Deliberate or Instinctive? Proactive and Reactive Coping for Technostress

References

• Aiken, L.S.; West, S.G.; and Reno, R.R. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. New York: Sage, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, L.G.; and Taylor, S.E. A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3 (1997), 417–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avey, J.B.; Reichard, R.J.; Luthans, F.; and Mhatre, K.H. Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22, 2 (2011), 127–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyagari, R.; Grover, V.; and Purvis, R. Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35, 4 (May 2011), 831–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, (1991), 248–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, A.; and Pinsonneault, A. Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly, 29, 3 (2005), 493–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, A.; and Pinsonneault, A. The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 34, 4 (2010), 689–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J.; and Tomaka, J. The Biopsychosocial Model of Arousal Regulation. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1996, pp. 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Brissette, I.; Scheier, M.F.; and Carver, C.S. The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological adjustment during a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1 (2002), 102–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushman, B.J.; Baumeister, R.F.; and Phillips, C.M. Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1 (2001), 17–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C.S.; and Connor-Smith, J. Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, (2010), 679–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C.; Scheier, M.; and Weintraub, J. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 56 (1989), 267–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W.W. Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22, 1 (1998), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, G.L.; Dewe, P.J.N.; and O’Driscoll, M.P. Organizational Stress: A Review and Critique of Theory, Research, and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc., 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzarelli, C. Personality and self-efficacy as predictors of coping with abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 6 (1993), 1224–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arcy, J.; Herath, T.; and Shoss, M. Understanding employee responses to stressful information security requirements: A coping perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 2 (2014), 285–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M.; and Ajzen, I., Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Folkman, S. Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 4 (1984), 839–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman, S.; Lazarus, R.S.; Dunkel-Schetter, C.; DeLongis, A.; and Gruen, R. J. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, (1986), 992–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman, S.; and Moskowitz, J.T. Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1 (2004), 745–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C.; and Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 18, 1 (1981), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, P.; Tennen, H.; Gavian, M.; Park, C.; Tomich, P.; and Tashiro, T. Does self-reported posttraumatic growth reflect genuine positive change? Psychological Science, 20, 7 (2009), 912–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galluch, P.; Grover, V.; and Thatcher, J. Interrupting the workplace: Examining stressors in an information technology context. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 1 (2015), 1–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D.; Straub, D.W.; and Boudreau, M.-C. Structural equation modeling and regression : Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, ( October 2000), 2–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D.; Straub, D.W.; and Rigdon, E.E. An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35, 2 (2011), iii–xiv.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J.J. Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1 (1998), 224–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, D.; Coughlan, J.; and Mullen, M.R. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines For Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 1 (2008), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.; and Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1 (1999), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, W.H.; Chen, K.; and Lin, C.P. Does the proactive personality mitigate the adverse effect of technostress on productivity in the mobile environment? Telematics and Informatics, 32, 1 (2014), 143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A.; and Moosbrugger, H. Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 4 (2000), 457–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R.S. Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R.S.; and Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Lefcourt, H. M. Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research. New York: Halstead, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Leiter, M.P. Coping patterns as predictors of burnout: The function of control and escapist coping patterns. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, (1991), 123–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H.; and Xue, Y. Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33, 1 (2009), 71–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H.; Xue, Y.; Pinsonneault, A.; and Wu, Y. What users do besides problem-focused coping when facing it security threats: An emotion-focused coping perspective. MIS Quarterly, 43, 2 (2019), 373–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P.B.; D’Arcy, J.; Hammer, B.; and Moody, G.D. Cargo Cult science in traditional organization and information systems survey research: A case for using nontraditional methods of data collection, including Mechanical Turk and online panels. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25, 3 (2016), 232–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslowsky, J.; Jager, J.; and Hemken, D. Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39, 1 (2014), 87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, J. T. Coping interventions and the regulation of positive affect. The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, J. T.; Folkman, S.; Collette, L.; and Vittinghoff, E. Coping and mood during AIDS-related caregiving and bereavement. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 1 (1996), 49–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B.; and Asparouhov, T. Latent variable interactions. https://www.statmodel.com/download/LVinteractions.pdf, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C.; and Bernstein, I.H. The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 1 (1994), 248–292.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C.L.; Cohen, L.H.; and Murch, R.L. Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth. Journal of Personality, 64, 1 (1996), 71–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragu-Nathan, T.S.; Tarafdar, M.; Ragu-Nathan, B.S.; and Tu, Q. The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and validation. Information Systems Research, 19, 4 (2008), 417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo, M.; Makkonen, M.; and Hekkala, R. ”I just cursed and opened a beer”: Explaining mobile users’ non-complaining behavior through coping. In Proceedings of the Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), USA, Fort Worth, Texas, 2015, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A.; and Bentler, P.M. Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 2 (2010), 243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheier, M.F.; Carver, C.S.; and Bridges, M.W. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 6 (1994), 1063–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R.; and Taubert, S. Tenacious goal pursuits and striving toward personal growth: Proactive coping. In E. Frydenberg (Ed.), Beyond Coping: Meeting Goals, Visions and Challenges. 2002, pp. 19–35. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R.; and Knoll, N. Positive Coping: Mastering Demands and Searching for Meaning. In Lopez, S. J. and Snyder, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychological Assessment, 2008, pp. 1–27. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E.A.; and Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J. Perceived control and the development of coping. In Folkman, S. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping, 2012, pp. 35–59. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S.C.; Chandra, S.; and Shirish, A. Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Information Systems Journal, 25, 4 (2015), 355–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M.-K.; Newell, S.; Wagner, E.L.; and Galliers, R.D. Coping with information technology: Mixed emotions, vacillation, and nonconforming use patterns. MIS Quarterly, 39, 2 (2015), 367–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M.; Cooper, C.L.; and Stich, J.F. The technostress trifecta - Techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal, 29, 1 (2019), 6–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M.; Pullins, E.B.; and Ragu-Nathan, T.S. Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25, 2 (2015), 103–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M.; Tu, Q.; Ragu-Nathan, B.; and Ragu-Nathan, T. The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 1 (2007), 301–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M.; Tu, Q.; and Ragu-Nathan, T.S. Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 3 (2011), 303–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tugade, M.M. Positive emotions and coping: examining dual-process models of resilience. In Folkman, S. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping, 2012, pp. 1–26. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. Determinants of perceived ease of use : Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information System Research, 11, 4 (2000), 342–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh, C.E.; Wager, T.D.; Fredrickson, B.L.; Noll, D.C.; and Taylor, S.F. The neural correlates of trait resilience when anticipating and recovering from threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 4 (2008), 322–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar