3,244
Views
99
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Thumbs Up, Sales Up? The Contingent Effect of Facebook Likes on Sales Performance in Social Commerce

References

  • Acquisti, A., and Cho, D. The more social cues, the less trolling? An empirical study of online commenting behaviors. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, 2015.
  • Aiken, L.S., and West, S.G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
  • Akerlof, G.A. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 3 (1970), 488–500.
  • Amblee, N., and Bui, T. Harnessing the influence of social proof in online shopping: The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales of digital microproducts. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 2 (2011), 91–114.
  • Amblee, N., and Bui, T.X. The impact of electronic-word-of-mouth on digital microproducts: An empirical investigation of amazon shorts. In H. Österle, J. Schelp, and R. Winter, eds., Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems. St Gallen, Switzerland: AIS, 2007, pp. 36–47.
  • Anderson, N.H. Integration theory and attitude change. Psychological Review, 78, 3 (1971), 171–206.
  • Animesh, A.; Ramachandran, V.; and Viswanathan, S. Research note—quality uncertainty and the performance of online sponsored search markets: An empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 21, 1 (2010), 190–201.
  • Ba, S., and Pavlou, P.A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26, 3 (2002), 243–268.
  • Bakos, Y.; Lucas, H.C.; Oh, W.; Simon, G.; Viswanathan, S.; and Weber, B.W. The impact of e-commerce on competition in the retail brokerage industry. Information Systems Research, 16, 4 (2005), 352–371.
  • Bartik, T.J. The estimation of demand parameters in hedonic price models. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 1 (1987), 81–88.
  • Benlian, A.; Titah, R.; and Hess, T. Differential effects of provider recommendations and consumer reviews in e-commerce transactions: An experimental study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 1 (2012), 237–272.
  • Bettman, J.R. Memory factors in consumer choice: A review. Journal of Marketing, 43, 2 (1979), 37–53.
  • Bitta, A.J.D.; Monroe, K.B.; and McGinnis, J.M. Consumer perceptions of comparative price advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 4 (1981), 416–427.
  • Blair, E.A., and Landon, E.L., Jr. The effects of reference prices in retail advertisements. Journal of Marketing, 45, 2 (1981), 61–69.
  • Bronner, R. Decision Making Under Time Pressure: An Experimental Study of Stress Behavior in Business Management. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1982.
  • Brynjolfsson, E., and Smith, M.D. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science, 46, 4 (2000), 563–585.
  • Bullock, D. 5 reasons customers are turning against groupon. Minyanville, 2012. http://www.minyanville.com/sectors/consumer/articles/groupon-complaints-groupon-customer-service-grpn/3/21/2012/id/40010?refresh=1.
  • Chen, P.Y.; Wu, S.Y.; and Yoon, J. The impact of online recommendations and consumer feedback on sales. In J. I. DeGross, ed., Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Information Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2004, pp. 711–724.
  • Chevalier, J.A., and Mayzlin, D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 3 (2006), 345–354.
  • Clemons, E.K.; Gao, G.G.; and Hitt, L.M. When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 2 (2006), 149–171.
  • Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.
  • Cohen, J.E. A right to read anonymously: A closer look at copyright management in cyberspace. Connecticut Law Review, 28 (1995), 981–1039.
  • Conley, T.G.; Hansen, C.B.; and Rossi, P.E. Plausibly exogenous. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94, 1 (2012), 260–272.
  • Dehejia, R.H., and Wahba, S. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 1 (2002), 151–161.
  • Dellarocas, C.; Gao, G.; and Narayan, R. Are consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit or niche products? Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 2 (2010), 127–158.
  • Dimoka, A.; Hong, Y.; and Pavlou, P.A. On product uncertainty in online markets: Theory and evidence. MIS Quarterly, 36, 2 (2012), 395–426.
  • Duan, W.; Gu, B.; and Whinston, A.B. Do online reviews matter? An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45, 4 (2008), 1007–1016.
  • Eisingerich, A.B.; Chun, H.H.; Liu, Y.; Jia, H.; and Bell, S.J. Why recommend a brand face-to-face but not on Facebook? How word-of-mouth on online social sites differs from traditional word-of-mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25, 1 (2015), 120–128.
  • Erdem, T., and Keane, M.P. Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Science, 15, 1 (1996), 1–20.
  • Forman, C.; Ghose, A.; and Wiesenfeld, B. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19, 3 (2008), 291–313.
  • Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2011.
  • Gupta, S., and Cooper, L.G. The discounting of discounts and promotion thresholds. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 3 (1992), 401–411.
  • Gupta, S.; Weaver, R.; and Rood, D. Groupon. Harvard Business School Case, 511–094 (2012).
  • Hair, J.F.; Tatham, R.L.; Anderson, R.E.; and Black, W. Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall, 2006.
  • Hansen, M.T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1 (1999), 82–111.
  • Hoch, S.J., and Loewenstein, G.F. Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 4 (1991), 492–507.
  • Hu, N.; Pavlou, P.A.; and Zhang, J. Can online reviews reveal a product’s true quality? Empirical findings and analytical modeling of online word-of-mouth communication. In J. Feigenbaum, J. Chuang, and D. Pennock, eds., Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. New York: ACM Press, 2006, pp. 324–330.
  • Iyer, E.S. Unplanned purchasing: Knowledge of shopping environment and time pressure. Journal of Retailing, 65, 1 (1989), 40–57.
  • Jensen, M.L.; Averbeck, J.M.; Zhang, Z.; and Wright, K.B. Credibility of anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 1 (2013), 293–324.
  • Jessup, L.M.; Connolly, T.; and Galegher, J. The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly, 14, 3 (1990), 313–321.
  • Kauffman, R.; Lai, H.; and Lin, H.-C. Consumer adoption of group-buying auctions: An experimental study. Information Technology and Management, 11, 4 (2010), 191–211.
  • Klein, L.R. Evaluating the potential of interactive media through new lens: Search versus experience goods. Journal of Business Research, 41, 3 (1998), 195–203.
  • Kuruzovich, J.; Viswanathan, S.; Agarwal, R.; Gosain, S.; and Weitzman, S. Marketspace or marketplace? Online information search and channel outcomes in auto retailing. Information Systems Research, 19, 2 (2008), 182–201.
  • Laroche, M.; Vinhal Nepomuceno, M.; and Richard, M.-O. How do involvement and product knowledge affect the relationship between intangibility and perceived risk for brands and product categories? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27, 3 (2010), 197–210.
  • Lattin, J.M., and Bucklin, R.E. Reference effects of price and promotion on brand choice behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 3 (1989), 299–310.
  • Li, X., and Hitt, L.M. Price effects in online product reviews: An analytical model and empirical analysis. MIS Quarterly, 34, 4 (2010), 809–831.
  • Liang, T.-P.; Ho, Y.-T.; Li, Y.-W.; and Turban, E. What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 2 (2011), 69–90.
  • Liang, T.-P., and Turban, E. Introduction to the special issue Social Commerce: A research framework for social commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 2 (2011), 5–14.
  • Luca, M. Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper, Harvard Business School, 2011.
  • Luo, J.; Ba, S.; and Zhang, H. The effectiveness of online shopping characteristics and well-designed websites on satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 36, 4 (2012), 1131–1144.
  • Ma, M., and Agarwal, R. Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Information Systems Research, 18, 1 (2007), 42–67.
  • Ma, X.; Khansa, L.; Deng, Y.; and Kim, S.S. Impact of prior reviews on the subsequent review process in reputation systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 3 (2013), 279–310.
  • Madan, V., and Suri, R. Quality perception and monetary sacrifice: A comparative analysis of discount and fixed prices. Journal of Product and Brand Manangement, 10, 3 (2001), 170–184.
  • Markopoulos, P.M., and Clemons, E.K. Reducing buyers’ uncertainty about taste-related product attributes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 2 (2013), 269–299.
  • Mayzlin, D. Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Science, 25, 2 (2006), 155–163.
  • Mobley, M.F.; Bearden, W.O.; and Teel, J.E. An investigation of individual responses to tensile price claims. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 2 (1988), 273–279.
  • Monroe, K.B. Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 1 (1973), 70–80.
  • Mudambi, S.M., and Schuff, D. What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1 (2010), 185–200.
  • Nelson, P. Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 2 (1970), 311–329.
  • Olbrich, R., and Holsing, C. Modeling consumer purchasing behavior in social shopping communities with clickstream data. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 2 (2011), 15–40.
  • Omernick, E., and Sood, S.O. The impact of anonymity in online communities. In L.W. Chang, ed., International Conference on Social Computing. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2013, pp. 526–535.
  • Pathak, B.; Garfinkel, R.; Gopal, R.D.; Venkatesan, R.; and Yin, F. Empirical analysis of the impact of recommender systems on sales. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 2 (2010), 159–188.
  • Pavlou, P.A.; Huigang, L.; and Yajiong, X. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal–agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31, 1 (2007), 105–136.
  • Pelaez, A.; Yu, M.Y.; and Lang, K.R. Social buying: The effects of group size and communication on buyer performance. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18, 2 (2013), 127–157.
  • Postmes, T., and Spears, R. Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 3 (1998), 238.
  • Rao, A.R.; Qu, L.; and Ruekert, R.W. Signaling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 2 (1999), 258–268.
  • Reinstein, D.A., and Snyder, C.M. The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand for experience goods: A case study of movie critics. Journal of Industrial Economics, 53, 1 (2005), 27–51.
  • Ronald, D., and Marlene, J. Risk and maximum acceptable discount levels. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14, 4 (2005), 264–270.
  • Rosenbaum, P.R., and Rubin, D.B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 1 (1983), 41–55.
  • Rubin, P.H. The theory of the firm and the structure of the franchise contract. Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 1 (1978), 223–233.
  • Schlenker, B.R., and Leary, M.R. Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 3 (1982), 641.
  • Sommer, R.; Wynes, M.; and Brinkley, G. Social facilitation effects in shopping behavior. Environment and Behavior, 24, 3 (1992), 285–297.
  • Song, K. Korean Internet usage status report. Korea Consumer Agency, 2012.
  • Stock, J.H., and Yogo, M. Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • Stoner, J.A.F. A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk. School of Industrial Management. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1961.
  • Timian, A.; Rupcic, S.; Kachnowski, S.; and Luisi, P. Do patients “like” good care? Measuring hospital quality via Facebook. American Journal of Medical Quality, 28, 5 (2013), 374–382.
  • Vinokur, A. Review and theoretical analysis of the effects of group processes upon individual and group decisions involving risk. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 4 (1971), 231.
  • Wagner, K. Your Facebook friends really do care what you think. Mashable, 2014. http://mashable.com/2014/04/16/facebook-recommend-feature/.
  • Wells, J.D.; Valacich, J.S.; and Hess, T.J. What signal are you sending? How website quality influences perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions. MIS Quarterly, 35, 2 (2011), 373–396.
  • Zhu, F., and Zhang, X. Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74, 2 (2010), 133–148.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.