The Role of Provision Points in Online Crowdfunding

References

• Agrawal, A.; Catalini, C.; and Goldfarb, A. Some simple economics of crowdfunding. In J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A.; Catalini, C.; and Goldfarb, A. Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 24, 2 (2015), 253–274. doi:10.1111/jems.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A.; Catalini, C.; and Goldfarb, A. Are syndicates the killer app of equity crowdfunding? California Management Review, 58, 2 (2016), 111–124. doi:10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlers, G.K.; Cumming, D.; Günther, C.; and Schweizer, D. Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 4 (2015), 955–980. doi:10.1111/etap.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagnoli, M., and McKee, M. Voluntary contribution games: Efficient private provision of public goods. Economic Inquiry, 29, 2 (1991), 351–366. doi:10.1111/ecin.1991.29.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 3 (1992), 797–817. doi:10.2307/2118364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichler, M.; Gupta, A.; and Ketter, W. Designing smart markets. Information Systems Research, 21, 4 (2010), 688–699. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtch, G. Herding behavior as a network externality. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. Shanghai, China: Association for Information Systems, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Burtch, G.; Ghose, A.; and Wattal, S. An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Information Systems Research, 24, 3 (2013), 499–519. doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtch, G.; Ghose, A.; and Wattal, S. The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Science, 61, 5 (2015), 949–962. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtch, G.; Ghose, A.; and Wattal, S. Secret admirers: An empirical examination of information hiding and contribution dynamics in online crowdfunding. Information Systems Research, 27, 3 (2016), 478–496. doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Z.; Liu, D.; and Chan, J. Better to give than receive: The impact of donation-based crowdfunding schemes on crowdfunding outcomes of reward-based campaigns. Working paper, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Crowdsourcing.org. Number of crowdfunding platforms worldwide in 2012, by country. Statista: The Statistics Portal. https://www.statista.com/statistics/251573/number-of-crowdfunding-platforms-worldwide-by-country/ (accessed on September 13, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, D.J.; Leboeuf, G.; and Schwienbacher, A. Crowdfunding models: Keep-it-all vs. all-or- nothing. Unpublished manuscript, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chuen, D.L.K., and Teo, E.G. Emergence of fintech and the LASIC principles. Journal of Financial Perspectives, 3, 3 (2015), 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, J., and Wong, T. On the essentiality of e-money. Staff Working Paper 2015-43. Ottawa: Bank of Canada, 2015. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/141986 (accessed on September 17, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Einav, L.; Farronato, C.; and Levin, J. Peer-to-peer markets. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 1 (2016), 615–635. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortnum, D.; Pollari, I.; Mead, W.; Hughes, B.; and Speier, A. The pulse of fintech Q1 2017: Global analysis of investment in fintech. KPMG technical report, 2017. New York. https://home.kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2017/04/the-pulse-of-fintech-q1-2017.html (accessed on September 17, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Z.; Kauffman, R.J.; Lin, M.; and Ma, D. Near real-time retail payment and settlement systems mechanism design. Working paper. SWIFT Institute, London, 2015. http://www.swiftinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/WP-No-2014-004-1.pdf (accessed on September 17, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Hashim, M.J.; Kannan, K.N.; and Maximiano, S. Information feedback, targeting, and coordination: An experimental study. Information Systems Research, 28, 2 (2017), 289–308. doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M.; Li, X.; and Shi, M. Product and pricing decisions in crowdfunding. Marketing Science, 34, 3 (2015), 331–345. doi:10.1287/mksc.2014.0900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, R.J., and Ma, D. Special issue: Contemporary research on payments and cards in the global fintech revolution. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14, 5 (2015), 261–264. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppuswamy, V., and Bayus, B. Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of projects backers in kickstarter. SSRN working paper, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, M.; Prabhala, N.; and Viswanathan, S. Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Science, 59, 1 (2013), 17–35. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D.; Brass, D.J.; Lu, Y.; and Chen, D. Friendships in online peer-to-peer lending: Pipes, prisms, and relational herding. MIS Quarterly, 39, 3 (2015), 729–742. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.3.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, J.; Rauhut, H.; Schweitzer, F.; and Helbing, D. How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 22 (2011), 9020–9025. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008636108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., and Liu, D. Introduction to the special issue on “Crowdfunding and fintech.” Financial Innovation, 3, 1 (2017), 8. doi:10.1186/s40854-017-0058-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M.B., and Croson, R.T.A. The effect of incomplete information in a threshold public goods experiment. Public Choice, 99, 1–2 (1999), 103–118. doi:10.1023/A:1018316500800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., and Ransbotham, S. Information disclosure and the diffusion of information security attacks. Information Systems Research, 26, 3 (2015), 565–584. doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollick, E., and Nanda, R. Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Management Science, 62, 6 (2015), 1533–1553. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overby, E., and Forman, C. The effect of electronic commerce on geographic purchasing patterns and price dispersion. Management Science, 61, 2 (2014), 431–453. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palfrey, T.R., and Rosenthal, H. Participation and the provision of discrete public goods: A strategic analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 24, 2 (1984), 171–193. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(84)90023-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S.; Clark, J.; Poe, G.; Rondeau, D.; and Schultz, W. The private provision of public goods: Tests of a provision point mechanism for funding green power programs. Resource and Energy Economics, 24, 1–2 (2002), 131–155. doi:10.1016/S0928-7655(01)00048-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., and Kim, Y.G. A typology of crowdfunding sponsors: Birds of a feather flock together? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 16 (2016), 43–54. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2016.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierling, M.; Koch, J.; and Deokar, A. Detecting fraudulent behavior on crowdfunding platforms: The role of linguistic and content-based cues in static and dynamic contexts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 2 (2016), 421–455. doi:10.1080/07421222.2016.1205930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, M. Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 3 (1973), 355–374. doi:10.2307/1882010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strausz, R. A theory of crowdfunding: A mechanism design approach with demand uncertainty and moral hazard. American Economic Review, 107, 6 (2017), 1430–1476. doi:10.1257/aer.20151700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies, F.; Wessel, M.; and Benlian, A. Effects of social interaction dynamics on platforms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 3 (2016), 843–873. doi:10.1080/07421222.2016.1243967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varian, H. Public goods and private gifts. Working paper. University of California, Berkeley, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Z., and Lin, M. Market mechanisms in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Science, 63, 12 (2016), 4236–4257.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., and Liu, P. Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Science, 58, 5 (2012), 892–912. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar