Information Processing on Online Review Platforms

References

• Aggarwal, N; Dai, Q; and Walden, E.A. The more, the merrier? How the number of partners in a standard-setting initiative affects shareholder’s risk and return. MIS Quarterly, 35, 2 (2011), 445–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern, K.R. Sample selection and event study estimation. Journal of Empirical Finance, 16, 3 (2009), 466–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajinkya, B.B. and Jain, P.C. The behavior of daily stock market trading volume. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11, 4 (1989), 331–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archak, N; Ghose, A; and Ipeirotis, P.G. Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Science, 57, 8 (2011), 1485–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, A; Darné, O; and Kim, J.H. Exchange-rate return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from major foreign exchange rates. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31, 6 (2012), 1607-1626.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H; Hu, Y.J; and Huang, S. Monetary Incentive and Stock Opinions on Social Media. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 2 (2019), 391–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons, E.K; Gao, G.G; and Hitt, L.M. When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 2 (2006), 149–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 3 (1995), 273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellarocas, C; Gao, G; and Narayan, R. Are consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit or niche products? Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 2 (2010), 127–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorner, V; Ivanova, O; and Scholz, M. Think Twice Before You Buy! How Recommendations Affect Three-Stage Purchase Decision Processes. ICIS 2013 Proceedings, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, Brian L; Zheng, Z; Mookerjee, V.S; and Chen, H. Are new IT-enabled investment opportunities diminishing for firms? Information Systems Research, 23, 2 (2012), 287–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E.F. Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25, 2 (1970), 383–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E.F; Fisher, L; Jensen, M.C; and Roll, R. The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International economic review, 10, 1 (1969), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, K. and Powell, D.A. The use of restaurant inspection disclosure systems as a means of communicating food safety information. Journal of Foodservice, 20, 6 (2009), 287–297.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, C; Ghose, A; and Wiesenfeld, B. Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets. Information Systems Research, 19, 3 (2008), 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, C.M; Biros, D.P; Burgoon, J; and Nunamaker, J. An examination and validation of linguistic constructs for studying high-stakes deception. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22, 1 (2013), 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, G.G; Greenwood, B.N; Agarwal, R; and McCullough, J.S. Vocal minority and silent majority: How do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality?. MIS Quarterly 39, 3, (2015), 565–589.
   Google Scholar
• Goes, P.B; Lin, M; and Yeung, C.-m.A. “Popularity effect” in user-generated content: evidence from online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 25, 2 (2014), 222–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, S.S; Siering, M; and Gomber, P. How to enable automated trading engines to cope with news-related liquidity shocks? extracting signals from unstructured data. Decision Support Systems, 62 (2014), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gunaratne, J; Zalmanson, L; and Nov, O. The persuasive power of algorithmic and crowdsourced advice. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 4 (2018), 1092–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J; Zhang, W; Fan, W; and Li, W. Combining geographical and social influences with deep learning for personalized point-of-interest recommendation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 4 (2018), 1121–1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K; Oh, W; Im, K.S; Oh, H; Pinsonneault, A; and Chang, R.M. Value cocreation and wealth spillover in open innovation alliances. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1 (2012), 291–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, C; Jorder, M; Stern, H; Stavinsky, F; Reddy, V; Hanson, H; Waechter, H; Lowe, L; Gravano, L; and Balter, S. Using online reviews by restaurant patrons to identify unreported cases of foodborne illness—New York City, 2012–2013. MMWR, 63, 20 (2014), 441–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, S; Majowicz, S; Masakure, O; Sockett, P; Jones, A; Hart, R; Carr, D; and Knowles, L. Consumer assessment of the safety of restaurants: The role of inspection notices and other information cues. Journal of food safety, 26, 4 (2006), 275–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, Y.-C; Wu, J; and Tan, Y. Disconfirmation effect on online rating behavior: A structural model. Information Systems Research, 28, 3 (2017), 626–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y; Li, C; Wu, J; and Lin, Z. Online customer reviews and consumer evaluation: The role of review font. Big Data Commerce, 55, 4 (2018), 430–440.
   Google Scholar
• Im, K.S; Dow, K.E; and Grover, V. A reexamination of IT investment and the market value of the firm—An event study methodology. Information Systems Research, 12, 1 (2001), 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, A. and Sharman, R. Impact of user-generated internet content on hospital reputational dynamics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 4 (2018), 1277–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.L; Averbeck, J.M; Zhang, Z; and Wright, K.B. Credibility of anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 1 (2013), 293–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, G.Z. and Leslie, P. The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 2 (2003), 409–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J.S; Kuznetsova, P; Luca, M; and Choi, Y. Where not to eat? Improving public policy by predicting hygiene inspections using online reviews. Proceedings 2013 Conference Empirical Methods Natural Language Process, 2013 (2013), 1443–1448.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.M; Pantel, P; Chklovski, T; and Pennacchiotti, M. Automatically assessing review helpfulness. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2006, pp. 423–430.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, A.J; Worosz, M.R; and Todd, E.C.D. Dining for safety: Consumer perceptions of food safety and eating out. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 33, 4 (2009), 471–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konchitchki, Y. and O’Leary, D.E. Event study methodologies in information systems research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12, 2 (2011), 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kwark, Y; Chen, J; and Raghunathan, S. Online product reviews: Implications for retailers and competing manufacturers. Information Systems Research, 25, 1 (2014), 93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappas, T; Sabnis, G; and Valkanas, G. The impact of fake reviews on online visibility: A vulnerability assessment of the hotel industry. Information Systems Research, 27, 4 (2016), 940–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D.D; Yang, Y; Rose, T.G; and Li, F. Rcv1: A new benchmark collection for text categorization research. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5, Apr (2004), 361–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J; Ott, M; Cardie, C; and Hovy, E.H. Towards a General rule for identifying deceptive opinion spam. ACL (2014), 1566–1567.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. and Hitt, L.M. Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19, 4 (2008), 456–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, T.-P. and Turban, E. Introduction to the special issue social commerce: A research framework for social commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 2 (2011), 5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y; Jiang, C; and Zhao, H. Using contextual features and multi-view ensemble learning in product defect identification from online discussion forums. Decision Support System: Directions for the Nest Decade, 105 (2018), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, A.W. The adaptive markets hypothesis. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30, 5 (2004), 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X; Ba, S; Huang, L; and Feng, Y. Promotional marketing or word-of-mouth? Evidence from online restaurant reviews. Information Systems Research, 24, 3 (2013), 596–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, M. and Zervas, G. Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Science, 62, 12 (2016), 3412–3427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X; Khansa, L; Deng, Y; and Kim, S.S. Impact of prior reviews on the subsequent review process in reputation systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 3 (2013), 279–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinlay, A.C. Event Studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 1 (1997), 13–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCornack, S.A. Information manipulation theory. Comm. Monographs, 59, 1 (1992), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudambi, S.M. and Schuff, D. What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1 (2010), 185–200.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, C.J; Weller, P.A; and Ulrich, J.M. The adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from the foreign exchange market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44, 2 (2009), 467–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentina, I; Bailey, A.A; and Zhang, L. Exploring effects of source similarity, message valence, and receiver regulatory focus on yelp review persuasiveness and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24, 2 (2018), 125–145.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.F. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14, 3 (1980), 211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Rangan, S. Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50, 1 (1998), 101–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raschka, S. Python Machine Learning. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sadilek, A; Brennan, S; Kautz, H; and Silenzio, V. nEmesis: Which restaurants should you avoid today? First AAAI Conference on Human Computing and Crowdsourcing, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sahoo, N; Dellarocas, C; and Srinivasan, S. The Impact of online product reviews on product returns. Information Systems Research, 29, 3 (2018), 723–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siering, M; Deokar, A.V; and Janze, C. Disentangling consumer recommendations: Explaining and predicting airline recommendations based on online reviews. Decision Support Systems, 107 (2018), 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Siering, M; Muntermann, J; and Rajagopalan, B. Explaining and predicting online review helpfulness: The role of content and reviewer-related signals. Decision Support Systems, 108 (2018), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, B.A. and Browning, V. The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management, 32, 6 (2011), 1310–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, B.A; Perkins, H.E; and Buckley, R. Online travel reviews as persuasive communication: The effects of content type, source, and certification logos on consumer behavior. Tourism Management, 39 (2013), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Talwar, A; Jurca, R; and Faltings, B. Understanding user behavior in online feedback reporting. Proc. 8th ACM Conference on Electron. Commer. (ACM), 2007, pp. 134–142.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C; Zhang, X; and Hann, I.-H. Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings. Information Systems Research, 29, 3 (2018), 641-–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worsfold, D. Consumer information on hygiene inspections of food premises. Journal of Foodservice, 17, 1 (2006), 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-B; Lim, J.-H; Oh, W; Animesh, A; and Pinsonneault, A. Research note—Using real options to investigate the market value of virtual world businesses. Information Systems Research, 23, 3–part–2 (2012), 1011–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, Q; Law, R; Gu, B; and Chen, W. The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: An empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2 (2011), 634–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, D; Bond, S.D; and Zhang, H. Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly, 38, 2 (2014), 539–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L; Burgoon, J.K; Nunamaker, J.F; and Twitchell, D. Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communications. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 1 (2004), 81–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, S; Qiao, Z; Du, Q; Wang, G.A; Fan, W; and Yan, X. Measuring customer agility from online reviews using big data text analytics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 2 (2018), 510–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, F. and Zhang, X. Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: the moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74, 2 (2010), 133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar