Circadian modulation of the time course of automatic and controlled semantic processing

References

• Adan A, Almirall H. 1991. Horne & Östberg morningness-eveningness questionnaire: a reduced scale. Pers Indiv Differ. 12:241–253. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90110-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adan A, Archer SN, Hidalgo MP, Di Milia L, Natale V, Randler C. 2012. Circadian typology: a comprehensive review. Chronobiol Int. 29:1153–1175. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.719971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antypa N, Vogelzangs N, Meesters Y, Schoevers R, Penninx BWJH. 2016. Chronotype associations with depression and anxiety disorders in a large cohort study: research article: chronotypes in depression and anxiety. Depress Anxiety. 33:75–83. doi: 10.1002/da.22422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota DA, Black SR, Cheney M. 1992. Automatic and attentional priming in young and older adults: reevaluation of the two-process model. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 18:485–502. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.2.485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker CA. 1980. Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies. Mem Cognit. 8:493–512. doi: 10.3758/BF03213769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besner D, Humphreys GW. 1991. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. L. Erlbaum Associates. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10630126.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter K, Cajochen C. 2007. Circadian rhythms in cognitive performance: methodological constraints, protocols, theoretical underpinnings. Physiol Behav. 90:196–208. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.09.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocanegra BR, Hommel B. 2014. When cognitive control is not adaptive. Psychol Sci. 25:1249–1255. doi: 10.1177/0956797614528522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver TS. 2012. The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends Cogn Sci. 16:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng W-J, Puttonen S, Vanttola P, Koskinen A, Kivimäki M, Härmä M. 2021. Association of shift work with mood disorders and sleep problems according to chronotype: a 17-year cohort study. Chronobiol Int. 38:518–525. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1885431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins AM, Loftus EF. 1975. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev. 82:407–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa Á, Molina E, Sanabria D. 2014. Effects of chronotype and time of day on the vigilance decrement during simulated driving. Accident Anal Prev. 67:113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daza MT, Ortells JJ, Fox E. 2002. Perception without awareness: further evidence from a Stroop priming task. Percept Psychophys. 64:1316–1324. doi: 10.3758/BF03194774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Milia L, Smolensky MH, Costa G, Howarth HD, Ohayon MM, Philip P. 2011. Demographic factors, fatigue, and driving accidents: an examination of the published literature. Accident Anal Prev. 43:516–532. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy JF, Rimmer DW, Czeisler CA. 2001. Association of intrinsic circadian period with morningness–eveningness, usual wake time, and circadian phase. Behav Neurosci. 115:895–899. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.115.4.895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facer-Childs ER, Campos BM, Middleton B, Skene DJ, Bagshaw AP. 2019. Circadian phenotype impacts the brain’s resting-state functional connectivity, attentional performance, and sleepiness. Sleep. 42:zsz033. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facer-Childs ER, Middleton B, Skene DJ, Bagshaw AP. 2019. Resetting the late timing of ‘night owls’ has a positive impact on mental health and performance. Sleep Med. 60:236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fales CL, Barch DM, Burgess GC, Schaefer A, Mennin DS, Gray JR, Braver TS. 2008. Anxiety and cognitive efficiency: differential modulation of transient and sustained neural activity during a working memory task. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 8:239–253. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.3.239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk AD, Schneider W. 1981. Control and automatic processing during tasks requiring sustained attention: a new approach to vigilance. Hum Factors. 23:737–750. doi: 10.1177/001872088102300610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghin F, Stock A-K, Beste C. 2022. The importance of resource allocation for the interplay between automatic and cognitive control in response inhibition – an EEG source localization study. Cortex. 155:202–217. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin AP, Sigman M, Braier G, Golombek DA, Leone MJ. 2020. Interplay of chronotype and school timing predicts school performance. Nat Hum Behav. 4:387–396. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0820-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison Y, Horne JA. 1999. One night of sleep loss impairs innovative thinking and flexible decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 78:128–145. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne JA. 1993. Human sleep, sleep loss and behaviour: Implications for the prefrontal cortex and psychiatric disorder. Brit J Psychiat. 162:413–419. doi: 10.1192/bjp.162.3.413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. 2022. JASP (Version 0.16.3)[Computer software]. [Software]. https://jasp-stats.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkhof GA, Van Dongen HPA. 1996. Morning-type and evening-type individuals differ in the phase position of their endogenous circadian oscillator. Neurosci Lett. 218:153–156. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(96)13140-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley LK, Saville AL, Gayzur ND, Fuentes LJ. 2008. Adult age differences in attention to semantic context. Aging Neuropsychol Cognit. 15:657–686. doi: 10.1080/13825580802036928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara T, Madrid JA, Correa Á, van Wassenhove V. 2014. The vigilance decrement in executive function is attenuated when individual chronotypes perform at their optimal time of day. PLoS One. 9:e88820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner I, Bentin S, Shriki O. 2014. Integrating the automatic and the controlled: strategies in semantic priming in an attractor network with latching dynamics. Cogn Sci. 38:1562–1603. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levandovski R, Sasso E, Hidalgo MP. 2013. Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 35:3–11. doi: 10.1590/S2237-60892013000100002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manly T. 2002. Coffee in the cornflakes: time-of-day as a modulator of executive response control. Neuropsychologia. 40:1–6. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00086-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Pérez V, Palmero LB, Campoy G, Fuentes LJ. 2020. The role of chronotype in the interaction between the alerting and the executive control networks. Sci Rep. 10:11901. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68755-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Pérez V, Tortajada M, Palmero LB, Campoy G, Fuentes LJ. 2022. Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation over right-DLPFC on vigilance tasks depend on the arousal level. Sci Rep. 12:547. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04607-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May CP, Hasher L. 1998. Synchrony effects in inhibitory control over thought and action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 24:363–379. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.2.363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May CP, Hasher L. 2017. Synchrony affects performance for older but not younger neutral-type adults. Timing Time Percept. 5:129–148. doi: 10.1163/22134468-00002087.
   Google Scholar
• May CP, Hasher L, Foong N. 2005. Implicit memory, age, and time of day: paradoxical priming effects. Psychol Sci. 16:96–100. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00788.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara TP. 2005. Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. Hove, England: Psychology Press. doi: 10.4324/9780203338001.
   Google Scholar
• Merikle PM, Joordens S. 1997. Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Conscious Cogn. 6:219–236. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1997.0310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer DE, Schvaneveldt RW. 1971. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. J Exp Psychol. 90:227–234. doi: 10.1037/h0031564.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller EK, Cohen JD. 2001. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 24:167–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JD, Morin LP, Schwartz WJ, Moore RY. 1996. New insights into the mammalian circadian clock. Sleep. 19:641–667. doi: 10.1093/sleep/19.8.641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina E, Sanabria D, Jung T-P, Correa Á. 2019. Electroencephalographic and peripheral temperature dynamics during a prolonged psychomotor vigilance task. Accident Anal Prev. 126:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely JH. 1977. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. J Exp Psychol. 106:226–254. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226.
   Google Scholar
• Neely JH, Keefe DE, Ross KL. 1989. Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 15:1003–1019. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.6.1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely JH, O’Connor PA, Calabrese G. 2010. Fast trial pacing in a lexical decision task reveals a decay of automatic semantic activation. Acta Psychol. 133:127–136. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginska H, Fafrowicz M, Golonka K, Marek T, Mojsa-Kaja J, Tucholska K. 2010. Chronotype, sleep loss, and diurnal pattern of salivary cortisol in a simulated daylong driving. Chronobiol Int. 27:959–974. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2010.489412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orban C, Kong R, Li J, Chee MWL, Yeo BTT. 2020. Time of day is associated with paradoxical reductions in global signal fluctuation and functional connectivity. ne Biol. 18:e3000602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000602.
   Google Scholar
• Ortells JJ, Daza MT, Fox E. 2003. Semantic activation in the absence of perceptual awareness. Percept Psychophys. 65:1307–1317. doi: 10.3758/BF03194854.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmero LB, Martínez-Pérez V, Tortajada M, Campoy G, Fuentes LJ. 2022. Mid-luteal phase progesterone effects on vigilance tasks are modulated by women’s chronotype. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 140:105722. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmero LB, Martínez-Pérez V, Tortajada M, Campoy G, Fuentes LJ. 2024. Testing the modulation of self-related automatic and others-related controlled processing by chronotype and time-of-day. Conscious Cogn. 118:103633. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA. 2016. Psychology software tools, inc. [E-Prime 3.0]. [ Software]. https://support.pstnet.com/.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2022. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [ Software]. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Roenneberg T, Kuehnle T, Juda M, Kantermann T, Allebrandt K, Gordijn M, Merrow M. 2007. Epidemiology of the human circadian clock. Sleep Med Rev. 11:429–438. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehinejad MA, Wischnewski M, Ghanavati E, Mosayebi-Samani M, Kuo M-F, Nitsche MA. 2021. Cognitive functions and underlying parameters of human brain physiology are associated with chronotype. Nat Commun. 12:4672. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24885-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarabia JA, Rol MA, Mendiola P, Madrid JA. 2008. Circadian rhythm of wrist temperature in normal-living subjects. Physiol Behav. 95:570–580. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt C, Collette F, Cajochen C, Peigneux P. 2007. A time to think: circadian rhythms in human cognition. Cogn Neuropsychol. 24:755–789. doi: 10.1080/02643290701754158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt C, Peigneux P, Leclercq Y, Sterpenich V, Vandewalle G, Phillips C, Berthomier P, Berthomier C, Tinguely G, Gais S, et al. 2012. Circadian preference modulates the neural substrate of conflict processing across the day. PLoS One. 7:e29658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A. 2012. E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [ Software].
   Google Scholar
• Schneider W, Shiffrin RM. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev. 84:1–66. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkat N, Sinha M, Sinha R, Ghate J, Pande B. 2020. Neuro-cognitive profile of morning and evening chronotypes at different times of day. Ann Neurosci. 27:257–265. doi: 10.1177/0972753121990280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh NA, Repa LM, Garland SN. 2022. Mindful larks and lonely owls: the relationship between chronotype, mental health, sleep quality, and social support in young adults. J Sleep Res. 31. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff N, Chmielewski W, Buse J, Roessner V, Beste C. 2019. Paradoxical response inhibition advantages in adolescent obsessive compulsive disorder result from the interplay of automatic and controlled processes. NeuroImage Clin. 23:101893. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Hasher L, Wilson DE. 2007. Synchrony effects in automatic and controlled retrieval. Psychon Bull Rev. 14:51–56. doi: 10.3758/BF03194027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar