A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior

References

• Adler, P.S., and Shenbar, A. Adapting your technological base: the organizational challenge. Sloan Management Review, 32 (Fall 1990), 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.C., and Gerbing, D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 3 (1988), 411–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attewell, P. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: the case of business computing. Organization Science, 3 (1992), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, J., and Melone, N. A critique of diffusion theory as a managerial framework for understanding adoption of software engineering innovations. Journal of Systems and Software, 9 (February 1989), 161–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beath, C.M. Supporting the information technology champion. MIS Quarterly, 10, 3 (September 1991), 355–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman, R. A., and Sayles, L.R. Inside Corporate Innovation: Strategy, Structure and Managerial Skills. New York: Free Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, G., and Kozlowski, S. Employee perceptions on the implementation of robotics manufacturing technology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 17, 1 (1986), 70–76.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, G.A. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (1979), 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooprider, J.G., and Henderson, J.C. Technology-process fit: perspectives on achieving prototyping effectiveness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 3 (Winter 1990–91), 67–87.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T.H., and Short, J.E. The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31 (Summer 1990) 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ettlie, J.E. Organizational policy and innovation among suppliers to the food processing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 1 (1983), 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuche, M. Implementing CASE? Learn from the users. MIS Week (September 18, 1989), 1, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Fichman, R.G. Information technology diffusion: a review of empirical research. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems, 1992, pp. 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C. Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis: a comment. Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (1993), 443–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forte, G., and Norman, R.J. A self-assessment by the software engineering community. Communications of the ACM, 35, 4 (April 1992), 28–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, M.K., and Swanson, E.B. Information centers as organizational innovation: exploring the correlates of implementation success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9, 1 (1992), 47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, V., and Goslar, M.D. The initiation, adoption, and implementation of telecommunications technologies in U.S. organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 1 (1993), 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• Hage, J. Theories of Organizations. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Hage, J., and Dewar, R. Elite values versus organizational structure in predicting innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18 (1973), 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. Reengineering work: don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 68, 4 (1990), 104–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Jr.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L.; and Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 3d ed. New York: Macmillan, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Hayduk, L.A. Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G.P. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 1 (1991), 88–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, C.C. Elements of a realistic CASE tool adoption budget. Communications of the ACM, 35, 4 (1992), 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K.G., and Sorbom, D. LISREL 7. Chicago: SPSS Inc., 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Kemerer, C.F. How the learning curve affects CASE tool adoption. IEEE Software, 9, 9 (May 1992), 23–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimberly, J.R., and Evanisko, M.J. Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24 (4), 1981, 689–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J.G., and Simon, H.A. Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, M.L., and Robey, D. Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34, 5 (1988), 583–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. Preventing the application development revolution. PC Week (August 28, 1989), 70.
   Google Scholar
• Melone, N.P., and Bayer, J. The effect of communication channel, level of sponsorship and timing on implementation. Working Paper no. 88–89–32, GSIA, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Nilakanta, S., and Scamell, R. The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base environment. Management Science, 36, 1 (1990), 24–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, R.J.; Corbitt, G.F.; and Butler, M.C. Case technology transfer: a case study of unsuccessful change. Journal of Systems Management, 40 (1989), 33–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, R.J., and Nunamaker, J.F. CASE productivity perceptions of software engineering professionals. Communications of the ACM, 32, 9 (September 1989), 1102–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J. CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17, 3 (1993), 309–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, W. The implementation of structured methodologies as a productivity technique in systems development. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, A. External information source and channel effectiveness and the diffusion of CASE innovations: an empirical study. European Journal of Information Systems, 4 (1995), 93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, A., and Howard, G.S. An organizational context for CASE innovation. Information Resources Management Journal, 6 (Summer 1993), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, A., and Howard, G.S. Propagating CASE usage for software development: an empirical investigation of key organizational correlates. OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science, 22, 2 (1994), 133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockart, J.F. The line takes the leadership—IS management in a wired society. Sloan Management Review, 29 (Summer 1988), 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, V., and King, W.R. Construct measurement in information systems research: an illustration in strategic systems. Decision Sciences, 22, 3 (1991), 455–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B.M.; Sandelands, L.E.; and Dutton, J.E. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multi-level analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (1981), 501–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A.H. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), 590–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., and Grant, J.H. Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: a critique and proposal. Academy of Management Review, 11, 1 (1986), 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, B.B.; Muthen, B.; Alwin, D.F.; and Summers, G.F. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D.H. Heise (ed.), Social Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Wynekoop, J.L. An innovation study of implementation of computer-aided software engineering tools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgia State University, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Zaltman, G.; Duncan, R.; and Holbeck J. Innovation and Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Zmud, R.W. Diffusion of modem software practices: influence of centralization and formalization. Management Science, 28, 12 (December 1982), 1421–1431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud, R.W. The effectiveness of external information channels in facilitating innovation within software development groups. MIS Quarterly, 51 (June 1983), 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud, R.W. An examination of “push-pull” theory applied to process innovation and knowledge work. Management Science, 30, 6 (1984), 727–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar