Generalizability of a biomathematical model of fatigue’s sleep predictions

Refere nces

• Åkerstedt T, Anund A, Axelsson J, Kecklund G. 2014. Subjective sleepiness is a sensitive indicator of insufficient sleep and impaired waking function. J Sleep Res. 23(3):240–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerstedt T, Connor J, Gray A, Kecklund G. 2008. Predicting road crashes from a mathematical model of alertness regulation–The sleep/wake predictor. Accid Anal Prev. 40(4):1480–1485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerstedt T, Folkard S, Portin C. 2004. Predictions from the three-process model of alertness. Aviat Space Environ Med. 75(3, Suppl):A75–A83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Civil Aviation Safety Authority. 2014. Biomathematical Fatigue Models Guidance Document. Albert Park, Australia: Dédale Asia Pacific. Retrieved 28 Sep 2019 from https://www.icao.int/safety/fatiguemanagement/ArticlesPublications/biomathematical_fatigue_models.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Darwent D, Dawson D, Roach GD. 2010. Prediction of probabilistic sleep distributions following travel across multiple time zones. Sleep. 33(2):185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwent D, Dawson D, Roach GD. 2012. A model of shift worker sleep/wake behaviour. Accid Anal Prev. 45S:6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson D, Darwent D, Roach GD. 2017. How should a bio-mathematical model be used within a fatigue risk management system to determine whether or not a working time arrangement is safe? Accid Anal Prev. 99(Pt B):469–473.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson D, McCulloch K. 2005. Managing fatigue: it’s about sleep. Sleep Med Rev. 9(5):365–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson D, Noy YI, Härma M, Åkerstedt T, Belenky G. 2011. Modelling fatigue and the use of fatigue models in work settings. Accid Anal Prev. 43:549–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean DA, Fletcher A, SR H, EB K. 2007. Developing mathematical models of neurobehavioral performance for the “real world”. J Biol Rhythms. 22(3):246–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorrian J, Darwent D, Dawson D, Roach GD. 2012. Predicting pilot's sleep during layovers using their own behaviour or data from colleagues: Implications for biomathematical models. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 45S 45:17–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabarino S, de Carli F, Nobili L, Mascialino B, Squarcia S, Penco MA, Beelke M, Ferrillo F. 2002. Sleepiness and sleep disorders in shift workers: A study on a group of Italian police officers. Sleep. 25(6):642–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabarino S, Guglielmi O, Puntoni M, Bragazzi NL, Magnavita N. 2019. Sleep quality among police officers: implications and insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(5):885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gander PH. 2015. Evolving regulatory approaches for managing fatigue risk in transport operations. Rev Hum Ergon. 10(1):253–271.
   Google Scholar
• Gander PH, Wu LJ, van den Berg M, Lamp A, Hoeg L, Belenky G. 2016. Fatigue risk management systems. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, editors. Principles and practice of sleep medicine. 6th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier; p. 697–707.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler J, Hursh S, Fanzone RT 2012. Validation of FAST model sleep estimates with actigraph measured sleep in locomotive engineers; Baltimore, MD: Federal Railroad Administration. U.S. Department of Transportation. Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-12/15.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs AN, Gregory KB, Parke BK, Pradhan SK, Caddick Z, Bathurst NG, Flynn-Evans EE San Francisco bar pilot fatigue study. Moffett Field (CA): NASA Ames Research Center. Report No. NASA/TM-2018-219934, ARC-E-DAA-TN58326.
   Google Scholar
• Hursh SR, Balkin TJ, Van Dongen HPA. 2016. Sleep and performance prediction modeling. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, editors. Principles and practice of sleep medicine. 6th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier; p. 689–696.
   Google Scholar
• Hursh SR, Raslear TG, Kaye AS, Fanzone JF 2008. Validation and calibration of a fatigue assessment tool for railroad work schedules, final report. Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-08/04 Washington (D.C.): U.S. Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Hursh SR, Waggoner LB 2017. Refining sleep predictions using actigraphy in operational environments: studies with pilots. 10th International Conference on Managing Fatigue Conference website Accessed September 28, 2019. San Diego, CA, USA. https://fatigueconference2017.com/materials/wednesday-am/modeling/Abstract_Hursh.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ingre M, Van Leeuwen W, Klemets T, Ullvetter C, Hough S, Kecklund G, Karlsson ÅT. 2014. Validating and extending the three process model of alertness in airline operations. PLoS One. 9(10):e108679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James FO, Mapp KJ, Greenwood P, Waggoner LB 2017. Applied fatigue risk management for transit: Biomathematical modeling in the analysis of recorded events. 10th International Conference on Managing Fatigue Conference website. Accessed February 9, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• James FO, Waggoner LB, Weiss PM, PattersonDP, Higgins JS, Lang ES, Van Dongen HPA. 2018. Does implementation of biomathematical models mitigate fatigue and fatigue-related risks in emergency medical services operations? A systematic review. 22(sup1):69–80. doi:10.1080/10903127.2017.1384875
   Google Scholar
• Jones CB, Dorrian J, Rajaratnam SMW, Dawson. 2005. Working Hours Regulations and Fatigue in Transportation: a Comparative Analysis. Safety Science. 43(4):225–252.
   Google Scholar
• Kandelaars KJ, Dorrian J, Fletcher A, Roach GD, Dawson D 2005. A review of bio-mathematical fatigue models: where to from here? Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Fatigue Management in Transportation, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Lamp A, Chen Jane M.C, McCullough DBelenky G. 2019. Equal to or better than: the application of statistical non-inferiority to fatigue risk management. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 126:184–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallis MM, Mejdal S, Nguyen TT, Dinges DF. 2004. Summary of the key features of seven biomathematical models of human fatigue and performance. Aviat Space Environ Med. 75(3, Suppl):A4–A14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald N. 1981. Safety and regulations restricting the hours of driving of goods vehicle drivers. Ergonomics. 24(6):475–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruchnicki SA, Wu LJ, Belenky G. 2011. An exploration of the utility of mathematical modeling predicting fatigue from sleep/wake history and circadian phase applied in accident analysis and prevention: the crash of comair flight 5191. Accid Anal Prev. 43(3):1056–1061. Doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quantum Version FAID 1.0. User Guide. 2017. InterDynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Reaves BA. 2012. Hiring and retention of state and local law enforcement officers, 2008– statistical tables. October 2012. Washington (D.C.): Bureau of Justice Statistics. Report No.: NCJ238251 Accessed 2019 Nov 1 . https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/hrslleo08st.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Riedy SM, Dawson D, Vila B. 2019. U.S. police rosters: fatigue and public complaints. Sleep. 42(3):1–10. Doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagherian K, Zhu S, Storr C, Hinds PS, Derickson D, Geiger-Brown J. 2018. Bio-mathematical fatigue models predict sickness absence in hospital nurses: an 18 months retrospective cohort study. Applied Ergonomics. 73:42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar