Beyond Brainstorming: Exploring Convergence in Teams

References

• Aakhus, M. Technocratic and design stances toward communication expertise: How GDSS facilitators understand their work. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 4 (2001) 341–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althuizen, N., and Reichel, A. The effects of IT-enabled cognitive stimulation tools on creative problem solving: A dual pathway to creativity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 1 (2016), 11–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.R. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. 6th ed. New York, NY: Worth Publishers, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Anson, R.; Bostrom, R.; and Wynne, B. An experiment assessing group support system and facilitator effects on meeting outcomes. Management Science, 41, 2 (1995), 189–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L.; McEvily, B.; and Reagans, R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49, 4 (2003), 571–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25, 3 (2001), 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner, E.A.C., and Leimeister, J.M. Creating shared understanding in heterogeneous work groups: Why it matters and how to achieve it. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 1 (2014), 111–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bjelland, O.M., and Wood, R.C. An inside view of IBM’s “Innovation Jam.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 1 (2008), 32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, R.P.; Anson, R.; and Clawson, V.K. Group facilitation and group support systems. In L.M. Jessup and J.S. Valacich (eds.), Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1993, pp. 146–168.
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D.C. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14, 1 (2008), 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, R.O. et al. A technology transition model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the U.S.S. Coronado. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 3 (1998), 151–195.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, R.O.; de Vreede, G.J.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Collaboration engineering with ThinkLets to pursue sustained success with group support systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (2003), 31–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, R.O.; Reinig, B.A.; and de Vreede, G.J. Meeting satisfaction for technology-supported groups: An empirical validation of a goal-attainment model. Small Group Research, 37, 6 (2006), 585–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, R.O., and Reinig, B.A. Bounded ideation theory: A new model of the relationship between idea quantity and idea-quality during ideation. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, HI: IEEE, 2007, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, R.O.; Reinig, B.A.; and de Vreede, G.J. The yield shift theory of satisfaction and its application to the IS/IT domain. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 5 (2008), 267–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, R.O., and de Vreede, G.J. ThinkLets: Building Blocks for Concerted Collaboration. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska, Center for Collaboration Science, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, R.O. et al., Facilitator-in-a-box: Process support applications to help practitioners realize the potential of collaboration technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 4 (2013), 159–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cady, S.H., and Valentine, J. Team innovation and perceptions of consideration: What difference does diversity make? Small Group Research, 30, 6 (1999), 730–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. et al. Automatic concept classification of text from electronic meetings. Communications of the ACM, 37, 10 (1994), 56–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clawson, V.K.; Bostrom, R.P.; and Anson, R. The role of the facilitator in computer-supported meetings. Small Group Research, 24, 4 (1993), 547–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A.; de Vreede, G.J.; and Briggs, R.O. Designing thinkLets for convergence. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). Keystone, CO: AMCIS, 2007, paper 358.
   Google Scholar
• Day, D.V.; Gronn, P.; and Salas, E. Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 6 (2004), 857–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreede, G.J.; Kolfschoten, G.L.; and Briggs, R.O. ThinkLets: A collaboration engineering pattern language. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 25, 2–3 (2006), 140–154.
   Google Scholar
• De Vreede, G.J.; Briggs, R.O.; and Massey, A.P. Collaboration engineering: Foundations and opportunities: Editorial to the special issue on the Journal of the Association of Information Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 3 (2009), 121–137.
   Google Scholar
• De Vreede, G.J. Two case studies of achieving repeatable team performance through collaboration engineering. MIS Quarterly Executive,13, 1 (2014), 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, D.L. et al., Identifying quality, novel, and creative Ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7, 1 (2006), 646–699.
   Google Scholar
• DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 1 (1992), 60–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Hengst, M., and Adkins, M. Which collaboration patterns are most challenging: A global survey of facilitators. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CE: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2007, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R., and Wixom, B.H. Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems,18, 3 (2002), 235–257.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; Minas, R.K.; and Bhagwatwar, A.P. Sparking creativity: Improving electronic brainstorming with individual cognitive priming. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 4 (2013), 195–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, G.W.; Partridge, J.-E.L.; and Robinson, L.H., Exploring modes of facilitative support for GDSS technology. MIS Quarterly, 17, 2 (1993), 173–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugosh, K.L., and Paulus, P.B. Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 3 (2005), 313–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, D.E., and VanHuss, S.H. Creativity software and DSS: Cautionary findings. Information and Management, 32, 1 (1992), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Eppler, M.J., and Mengis, J. The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Information Society, 20, 5 (2004), 325–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1 (1981), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S.R. An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 3 (1998), 7–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J.F., et al. A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Information Systems Research, 1990. 1(4), p. 394–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girotra, K.; Terwiesch, C.; and Ulrich, K.T. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56, 4 (2010), 591–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S.G., and Taber, T.D. The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 1 (1980), 97–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, T.L.; Fuller, M.A.; and Northcraft, G.B. Facilitator influence in group support systems: Intended and unintended effects. Information Systems Research, 9, 1 (1998), 20–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisé, M.-L., and Gallupe, R.B. Information overload: Addressing the productivity paradox in face-to-face electronic meetings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 3 (1999), 157–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F. Jr. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hair J.F. Jr. et al. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M.T., and Birkinshaw, J. The innovation value chain. Harvard Business Review (June 2007), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F.A. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review (1945), 519–530.
   Google Scholar
• Hayne, S.C. The facilitators perspective on meetings and implications for group support systems design. ACM SIGMIS Database, 30, 3–4 (1999), 72–91.
   Google Scholar
• Helquist, J.H. et al. Enabling large group collaboration. In J.F. Nunamaker, N.C. Romano, and R.O. Briggs (eds.), Collaboration Systems: Concept, Value, and Use. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2013, pp. 128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, C. et al., When social media can be bad for you: Community feedback stifles consumer creativity and reduces satisfaction with self-designed products. Information Systems Research, 24, 1 (2013), 14–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M.D. et al. Functional versus dysfunctional team change: Problem diagnosis and structural feedback for self-managed teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 1 (2013), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouret, G. Inside Cisco’s search for the next big idea. Harvard Business Review, September (2009), 43–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kayande, U. et al. How incorporating feedback mechanisms in a DSS affects DSS evaluations. Information Systems Research, 20, 4 (2009), 527–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmerle, J.; Cress, U.; and Held, C. The interplay between individual and collective knowledge: Technologies for organisational learning and knowledge building. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 8, 1 (2010), 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, N.W.; Paulus, P.B.; and Choi, Y. Building on the ideas of others: An examination of the idea combination process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 3 (2011), 554–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolfschoten, G.L. et al. A conceptual foundation of the thinkLets concept for collaboration engineering. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 64, 7 (2006), 611–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolfschoten, G.L. et al. Facilitation roles and responsibilities for sustained collaboration support in organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 4 (2012), 129–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.P. Boundary negotiating artifacts: Unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 16, 3 (2007), 307–339.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P.M. Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research, 25, 4 (2014), 796–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limayem, M., and DeSanctis, G. Providing decisional guidance for multicriteria decision making in groups. Information Systems Research 11, 4 (2000), 386–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limayem, M.; Banerjee, P.; and Ma, L. Impact of GDSS: Opening the black box. Decision Support Systems, 42, 2 (2006), 945–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luciano, M.M.; Mathieu, J.E.; and Ruddy, T.M. Leading multiple teams: Average and relative external leadership influences on team empowerment and effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 2 (2014), 322–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, G.; Lyytinen, K.; and Bergman, M. Boundary objects in design: An ecological view of design artifacts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 11 (2007), 546–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M.A.; Mathieu, J.E.; and Zaccaro, S.J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 3 (2001), 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J.E. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, R.M., and Salas, E. Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R. Guzzo and E. Salas (eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1995, pp. 149–203.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, K.; Dennis, A.R.; and Carte, T.A. It’s the thought that counts: The mediating effects of information processing in virtual team decision making. Information Systems Management, 25, 1 (2008), 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michinov, N. Is electronic brainstorming or brainwriting the best way to improve creative performance in groups? An overlooked comparison of two idea-generation techniques. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 1 (2012), 222–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, I.; Swaak, J.; and Kessels, J. Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology-mediated interaction. Educational Technology and Society, 5, 1 (2002), 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Niederman, F., and DeSanctis, G. The impact of a structured-argument approach on group problem formulation. Decision Sciences, 26, 4 (1995), 451–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science,5, 1 (1994), 14–37.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I.; von Krogh, G.; and Voelpel, S. Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27, 8 (2006), 1179–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., and von Krogh, G. Perspective—tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20, 3 (2009), 635–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. Psychometric methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P., and Nakui, T. Facilitation of group brainstorming. In S. Schuman (ed.), The IAF Handbook of Group Facilitation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005, pp. 103–114.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P.B. et al., Understanding the group size effect in electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 44, 3 (2013), 332–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter, S.; DeLone, W.; and McLean, E.R. Information systems success: The quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 4 (2013), 7–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilli, L.E., and Mazzon, J.A. Information overload, choice deferral, and moderating role of need for cognition: Empirical evidence. Revista de Administração, 51, 1 (2016), 36–55.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M., and Sen, A. The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Qudrat-Ullah, H. Yes we can: Improving performance in dynamic tasks. Decision Support Systems, 61 (2014), 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Reinig, B.A. et al. Affective reward and the adoption of group support systems: Productivity is not always enough. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 3 (1995), 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Reinig, B.A. Toward an understanding of satisfaction with the process and outcomes of teamwork. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (2003), 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietzschel, E.F.; Nijstad, B.A.; and Stroebe, W. The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 1 (2010), 47–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santanen, E.L.; Briggs, R.O.; and de Vreede, G.J. Causal relationships in creative problem solving: Comparing facilitation interventions for ideation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 4 (2004), 167–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M.M. et al. Invoking social comparison to improve electronic brainstorming: Beyond anonymity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 3 (1995), 155–170.
   Google Scholar
• Sheskin, D.J. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger (ed.), Computers, Communication, and the Public Interest. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S.L., and Griesemer, J.R. Institutional ecology, translations, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 3 (1989), 387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, B.; Wei, K.-K.; and Lee-Partridge, J. Effects of facilitation and leadership on meeting outcomes in a group support system environment. European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 4 (1999), 233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, P. et al. Team learning: Building shared mental models. Instructional Science, 39, 3 (2011), 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, R. How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science, 12, 5 (2001), 559–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, R.T.; DeSanctis, G.; and Poole, M.S. Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 3 (1988), 463–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, B.C., and Valacich, J.S. Facilitation, GSS, and training as sources of process restrictiveness and guidance for structured group decision making: An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 7, 4 (1996), 429–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Z., and Aiken, M. Automated facilitation of electronic meetings. Information and Management, 41, 2 (2003), 125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J., and Orlikowski, W. Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 1 (2002), 13–35.
   Google Scholar