Influentials, Imitables, or Susceptibles? Virality and Word-of-Mouth Conversations in Online Social Networks

References

• Adar, E.; Zhang, L.; Adamic, L.A.; and Lukose, R. Implicit structure and the dynamics of blogspace. In Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem, Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Aral, S., and Walker, D. Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Science, 57, 9 (2011), 1623–1639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aral, S., and Walker, D. Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science, 337, 6092 (2012), 337–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., and Bond, S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58 (1991), 277–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batagelj, V., and Mrvar, A. Analysis of large networks with Pajek. In Twenty-Sixth Sunbelt Conference, 2006. Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, C.F., and Schaffer, M. E. IVREG2H: Stata module to perform instrumental variables estimation using heteroskedasticity-based instruments. Statistical Software Components S457555, (2012). Boston College Department of Economics, revised April 2, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, B.F. Implementing new econometric tools in Stata. In Mexican Stata Users’ Group Meetings, 2013–09. Stata Users Group. Mexico City: CIDE.
   Google Scholar
• Bearden, W.O.; Netemeyer, R.G.; and Teel, J.E. Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (1989), 473−481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benevenuto, F.; Rodrigues, T.; Almeida, V.; Almeida, J.; and Ross, K. Video interactions in online video social networks. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 5, 4 (2009), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., and Heath, C. Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 2 (2007), 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., and R. Iyengar. Communication channels and word of mouth: How the medium shapes the message. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 3 (2012), 567–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., and Schwartz, E.M. What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (October 2011), 869–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani, S.; Hirshleifer, D.; and Welch, I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100 (1992), 992–1026.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P., and Everett, M.G. A graph-theoretic framework for classifying centrality measures. Social Networks, 28, 4 (2006), 466–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J.J., and Reingen, P.H. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 3 (1987), 350–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budak, C.; Agarwal, D.; El Abbadi, A. Where the blogs tip: Connectors, mavens, salesmen and translators of the blogosphere. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, Washington, DC: ACM, 2010, pp. 106–114.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R.S. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 6 (1987), 1287–1335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmi, S.; Havlin, S.; Kirkpatrick, S.; Shavitt, Y.; and Shir, E. A model of Internet topology using k-shell decomposition. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, pp. 1150–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, M., Kwak, H., Rodriguez, P., Ahn, Y., and Moon, S. I tube, YouTube, everybody tubes: Analyzing the world’s largest user generated content video system. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference, Washington, DC: ACM, 2007, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Leskovec, J.; and Faloutsos, C. Epidemic thresholds in real networks. ACM Transactions on Information Systems Security, 10, 4 (January 2008), 1:1–1:26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.; Xu, H.; and Whinston, A.B. Moderated online communities and quality of user-generated content. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 2 (2011), 237–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chingtagunta, P.; Gopinath, S.; and Venkatraman, S. The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Science, 29, 5 (2010), 944–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauset, A. Finding local community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 72, 2 (2007), 026132–026137.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, R., and Sornette, D. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 41, (2008), 15649–15653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, P. Finite mixture models. Summer North American Stata Users’ Group Meetings, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, P., and Trivedi, P.K. Demand for medical care by the elderly: A finite mixture approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12 (1997), 313–336.
   Google Scholar
• Duan, W.; Gu, B.; and Whinston, A.B. Do online reviews matter? An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45, 4 (2008), 1007–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, W.; Gu, B.; and Whinston, A.B. Informational cascades and software adoption on the Internet: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 33, 1 (2009), 23–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girvan, M., and Newman, M.E.J. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 12 ( June 2002), 7821–7826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston, MA: Little Brown, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Godes, D., and Mayzlin, D. Using on-line conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23, 4 (2004), 545–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, J.; Oestreicher-Singer, G.; and Reichman, S. The quest for content: The integration of product networks and social networks in online content exploration. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 4 (2012), 452–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J.J., and Singer, B. Econometric duration analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 24 (1984), 63–132.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, L.; Tan, C.-H.; Ke W.; and Wei. K.-K. Comprehension and assessment of product reviews: A review-product congruity proposition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 3 (Winter 2013–14), 311–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katona, Z.; Zubschek, P.; and Sarvary, M. Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (2011), 425–443.
   Google Scholar
• Kempe, D.; Kleinberg, J.; and Tardos, E. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, DC: ACM, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., and Lankshear, C. Online memes, affinities and cultural production. In C. Lankshear, M. Knobel, C. Bigum, and M. Peters (eds.), A New Literacies Sampler. New York: Peter Lang, 2007, pp. 199–227.
   Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. Structural leverage in marketing. In D. Iacobucci (ed.), Networks in Marketing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kuan, K.K.Y.; Zhong, Y.; and Chau, P.Y.K. Informational and normative social influence in group-buying: Evidence from self-reported and EEG data. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 4 (Spring 2014), 151–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leskovec, J.; Adamic, L.; and Huberman, B. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web, 1, 1 (2007), article 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewbel, A. Using heteroskedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 30 (2012), 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, S. At the nexus of destruction and creation: Pirate and anti-pirate discourse in Swedish online media. In Uğur Dai et al. (eds.), New Media and Interactivity. Proceedings of NMIC2010. Istanbul: Marmara University, pp. 229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Lotan, G. The Harlem Shake: Anatomy of a viral meme. Huffingtonpost, 2013. www.huffingtonpost.com/gilad-lotan/the-harlem-shake_b_2804799.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, L.; Krishnan, R.; and Montgomery, A. Latent homophily or social influence? An empirical analysis of purchase within a social network. Management Science, 61, 2 (2015), 454–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X.; Khansa, L.; Deng, Y.; and Kim, S.S. Impact of prior reviews on the subsequent review process in reputation systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 3 (Winter 2013–14), 279–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan, D.J., and Peel, D. Finite Mixture Models. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Monge, P.R., and Contractor, N.S. Theories of Communication Networks. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Muchnik, L.; Aral, S.; and Taylor, S.J. 2013. Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science, 341, 6146 (2013), 647–651.
   Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer, G., and Zalmanson. L. Content or community? A digital business strategy for content providers in the social age. MIS Quarterly, 37, 2 (2013), 591–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, L.; Rui, H.; and Whinston, A.B. The impact of social network structures on prediction market accuracy in the presence of insider information. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 1 (Summer 2014), 145–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M. The diffusion of home computers among households in Silicon Valley. Marriage and Family Review, 8 (1985), 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R., and Rubin, D.B. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 387 (1984), 516–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutz, O.J.; Bucklin, R.E.; and Sonnier, G.P. A latent instrumental variables approach to modeling keyword conversion in paid search advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 3 (2012), 306–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacerdote, B. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 2 (2001), 681–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabrook, J. Streaming dreams. New Yorker, January 16, 2012. www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/01/16/120116fa_fact_seabrook?currentPage=all/.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, S.B. Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks, 5 (1983), 269–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Z., and Whinston, A.B. Network structure and observational learning: Evidence from a location-based social network. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 2 ( Fall 2013), 185–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifman, E. An anatomy of a YouTube meme. New Media and Society, 14, 2 (2011), 187–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susarla, A.; Oh, J.; and Tan, Y. Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Information Systems Research, 23, 1 (2012), 23–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, A.T., and Toubia, O. Deriving value from social commerce networks. Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (2010), 215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Szabo, G., and Huberman, B.A. Predicting the popularity of online content. Communications of the ACM, 53, 8 (2010), 80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Q.; Gu, B.; and Whinston, A.B. Content contribution for revenue sharing and reputation in social media: A dynamic structural model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 2 (2012), 41–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trusov, M.; Bucklin, R.E.; and Pauwels, K. Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73, 3 (2009), 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D.J. A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9 (2002), pp. 5766–5771 .
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D.J., and Dodds, P. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (2007), 441–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. How to boost your YouTube subscribers: Power of video marketing. Search Engine Journal (December 2007). https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-boost-your-youtube-subscribers-power-of-video-marketing/6105/
   Google Scholar
• Xie,L.; Natsev, A.; He, X.; Kender, J.; Hill, M.; and Smith, J.R. Visual memes in social media: tracking real-world news in YouTube videos. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM New York: ACM, 2011, pp. 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan, H. Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using YouTube data. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10, 1 (2012), 111–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar