. 2014. Age, the big five, and time-of-day preference: A mediational model. Pers Individ Dif. 56:170–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2007. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Geneva (CH): WHO. accessed 2018 Oct 15. https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/
   Google Scholar
• Zager Kocjan G 2016. Zavzetost, strast in zanos pri zaposlenih: teoretična in empirična razmejitev: doktorska disertacija [Engagement, passion, and flow among employees: a theoretical and empirical distinction: doctoral dissertation]. Ljubljana (SLO): G. Zager Kocjan.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann LK. 2011. Chronotype and the transition to college life. Chronobiol Int. 28:904–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar