The Effects of Process Orientations on Collaboration Technology Use and Outcomes in Product Development

References

• Adler, P.S. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design–manufacturing interface. Organization Science, 6, 2 (1995), 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H., and Herker, D. Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2, 2 (1977), 217–230.
   Google Scholar
• Argote, L.; McEvily, B.; and Reagans, R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49, 4 (2003), 571–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, N.; Ngai, E.W.T.; and Cheng, T.C.E. Extending the understanding of end user information systems satisfaction formation: An equitable needs fulfillment model approach. MIS Quarterly, 32, 1 (2008), 43–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala, H., and Venkatesh, V. Changes in employees’ job characteristics during an enterprise system implementation: A latent growth modeling perspective. MIS Quarterly, 37, 4 (2013), 1113–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R.D.; Bardhan, I.; and Asdemir, O. Understanding the impact of collaboration software on product design and development. Information Systems Research, 17, 4 (2006), 352–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendoly, E.; Bharadwaj, A.; and Bharadwaj, S. Complementary drivers of NPD performance: Cross-functional coordination, information system capability, and intelligence quality. Production and Operations Management, 21, 4 (2012), 653–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, K., and Levy, J. Collaboration capability: A focal concept in knowledge creation and collaboration innovation in networks. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2, 1 (2006), 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M.B., and Gardner, W. Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1 (1996), 83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S.A.; Dennis, A.R.; and Venkatesh, V. Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 2 (2010), 9–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S.L., and Eisenhardt, K. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 2 (1995), 343–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S.A.; Massey, A.P.; and Ward, K.W. Handle mergers and acquisitions with care: The fragility of trust between the IT service provider and end-users. European Journal of Information Systems, 25, 2 (2016), 170–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke C.S.; Stagl, K.C.; Salas, E.; Pierce L.; and Kendall, D. Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 6 (2006), 1189–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones, A., and Straub, D.W. Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research, 17, 3 (2006), 228–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calantone, R.; Harmancioglu, N.; and Droge, C. Inconclusive innovation “returns”: A meta-analysis of research on innovation in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 7 (2010), 1065–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli, R.T., and Bassellier, G. Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 33, 4 (2009), 689–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W.W.; Marcolin, B.L.; and Newsted, P.R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14, 2 (2003), 189–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K.B., and Fujimoto, T. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the Auto Industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Crowston, K. A taxonomy of organizational dependencies and coordination mechanisms. In T.W. Malone, K. Crowston, and G. Herman (eds.), The Process Handbook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003, pp. 85–108.
   Google Scholar
• Crowston, K. A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organization Science, 8, 2 (1997), 57–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowston, K.; Rubleske, J.; and Howison, J. Coordination theory: A ten-year retrospective. In P. Zhang and D. Galletta (eds.), Human–Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2004, pp. 120–138.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R.L., and Lengel, R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), 554–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J.; Subramanian, E.; Konda, S.; Granger, H.; Collins, M.; and Westerberg, A. Creating shared information spaces to support collaborative design work. Information Systems Frontiers, 3, 3 (2001), 377–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (2003), 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R., and Valacich, J.S. Group, sub-group and nominal group idea generation: New rules for a new media? Journal of Management, 20, 4 (1994), 723–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; Fuller, R.M.; and Valacich, J.S. Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32, 3 (2008), 575–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., and Monge, P.R. Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10 (1999), 693–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durmusoglu, S.; Calantone, R.; and Sambamurthy, V. Is more information technology better for new product development? Journal of Product and Brand Management, 15, 7 (2006), 435–441.
   Google Scholar
• Easley, R.F.; Devaraj, S.; and Crant, M. Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (2003), 247–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, J.A.; Slaughter, S.A.; Kraut, R.E.; and Herbsleb, J.D. Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 1 (2007), 135–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1 (1981), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, S., and Mick, D.G. Rediscovering satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1 (1999), 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, R.M., and Dennis, A.R. Does fit matter? The impact of task-technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks. Information Systems Research, 20, 1 (2009), 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L.L.; Maynard, M.T.; Jones Yound, N.C.; Vartiainen, M.; and Hakonen, M. Virtual teams: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41, 5 (2015), 1313–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannetti, G.T., and Morrison, S.W. Convergence: The Biotechnology Industry Report. Palo Alto, CA: Ernst & Young, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gopal, A., and Koka, B.R. The asymmetric benefits of relational flexibility: Evidence from software development outsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 36, 2 (2012), 553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, T.L. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24, 3 (1999), 472–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruman, G. The fallacy of collaboration technology. 2012. Available at: http://www.infoworld. com/article/2617511/collaboration-software/the-fallacy-of-collaboration-technology (accessed on June 12, 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A.K.; Smith, K.G.; and Shalley, C.E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 4 (2006), 693–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M.; Kass, A.; and Alter, A.E. How collaboration technologies are improving process, workforce and business performance. Outlook Point of View, 2 (2013), 1–2. Available at: https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insight-outlook-how-collaboration-technologies-are-improving-process-workforce-business (accessed on June 12, 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M.T. When internal collaboration is bad for your company. Harvard Business Review, 87, 4 (2009), 82–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z.L., and Wong, P.K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 4 (2004), 481–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, P., and Kiesler, S. Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of technologies in a large organization. Organization Science, 6, 4 (1995), 373–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsz, V.B.; Tindale, R.S.; and Vollrath, D.A. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 1 (1997), 43–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J.J.P.; van den Bosch, F.A.J.; and Volberda, H.W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52, 11 (2006), 1661–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasmand, C.; Blazevic, V.; and de Ruyter, K. Generating sales while providing service: A study of service representatives’ ambidextrous behavior Journal of Marketing, 76, 1 (2012), 20–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasperson, J.; Carter, P.E.; and Zmud, R.W. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly, 29, 3 (2005), 525–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, G.C., and Alavi, M. Information technology and organizational learning: An investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organization Science, 18, 5 (2007), 796–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M.; Tan, B.C.Y.; Wei, K.K.; Saarinen, T.; Tuunainen, V.; and Wassenaar, A.A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly, 24, 2 (2000), 299–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and Wilemon, D. Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects. R&D Management, 33, 1 (2002), 16–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koen, P.A.; Ajamian, G.; Burkart, R.; Clamen, A.; Davidson, J.; D’Amoe, R.; Elkins, C.; Herald, K.; Incorvia, M.; Johnson, A.; Karol, R.; Seibert, R.; Slavejkov, A.; and Wagner, K. New concept development model: Providing clarity and a common language to the “Fuzzy Front End” of innovation. Research-Technology Management, 44, 2 (2001), 46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V., and Ulrich, K.T. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science, 47, 1 (2001), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D.; Stettner, U.; and Tushman, M.L. Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 1 (2010), 109–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D.A., and March, J.G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, S2 (1993), 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan, R., and Grover, R. From embedded to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing, 62, 4 (1998), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni, M.; Proserpio, L.; Hoegl, M.; and Provera, B. The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation. Research Policy, 38, 6 (2009), 1153–1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A.; Wagner, C.; and Yates, D. The impact of shaping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with Wikis. MIS Quarterly, 37, 2 (2013), 455–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., and Majchrzak, A. Communication context-dependent technology use in virtual teams. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, AZ, 2009, pp. 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., and Majchrzak, A. How virtual teams use their virtual workspace to coordinate knowledge. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 3, 1 (2012), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T.W., and Crowston, K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. Computing Surveys, 26, 1 (1994), 87–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J.G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 1 (1991), 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M.A.; Mathieu, J.E.; and Zaccaro, S.J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 3 (2001), 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrone, J.A. Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for future. Journal of Management, 36, 4 (2010), 911–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, A.P., and Montoya-Weiss, M. Unraveling the temporal fabric of knowledge conversion: A model of media selection and use. MIS Quarterly, 30, 1 (2006), 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, A.P.; Montoya-Weiss, M.M.; and Hung, Y.T. Because time matters: Temporal coordination in global virtual project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (2003), 129–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, A.P.; Montoya-Weiss, M.M.; and O’Driscoll, T.M. Performance-centered design of knowledge-intensive processes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 4 (2002), 37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, A.P.; Montoya-Weiss, M.M.; and O’Driscoll, T.M. Knowledge management in pursuit of performance: Insights from Nortel networks. MIS Quarterly, 26, 3 (2002), 269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J.E. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 2 (1991), 147–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, A.; Spada, H.; and Rummel, N. A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration process. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 1 (2007), 63–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. Cisco’s collaboration success (and failure). 2012. Available at: http://collaborativeinnovation.org/ciscos-collaboration-success-and-failure (accessed on June 12, 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Mom, T.J.M.; van den Bosch, F.A.J.; and Volberda, H.W. Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 4 (2009), 812–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, M.M.; Massey, A.P.; and Lockwood, N.S. 3D collaborative virtual environment: Exploring the link between collaborative behaviors and team performance. Decision Sciences, 42, 2 (2011), 451–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S. Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. MIS Quarterly, 27, 1 (2003), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S. Information technology and product-service innovation: A brief assessment and some suggestions for future research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 4 (2013), 215–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 1 (1994), 14–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E.; Harris, D.; and Southern, M. IT-based knowledge management systems to support the design of product development processes. In S. Nambisan (ed.), Information Technology and Product Development. Annals of Information Systems. New York, NY: Springer, 2010, pp. 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C.A., and Tushman, M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research on Organizational Behavior, 28, 1 (2007), 1–60.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P.A., and El Sawy, O.A. From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17, 3 (2006), 198–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter, S.; Straub, D.; and Rai, A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 (2007), 623–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault, A., and Kraemer, K.L. Survey research methodology in management information systems: An assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 2 (1993), 75–106.
   Google Scholar
• Raisch, S.; Birkinshaw, J.; Probst, G.; and Tushman, M.L. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 4 (2009), 685–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, R.; Sánchez-Manzanares, M.; Gil, F.; and Gibson, C. Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 1 (2008), 163–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C.M.; Wende, S.; and Becker, J.-M. SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS, 2015. Available at: http://www.smartpls.com.
   Google Scholar
• Robey, D.; Khoo, H.M.; and Powers, C. Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43, 1 (2000), 51–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, E. Creating collaboration takes more than technology. April 2010. Available at: http://www.businessweek. com/managing/content/apr2010/ca20100419_510753.
   Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F.T., and Deeds, D.L. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 3 (2004), 201–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M.A., and Hill, C.W.L. Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 3 (1998), 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Song, M.; van der Bij, H.; and Weggeman, M. Factors for improving the level of knowledge generation in new product development. R&D Management, 36, 2 (2006), 173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, R.J.; Cannon-Bowers, J.A.; Salas, E.; and Milanovich, D.M. Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41, 1 (1999), 61–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturman, M.C.; Shao, L.; and Katz, J.H. The effect of culture on the curvilinear relationship between performance and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1 (2012), 46–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H. Understanding user revisions when using information system features: Adaptive system use and triggers. MIS Quarterly, 36, 2 (2012), 453–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teigland, R., and Wasko, M. Integrating knowledge through information trading: Examining the relationship between boundary spanning communication and individual performance. Decision Sciences, 34, 2 (2003), 261–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M.G. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 1 (2000), 115–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.A.; Maruping, L.M.; and Bala, H. Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32, 3 (2008), 483–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J.B., and Burgoon, J.K. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 1 (1992), 50–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, B.P. Cisco CIO: Building a collaboration network. CIO Insights, April 13, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.; Venkatesh, V.; and Brown, S.A. Designing collaborative systems to enhance team performance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 8 (2011), 556–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirger, B.J., and Maidique, M.A. A model of new product development: An empirical test. Management Science, 36, 7 (1990), 867–883.
   Google Scholar