Computer-Mediated Deception: Strategies Revealed by Language-Action Cues in Spontaneous Communication

References

• Buller, D.B., and Burgoon, J.K. Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic communication. In Daly, J.A., and Wiemann, J.M. (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication. New York, NY: Psychology Press, 1994, 191–223.
   Google Scholar
• Buller, D.B., and Burgoon, J. K. Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 3 (1996), 203–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J.K., and Buller, D. B. Interpersonal deception: III. Effects of deceit on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 2 (1994), 155–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J.K.; Buller, D.B.; Dillman, L.; and Walther, J.B. Interpersonal deception: IV. Effects of suspicion on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics. Human Communication Research, 22, 2 (1995), 163–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J.K.; Buller, D.B.; Ebesu, A.S.; White, C.H.; and Rockwell, P.A. Testing interpersonal deception theory: Effects of suspicion on communication behaviors and perceptions. Communication Theory, 6, 3 (1996), 243–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J.K.; Stern, L.A.; and Dillman, L. Interpersonal Adaptation: Dyadic Interaction Patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M.B., and Moffitt, K.C. Automated deception detection of 911 call transcripts. Security Informatics, 3, 8 (2014), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R.L., and Lengel, R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Journal of Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), 554–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft, R.L.; Lengel, R.H.; and Trevino, L.K. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 3 (1987), 355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B.M.; Ansfield, M.E.; Kirkendol, S.E.; and Boden, J.M. Serious lies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 2 and 3 (2004), 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B.M., and Kashy, D.A. Everyday lies in close and causal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1 (1998), 63–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B.M.; Kashy, D.A.; Kirkendol, S.E.; Wyer, M.M.; and Epstein, J.A. Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 5 (1996), 979–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B.M.; Lindsay, J.J.; Malone, B.E.; Muhlenbruck, L.; Charlton, K.; and Cooper, H. Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129 (2003), 74–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrick, D.C.; Elkins, A.C.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Nunamaker, J.F., Jr. Border security credibility assessments via heterogeneous sensor fusion. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25, 3 (2010), 41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage. 4th ed. New York: Norton, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., and Friesen, W B. Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32 (1969), 88–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., and O’Sullivan, M. Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 9 (1991), 913–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, A.C.; Dunbar, N.E.; Adame, B.; and Nunamaker, J.F., Jr. Are users threatened by credibility assessment systems? Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 4 (2013), 249–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Granhag, P.A., and Strömwall, L.A. Repeated interrogations: Verbal and non-verbal cues to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16 (2002), 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, P. Further notes on logic and conversation. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989, pp. 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J.; Birnholtz, J.; Bazarova, N.; Guillory, J.; Perlin, J.; and Amos, B. Butler lies: Awareness, deception and design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09), Boston, MA, April 7, 2009, pp. 517–526.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J.; Toma, C.; and Ellison, N. The truth about lying in online dating profile. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07), San Jose, CA, April 28–May 3, 2007, pp. 449–452.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J.T.; Curry, L E.; Goorha, S.; and Woodworth, M. On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45, 1 (2008), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J.T.; Thom-Santelli, J.; and Ritchie, T. Deception and design: The impact of communication technologies on lying behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’04), Vienna, Austria, April 24–29, 2004, pp. 129–134.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S.M.; Fu, H.; Timmarajus, S.S.; Booth, C.; Baeg, J.H.; and Liu, M. Insider threat: Language-action cues in group dynamics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research (SIGMIS-CPR’15), Newport Beach, CA, June 4–6, 2015, pp. 101–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S.M.; Hancock, J.T.; Booth, C.; Burmester, M.; Liu, X.; and Timmarajus, S.S. Demystifying insider threat: Language-action cues in group dynamics. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-49), Kauai, Hawaii, January 5–6, 2016, pp. 2729–2738.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S.M.; Hancock, J.T.; Booth, C.; Liu, X.; Liu, M.; Timmarajus, S. S.; and Burmester, M. Real or Spiel? A decision tree approach for automated detection of deceptive language-action cues. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-49), Kauai, Hawaii, January 5–8, 2016, pp. 3706–3715.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S. M., Hancock, J. T., Booth, C., Liu, X., Timmarajus, S. S., and Burmester, M. Liar, Liar, IM on Fire: Deceptive language-action cues in spontaneous online communication. In IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, Baltimore, MD, May 27–29, 2015, pp. 157–159.
   Google Scholar
• Kahai, S.S., and Cooper, R.B. Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 1 (2003), 263–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCornack, S.A., and Park, H.S. Deception detection accuracy in dating relationships: The other side of trust. In M.L. McLaughlin (ed.), Communication Yearbook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication, 1986, pp. 377–389.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. Methods and designs: Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1, 6 (1968), 203–207.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G.R.; Deturck, M.A.; and Kalbfleisch, P.J. Self-monitoring, rehearsal, and deceptive communication. Human Communication Research, 10, 1 (1983), 97–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, B.A. Beyond bandwidth: Dimensions of connection in interpersonal communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14, 2 (2005), 91–130.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M.L.; Pennebaker, J.W.; Berry, D.S.; and Richard, J.M. Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personal Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 5 (2003), 665–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J.F., Jr.; Derrick, D.C.; Elkins, A.C.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Patton, M.W. Embodied conversational agent-based kiosk for automated interviewing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 1 (2011), 17–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, M.; Cardie, C.; and Hancock, J. Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’12), Lyon, France, April 16–20, 2012, pp. 201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, M.; Cardie, C.; and Hancock, J.T. Negative deceptive opinion spam. In Proceedings of the Fifty-First Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (HLT’13), Atlanta, GA, June 9–14, 2013, pp. 497–501.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, M.; Choi, Y.; Cardie, C.; and Hancock, J.T. Finding deceptive online spam by any stretch of the imagination. In Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (HLT’11). Portland, OR, June 19–24, 2011, pp. 309–319.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J.W., and King, L.A. Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 6 (1999), 1296–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiff, J.B. Theoretical approaches to the study of deceptive communication: Comments on interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 3 (1996), 289–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C., and Hancock, J. Reading between the lines: Linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2010), Savannah, GA, February 6–10, 2010, pp. 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Toma, C.L., and Hancock, J.T. What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication, 62, 1 (2012), 78–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevino, L.K.; Lengel, R.H.; and Daft, R.L. Media symbolism, media richness and media choice in organizations. Communication Research, 14, 5 (1987), 553–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twyman, N.W.; Elkins, A.C.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Nunamaker, J.F., Jr. A rigidity detection system for automated credibility assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 1 (2014), 173–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twyman, N.W.; Lowry, P.B.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Nunamaker, J.F., Jr. Autonomous scientifically controlled screening systems for detecting information purposely concealed by individuals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 3 (2014), 106–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, M.T.; Buchanan, T.; Joinson, A.N. and Meredith, A. Not all lies are spontaneous: An examination of deception across different modes of communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1 (2012), 208–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R.T., and Marett, K. The influence of experiential and dispositional factors in phishing: An empirical investigation of the deceived. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 1 (2010), 273–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L.; Burgoon, J.K.; Nunamaker, J.F., Jr.; and Twitchell, D.P. Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communications. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 1 (2004), 81–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L.; Burgoon, J.K.; Twitchell, D.P.; Qin, T.; and Nunamaker, J.F., Jr. A comparison of classification methods for predicting deception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 4 (2004), 139–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L.; Twitchell, D.P.; Qin, T.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Nunamaker, J.F., Jr. An exploratory study into deception detection in text-based computer-mediated communication. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS–36), Hawaii, January 6–9, 2003, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., and Zenebe, A. Representation and reasoning under uncertainty in deception detection: A neuro-fuzzy approach. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 16, 2 (2008), 442–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., and Zhang, D. Can online behavior unveil a deceiver? In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37), Hilton Waikoloa Village Big Island, Hawaii, January 5–8, 2004, pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., and Zhang, D. Typing or messaging? Modality effect on deception detection in computer-mediated communication. Decision Support Systems, 44, 1 (2007), 188–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., and Zhang, D. Following linguistic footprints: Automatic deception detection in online communication. Communications of the ACM, 51, 9 (2008), 119–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar