14
Views
99
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Comparison of the Structural Contingency and Risk-Based Perspectives on Coordination in Software-Development Projects

Pages 77-113 | Published online: 11 Dec 2015

References

  • Alavi, M. An assessment of the prototyping approach to information systems development. Communications of the ACM, 27, 6 (1984), 556–563.
  • American Banker. Top 300 commercial banks in the United States. September 13, 1990, pp. 26–27.
  • Anderson, J.C., and Gerbing, D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 3 (1988), 411–423.
  • Anderson, J.C., and Narasimhan, R. Assessing implementation risk: a methodological approach. Management Science, 25, 6 (1979), 512–521.
  • Arnold, H. J. Moderator variables: a clarification of conceptual, analytic and psychometric issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29 (1982), 143–174.
  • Argote, L. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (1982), 420–434.
  • Argyris, C. Management information systems: the challenge to rationality and emotionality. Management Science, 17, 6 (1971), 275–292.
  • Barki, H.; Rivard, S.; and Talbot, J. Toward an assessment of software development risk. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 2 (Fall 1993), 203–225.
  • Beath, C.M. Strategies for managing MIS projects: a transaction cost approach. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Houston, 1983, pp. 133–147.
  • Beath, C.M. Managing the user relationship in management information systems projects: a transaction governance approach. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Graduate School of Management, UCLA, 1986.
  • Bentler, P. M. Theory and Implementation of EQS: A Structural Equations Program. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, 1985.
  • Bentler, P. M. EQS: Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, 1989.
  • Berkeley, D.; de Hoog, R.; and Humphreys, P. Software Development Project Management: Process and Support. New York: Ellis Horwood Ltd., 1990.
  • Boehm, B. W. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer (May 1988), 61–72.
  • Boehm, B.W. Software Risk Management. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1989.
  • Bollen, K. A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1989.
  • Bryman, A.; Bresnen, M.; Beardsworth, A.D.; Ford, J.; and Keil, E.T. The concept of the temporary system: the case of the construction project. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 5 (1987), 253–283.
  • Buse, A. The likelihood ratio, Wald, and Lagrange multiplier tests: an expository note. American Statistician, 36 (1982), 153–157.
  • Business Week. It’s late, costly, incompetent—but try firing a computer system. November 7, 1988, pp. 164–165.
  • Campbell, D.T., and Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56 (1959), 81–105.
  • Chan, Y., and Huff, S. Investigating information systems strategic alignment. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Information Systems. Orlando, Florida, December 1993, pp. 345–363.
  • Charette, R.N. Software Engineering Risk Analysis and Management. New York: Multiscience Press, Inc., 1989.
  • Cleland, D.I., and King, W.R. Systems Analysis and Project Management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983.
  • Constantine, L.L. Work organization: paradigms for project management and organization. Communications of the ACM, 36, 10 (October 1993), 35–43.
  • Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T. Quasi-Experimentation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
  • Cooprider, J.G., and Henderson, J.C. Technology-process fit: perspectives on achieving prototyping effectiveness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 3 (Winter 1990-91), 67–87.
  • Daft, R.L., and Macintosh, N.B. A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (1981), 207–224.
  • Davis, G.B., and Olson, M.H. Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure and Development. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985.
  • DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 1 (1992), 60–95.
  • Dess, G.G., and Beard, D.W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (1984), 52–73.
  • Dewar, R., and Hage, J. Size, technology, complexity and structural differentiation: toward a theoretical synthesis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23 (March 1978), 111–136.
  • Dewar, R., and Werbel, J. Universalistic and contingency predictions of employee satisfaction and conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (1979), 426–448.
  • Drazin, R., and Van De Ven, A.H. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30 (1985), 514–539.
  • Drury, D.H. An evaluation of data processing steering committees. MIS Quarterly (December 1984), 257–265.
  • Ein-Dor, P., and Segev, E. Information-system responsibility. MSU Business Topics, 25, 4 (Autumn 1977), 33–40.
  • Fowler, F. J., Jr. Survey Research Methods, 2d ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1993.
  • Franz, C.R. User leadership in the systems development life cycle: a contingency model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2, 2 (Fall 1985), 5–25.
  • Fry, L.W., and Slocum, J.W., Jr. Technology, structure and workgroup effectiveness: a test of a contingency model. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 2 (1984), 221–246.
  • Galbraith, J.R. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
  • Galbraith, J.R. Organizational Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
  • Georgopoulos, B.S. The hospital as an organization and problem-solving system. In B.S. Georgopolous (ed.), Organizational Research on Health Institutions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, 1972, pp. 9–48.
  • Gersick, C.J.G. Pacing strategic change: the case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1 (1994), 9–45.
  • Ghiselli, E.E.; Campbell, J.P.; and Zedeck, S. Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1981.
  • Gibbs, W.W. Software’s chronic crisis. Scientific American (September 1994), 86–95.
  • Gilb, T. Estimating the risk. In B.W. Boehm (ed.), Software Risk Management. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1989.
  • Goodman, R.A. Temporary Systems: Professional Development, Manpower Utilization, Task Effectiveness, and Innovation. New York: Praeger, 1981.
  • Gresov, V. Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34 (1989), 431–453.
  • Hanley, T.H.; Rosenberg, J.M.; D’Arista, C.A.; and Mitchell, N.A. Technology in Banking: A Path to Competitive Advantage. New York: Salomon Brothers, Inc., May 1985.
  • Kangari, R., and Boyer, L.T. Risk management by expert systems. Project Management Journal, 20, 1 (1989), 40–48.
  • Keller, R.T. Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: a test of contingeny theory. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1 (1994), 167–179.
  • Kendall, M.G., and Stuart, A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. New York: Hafner, 1958.
  • Kerlinger, F.N. Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1986.
  • Kim, K.K. Organizational coordination and performance in hospital accounting information systems: an empirical investigation. Accounting Review, 63, 3 (1988), 472–489.
  • Kim, K.K., and Umanath, N.S. Structure and perceived effectiveness of software development subunits: a task contingency analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9, 3 (Winter 1992-93), 157–181.
  • Kydd, C. Understanding the information content in MIS Management tools. MIS Quarterly, 13 (September 1989), 277–290.
  • Lewin, A.Y., and Minton, J.W. Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research. Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), 514–538.
  • Los Angeles Times. BofA’s plan for computer don’t add up. February 7, 1988, Business Section, p. 1.
  • Lucas, H.C. Alternative structures for the management of information processing. In R. Goldberg and H. Lorin (eds.) On the Economics of Information Processing, vol. 2. New York: Wiley-InterScience, 1982, pp. 55–61.
  • Malone, T.W., and Crowston, K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26, 1 (March 1994), 87–119.
  • Mann, R.I., and Watson, H.J. A contingency approach for user involvement in DSS development. MIS Quarterly, 8, 1 (1984), 27–38.
  • March, J.G., and Simon, H.A. Organization. New York: Wiley, 1958.
  • McFarlan, F.W. Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Business Review, 59, 4 (July-August 1981), 142–150.
  • Meyer, A.D.; Tsui, A.S.; and Hinings, C.R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 6 (1993), 1175–1195.
  • Milliken, F.J. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: state, effect and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12, 1 (1987), 133–143.
  • Mitchell, T.R. An evaluation of the validity of correlational research conducted in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 10, 2 (1985), 192–205.
  • Mookerjee, A.S. Global electronic wholesale banking delivery-system structure. Unpublished D.B.A dissertation. Harvard University, 1988.
  • Neumann, P.G. System development woes. Communications of the ACM, 36, 10 (1993), 146.
  • Newman, M., and Noble, F. User involvement as an interaction process: a case study. Information Systems Research, 1, 1 (1990), 89–112.
  • Nidumolu, S.R. The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Information Systems Research, 6, 3 (September 1995), 191–219.
  • Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
  • Perrow, C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32 (1967), 194–208.
  • Pressman, R.S. Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992.
  • Rice, R.E. Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: a multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3, 4 (1992), 475–500.
  • Sabherwal, R., and Kirs, P. The alignment between organizational critical success factors and information technology capability in academic institutions. Decision Sciences, 25, 2 (1994), 301–330.
  • Sabherwal, R., and Robey, D. An empirical taxonomy of implementation processes based on sequences of events in information system development. Organization Science, 4, 4 (1993), 548–575.
  • Sammons, C.C. Structure-technology fit: an exploration of two perspectives. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA, Spring 1988.
  • Schoonhoven, C.B. Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency “theory.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (1981), 349–377.
  • Scott, W.R. Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981.
  • Stinchcombe, A.L. Contracts as hierarchical documents. In J. Stinchcombe and C.A. Heimer (eds.), Organization Theory and Project Management: Adminstering Uncertainty in Norwegian Offshore Oil. Bergen: Norwegian University Press, 1985, pp. 121–169.
  • Tait, P., and Vessey, I. The effect of user involvement on system success: a contingency approach. MIS Quarterly, 12 (March 1988), 91–110.
  • Thompson, J.D. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
  • Turner, J.A. A comparison of the process of knowledge elicitation with that of information requirements determination. In W.W. Cotterman and J.A. Senn (eds.), Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development. Chichester, UK: John Wiley, 1992, pp. 415–430.
  • Tushman, M.L., and Nadler, D.A. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3 (1978), 613–624.
  • Umanath, N.S., and Kim, K.K. Task-structure relationship of information systems development subunit: a congruence perspective. Decision Sciences, 23, 4 (1992), 819–838.
  • Van de Ven, A.H.; Delbecq, A.L.; and Koenig, R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41 (April 1976), 322–338.
  • Venkatraman, N. The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14, 3 (1989), 423–444.
  • Withey, M.; Daft, R.L.; and Cooper, W.H. Measures of Perrow’s work unit technology: an empirical assessment and a new scale. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 1 (1983), 45–63.
  • Zmud, R.W. Management of large software development efforts. MIS Quarterly, 4 (June 1980), 45–55.
  • Zmud, R.W. Design alternatives for organizing information systems activities. MIS Quarterly, 8 (June 1984), 79–93.
  • Zmud, R.W., and Cox, J.F. The implementation process: a change approach. MIS Quarterly, 3, 2 (June 1979), 35–43.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.