Do Social Dominance-Based Faultlines Help or Hurt Team Performance in Crowdsourcing Tournaments?

References

• Afuah, A.; and Tucci, C.L. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37, 3 (2012), 355–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L.S.; West, S.G., and Reno, R.R. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Anseel, F.; Beatty, A.S.; Shen, W.; Lievens, F.; and Sackett, P.R. How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Management, 41, 1 (2015), 318–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arazy, O.; Lifshitz‐Assaf, H.; and Balila, A. Neither a Bazaar nor a cathedral: The interplay between structure and agency in Wikipedia’s role system. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70, 1 (2019), 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arazy, O.; Nov, O.; Patterson, R.; and Yeo, L. Information quality in Wikipedia: The effects of group composition and task conflict. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 4 (2011), 71–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford, S.J.; and Cummings, L.L. Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 3 (1983), 370–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford, S.J.; and Tsui, A.S. Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 2 (1991), 251–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J.B.; and Dennis, A.R. Not as smart as we think: A study of collective intelligence in virtual groups. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 3 (2016), 684–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayus, B.L. Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59, 1 (2013), 226–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntzen, M.; and Wong, S.I. Autonomous but interdependent: The roles of initiated and received task interdependence in distributed team coordination. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 25, 1 (2021), 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezrukova, K.; Jehn, K.A.; Zanutto, E.L.; and Thatcher, S.M. Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20, 1 (2009), 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blohm, I.; and Leimeister, J.M. Gamification - Design of IT-Based Enhancing Services for Motivational Support and Behavioral Change. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5, 4 (2013), 275–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P.; and Jones, C. A measure of past collaboration. Connections, 19, 1 (1996), 58–60.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M.B. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 2 (1979), 307–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J.S.; and Boumgarden, P. Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21, 3 (2010), 609–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carton, A.M.; and Cummings, J.N. A faultline-based model of team leadership. In Academy of Management Proceedings: Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, 2009, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Carton, A.M.; and Cummings, J.N. A theory of subgroups in work teams. Academy of Management Review, 37, 3 (2012), 441–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli, R.T.; and Bassellier, G. Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quarterly (2009), 689–707.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Xu, P.; and Liu, D. Effect of crowd voting on participation in crowdsourcing contests. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 2 (2020), 510–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X.; Fu, S.; De Vreede, T.; De Vreede, G.-J.; Seeber, I.; Maier, R.; and Weber, B. Idea convergence quality in open innovation crowdsourcing: A cognitive load perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 2 (2020), 349–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiravuri, A.; Nazareth, D.; and Ramamurthy, K. Cognitive conflict and consensus generation in virtual teams during knowledge capture: Comparative effectiveness of techniques. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 1 (2011), 311–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D.; Patel, P.C.; and Thatcher, S.M. It depends: Environmental context and the effects of faultlines on top management team performance. Organization Science, 25, 2 (2014), 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramton, C.D.; and Hinds, P.J. Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior, 26(2004), 231–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowston, K.; Wei, K.; Li, Q.; and Howison, J. Core and periphery in free/libre and open source software team communications. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06): IEEE, 2006, pp. 118a–118a.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A.; Murphy, J.D.; Owens, D.; Khazanchi, D., and Zigurs, I. Avatars, people, and virtual worlds: Foundations for research in metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 2 (2009), 90–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayake, I.; Nerur, S.; Wang, J.; Yasar, M., and Zhang, J. The impact of helping others in coopetitive crowdsourcing communities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 1 (2021), 67–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayake, I.; Zhang, J.; and Gu, B. Task division for team success in crowdsourcing contests: Resource allocation and alignment effects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 2 (2015), 8–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayake, I.; Zhang, J.; Yasar, M.; and Nerur, S.P. Strategic effort allocation in online innovation tournaments. Information & Management, 55, 3 (2018), 396–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J.F.; Gaertner, S.L., and Validzic, A. Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75, 1 (1998), 109–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A.P.; Mai, K.M., and Christian, J.S. Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups: A categorization-elaboration approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 6 (2013), 948–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füller, J.; Hutter, K.; Hautz, J.; and Matzler, K. User roles and contributions in innovation-contest communities. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 1 (2014), 273–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S.L., and Dovidio, J.F. Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. New York: Psychology Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C.; and Vermeulen, F. A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 2 (2003), 202–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L.S. Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 1 (1997), 79–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinan, P.J.; Cooprider, J.G.; and Faraj, S. Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: A behavioral versus technical approach. Information Systems Research, 9, 2 (1998), 101–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häussler, C., and Sauermann, H. The anatomy of teams: Division of labor and allocation of credit in collaborative knowledge production. Available at SSRN 2434327 (2014). http://ssrn.com/ abstract=2434327 37
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A., and Terry, D.J. Social Identity Theory and Organizational Processes. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts: 1-12. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A.; and Terry, D.J. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational context. Academy of Management Review, 25, 1 (2000), 121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homan, A.; and Van Knippenberg, D. The beneficial effects of cross-categorizing informational and demographical diversity in groups. In 11th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology, Lisbon, Portugal, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Homan, A.C.; Van Knippenberg, D.; Van Kleef, G.A., and De Dreu, C.K. Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 5 (2007), 1189–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M.; and Wang, L. Joint vs. separate crowdsourcing contests. Management Science, 67, 5 (2021), 2711–2728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, Y.; Lee, H.C.B.; Ba, S., and Stallaert, J. Winning by learning? Effect of knowledge sharing in crowdsourcingcontests. Information Systems Research, 32, 3 (2021), 836–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T.A.; Hurst, C., and Simon, L.S. Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 3 (2009), 742–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, A.A.; Argote, L.; and Levine, J.M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 1 (2005), 56–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knouse, S.B. Task cohesion: A mechanism for bringing together diverse teams. International Journal of Management, 23, 3 (2006), 588–596.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmann, T.; Häsel, M.; and Breugst, N. Competence of IT professionals in e-business venture teams: The effect of experience and expertise on preference structure. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 4 (2009), 51–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor, Y.Y.; and Sundaramurthy, C. Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35, 4 (2009), 981–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, D.C.; and Murnighan, J.K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 2 (1998), 325–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, D.C.; and Murnighan, J.K. Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 4 (2005), 645–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leimeister, J.M.; Huber, M.; Bretschneider, U.; and Krcmar, H. Leveraging crowdsourcing: activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 1 (2009), 197–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, S.; Federico, C.M.; Sidanius, J.; and Rabinowitz, J.L. Social dominance orientation and intergroup bias: The legitimation of favoritism for high-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 2 (2002), 144–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J.; and Hambrick, D.C. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 5 (2005), 794–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R.; Lu, Y.; Ma, J.; and Wang, W. Examining gifting behavior on live streaming platforms: An identity-based motivation model. Information & Management, 58, 6 (2021), 103406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, D.M.; Devos, T., and Smith, E.R. Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 4 (2000), 602–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A.; Majchrzak, A.; Carman, R.; and Lott, V. Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne. MIS Quarterly (2001), 229–249.
   Google Scholar
• Mannix, E.A. Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on coalition formation in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 1 (1993), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marden, J.I. Analyzing and Modeling Rank Data. London: Chapman and Hall, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Minas, R.K.; Potter, R.F.; Dennis, A.R.; Bartelt, V.; and Bae, S. Putting on the thinking cap: Using NeuroIS to understand information processing biases in virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 4 (2014), 49–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molleman, E. Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning? Group decision and Negotiation, 14, 3 (2005), 173–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, Y.; and Yao, T. A robust mean absolute deviation model for portfolio optimization. Computers & Operations Research, 38, 9 (2011), 1251–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neiss, M.B.; Sedikides, C.; and Stevenson, J. Genetic influences on level and stability of self-esteem. Self and Identity, 5, 3 (2006), 247–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J.G. Effort is virtuous, but it’s better to have ability: Evaluative responses to perceptions of effort and ability. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 3 (1976), 306–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, D.E. An empirical analysis of information search and information sharing in crowdsourcing data analytic contests. Decision Support Systems, 120(2019), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• ’O’Mahony, S.; and Ferraro, F. The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 5 (2007), 1079–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearsall, M.J.; Ellis, A.P., and Evans, J.M. Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1 (2008), 225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polzer, J.T.; Crisp, C.B.; Jarvenpaa, S.L.; and Kim, J.W. Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 4 (2006), 679–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F.; Sidanius, J.; Stallworth, L.M., and Malle, B.F. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 4 (1994), 741–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, J.; and Shneiderman, B. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 1 (2009), 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Jr, L.P.; and Romero, D.M. The influence of diversity and experience on the effects of crowd size. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 2 (2017), 321–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L.; and Romero, D.M. Crowd size, diversity and performance. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2015, pp. 1379–1382.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, J.E.; Houlette, M.A.; and Yeagley, E.L. Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 1 (2006), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K.; and Fels, D.I. Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74(2015), 14–31.
   Google Scholar
• Seeber, I.; De Vreede, G.-J.; Maier, R.; and Weber, B. Beyond brainstorming: Exploring convergence in teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34, 4 (2017), 939–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S.M. The constraining effects of initial ideas. In P. B. Paulus and B. A. Nijstad (eds.), Group Creativity: Innovation through Collaboration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003, 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y.; Wang, N.; Yin, C.; and Zhang, J.X. Understanding the relationships between motivators and effort in crowdsourcing marketplaces: A nonlinear analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 35, 3 (2015), 267–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H.; Turner, J.C.; Austin, W.G.; and Worchel, S. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational Identity: A Reader, 56, 65 (1979), 9780203505984–9780203505916.
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C.; and Xu, Y. Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science, 54, 9 (2008), 1529–1543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, S., and Patel, P.C. Demographic faultlines: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 6 (2011), 1119–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, S.M.; Jehn, K.A.; and Zanutto, E. Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 3 (2003), 217–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, S.M.; and Patel, P.C. Group faultlines: A review, integration, and guide to future research. Journal of Management, 38, 4 (2012), 969–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichy, N.M.; Tushman, M.L.; and Fombrun, C. Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4, 4 (1979), 507–519.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, Y.; Yang, X.; and Teo, H.H. Spontaneous virtual teams: Improving organizational performance through information and communication technology. Business Horizons, 56, 3 (2013), 361–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J.C. Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In T. Postmes and N. R. Branscombe (eds.), Rediscovering Social Identity. Psychology Press, 2010, pp. 243–272.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J.C.; and Reynolds, K.J. Self-categorization theory. Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology, 2, 1 (2011), 399–417.
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D.; Dawson, J.F.; West, M.A.; and Homan, A.C. Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance. Human Relations, 64, 3 (2011), 307–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D.; De Dreu, C.K., and Homan, A.C. Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 6 (2004), 1008–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vugt, M., and Hart, C.M. Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 4 (2004), 585–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K.Y.; and O’Reilly III, C.A. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20(1998), 77–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S.I.; Bunjak, A.; Černe, M.; and Fieseler, C. Fostering creative performance of platform crowdworkers: The digital feedback dilemma. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 25, 3 (2021), 263–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X.; Tong, Y., and Teo, H.H. Fostering fast-response spontaneous virtual team: Effects of member skill awareness and shared governance on team cohesion and outcomes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 11 (2015), 919–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, G.B., and Neal, A. A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: Effects; of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 2 (2004), 231–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar