19
Views
117
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Organizational Context and Information Systems Success: A Contingency Approach

Pages 5-20 | Published online: 22 Dec 2015

References

  • Alexander, J. W., and Randolph, W. A. The fit between technology and structure as a predictor of performance in nursing subunits. Academy of Management Journal, 8, 4 (1985), 844–859.
  • Argote, L. Organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (1982), 420–434.
  • Bailey, J. E., and Pearson, S. W. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29, 6 (May 1983), 519–529.
  • Baroudi, J. J.; Olson, M. H.; and Ives, B. An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 29, 3 (March 1986), 232–238.
  • Bean, A. S.; Neal, R. D.; Radnor, M.; and Tansik, D. A. Structural and behavioral correlates of implementation in U.S. business organizations. In Implementating Operations Research/Management Science, R. L. Schultz and D. P. Slevin, eds. New York: Elsevier North-Holiand, 1975, 77–132.
  • Benbasat, I.; Dexter, A. S.; Drury, D. H.; and Goldstein, R. C. A critique of the stage hypothesis: theory and empirical evidence. Communications of the ACM, 27, 5 (May 1984), 476–485.
  • Cheney, P. H., and Dickson, G. W. Organizational characteristics and information systems: an exploratory investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 1 (March 1982), 170–184.
  • Cheney, P. H.; Mann, R. I.; and Amoroso, D. L. Organizational factors affecting the success of end-user computing. JMIS, 3, 1 (Summer 1986), 65–79.
  • DeLone, W. H. Determinants of success for computer usage in small business. MIS Quarterly, 12, 1 (March 1988), 51–61.
  • Dewar, R., and Hage, J. Size, technology and structure differentiation: toward a theoretical synthesis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 1 (March 1978), 111–134.
  • Ein-Dor, P., and Segev, E. Organizational context and the success of management information systems. Management Science, 24, 10 (June 1978), 1067–1077.
  • Ein-Dor, P., and Segev, E. Organizational context and MIS structure: some empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly, 6, 3 (September 1982), 55–68.
  • Ein-Dor, P.; Segev, E.; Blumenthal, D.; and Millet, I. Perceived importance, investment and success of MIS, or the MIS zoo. Systems, Objectives, Solutions, 4 (1984), 61–67.
  • Gremillion, L. L. Organizational size and information system use. JMIS, 1, 2 (Fall 1984), 4–17.
  • Hall, R. H. Organizations: Structure and Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.
  • Ives, B.; Olson, M. H.; and Baroudi, J. J. Measuring user information satisfaction: a method and critique. Communications of the ACM, 26, 10 (October 1983), 785–793.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L.; Dickson, G. W.; and DeSanctis, G. Methodological issues in experimental IS research: experiences and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 9, 2 (June 1985), 141–156.
  • Jones, W. D. Characteristics of planning in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management (July 1982), 15–19.
  • Langbein, L. I., and Lichtman, A. J. Ecological Inference. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1978.
  • Lehman, J. A. Organizational Size and Information System Sophistication. Working paper 85-18, MIS Research Center, University of Minnesota, 1985.
  • Lucas, H. C., and Sutton, J. A. The stage hypothesis and the s-curve: some contradictory evidence. Communications of the ACM, 20, 4 (April 1977), 254–259.
  • Mahmood, M. A., and Becker, J. D. Impact of organizational maturity on user satisfaction with information systems. 21st Annual Computer Personnel Research Conference, ACM, May 1985, 134–151.
  • Mansour, A. H., and Watson, H. J. The determinants of computer based information system performance. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 3 (March 1980), 521–523.
  • Markus, M. L., and Robey, D. The organizational validity of management information systems. Human Relations, 36, 3 (1983), 203–226.
  • Moch, M. K., and Morse, E. V. Size, centralization and organizational adoption of innovation. American Sociological Review, 42, 4 (August 1977), 716–725.
  • Nie, N. H.; Hull, C. H.; Jenkins, J. G.; Steinbrenner, K.; and Bent, D. H. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
  • Nolan, R. L. Managing the crises in data processing. Harvard Business Review, 57, 2 (March/April 1979), 115–126.
  • Olson, M. H., and Chervany, N. L. The relationship between organizational characteristics and the structure of the information services function. MIS Quarterly, 4, 2 (June 1980), 57–68.
  • Pugh, D.; Hickson, D. J.; Hinings, C. R.; and Turner, C. Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, 1 (March 1968), 65–105.
  • Raymond, L. Organizational characteristics and MIS success in the context of small business. MIS Quarterly, 9, 1 (March 1985), 37–52.
  • Robey, D., and Zeller, R. L. Factors affecting the success and failure of an information system for product quality. Interfaces, 8, 2 (February 1978), 70–75.
  • Sanders, G. L., and Courtney, J. F. A field study of organizational factors influencing DSS success. MIS Quarterly, 9, 1 (March 1985), 77–93.
  • Saunders, G. L., and Keller, R. T. A study of the maturity of the information system function, task characteristics and interdepartmental communication: the importance of information system-organizational fit. 4th International Conference on Information Systems, December 1983, 111–124.
  • Schultz, R. L., and Slevin, D. P. Implementation and organizational validity: an empirical investigation. In Implementing Operations Research/Management Science, R. L. Schultz and D. P. Slevin, eds. New York: Elsevier North-Holland, 1975, 153–182.
  • Srinivasan, A. Alternative measures of system effectiveness: associations and implications. MIS Quarterly, 9, 3 (September 1985), 243–253.
  • Srinivasan, A., and Kaiser, K. M. Relationships between selected organizational factors and systems development. Communications of the ACM, 30, 6 (June 1987), 556–562.
  • Tait, P., and Vessey, I. The effect of user involvement on system success: a contingency approach. MIS Quarterly, 12, 1 (March 1988), 91–109.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.