Adherence to Clinical Guidelines, Electronic Health Record Use, and Online Reviews

References

• Bardach, N.S.; Asteria-Peñaloza, R.; Boscardin, W.J.; and Dudley, R.A. The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22, 3 ( March 2013), 194–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J.; and Iyengar, R. How interest shapes word-of-mouth over different channels. http://papers.ssrn.com (accessed on February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D.M.; Ng, A.Y.; and Jordan M.I. Latent Dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3 (January 2003), 993–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Burkle, C.M.; and Keegan, M.T. Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their Apparent influence on patients’ choices of physicians. BMC Health Services Research, 15 (September 2015), 416–422.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, Y.; and Xie, J. Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54, 3 (March 2008), 477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, J.A.; and Mayzlin, D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 3 (August 2006), 345–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintagunta, P.K.; Gopinath, S.; and Venkataraman, S. The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Science, 29, 5 (May 2010), 944–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons, E.K.; Gao, G.G.; and Hitt, L.M. When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 2 ( Fall 2006), 149–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby, M.R.; and Karni, E. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. The Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 1 (April 1973), 67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellarocas, C.; Gao, G.; and Narayan, R. Are consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit or niche products? Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 2 ( Fall 2010), 127–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellarocas, C.; and Narayan, R. What motivates consumers to review a product online? A study of the product-specific antecedents of online movie reviews. Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Duggirala, M.; Rajendran, C.; and Anantharaman R.N. Patient-perceived dimensions of total quality service in healthcare. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15, 5 (2008), 1463–5771.
   Google Scholar
• Federman, A.D.; and Keyhani, S. Physicians’ participation in the physicians’ quality reporting initiative and their perceptions of its impact on quality of care. Health Policy, 102, 2 (October 2011), 229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, C.; Ghose, A.; and Wiesenfeld, B. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19, 3 (September 2008), 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, G.G.; Greenwood, B.N.; Agarwal, R.; and McCullough, J.S. Vocal minority and silent majority: How do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality? MIS Quarterly, 39, 3 (September 2015), 565–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, G.G.; McCullough, J.S.; Agarwal, R.; and Jha, A.K. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: Analysis of patients’ online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, 1 (February 2012), e38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godes, D.; and Silva, J.C. Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science, 31, 3 (May-June 2012), 448–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, B.M.; Vandergrift, J.L.; Gao, G.G.; McCullough, J.S.; and Lipner, R.S. Website ratings of physicians and their quality of care. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175, 2 (February 2015), 291–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, B.; Park, J.; and Konana, P. Research note—The impact of external word-of-mouth sources on retailer sales of high-involvement products. Information Systems Research, 23, 1 (March 2012), 182–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanauer, D.A.; Zheng, K.; Singer, D.C.; Gebremariam, A.; and Davis M.M. Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 311, 7 (February 2014), 734–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L.; Tan, C-H.; Ke, W.; and Wei, K-K. Comprehension and assessment of product reviews: A review-product congruity proposition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 3 ( Winter 2013), 311–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, J.S.; Middleton, J.L.; Marfatia, R.; Omana, E.T.; and D’amico, F. The use of electronic health records in the exam room and patient satisfaction: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 22, 5 (September-October 2009), 553–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltov, M.K.; and Damle, N.S. Health policy basics: Physician Quality Reporting System. Annals of Internal Medicine, 161, 5 (September 2014), 365–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, A.; and Seidmann, A. Information hang-overs in healthcare service systems. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 14, 4 ( Fall 2012), 634–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X.; and Hitt, L.M. Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19, 4 (December 2008), 456–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X.; Hitt, L.M.; and Zhang Z.J. Product reviews and competition in markets for repeat purchase products. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 4 ( Spring 2011), 9–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 5, 1 (May 2012), 1–167.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, S.F.; and Rui. H. Can we trust online physician ratings? Evidence from cardiac surgeons in Florida. Management Science, 64, 6 (June 2018), 2473–2972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, M.; and Zervas. G. Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Science, 62, 12 (December 2016), 3412–3427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X.; and Zhang J. How do consumer buzz and traffic in social media marketing predict the value of the Firm? Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 2 ( Fall 2013), 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X.; Khansa, L.; Deng, Y.; and Kim, S.S. Impact of prior reviews on the subsequent review process in reputation systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 3 ( Winter 2013), 279–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayzlin, D.; Dover, Y.; and Chevalier, J. 2014. Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. American Economic Review, 104, 8 (August 2014), 2421–2455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, W.W.; and Trusov, M. The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 3 (June 2011), 444–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchnik, L.; Aral, S.; and Taylor, S.J. Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science, 341, 6146 (August 2013), 647–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudambi, S.M.; and Schuff, D. Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1 (March 2010), 185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saifee, D.H.; Zheng, Z.; Bardhan, I.R.; and Lahiri, A. Are online reviews of physicians reliable indicators of clinical outcomes? Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, Seoul, South Korea, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tirunillai, S.; and Tellis G.J. Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: Strategic brand analysis of big data using latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 4 (August 2014), 463–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar