A Comparison of Machine Learning with Human Judgment

References

• Abdel-Khalik, A.R., and El-Sheshai, K.M. Information choice and utilization in an experiment on default prediction. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn 1980), 325–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, H. Effects of pretraining on the construction of complex rules in probabilistic inference tasks. Umea Psychological Reports, 162 (1982), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, H., and Brehmer, B. Note on the policies acquired in interpersonal learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 2 (October 1979), 195–201.
   Google Scholar
• Arkes, H.R., and Harkness, A.R. Estimates of contingency between two dichotomous variables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1 (1983), 117–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, A., and Feigenbaum, E.A. The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2. London: Pittman Books, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Biehal, G., and Chakravarti, D. Information-presentation format and learning goals as determinants of consumers’ memory retrieval and choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (March 1982), 431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, S.F.; Messier, W.F.; and Hansen, J.V. A descriptive analysis of computer audit specialists’ decision-making behavior in advanced computer environments. Auditing: Journal of Practice and Theory (Spring 1987), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrow, D.C.; Mittal, S.; and Stefik, M.J. Expert systems: perils and promise. Communication of the ACM, 29 (1986), 880–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, H., and Chandler, J.S. Predicting stock market behavior through rule induction: an application of the learning-from-example approach. Decision Sciences, 18 (1987), 415–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehmer, B. Effects of practice on utilization of nonlinear rules in inference tasks. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, (1979), 141–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehmer, B. Note on subjects’ hypotheses in multiple-cue probability learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40 (December 1987), 323–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehmer, B., and Kuylenstierna, J. Content and consistency in probabilistic inference tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26 (1980), 54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L.; Friedman, J. J.; Olshen, R.A.; and Stone, C.J. Classification and Regression Trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, D., and Wright, G. Interaction of judgmental and statistical forecasting methods: issues and analysis. Management Science, 37 (1991), 501–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, J.D., and Sorensen, S.W. Rule induction for group decisions with statistical data—an example. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 42 (1991), 227–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. General conditions for the success of bootstrapping models. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27 (1981), 411–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M.T.H.; Glaser, R.; and Rees, E. Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sterberg (ed.), Advances in Psychology of Human Intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1982, pp. 7–75.
   Google Scholar
• Cronan, T.P., and Kattan, M.W. Student performance in the business computer information systems course: a recursive partitioning approach. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 31 (1991), 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D.B. Artificial intelligence goes to work. High Technology (April 1987), 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, D.H.; Hammond, K.R.; and Summers, D.A. Acquisition and application of knowledge in complex inference tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology (1972), 20–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durkin, J. Induction via ID3. AI Expert (April 1992), 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Einhorn, H.J. Accepting error to make less error. Journal of Personality Assessment (1986), 387–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D.H., and McKusick, K.B. An empirical comparison of ID3 and back-propagation. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1989), 788–793.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, N. From information- to knowledge-management: the role of rule induction and neural net machine learning techniques in knowledge generation. Journal of Information Science (1989), 299–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glorfeld, L. A comparison of three expert systems models for capturing a committee’s decision policy. Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute (1990), 416–418.
   Google Scholar
• Glorfeld, L., and Kattan, M.W. A comparison of the performance of three classification procedures when applied to contaminated data. Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute (1989), 1153–1155.
   Google Scholar
• Hagafors, R., and Brehmer, B. Effects of information-presentation mode and task complexity on the learning of probabilistic inference tasks. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 2 (1980), 109–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagafors, R., and Brehmer, B. Does having to justify one’s judgments change the nature of the judgment process? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 2 (April 1983), 223–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, K.R., and Summers, D.A. Cognitive control. Psychological Review (1972), 58–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J.V., McDonald, J.B., and Stice, J.D. Artificial intelligence and generalized qualitative-response models: an empirical test on two audit decision-making domains. Decision Sciences, 23 (1992), 708–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth, R.M. Judgment and Choice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Ignizio, J.P. An Introduction to Expert Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L. The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies. Management Science, 35, 3 (March 1989), 285–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.A., and Wichern, D.W. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Klayman, J. Cue discovery in probabilistic environments: uncertainty and experimentation. Learning Memory and Cognition, 14, 2 (1988), 317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, K. Connectionist ideas and algorithms. Communications of the ACM (November 1990), 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, T.P. A composite approach to inducing knowledge for expert systems design. Management Science, 38 (1992), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, R.; Trotman, K.T.; and Zimmer, I. Member variation, recognition of expertise, and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 1 (1987), 81–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon, K., and Taylor, R. Decision making and problem solving. In M. Allais and O. Hagen (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R.L.; Gunst, R.F.; and Hess, J.L. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Messier, W.F., and Hansen, J.V. Inducing rules for expert system development: an example using default and bankruptcy data. Management Science, 34 (1988), 1403–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalski, R.S., and Chilausky, R.L. Learning by being told and learning from examples: an experimental comparison of the two methods of knowledge acquisition in the context of developing an expert system for soybean diagnosis. International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems (1980), 125–161.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction. Machine Learning, 5 (1989), 227–243.
   Google Scholar
• Muchinsky, P.M., and Dudycha, A.L. Human inference behavior in abstract and meaningful environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13 (1975), 377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshavsky, R.W. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: a replication and extension. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24 (1979), 300–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette, L., and Kida, T. The effect of decision strategy and task complexity on decision performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41 (1988), 128–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, M.S.; Siemens, N.; and Watson, H.J. A generalized model for automating judgmental decisions. Management Science, 22 (1976), 841–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J.W. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: an information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22 (1976), 366–387.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan, J.R. Learning efficient classification procedures and their application to chess end games. In R.S. Michalski et al. (eds.), Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Palo Alto, CA: Tioga, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan, J.R. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 2 (1986), 81–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, C.T., and Stam, A. Introducing discriminant analysis to the business curriculum. Decision Sciences, 23 (1992), 724–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H.G. The effects of time pressure on judgment in multiple cue probability learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1 (February 1986), 83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruble, T.L., and Cosier, R.A. Effects of cognitive styles and decision setting on performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 2 (August 1990), 283–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, J.E., and Dosher, B.A. Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 4 (1983), 676–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 6.03 Edition, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Shavlik, J.W., Mooney, R.J., and Towell, G.G. Symbolic and neural learning algorithms: an experimental comparison. Machine Learning (1991), 111–143.
   Google Scholar
• Sniezek, J.A. The role of variable labels in cue probability learning tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 2 (October 1986), 141–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniezek, JA.; Dudycha, A.L.; and Schmitt, N.W. Learning of negative cue validities as a function of statistical sophistication and instruction. Psychological Reports, 43, 3, pt. 2 (December 1978), 1095–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. Introduction to Neural Networks, 2d ed. Sierra Madre, CA: California Scientific Software, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T.R. Judgment analysis: procedures. In B. Brehmer and C.R.B. Joyce (eds.), Human Judgment: The SJT View. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1988, pp. 41–74.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L.A. Decision quality and commitment within a probabilistic environment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 2 (April 1987), 203–227.
   Google Scholar
• Wallsten, T.S. Processes and models to describe choice and inference. In T.S. Wallsten (ed.), Cognitive Processes in Choice and Inference. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Wallsten, T.S., and Barton, C. Processing probabilistic multidimensional information for decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 5 (September 1982), 361–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, S.M., and Kapouleas, I. An empirical comparison of pattern recognition, neural nets, and machine learning classification methods. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1989), 781–787.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. Neural-network learning and statistics. AI Expert (December 1989), 48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P. The harassed decision maker: time pressure distractions, and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (1974), 555–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar